In post 421, ConnorJC wrote:It's because this was all of his reads. What he said was basically just a rehash of what other people had already said. This could be because he's new, or because he's scum that's way too careful.
I also posted about Lovesick in a later post. As I said previously, every time I think something about a player or a post it seems that pretty soon after someone else has already echoed my thoughts in the thread. So I can either (a) post nothing and not contribute or (b) post my thoughts even if this means repeating what other people have already said. However, this is not "rehashing" as you put it - just because my views are the same as others does not mean I am copying them. There can only be a certain few viewpoints on people and posts and with 9 players there are bound to be people who have the same viewpoint
Its absolutely fine to share viewpoints with other players and if you agree with a theory that has already been stated, reinstating it (not rehashing, for instance you can say, 'I agree with the theory first proposed by player x etc etc',) adds weight to the theory, or at the very least, makes you easier to read.
In post 421, ConnorJC wrote:It's because this was all of his reads. What he said was basically just a rehash of what other people had already said. This could be because he's new, or because he's scum that's way too careful.
I also posted about Lovesick in a later post. As I said previously, every time I think something about a player or a post it seems that pretty soon after someone else has already echoed my thoughts in the thread. So I can either (a) post nothing and not contribute or (b) post my thoughts even if this means repeating what other people have already said. However, this is not "rehashing" as you put it - just because my views are the same as others does not mean I am copying them. There can only be a certain few viewpoints on people and posts and with 9 players there are bound to be people who have the same viewpoint
Its absolutely fine to share viewpoints with other players and if you agree with a theory that has already been stated, reinstating it (not rehashing, for instance you can say, 'I agree with the theory first proposed by player x etc etc',) adds weight to the theory, or at the very least, makes you easier to read.
Yes, but people rarely have the exact same viewpoint in this game. That is why adding variations to the reasons for the conclusion go a long way.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
@LQ
Naturally.
I was just saying to Toblerone, that his ideas don't need to be 100% original, especially if he is intimidated from posting for this reason.
Is this because of her emotional reaction to post 113 or do you have any newer reads?
I already went over this with her even. I know you are paying attention in this game, so I have no idea why you are bringing this up right now.
Lovesick asked if that post was the only reason I was Town reading them and I said "That is all I need." My next post I quoted from her I said that confirmed it for me.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
In post 629, Superhans wrote:@LQ
Naturally.
I was just saying to Toblerone, that his ideas don't need to be 100% original, especially if he is intimidated from posting for this reason.
Right.
I gave my read on that one as well. I said his thinking was open process.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
Their case on me that I am Scum was completely lackluster. This is because Scum have a much harder time fabricating a Scum read (or reads in general). To compound on this, they later said they don't have any strong reads. So then, why the strong push on me in the first place? I mean, they linked a lot of my posts and tried to use those as evidence for why I am Scum, but guess what? No one really bought those reasons. I would be a wagon right now if that post was legit.
TL;DR they are faking their reads.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
Their case on me that I am Scum was completely lackluster. This is because Scum have a much harder time fabricating a Scum read (or reads in general). To compound on this, they later said they don't have any strong reads. So then, why the strong push on me in the first place? I mean, they linked a lot of my posts and tried to use those as evidence for why I am Scum, but guess what? No one really bought those reasons. I would be a wagon right now if that post was legit.
TL;DR they are faking their reads.
^very very good point.
Rautherdir has some serious explaining to do.
In post 637, Rautherdir wrote:There were two reasons I voted LQ. One was post 6. The other was his failure to produce a reason for his vote on me.
He just did produce a sick reason for voting for you, as have I in post 604.
Post 6 was a very very very weak reason indeed. Why include 14 points if all bar one is valid?
Also which scenario out of the 4 here:
In post 265, Superhans wrote:There are four different situations with the upcoming Rautherdir vs LicketyQuickety fight.
1) R is scum, trying to appear town-ish by using potentially broken logic to trick the town into lynching LQ.
2) R is town and LQ is scum and the logic he is working with is valid.
3) R is town and LQ is town (most likely), the argument will hopefully yield good content though.
4) Both R and LQ are mafia trying a really cliche technique of pretending to fight each other to gain town trust.
