newbie 1905: pictures from my phone (GAME OGRE !!!)
-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
The scum already know we're all town. How does my post help them decide I'm a PR?In post 177, volxen wrote:
Welcome, but you really shouldn't state your role, even as VT, as that helps scum to narrow down who the town power roles are...In post 174, foodcoats wrote:... aaand it'll probably be tomorrow before I get to writing anything, since it's bedtime in my house. Please don't scumread me for it. I'm vanilla town.-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
This was the first post to strike me as scummy. Vorkuta has the opportunity to provide analysis here, or to ignore the L-2 discussion and focus on something she/he feels is more worthwhile discussion, but gives a gentle stir to the pot instead. As a first post, I immediately lean scum on someone posting this way.In post 37, Vorkuta wrote:So what's the consensus- is the L-2 a noob thing, a truly random RVS, or has scum decided to blitz D-1?-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
Follows up with a discussion of the most fundamental mechanics. Right, we need to lynch someone. Who should we lynch?In post 49, Vorkuta wrote:
IMHO without votes and pressure, nothing happens. Any and all inactivity benefits scum more than in benefits town.In post 26, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:The vote wasn’t really needed here
Like- if we casually gave 1 vote here, one vote there, removed 1 vote here, we wouldn't get anything done by the deadline.
VOTE: Vorkuta-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
As a counterpoint, this is the kind of post I expect from town. InfernoDragon18 looks at a variety of factors that might affect who we decide to lynch and why.In post 98, InfernoDragon18 wrote:Alright I've been way too inactive this game so I'm going to get things going
I'm pretty sure that the worst is town. His general attitude seems pretty towny and I think that he actively attempting to further the goals of the town. I do agree that the use of probabilities can be scum approaching the game with an overly mechanistic mindset, but I believe in this case he is trying to use them to the maximum benefit of the town
As far as scum reads go, I am a little suspicious of both Vortuka and Yyotta. Yyotta seems abnormally defensive considering the votes on her were mainly random just to apply pressure. Vortuka seems overly agressive especially against the worst. I'm not sure what their opposition against the use of probabilities really means anything, but overall the bevavior of Vortuka seems overall extremely on the attack in a way I'm not sure really represents town play.
That said, I specifically disagree about Yyotta on a gut vibe. I'll read Yyotta's ISO.
I would NOT lynch InfernoDragon18 as of this moment. Townlean.-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
In post 42, YyottaCat wrote:UNVOTE: the worst
nah better not attract too much attention (will probably go horribly wrong)In post 43, YyottaCat wrote:wait it already went horribly wrong oh no
I don't see this kind of activity chain coming from scum, unless Yyotta is very cleverly setting up to be a deep threat. I feel it's more likely Yyotta is tunneling on their own play as town. More or less neutral on YyottaCat at the moment.In post 44, YyottaCat wrote:wait no im alright
Yyotta, who do you think we should lynch right now and why?-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
Hey volxen. Do you think there are any legitimate reasons to lynch The Worst at the moment? I'm going to read their ISO last since they've posted so much, so I'd appreciate any insight you've picked up already. I appreciate the kind of questions you are asking, but it seems so far you've only read Yyotta as null, which feels like an easy read.In post 13, volxen wrote:Yeah, might as well make this a repeat of Newbie 1888 where we tunneled each other all day long on day one. Fun times!
VOTE: The Worst-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
Hey nonny, I'm bad at clipping quotes, but I want to follow up on the piece I red-bolded. I think you have a good point here. I haven't read NAJOM's ISO yet, but I also don't see any reason someone would honestly take a scumlean on YyottaCat. Is there anything else you've found fishy about NAJOM?In post 105, nonny wrote:
Agree the second post is odd and would still like to see a response to it, but the first quote is obviously a joke. That whole three set post you pulled that from was joking, trying to diffuse pressure. Whether it was planned/forced or not is another thing, but def made to look casual.In post 77, Vorkuta wrote:In post 43, YyottaCat wrote:wait it already went horribly wrong oh noMy head hurts from this and I can't tell if this is a newbie thing, scum self-preservation instinct, an intentional misplay to get a response out of people, or something in between. So I'll just call it a scumslip for the time being.
In post 87, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:HEY, THAT’S ME!NotAJumbleOfNumbers
TOWN-LEANING:nonny, volxen, the worst
NEUTRAL:InfernoDragon, Tine, PvtUrist, Vorkuta
SCUM-LEANING:Yyotta(I see 91, is there more?)Talk to me about this scum lean please. You jumped to questioning the vote on her page 1 almost defensively and now have a scum lean on her. She's also voted you in that time frame. Please expand on the scum lean, I'm curious.
101 from Vorkuta feels agressive but overall the rest of his posts feel pretty casual, only slightly odd in that he said he felt like TW was poking him. Read the interaction at TvT for now.
Townleans on TW, Vorkuta
Still null for everyone else. Jumble is a big question mark I'd like to sort.-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
You are too kind! The Worst, is there a way to do a double-ISO, to compare two players at once?In post 184, the worst wrote: but it's whatever, what's done is done. i'm liking your catch up so far.-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
Nice, thanks!In post 188, the worst wrote:you betcha, check at the bottom of the page for the Display posts by user' option and click the [+] & [-] to the right:-
-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
Those playful posts made me a little suspicious but addressing it makes me less so.In post 153, PvtUrist wrote:I'm seeing that massive mistake I've made now. The initial response to Yyotta was bad, the follow up killed it. That playful response (x2) is about as close as how I'd personally act in real life, but I can definitely see how that comes across as suspicious.
