Also..
In post 564, Cheery Dog wrote:I am therefore of the belief that someone must have been bussing Lupo either then or today.
Do you realize the most of the playerlist "bussed" Lupo so far? The only ones who haven't are you and Melmond.
In post 564, Cheery Dog wrote:I am therefore of the belief that someone must have been bussing Lupo either then or today.
In post 390, basketballstar24 wrote:Lupo:Lupo wrote:So by me saying why each case was bad (a few times actually), I wasn't engaging?
Also, by me voting for someone else and stating why I wasn't starting a counter-wagon?
Also, me going against his case showed I had a town read on him. I didn't figure that the players would be so stupid to not understand that just because I don't exactly say "he's town."
Your argument is invalid. Try again.
The last sentence is what I would do if I was jester. I don't know about Lupo,though I think town since Hellhound turned out to be vig.
In post 577, killerjester wrote:
Your information on Melmond is even more reason to select from my lynch pool. There's no way theentireHellhound wagon was town-driven.
In post 578, basketballstar24 wrote:@CheeryDog, That post was just a mere joke.
I actually thought Lupo was scum D1, more scummy that Hellhound, but after Hellhound flipped vig I thought he was null-town.
In post 582, Melmond wrote:After looking at all the players, and thinking about the flips, I'm really thinking bbstar is scum.
1. He seemed overly cautious about putting Hellhound to L-1 and then really seemed to want permission to hammer, just seems overly cautious.
2. Of course there's his really weird VT claim he made earlier.
3. Then he finally gives some reads and then stops giving his analysis because he says that we criticize him over it . That doesn't seem good.
4. I've said before that I didn't think the NS "lynch" was a scumtell, but I'm not sure, it might be.
VOTE: Basketballstar24 at least for now.
In post 584, basketballstar24 wrote:1. When I was cautious of put Hellhound at L-1, it was because it wasn't even close to the deadline. When I asked for permission to hammer, it was close to deadline, we had to lynch someone to get info.
2. Well, I thought I was going to get lynched before I got on the next day since many people got onto my wagon.
3. So? What's the point of my reads if all you guys are going to do is make no use of it? I was trying my best, so I guessed that I wouldn't do reads anymore. Fine, I'll do a read soon.
In post 588, Cheery Dog wrote:
I placed myself into scum shoes to try and work out why that would could the case - yes he would have been easy to get him lynched today because of the chainsaw defence of lupo, however the problem would come when he flips town after a lynch.
but then maybe it was something he said and they thought he was involved in the no night 1 death.
In post 585, Melmond wrote:In post 584, basketballstar24 wrote:1. When I was cautious of put Hellhound at L-1, it was because it wasn't even close to the deadline. When I asked for permission to hammer, it was close to deadline, we had to lynch someone to get info.
2. Well, I thought I was going to get lynched before I got on the next day since many people got onto my wagon.
3. So? What's the point of my reads if all you guys are going to do is make no use of it? I was trying my best, so I guessed that I wouldn't do reads anymore. Fine, I'll do a read soon.
It was more because of being cautious of putting him to L-1, it just really seemed like you didn't want to have anything bad come back to you later.
They will always ask you to claim before they hammer. And you've already said you'd give reads in post 456, which was a while ago.
In post 593, basketballstar24 wrote:There was like a day left, and Hellhound was almost inactive. It was too late for a claim.