I personally think number 3 is most likely, and number 4 least likely, but wouldn't be surpised if 1/2 is the case.
We'll have to wait for Rautherdir to return before properly making an evaluations.
Also can you try and put a little more passion into your responses. If you were a food you would be tofu, or slimy cold unseasoned noodles that have been overcooked.
In post 637, Rautherdir wrote:There were two reasons I voted LQ. One was post 6. The other was his failure to produce a reason for his vote on me.
Thanks for clarifying your reasoning was garbage. Honestly I'm starting to think you're trying to start a wagon because LQ's mysteriousness is unpopular, and not because he's scummy.
There's only two scum. Anyways, it would be Rautherdir first, then TheDom. Third would likely be based on whether I hit 0, 1, or 2 mafia with those kills, unless I had to submit them all at once, in which case my third would probably be LoveSick.
There's only two scum. Anyways, it would be Rautherdir first, then TheDom. Third would likely be based on whether I hit 0, 1, or 2 mafia with those kills, unless I had to submit them all at once, in which case my third would probably be LoveSick.
Are your scum-reads on Lovesick based on her defending TheDominator (as you accused her of in 400) or do you have additional/ more gut based reads?
There's only two scum. Anyways, it would be Rautherdir first, then TheDom. Third would likely be based on whether I hit 0, 1, or 2 mafia with those kills, unless I had to submit them all at once, in which case my third would probably be LoveSick.
Are your scum-reads on Lovesick based on her defending TheDominator (as you accused her of in 400) or do you have additional/ more gut based reads?
More gut based if anything; however, another major component would be that during the beginning something like 70%-80% of her posts were self-defense. I had to ask 2-3 times just to get some lackluster reads.
In post 637, Rautherdir wrote:There were two reasons I voted LQ. One was post 6. The other was his failure to produce a reason for his vote on me.
He just did produce a sick reason for voting for you, as have I in post 604.
Post 6 was a very very very weak reason indeed. Why include 14 points if all bar one is valid?
Also which scenario out of the 4 here:
In post 265, Superhans wrote:There are four different situations with the upcoming Rautherdir vs LicketyQuickety fight.
1) R is scum, trying to appear town-ish by using potentially broken logic to trick the town into lynching LQ.
2) R is town and LQ is scum and the logic he is working with is valid.
3) R is town and LQ is town (most likely), the argument will hopefully yield good content though.
4) Both R and LQ are mafia trying a really cliche technique of pretending to fight each other to gain town trust.
I personally think number 3 is most likely, and number 4 least likely, but wouldn't be surpised if 1/2 is the case.
We'll have to wait for Rautherdir to return before properly making an evaluations.
Do you think is the case and why?
Okay, to be perfectly honest? My vote was to get him to give me a reason for voting me in the first place. After I saw that was going nowhere I put my vote on TheDom who I am almost certain at this point is scum. Out of those, probably 3. I'm coming to the conclusion that post 6 was just an RVS thing.
In post 637, Rautherdir wrote:There were two reasons I voted LQ. One was post 6. The other was his failure to produce a reason for his vote on me.
He just did produce a sick reason for voting for you, as have I in post 604.
Post 6 was a very very very weak reason indeed. Why include 14 points if all bar one is valid?
Also which scenario out of the 4 here:
In post 265, Superhans wrote:There are four different situations with the upcoming Rautherdir vs LicketyQuickety fight.
1) R is scum, trying to appear town-ish by using potentially broken logic to trick the town into lynching LQ.
2) R is town and LQ is scum and the logic he is working with is valid.
3) R is town and LQ is town (most likely), the argument will hopefully yield good content though.
4) Both R and LQ are mafia trying a really cliche technique of pretending to fight each other to gain town trust.
I personally think number 3 is most likely, and number 4 least likely, but wouldn't be surpised if 1/2 is the case.
We'll have to wait for Rautherdir to return before properly making an evaluations.
Do you think is the case and why?
Okay, to be perfectly honest? My vote was to get him to give me a reason for voting me in the first place. After I saw that was going nowhere I put my vote on TheDom who I am almost certain at this point is scum. Out of those, probably 3. I'm coming to the conclusion that post 6 was just an RVS thing.