You've spent time analyzing TW, Vorkuta and Yyotta (and yourself). What do you think of nonny? nonny seems the opposite of playful. Do you reckon that's more town or scum?-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
You're very question-heavy, TW. I don't know how I read that yet, especially as it relates to your IC role.In post 152, the worst wrote:: the worstmechanical town
: -strong town
: volxen, Yyotta, NotAJumbleOfNumbersleaning town
: nonny, InfernoDragon18null-town
: Tinexkksinull
: PvtUristnull-scum
: Vorkutaleaning scum
: -strong scum
just for calibration & context; i'm about here, with my full reads.
Why do you lean town on volxen? I'm skeptical because volxen does read town but is a little too quiet. I like town to be more solve-oriented - which is what is leading me to question both of you, since you're both sort of reserved in a somewhat hidden way.
I'm null on NAJOM - literally can't even find a post I want to quote - and a little suspicious of nonny also, again because of being question-oriented.-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
In post 106, YyottaCat wrote:Jumble might be trying to publicly non-scummy-ly kill (aka lynch) me
You no longer believe NAJOM is trying to wagon you? What changed your mind?In post 199, YyottaCat wrote:oops i mean
UNVOTE: jumble
idk how i messed that up
idk what im doing half the time
the worst, volxen, jumble
I'm legitimately curious because I'm struggling to read NAJOM.-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
Are you trying to buddy YyottaCat? Is it fair if I find this scummy?In post 203, PvtUrist wrote:
In that case what's your favourite animal and why?YyottaCat wrote:his posts seem town-ish
and you are overloading me with questions
How do you respond to the threat of infection post werebeast attack? I feel like how you respond to such a threat to your fortress will give insight into your town morality.-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
Hi NAJOM. Perhaps this is a holdover from the meta where I played my first game (webdiplomacy.net), but I consider claiming VT to be NAI. That said, I stated it to deflect anyone from accusing me of active lurking because I appeared, said hello, and then offered an excuse for not posting reads/analysis.In post 176, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:Hello foodcoats! While I do welcome you into this game, one thing struck me as odd in your opening posts. Why did you claim VT without any pressure to do such a thing?
I for the life of me cannot read anything from your posts so far. What do you think are the most telling scumslips we've seen so far?-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
I'm glad to see there's been some more activity.In post 261, the worst wrote:I'm gonna hold off on voting for a bit.
@volxen, nonny, foodcoats - did you all get the same warm energy from {urist, vork, tw} that I did just now?before I firm up my D1 reads, but despite that, I'd like to address TW's question with a review of the most recently active players: TW, Vorkuta, PvtUrist, and InfernoDragon18.I'd really like to hear some substantive commentary from volxen, Jumble, YyottaCat and nonny
At the moment, I don't think the conversation so far has shifted my reads much, and from a strategic perspective,That's not to say I haven't thought about what they have written, and I don't believe I am tunneling Vorkuta. I was convinced enough by some of Vorkuta's posts to consider changing votes, and I actually think the InfernoDragon18 wagon is healthy because it will force ID18 to defend him/herself and give us more information.my vote on Vorkuta is reinforced.
But, that said:
In post 241, Vorkuta wrote: Seriously- a third of infernodragon's (8) posts are basically fancy ways to call me scum, and the rest of his answers are noncommittal and vague.
Isn't that the exact type of player (quiet, doesn't draw any attention, jumps on an early/easy opportunity) who deserves more suspicion than I do?I don't think that InfernoDragon18 has been vague at all. ID18 has a high density ofThis comment from Vorkuta is totally incorrect.commitmentin their posts. This is valuable to me as town because I can use it later to draw relationships between ID18 and other players, and their voting patterns. ID18 hasn't created many individual posts, but just look at how much information they give us in this single post (in response to PvtUrist):
If we compare the following quote, it shows how vastly differently Vorkuta is approaching the game from ID18. I'm only posting the last of Vorkuta's responses to PvtUrist, but I recommend everyone read all of post 248. To be fair: this post sounds intelligent, reasonable, and justified. I found myself agreeing with Vorkuta and was prepared to adjust my read on her/him. But when I take a step back,In post 209, InfernoDragon18 wrote: I feel that we have a good pretty much confirmed town in TW (at least I really hope he is given he is my strongest town read) and we have a decent sized block of town-ish looking people, mainly Volxen and yourself. Of course, any of these town-ish people could be scum obviously, but I don't think they would make a good lynch for today in our current place
For me, the most scummy people at this moment are Vortuka and Yyotta, and Vortuka is far more scummy in my eyes given thier interactions with theworst and their general attacking nature. I think something that also makes me very suspicious of them is the fact they seem to be trying to make everyone doubt the conclusions they have reached. Sure, it makes plenty of sense for them to be attacking TW considering they are TW's #1 scum read, but they are doing this mainly through casting doubt on other people's conclusions rather than pointing out what TW is doing that could be scummy (exept the questions). Yyotta to me just seems defensive and isn't really fleshing out any of her reads. The only things she has actually said in terms of reads basically amount to "they are town because they are town".. Vorkuta is, in my opinion,I can't help but notice that Vorkuta has chosen to spend a lot of effort responding to PvtUrist in defensive, mechanical and statistical terms - and has still managed to avoid making significant,committedreadsremaining flexible. Even if you don't believe this style is scummy, it is at the very least anti-town, because we will have difficulty going back and incriminating Vorkuta later on in the game due to how little opinion they've given us. We'll never be able to use the following post to draw relationships between Vorkuta and other players' alignments:
In comparison, TWIn post 248, Vorkuta wrote:These questions... I swear answering all of these would be a scum tell because only scum would have to try and stay alive for so long. If I get lynched for not answering them then at least I can flip green and justify myself.
I'll indulge Urist just because it's a refreshing change of pace from dealing with IC!theworst
...
