In post 3616, Chandra Nalaar wrote:I'm glad today because I'm traveling so I can't give dv as thorough a hug as I would like right now.
Hopefully a VOTE: massive will serve as an acceptable substitute for now.
This was more than enough.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
In post 3618, pieguyn wrote:Titus and whoever is scum with her (there is almost def another scum on the initial ABR wagon) have no reason to try and counterwagon ABR and then ML, as opposed to joining one of the 2 mislynch wagons on you and CN.
This doesn't seem that far-fetched to me at all.
In post 3618, pieguyn wrote:you missed point 8. suppose you did think I was scum here. don't you imagine that you would at least worry if you didn't do anything about it ASAP no one would, especially with the possibility of you being lynched?
I'd probably be more worried about being the one that was wrong, but I wouldn't be able to call you town either, so I'd most likely passive-aggressively call you scum without actually pushing you.
In post 3625, Chandra Nalaar wrote:In post 3615, Pander Bears wrote:which I feel is a stronger point now that the Chandra-alt thing is becoming less of a factor (at least that's the impression I'm getting).
It turns out she doesn't hold up very well under pressure. She kinda needs to be obvtown in order to function.
Oh there's no problem with that. It's just a thing!
In post 3629, Antihero wrote:oh look, all my scumreads are either sitting on their asses with no vote or are on the counterwagons to scum.
Well counterwagons to ourselves would probably be more appropriate. There's also the fact that both Chandra and I are the type to both bus and encourage others to bus us. I'm not 100% sure about the latter being true for Chandra, but hey it doesn't really need to be for bussing to be a thing if we were scum together.
The other thing is that if you call massive the scum and pretend that Chandra and I are counterwagons, you get completely different scum! Imagine that! :O Essentially you're making an assumption and using it to prove the same assumption. I don't think that's how it works.
Oh goodie Chandra liked it too!
In post 3664, massive wrote:I think part of Pander's case is "if he thinks I'm scummy why isn't he voting for me" so let me fix that.
So you're voting me because I was suspecting you for not voting me? Cool!
In post 3676, Trustworthy wrote:Pies not the first person to come up with this argument, yet he's presenting it as his own.
I don't really have a problem with this. If it contributes to his read on the slot, it's reasonable that he would post whether it's his own or not.
In post 3722, Lord Mhork wrote:I mean what are you going to do today. You gave yourself a free pass from activity yesterday because obvscum mastin. Are you actually gonna do a thing today?
I think I have done stuff today! Does this mean you'll join the Chandra + Pander wagon of win?
In post 3722, Lord Mhork wrote:Plz switch to pander bears
This doesn't make me very happy when I know you haven't read my recent posts!