This is not a omgus vote this is a vote for opportunism. I have re read and am working on a wall post, but for now I feel fine with this vote.
VOTE: persivul
In post 376, Persivul wrote:WTF is it with this game and people announcing wall posts?
In post 324, wgeurts wrote:
Alexcellent
His first post 9 looks a bit odd and awkward however isn't too alignment indicative as people are claiming. What's more condemning is his personal-bubble he only reacts to; all his posts until 300 are reactions to things concerning him. He lacks any reads outside of this bubble and isn't discussing things either. The way he coasted on his BW read looks really shady as it was an RVS vote, which he never later justifies with further explanation. He also has a scum-read on Texcat which he explains in post 120, the reasoning there is weak and honestly just wrong. I want reads from him on other players as well as further explanation as to why he scum-read BW and is scum-reading Texcat.
In post 324, wgeurts wrote:
texcat
Despite all the hassle texcat placing Alex at L-3 and unvoting remains non-alignment indicative and it will remain so all game, possibly with the exception of some scum-flips.
In post 361, Persivul wrote:In post 352, wgeurts wrote:Anyway, the fact that you don't actually replace-out if you're really busy (which I believe, but I don't think it's the explanation for your play) and aren't producing content or explaining reads is concerning.
Really? Why is that gurts? Because in my experience, replace outs are more a scum than a town tell.
In post 362, Persivul wrote:In post 356, wgeurts wrote:I played badly in that game, and it's been a few months since I've not been playing awfully.
Yeah, I can see how you've improved by the way you pushed a town PR...
In post 366, BlacleWorks wrote:Alright well I'm gonna just park my vote and lurk until I find a reason not to do this.
Wgeurts here's a fun question, If the JK doesn't JK me. Do you expect to make it to Day2? Is that the reason you think the Vig needs to be Jail Kept?
In post 383, Alexcellent wrote:In post 324, wgeurts wrote:
Alexcellent
His first post 9 looks a bit odd and awkward however isn't too alignment indicative as people are claiming. What's more condemning is his personal-bubble he only reacts to; all his posts until 300 are reactions to things concerning him. He lacks any reads outside of this bubble and isn't discussing things either. The way he coasted on his BW read looks really shady as it was an RVS vote, which he never later justifies with further explanation. He also has a scum-read on Texcat which he explains in post 120, the reasoning there is weak and honestly just wrong. I want reads from him on other players as well as further explanation as to why he scum-read BW and is scum-reading Texcat.
I don't think my reasoning there was necessarily wrong, jumping off a wagon that people start questioning is a suspicious thing to do and it didn't seem to line up with her own logic at the time of the L-3 wagon being fine, so I didn't understand her suddenly jumping off. That followed by her PR question was just iffy for me. But the reasoning there isn't strong enough for me to want to see her lynched.
I was fine with leaving my vote on Blacle based on 95 and 100 being dodgy and not liking his Maxous vote at the time.
In post 324, wgeurts wrote:
texcat
Despite all the hassle texcat placing Alex at L-3 and unvoting remains non-alignment indicative and it will remain so all game, possibly with the exception of some scum-flips.
Do you feel this way about all RVS actions or just this one in particular?
In post 385, Alexcellent wrote:The cases against Persivul are looking pretty flimsy to me.
In post 324, wgeurts wrote:
Persivul
I'll be blunt, I think Persivul is scum. He hasn't done any scum-hunting nor does he interact with people. He's coasting big time, the intent to hammer and his recent jump onto texcat look awful as he explains neither. Once. Nada. "Bad vibes and I like the wagon" is not a good reason to be lynching someone, I don't understand how a logical player like him can accept someone's lynch without providing his two-cents. I know persivul's town and scum game, as town he's a lot more pro-active. As scum he coasts and makes the best of what he gets. Guess which we're seeing this game?
In post 357, wgeurts wrote:
My god I literally cannot think how people think you are town right now.
This one post literally is my entire push against you summarised into one line. Coasting, opportunism and the whole package.
In post 348, wgeurts wrote:In post 346, Persivul wrote:In post 343, KuroiXHF wrote:Dude, I fucking get it if you have emergencies with your pets or families or whatever but if you're not going to be able to play this game, you should replace out.
Only three people have more posts than me. A couple people with fewer posts probably have more real content, but still, I'm at least in the middle of the pack as far as contribution goes. Check Masquerade's ISO and vote him if you want to charge someone with not playing the game.
p-edit: take your head out of your ass and put your vote somewhere useful.
This is bad, now this is the "why me fry my tell" I thought I saw with Clumsy earlier. Also the whole "I wouldn't do this as scum is" not correct as he does this as scum. I'll get some games as evidence.
In post 386, BlacleWorks wrote:Are there any cases that look solid to you alexcellent? Consider that this is D1...
In post 380, drmyshottyizsik wrote:Then the rest of his posts are nothing but spreading confusion and WIFOM.