The Activity Overview becauseIn post 238, PvtUrist wrote:Finally, before the end of D1, (aside from accusing me as a filthy elf) what is the biggest thing you'd wish town to pay attention to, and why?
-It shows that theworst has quadruple some player's posts and to urge other people to think about the extremes/both sides of the spectrum
-It shows that I spend half my game-timedefendinganswering worst's inquiry
and most importantly
-It shows that several players have succeeded in hiding in the background and that town MUST shine the spotlight in their direction in order to have a chance of winningattackedVorkuta, just as I am doing (TW's attack is several posts/pages long and the pressuring elements are relatively obvious, so I won't clip anything; if you require clarifying quotes, please ask me). This is pro-town activity, again because it will be useful information in the future.If Vorkuta were to "flip green," as he/she has insisted they will several times, ID18, TW and myself would all fall under suspicion. But if TW were to be lynched and flip town, Vorkuta has written their posts in such a way as to claim they made a mistake.
I have also been thinking that PvtUrist makes some scummy moves, particularly in this post directed at Vorkuta:
In post 238, PvtUrist wrote:Verkuta;I'm having mixed feelings about you. While I along with presumeably most others have much suspicion on your actions, your posts otherwise have brought up a few points that I atleast partially agree with. I currently don't feel like the D1 lynch on you is the most correct choice as I feel like there are crucial information and/or posts missing that might otherwise prove your potential innocence. Though, the outcome would heavily depend on your response to the upcoming questions.
Are you Vanilla? If you do cannot or do not wish to say so, why?
Hypothetically, if everyone was L-1 and you were forced to make the hammer decision, who would you choose and why?
Finally, before the end of D1, (aside from accusing me as a filthy elf) what is the biggest thing you'd wish town to pay attention to, and why?[/i]The questions are good because they try to force Vorkuta to take a position; but that is not in line with the initial read that PvtUrist no longer believes Vorkuta is scum. If PvtUrist thinks Vorkuta is town, why are they attacking so hard? The strangeness of this interaction is reinforced by this:The thing I find scummy about this post is that it is not internally consistent.
It doesn't help that I don't agree with Vorkuta's argument that ID18 deserves to be a wagon for scummy activity, but nonetheless, I see no clear logical path for PvtUrist to arrive at the decision to clear their suspicions of Vorkuta and thus apply pressure to ID18. There are inconsistencies in the way Urist is approaching the game. I don't want to get into a tunnel of circular reasoning, but
I'm glad to see on a re-read of Urist's ISO that she/he never voted for TW, as that would be a major red flag.this feels like Urist coming to her/his scum partner's defense more than Urist being legitimately convinced of something.
Do you really believe that Vorkuta's answers were good enough to (semi-)clear them? What makes you believe ID18 is scum?@PvtUrist:
What do you think of my argument? If you don't think Vorkuta is the best D1 lynch, who would you recommend we lynch instead? Is ID18 a legitimate wagon when they are (in my opinion) obviously pro-town in their activities?@nonny, volxen, YyottaCat and Jumble:
Do you think that Jumble might be a better example than ID18 of low post, low effort, non-committal reads?@Vorkuta:-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
Hey folks. I thought it would be worthwhile to address the two outstanding arguments against me. The first is that I defended ID18, which is being interpreted as buddying/pocketing or interaction between the scum team, and the second is Urist's ISO read.
Regarding my defense of ID18,both ID18 and Urist questioned why I would defend ID18:
In post 263, PvtUrist wrote:"Defend ID18 because reason x"Speaking of,why are you personally defending ID?I'm sure he's more than capable in defending himself, provided he's of the correct allignment. If anything, it makes me questionyourmotives, whatever they may be.In post 272, InfernoDragon18 wrote:While (foodcoats) made good points regarding the content of Vorkuta's posts and their interactions with Urist, some of what they did seems slightly odd for what I previously thought was a town player. I'm not really sure why they chose to defend me. The only person on my wagon who is voting for me because they believe I am scum is Vorkuta, while Urist is just applying pressure.We don't knowAs town, I believe it is just as important to identify town as it is to identify scum.eitherteam. By sharing our analyses or intuitions about who may be town, we can build trust within the town and work towards lynching the mafia. This isn't my idea; I took it from this article on the Mafia Universe University, on the concept of "Power Villaging:" https://www.mafiauniverse.com/forums/th ... nstrman%29.
As a sub point, in reading town, I can't actuallyknowwho is town, and, obviously, the scum will try to impersonate town. So what I'm looking for right now is what I call "pro-town behaviour." Pro-town behaviour involves making committed reads and explaining thoughts about who is or is not scum and why. ID18 may not be the towniest one here (that's me lololol amirite amirite), and they may not be town at all, but they've acted in a pro-town way because if we mislynch, for example, Vorkuta, we can review ID18's arguments against Vorkuta and follow the voting trail to come up with new deductions and information.
Finally, if I were scum, I might try to pocket ID18 this way, but I assure you there is no world in which the scum team is foodcoats / ID18. That's the kind of play that would break a two-person scum team pretty fast. If I know anything, it's that I'm not that bad at strategy games.
Secondly:I'll respond to a few of the comments in Urist's ISO. I've snipped from post 301 as required (identified by the ellipses, "...") for readability; if you think I skipped something that should have been discussed, please let me know. My responses are in lime green text in-line with the quote, because I don't want to fudge up the whole quote block by accident.
(Side note: I'm in the black and white standard forum template, so the bright colours like red and green help me to read. I noticed that TW shared a screenshot in a white and brown forum template. If my colours are total hot garbage for the way anyone is viewing the forum, please let me know. I know I write walls of text so I'm trying to make things more - not less! - readable.)
In post 301, PvtUrist wrote:So I went through foodcoats (FC)' ISO and here's what I came up with.
