This seems like backing down from what you originally said, which was that claiming hoods is pointless when scum already have the informational advantage. Why?In post 28, Writers Bloque wrote:Really my only issue is that you had to start with this out of the gateMarioManiac4 wrote:so, what do y'all think of massclaiming hoods?
For what reason?In post 28, Writers Bloque wrote:GinghamDog wrote:Meh, even if you don't agree with what MM is saying, would scum really stick their neck out this early like this?
It's not like I intended quicklynching. Rope is in this season, Mario's probably comfortable.
Why don't we lynch... you?
Unless there's something else in Beeboy's 3 posts that you find scummy, I don't see how you can hold that vote and that opinion at the same time.In post 36, Edosurist wrote:VOTE: beeboy
CHOOCHOO
Massclaiming hoods is stupid. We should just claim them as it becomes necessary, like Wroter's Bloque has said.
Really my only issue [with Mario] is that [he] had to start with saying that out of the gate is how that should sound.Treblesome wrote:This seems like backing down from what you originally said, which was that claiming hoods is pointless when scum already have the informational advantage. Why?In post 28, Writers Bloque wrote:Really my only issue is that you had to start with this out of the gateMarioManiac4 wrote:so, what do y'all think of massclaiming hoods?
The question is what reason is there not to?Treblesome wrote:For what reason?In post 28, Writers Bloque wrote:GinghamDog wrote:Meh, even if you don't agree with what MM is saying, would scum really stick their neck out this early like this?
It's not like I intended quicklynching. Rope is in this season, Mario's probably comfortable.
Why don't we lynch... you?
Why does very aggro = town?In post 32, beeboy wrote:I don't see why scum wouldn't do that?In post 23, GinghamDog wrote:Meh, even if you don't agree with what MM is saying, would scum really stick their neck out this early like this?
Like talking about theory is what scum love to do because you aren't really committing to much. Also I wouldn't consider his play very aggro atm or at least not aggro enough where I can consider it not scum.
Basically this. I thought it was pretty normal for any setup/mechanics discussion to happen at the beginning of the game.In post 55, Sobolev Space wrote:Like I really don't get how the timing is an issue for you unless you think there's some other time when it would have been better for him to bring it up.
IMO it makes the most sense to deal with procedural issues like that at the start of the game.
Scum can 'blend' the same way in theoretical discussions whenever they're started.
Well I did say not right at the startSobolev Space wrote:Like I really don't get how the timing is an issue for you unless you think there's some other time when it would have been better for him to bring it up.
In post 55, Sobolev Space wrote: Scum can 'blend' the same way in theoretical discussions whenever they're started.
That's intriguing, but naturally none of us can see the conversation so we can only take your word for how his reaction came across. So to be clear, you faked a scumslip just to gauge his reaction? What was the plan if he believed you?In post 65, Treblesome wrote: We asked in thread who we were going to shoot like we thought it was the mafia topic and his was response was essentially "nightkill huh what" like he didn't even consider the possibility of the slip.
Interesting how you chose to lie instantly.In post 65, Treblesome wrote:"nightkill huh what"
Also for full clarity to everyone, i said this, because there has been several times i have seen town members fuck up and call "lynching" shooting instead.In post 69, JasonWazza wrote: I said wait shoot?