is this a "i'm miffed about it" or "i think frogger is scummy for it"In post 248, Bellaphant wrote:i'm also more :S about
In post 242, borkjerfkin wrote:Actually wait, if you're calling this an 'oddball' TR that ostensibly scum would do why is SS [that you have described as an unconventional townread] any differentIn post 233, GuiltyLion wrote:If I were scum at the time of TTTT's 150 I'd probably oddball TR someone like Fro99er or Eddie (assuming that they're town) instead.
eh SS was asking me about how townreading a rando would keep the lynch off of them, so I gave an example of that. The reason I feel this scenario (TTTT townreading SS) is different is because I didn't think SS was immediately likely as a D1 lynch candidate, whereas my memory of that Newbie game was EL was definitely mislynchable early. I probably shouldn't have even answered that question from SS about who I'd expect scum to TR instead, it's not really relevant to my main thought which is I don't see why scum!TTTT would townread her in particular there.In post 243, borkjerfkin wrote:Ok yeah you're literally giving an example of you doing the thing as scum that you're townreading TTTT (at your highest tier) for doingIn post 233, GuiltyLion wrote:I mean you just saw how I did it with EccentricLemon in our Newbie Game, I recognized people were going to scumread her/push on her so I decided to townread her and it kept her alive to endgame.
?
this is what i was missingIn post 257, GuiltyLion wrote:so when it's someone who hasn't really attracted any attention or scumreads whatsoever, you don't really get the benefit of b, so I don't see why scum!TTTT would have done it with hypothetical town!SS there. I was trying to point to hypothetical town!Eddie instead as an example of where the b) scenario seems plausible
talk to me BIn post 253, Bellaphant wrote:I wanna chat with him before I come down on a side of that. i'm wondering if it's all scum!mindgames though, yes.
B, why are you surprised I'm using meta?In post 248, Bellaphant wrote:i'm also more :S about the fact that frog just saw me have a good town-game and is still saying the same stuff about my meta and using it as gospel.
What part of "I do this every game" did you fail to understand?In post 204, Lowell wrote:The eddie wagon is bad and you should feel bad.
eddie and TTTT are the only strong town reads for me at teh moment. bork is close.
froggy wants a vote, so let's have at it.
VOTE: froggy
His case against eddie is based on some incredibly weak logic, and looks like he just picked a random easy target and reverse-engineered some dumb meta shit. I don't want to be that guy rushing to whiteknight eddie, but yeah it has come to that. froggy needs to go.
oh like calling me out for self-WIFOMIn post 212, Eddie Cane wrote:obviously both alignments do it - i do it - but I typically see scum being the ones to call someone town out of seemingly nothing.
Because I think there is scum in the list. I'm trying to figure out who. Where are these people's votes?In post 226, GuiltyLion wrote:Well, Fro99er has since pointed out that he didn't say that people on his "list" are scummy, which makes me wonder why he's even keeping it.
I agree. And that's what I'm trying to sort out. I'm pointing it out because whenever I flip it'll be revealing that scum is most likely on this wagon.In post 226, GuiltyLion wrote:Like, he's noted/implied that Lowell, TTTT, and I have all done this, but we can't all be scum.
^In post 266, Fro99er wrote:I can see Lowell and eddie as a team right now
i'm not trying to be insulting!In post 216, Bellaphant wrote:I also don't think your meta on me as 'doesn't know anything/say anything' as town is kinda insulting - we both had two scum on day 1 and i went into night 2 knowing where my vote was going day three...
Why? Expand on thisIn post 200, SweetBlueFlowers wrote:I'm not particularly enchanted by Cain's anti-town opening or their apparent discontentment with my vote.
Then try interacting with cain and see what you get instead of just saying you don't see anythingI haven't seen anything from the slot that would warrant me unvoting.
derp I misread thisIn post 264, Fro99er wrote:oh like calling me out for self-WIFOMIn post 212, Eddie Cane wrote:obviously both alignments do it - i do it - but I typically see scum being the ones to call someone town out of seemingly nothing.
What was town about 190?In post 251, borkjerfkin wrote:I think ever since his response to frogger's pressure 183 i've kinda liked his attitude (190 in particular looked town), 212 looks like he's thinking critically about GL's points and evaluating them against his own actual preconceptions and reads and meh this is starting to sound confbiasy to myself
I think I expected to find more concrete things than I did but gun to my head I don't want to lynch him
In post 114, Lowell wrote:fos froggy. His entry reads like someone who wants to be seen asking questions actively than someone who gives a shit about the answers. Don't ask me to explain the difference, I probably can't.
VOTE: bella.
Lowell do you have anything else besides "I don't give a shit about the answers" and my case on eddie around the wifom stuff, which I've demonstrated I do in basically every game?In post 119, Lowell wrote:
froggy wants a vote, so let's have at it.
VOTE: froggy
His case against eddie is based on some incredibly weak logic, and looks like he just picked a random easy target and reverse-engineered some dumb meta shit. I don't want to be that guy rushing to whiteknight eddie, but yeah it has come to that. froggy needs to go.