...
"In post 179, foodcoats wrote:
The scum already know we're all town. How does my post help them decide I'm a PR?In post 177, volxen wrote: Welcome, but you really shouldn't state your role, even as VT, as that helps scum to narrow down who the town power roles are...The" (notice the use of singular, rather than plural (scum vs scums)).scumalready know we're all town, and so do I.
The plural of scum is scum. In case it comes up, the plural of mafia is mafia, and the plural of wolf is wolves.
In post 180, foodcoats wrote:
This was the first post to strike me as scummy. Vorkuta has the opportunity to provide analysis here, or to ignore the L-2 discussion and focus on something she/he feels is more worthwhile discussion, but gives a gentle stir to the pot instead. As a first post, I immediately lean scum on someone posting this way.In post 37, Vorkuta wrote:So what's the consensus- is the L-2 a noob thing, a truly random RVS, or has scum decided to blitz D-1?"This was the first post to strike me as an opportunity to paint someone else black and divert attention". Instead of "providing analysis" off of his own thoughts, he entertained the idea to promote further discussion before "analysis" was made. I'd believe flexible or passive, but hardly enough to call it scum-lean.
Perhaps I didn't write it as well as I could, but I do think there's a difference between Vorkuta's post and how I commented on it. Vorkuta asks a question, rather than commenting on the events in question. In fact, they are asking for someone else to provide analysis for them! My analysis is that Vorkuta dodges making meaningful contribution here. Vorkuta does not, him/herself, indicate what they think of the "L-2 affair."
"In post 181, foodcoats wrote:
Follows up with a discussion of the most fundamental mechanics. Right, we need to lynch someone. Who should we lynch?In post 49, Vorkuta wrote:
IMHO without votes and pressure, nothing happens. Any and all inactivity benefits scum more than in benefits town.In post 26, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:The vote wasn’t really needed here
Like- if we casually gave 1 vote here, one vote there, removed 1 vote here, we wouldn't get anything done by the deadline.
VOTE: VorkutaPaint it Black #2" I don't see any issues with Vorkuta's post here. Despite that, FC manages to find somehow find fault within and attempts the hammer wagon.
That's fair. And I am concerned that I've tunneled Vorkuta. I'll discuss in another post.
Inferno repeats shit town already agrees on. Apparently that's enough to be town-lean, according to FC.In post 182, foodcoats wrote:
As a counterpoint, this is the kind of post I expect from town. InfernoDragon18 looks at a variety of factors that might affect who we decide to lynch and why.In post 98, InfernoDragon18 wrote:Alright I've been way too inactive this game so I'm going to get things going
I'm pretty sure that the worst is town. His general attitude seems pretty towny and I think that he actively attempting to further the goals of the town. I do agree that the use of probabilities can be scum approaching the game with an overly mechanistic mindset, but I believe in this case he is trying to use them to the maximum benefit of the town
As far as scum reads go, I am a little suspicious of both Vortuka and Yyotta. Yyotta seems abnormally defensive considering the votes on her were mainly random just to apply pressure. Vortuka seems overly agressive especially against the worst. I'm not sure what their opposition against the use of probabilities really means anything, but overall the bevavior of Vortuka seems overall extremely on the attack in a way I'm not sure really represents town play.
That said, I specifically disagree about Yyotta on a gut vibe. I'll read Yyotta's ISO.
I would NOT lynch InfernoDragon18 as of this moment. Townlean.
You are misreading and misrepresenting the quote you yourself clipped! I did not infer ID18 was town because they agreed with other people I read as town. I said, "...this is the kind of post I expect from town. InfernoDragon18 looks at a variety of factors that might affect who we decide to lynch and why." That's why I read ID18 as town. I've already discussed my theory of pro-town behaviour. Even if it allows scum to blend in early, it condemns them later.
This could well be true when cooperation isn't explained. I think a good example of this is when Urist jumps on voting for ID18. I believe Urist partially explained this above by indicating they don't want to hammer Vorkuta, but I think there are more likely scum candidates to pressure. But I think I've been pretty clear about my reads, and I think we have relatively good reasons to not lynch ID18. As town, we do not want to lynch other town. It'll undoubtedly happen, but ID18 has at least shown a willingness to play the game and cooperate with the other players, which can't be said for everyone on the player list. I need good town partners who can help me win the game.
What I find strange in all this is that people seem to be inferring that cooperation is scummy.(As town, Urist. Not a scumslip, old friend.)-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
Yeah, I've been thinking about Jumble. I saw your vote last night (east coast North America here) and mulled it over. Unlike nonny and volxen, Jumble does make appearances, but they aren't strong. The ISO read of Jumble is... difficult. I think the behaviour around the posts is more telling to me, which is why it's taken a while to become comfortable with what is going on in Jumble's activity. Basically, Jumble seems to strike fast and quick. There's nothing inherently wrong with their posts, except that I smell a little bit of the prod-avoider.In post 308, the worst wrote:Jumble I'd appreciate someone else taking a look at him and telling me what they think... ISO might also be a good start I think
Also,Jumble has read YyottaCat and Vorkuta on the scum spectrum, but hasn't yet placed a vote. Going back to Urist's decision to move off Vorkuta: I think Urist made a strategically wise decision there, considering that we have Jumble lurking, voteless. I'm actually reminded of the argument Vorkuta made about "quiet and opportunistic" players. I've clipped Jumble's reads below, but I'll put them in a spoiler, because they are hard to read on their own and I'm more looking at the pattern. My point is more to show that Jumble is making reads, but isn't committing to a vote. Why save the vote?I don't know why Jumble hasn't voted since rescinding the vote on TW.
Spoiler:
But what I really don't like is Jumble's question about what the PRs should do:
Combined with more or less agreeing with the Vorkuta wagon and the active-lurking, town!Jumble looks like a PR and sets themself up to be NK'd. But I actually read this more as a scum post. The PRs, if they are not entirely clueless, most definitely have been thinking about what they will do in the night phase, nevermind that we are still days away from it. They don't need to be reminded. This reads to me as PR fishing, because the people with the most interesting responses are possible NK targets for scum!Jumble.In post 280, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote: Side note: What should the Town PRs do this night? I don’t think anyone’s brought up PRs at all, so I’m reminding everyone that theydoexist.
So, for what it's worth, if you're a PR, leverage TW's strategy post and don't respond to Jumble.-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
No, I signed up there and here after playing my first game on webdiplomacy.net. Diplomacy has been my main jam for a few years, and the webdippers always have a Mafia game going. I got a little burnt on Diplomacy and decided to jump in a Mafia game that was forming up, and it was a total blast. I feel like Diplomacy was the gateway game to something with EVEN MORE circular reasoning and conversation between players. Love it.In post 310, the worst wrote: incidentally foodcoats, do you play on mafiauniverse regularly?-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
, thank you for taking the time to extensively respond to my attack.@Vorkuta(BTW, I'm not sure if that's how people refer to things generally in Mafia, but I think of most substantial posts as attacks and defenses, rounded out with shitposts and filler. I hope it doesn't sound overly aggressive.)At the very least, you've earned "player points" from me: I appreciate that you're, y'know, playing. With no real fresh material from multiple players, I'm much less inclined to lynch you. If you are scum and you get through D1, at least we'll be having fun.
I have a few responses:
In post 269, Vorkuta wrote: Look- I picked ID18 out from the blue as he had the lowest post count. I could've easily picked nonny or volxen (who also spent a few posts calling me scummy). I have no intention of actually following through with a lynch WITHOUT any new information. Hell- last game this happened to me and I voted purely to get someone to say more things I JUMPED OFF the wagon as soon as the guy hit L-1 to give him some breathing room.
TO reiterate- I'm not voting for ID18 because I think he's scum. I'm voting for him because he doesn't get a free pass with his 8 posts (a third of which were 'vork is scummy'), and I have absolutely no information on him. This argument ALSO applies to the others with lower post counts, but it applies MOST STRONGLY to ID18.
Okay, that's fair. I like this reasoning more and more, though it's more from the perspective of appreciating the game than solving the game. I'm trying not to tunnel on the lurkers because I realize stuff happens in real life, but at the very least we have quite a catalogue of Vorkuta material to review later on... and as such, I'm aligning more with you in terms of how we should play right now, by applying pressure to the lurkers.
...
-There's no way you guys would lynch such a player. The utility/questions he bring to town, coupled with your faith in him make him almost invulnerable during daytime.In post 262, foodcoats wrote:But if TW were to be lynched and flip town, Vorkuta has written their posts in such a way as to claim they made a mistake.
I disagree. I've re-read TW's ISO several times, looking for a chink in the armour. TW could be a major deep threat. But you're right that, for now at least, TW has been able to not only direct (to some degree) the flow of conversation, but avoid suspicion insofar as they are the director. He is basically really, really good at appearing NAI in everything he says. I'm very open to hearing analysis of TW. I wish I had something worthwhile myself.
So, what I take away from all of this is, I still lean scum on Vorkuta, but I'm less inclined to lynch an active player. And town!Vorkuta would be a HUGE asset to us in future days.In post 270, Vorkuta wrote:
Yeah I call ridiculous on that. Hell- he only has 8 posts. Let me pick through his ISO with a finetooth comb. Here's my interpretation of everything he's said so far.In post 262, foodcoats wrote:ID18 has a high density of commitment in their posts
Post 30- RVS
Post 98- 'Worst is town, vork is scummy, yotta made a wierd newbie play'
Post 103- non committal "IDK anything about JUMBLE, he's neutral"
Post 165- 'vork still scummy, let's vote vork to see what he flips'
Post 172- 'if vork flips green, worst might be scummy, but not too scummy'
Post 209- 'vork and yotta still kinda scummy (sorry was afk for a while)'
Post 213 & 215- 'Ok guys lets talk!'
I think you misunderstand me a little... ID18 hasestablished a position. I don't think you have, yet. I think that establishing a position is pro-town,even ifit may result in early mislynches. Not providing a position is thoroughly anti-town. I've discussed my theory of pro-town behaviour elsewhere so I won't repeat it unless someone wants me to go total sperg on it.
-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
LOLIn post 314, Vorkuta wrote:And now that I know he comes from a diplomacy background I trust him even less.-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
VOTE: Jumble
I actually want to vote for volxen more, but I think I'll wait until tomorrow to try to wagon him purely for lurking (TW did also have a comment on volxen's meta which is a legit consideration). I think it will be useful to have volxen's insight; their posts have suggested they are clever. And, I believe this makes three votes on Jumble, which should be enough to make a sizzle.
Outside of voting strategy and in terms of my reading, I think I addressed my concerns about Jumble in the post above, responding to TW's request for an analysis of Jumble. Jumble is on point in a way that I do not think benefits the town. There's a very fine line between a player like Jumble and a player like ID18, I realize. I'd be happy to discuss it, because I think there is a difference.
For now, let's turn up the heat.-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
via Imgflip Meme GeneratorIn post 332, YyottaCat wrote:
yeah, i just don't know what to postIn post 331, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:
If I wasn’t playing this game, then I would’ve been replaced. There’s a difference between “not playing at all” and “playing minimalisticly”.In post 321, Vorkuta wrote:People who aren't playing this game: YyottaCat, InfernoDragon18, NotAJumbleOfNumbers-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
Humour us. What would you say if Yyotta voted for you right now?In post 339, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:
L-2 isn’t really that bad in my eyes. I’d only really get worried at L-1.In post 338, the worst wrote:Jumble, how do you feel about the votes on you?-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
Do you plan to evolve your play style over the course of the game to be more focused on scumhunting? Will you play a less minimalist game in future days and be more involved in catching scum and solving the game state?In post 331, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:
If I wasn’t playing this game, then I would’ve been replaced. There’s a difference between “not playing at all” and “playing minimalisticly”.In post 321, Vorkuta wrote:People who aren't playing this game: YyottaCat, InfernoDragon18, NotAJumbleOfNumbers-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
(I wanted to post last night, but needed to ensure I understood the rules about outside game information first.) I wanted to draw attention to the fact that volxen has been active in other threads, has a very high average post count, and is very articulate. The way he posts in other game threads shows that he is very clever and really enjoys mafia. Despite that enthusiasm and confirmed presence on the site, he's now promised us - in our poor ickle noob game - to "post more later."I'd like to get discussion going on volxen.And he's done this twice.
What is really disapointing is, volxen came online last tonight to... update his reads from a week ago? Really? The game has evolved a lot since then. And I don't buy that a player of volxen's type cannot find the time, or doesn't have the mental wherewithal, to catch up on only 10 pages of forum text.
I've tried another fruitless ISO of his posts and have nothing concrete to share. As I mentioned above in one of my responses to Vorkuta, I have come around more to the Vorkuta philosophy that lurking players deserve greater scrutiny. I was averse to this idea at the beginning because, on D1 of my first game, I was one of the main proponents of a wagon that "lynched the lurker." They turned out to be town, and I was very upset with myself for not having brought a broader perspective to the game. But that game was 48 hour phases. This phase is literally 10 days long! In this format, and in a modern society where our schedules are usually defined by the flow of our weeks, lurking can only be justified by someone admitting they never had the time to play mafia in the first place.
This means they are either lazy town, or scum. And with someone who appears to be smart and enthusiastic about mafia... I lean scum.But I don't think that's volxen's problem, because they have posted on this site every single day this week.
VOTE: volxen
, you've commented on volxen's meta previously. What do you think of my analysis above?@TW-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
I don't really care if you release your teeth, but I reflected on the fact that you had replied to my earlier post suggesting I replied too quickly, and thought that if I didn't respond here, you'd go down the WIFOM rabbit hole (In post 361, PvtUrist wrote:: foodcoatsleaning scum(Not releasing my teeth on you until there's a real good reason for me to do so. You know exactly why.)why didn't foodcoats respond quickly this time?).
I don't have anything to add to my previous rebuttals. If I've shut down all criticism against me, isn't that because I've adequately responded and/or your original arguments were weak?
I think you read me as scum because I am, as I like to think of it, "building an agenda." I think my posts are pretty obviously trying to latch onto a good lynch target, and you are worried that I am making a lot of hard, fast reads because I want to drive town to a lynch. So it sounds like you your philosophy, the Urist philosophy as it were, is the opposite of the Vorkuta philosophy. Vorkuta thinks the scummiest players are the lurkers who are trying to get a free pass to day two; you are most concerned that I, as one of the more active players, am trying to take leadership of the town, and then lead them astray.
And I think that's perfectly justifiable. But that said, the reason I want to see more players play like me is because having an agenda on D1 makes it much easier to catch scum on, say, D3. That's why I still can't clear Vorkuta, despite agreeing with a lot of what they have said and also being steadfastly opposed to lynching Vorkuta today. Vorkuta hasn't said anything that would incriminate them later on.
But... *sigh*... that's the case with a lot of the players here.-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
I was putting together a list and realized that I really owe Vorkuta a re-read of InfernoDragon18. Vorkuta has brought me over to the dark side and consequently I will try to shine a light on the lurkers.
And wow, re-reading ID18 is tough - they have posted almost nothing! I decided not to do an ISO but instead to read every one of ID18's posts in context. I get a vibe from ID18's posts that suggests they are written very un-self-consciously. I think that struck me early on, and so I gulped down ID18's reads, satisfying myself that I would have evidence against them later if I thought they looked scummier in future days. On re-read, though, ID18 is either scum or super lazy town.
This post is literally just parroting TW, which suggests ID18 is unduly influenced by one player, or is too lazy to dredge up additional material or think in new directions:
There's even a post a little later where ID18 basically parrots TW's opinion on using probability arguments. It's as if ID18 did an ISO of TW, pulled their ideas, and made a post to appear like an active scumhunter.In post 98, InfernoDragon18 wrote:Alright I've been way too inactive this game so I'm going to get things going
I'm pretty sure that the worst is town.
...
As far as scum reads go, I am a little suspicious of both Vortuka and Yyotta.
I get the whole RVS thing, but you need to follow up your random vote with pressure and questions or you don't get anything out of it. ID18 explains why in this post, but I just... this basically confirms that ID18 is either lazy, or just trying to fit in.I also don't like that ID18 glides effortlessly into this set of reads despite starting with a vote on Jumble.
In post 103, InfernoDragon18 wrote:
I don't really have a read on them at the moment. They seem really null as I haven't seen anything particularly AI from them at the moment. The only reason my vote is on them at the moment is that is was part of RVS and I see no real point in unvoting or voting for someone else until I've decided who I think is the proper lynch or Jumble gets close enough to a hammer that I have to change my vote to make sure they are not hammeredIn post 99, the worst wrote:Welcome back ID18! how're you reading Jumbz atm?The more I think on it, the more it seems like ID18 doesn't feel invested insolving the game.
ID18 spends some time discussing Vorkuta's scumminess, but I think I've established for myself that those reasons are no longer good enough, and ID18 basically just brings nonny and TW into the justification process anyway, so it's not like it actually brings new information to the table. For me, this continues to show a lack of initiative, which is definitely anti-town. This is probably the absolute worst post I've seen in the entire thread so far:
I guess it competes with Yyotta saying they were too lazy to read my post? Whatever. Obviously, this game isn't for everyone, but if you aren't willing to read, you can't catch scum. Why is ID18 not motivated to catch scum? Why is ID18 satisfied leveraging other players' posts to reinforce a tunnel on Vorkuta?In post 215, InfernoDragon18 wrote:given that you have posted so much, can you be a little more specific?
Onto ID18's scum defense. I think scum are more likely to admit to looking scummy than town, so that's a mark against ID18 here. But what's more interesting is that I think ID18 basically concludes that there are multiple ways to look scummy. I'd then expect ID18 to look for different versions of scumminess wthin our game and come up with a new conclusion... but, they don't bother. They drive home the Vorkuta read!
I don't like this because ID18 still does not give us any new information. ID18 is tunneled on Vorkuta at this point. On the one hand, I agree with ID18 that Vorkuta feels kind of scummy.In post 272, InfernoDragon18 wrote:Honestly, not at all surprised that there are multiple lynch votes on me. I haven't been active and that is pretty textbook for a new scum player. Now, this isn't my first game of mafia in a forum setting, its just my first game of Mafia on this site. Just to give you an idea of how scummy my town playstyle is, I've played 6 town games on the other site I play on and have been mislynched 5 times. I see that what I have done so far in this thread - "don't post much and post my observations/reads whenever I come in and then just leave" is pretty much right out of the lazy scum playbook, so I get why some of you might see it that way
However, I do want to draw your attention to everyone's responses...
...
Given my scum read on them, everything that Vorkuta has posted since the votes doesn't surprise me in the least. All it looks like to me is scum making the mistake of thinking "I got a wagon going on Person X, so I am going to be able to lynch Person X if I go all in on Person X." Vorkuta just seems like they are scrambling to make sure I am the lynch. If you think about it, I'm the perfect target for scum!Vorkuta:I think what we can best conclude from ID18's post is that "anyone can be scum." So why not try to find someone new to analyze for scum-like traits? ID18 doesn't bother. Why wouldn't they try? They seem not to have the motivation.But the bigger problem is that this conflicts with ID18's designation of their own play as scummy: Vorkuta is far from lurking, and is also not trying to wagon anyone; they are far more flexible than that.
ID18 praises Urist for their critical thinking, but does not seem to be employing this thinking themself. After this clip below, ID18 goes on to further tunnel Vorkuta.
In post 329, InfernoDragon18 wrote: To me (Urist's) post comes from a mindset of "what was this person trying to do here? Is this more useful for town or scum?" I think this mindset is critical and something that is hard to replicate with full effort when you are scum as you have very little incentive to do so. Early in the game, Urist also lined out the way they think about reading other players, and I think their analysis here plays right into that. By far the most towny thing they do here is putting themselves in a scum mindset and thinking about what they would have done in that position as scum, which is extremely important to identify scum once we have a flip. I don't really see any way that Urist would have the motivation to step out of whatever current role he has and just think about the angle everyone is coming at the game.In conclusion, ID18 is, at best, lazy town. They have not evolved their position and have largely relied on parroting other players' opinions. They don't bring new information to our town, and they are tunneled on Vorkuta.
So, to ask a Urist question: is this more likely to be a scum agenda, or a town agenda? I don't love that the answer is, ID18 looks pretty scummy now...-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
Ya beat me to it bruh.
As we're getting closer to deadline, I thought I'd provide a "lynch list." I don't want to write a complete TW-style reads list as the dynamic of the game still makes it very hard to read the whole player base, but I wanted to share who I would or wouldn't lynch at this point.
:WOULD NOT LYNCHthe worst,PvtUrist,Vorkuta. I have varying levels of town/scum reads on you all, but you're playing the game, so I want to keep you playing. I will actively oppose wagons on these players unless someone else breaks out of their shell and gives me reason to believe I'll have other allies in the future.
:I DON'T CAREnonny. Would love to see more from you; your initial posts suggested you'd provide good input.
:WOULD LYNCHYyottaCat,Jumble,volxen,InfernoDragon18. Active-not-active play. Not necessarily scum indicative, but not pro-town in my books. Hang 'em high.-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
Do you mean this one-liner in your post that was focused on attacking me? I can't find anything else in your ISO.In post 374, PvtUrist wrote:Replying to Post#372 - So, shit I've already talked about (yes)
In fact, one of the things I earlier pointed out that was scummy about you is you jumped in with Vorkuta to vote ID18 without providing any of your own justification. What did you already talk about?In post 301, PvtUrist wrote:Inferno repeats shit town already agrees on. Apparently that's enough to be town-lean, according to FC.
What was your goal in post #374?-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
Wait... so we need an absolute majority? I thought that was for hammering. You're saying if everyone voted and the top contender had 3 votes, it's a no-lynch?In post 386, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:Well, it seems like votes are all over the place, with 3 not even voting at all. This is a problem, because it takes 5 to lynch and with only 6 voting, it’s going to be hard to not end the day with a NL.-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
Welcome, pinturicchio.In post 393, pinturicchio wrote:Oh, hi
There's been some discussion about your predecessor's alignment. How do you feel about the wagon on you?-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
Please... please god no. This game is so absurdly long. We have 17 pages of DAY ONE TEXT. Whoever replaces nonny can catch up during the night phase. Or just modkill nonny.In post 415, PvtUrist wrote:@Moderator "Chad "Big Lips" Schadd", agreeing for deadline extension here.-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
Alright, so I did some analysis yesterday of some of the lurkers to try and get a better grasp on who they were.
volxen
I actually turned around my read of volxen. I know TW says not to read into absences and such, but I don't agree. As human beings, none of what we do is random - even if we don't understand the motivation. I noticed that volxen has two games on his wiki, one as town doctor and one as town cop, and he was active in the (completed/dead) thread of a game where he played as mafia. I didn't dig to figure out if he'd been in other games, but in theory, volxen may have drawn vanilla town here and as such not a felt a big commitment to the game. Some people are like that. I'm effectively saying that volxen is a "Timmy" as per the Magic: The Gathering player-type theory: he only wants to play the biggest roles. I'm backing this up with the fact that volxen was never actually inactive on this website, just inactive in our game.
As a result, I'm inclined not to lynch pinturicchio. (I'm also disinclined to do so because we have better targets. My original vote was just to stir some activity from volxen.)
UNVOTE: volxen UNVOTE: pinturicchio
YyottaCat
Yyotta has a completed micro under her belt. There's another game I want to draw on, but unfortunately it's live. Suffice to say: YyottaCat is a total wild card. Yyotta is basically destined to be lynched unless she changes her play style to be more... understandable to other players. If Yyotta is mafia, town is okay. If Yyotta is town, the unfortunate thing is that Yyotta is very unlikely to be an NK target; even if Yyotta is a PR, it's incredibly unlikely she'll be able to bring town along with her information. It would be hard to trust any hard claims she makes. But I guess we'd at least know her claims were true if she was lynched or NK'ed and flipped PR.
There's really no good option when it comes to someone who plays as ineffably as YyottaCat. The longer the game goes on, the more suspicious I am of her original scum-slip/not-slip, but I think it's on balance probably meaningless - just as everything else she says is. She's also received a lot of coaching already in this thread, and her refusal to change could be scum-indicative... but again, I think, on balance, it tells us nothing except that she is perhaps more of a social gamer.
Slight scum-read overall but would not feel great lynching her now.
Jumble
By far the most interesting dig. I jumped to their oldest game, Newbie 1866. Here's Jumble's ISO: viewtopic.php?t=76047&f=50&st=0&sk=t&sd ... er_sort=Go
The thing that's interesting about Jumble here is that they actually make several aggressive comments, and also several that are just more active. Jumble has only made, by my reckoning, one aggressive post so far in this game (which I'll discuss more below). But for example, look at this clip from Jumble in 1866 (post #353): "No, you're the one with the burden of proof. If you don't give a reason for your posts being of substance, then why should I believe you?" This is totally behavioural analysis and I could be wrong, but... that is not the voice of Jumble I've heard in this game here! Posts number 343, 351, 246 and 145 all have a level of engagement that I don't see Jumble taking in our game. In 1866, Jumble flipped PR.
So, I think we should lynch Jumble, and here's some analysis of why I think that's the best option:
This is that aggressive post I've mentioned above. I've been confused about this since the very beginning. Why does Jumble become righteously indignant about this? In the conversations that follow, nonny seems pretty reasonable, and I read into this that scum!Jumble may be trying to shade nonny for an easy wagon.In post 23, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:
Was voting for YyottaIn post 22, nonny wrote:VOTE: YyottaCat even this early it’s little quick to put someone at L-2 (meaning two more votes and it’s a lynch, day is over). Did you know this would be the case when you voted?
reallynessasary?
Also, if we lynch Jumble and they flip scum, there's an easy lynch of YyottaCat.
This post has the same problem that ID18's posts have. It's repetitious of what other players say. I also have to feel like Jumble may be reacting to the pressure they experienced when we started to wagon them, and is trying to compensate by posting a "reads list." The fact that Jumble is unable to supply their own original analysis or thoughts suggests they are just trying to go along and be under the radar. Under the Vorkuta Directive, this is a lynchable offense.In post 378, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:Seems like everyone is doing an activelist right now; may as well throw in my own ideas.
MOST ACTIVE
TW/Vorkuta/Pvt (at this point they’re considered active enough to not need any further ranking)
Foodcoats (doesn’t have the best posting rate but compensates with more substance per post)
NotAJumbleOfNumbers (honestly, i haven’t been the most active all game)
Nonny (until you follow up on your promise, I’m not putting you any higher)
Yyotta (posts are confusing, hasn’t posted much substance)
Volxen (has the second lowest post count)
Inferno (has clearly posted the least all game and didn’t really bring anything new to the table)
LEAST ACTIVE
Jumble pushes to lynch here. Right after this post, they push ID18 (presumably knowing that Vorkuta and I scumread ID), and also throw themselves out as a lynch option. Again, I think there's a psychological thing where scum will say things like "I could be scum!" that townies just never say. I think they do it to try to defuse tension because they lack confidence in their own town-image and the simplest thing to appeal to is reverse psychology. They also slightly later jump on the volxen wagon with TW and I.In post 386, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:Well, it seems like votes are all over the place, with 3 not even voting at all. This is a problem, because it takes 5 to lynch and with only 6 voting, it’s going to be hard to not end the day with a NL. I (along with others who have suggested the same thing before) suggest that we should lynch the least active and least game-advancing players. Yes, I know I’m a bit on the lurky side too, but if you want to vote me, you can do that.
Also, I'm also not inherently inclined to lynch lurkers, even if we want to threaten them to generate activity. In general, I think mafia have higher stakes - they can't afford to die the way townies can - and so will, in fact, tend to lurk less; they'll prefer active-lurking, like we've seen Jumble do.
Obviously, I wanted to hear Jumble's defense. This is a super weak reply. Jumble was quite active during this line of questioning, but they put very little effort into the thread at this point to help solve the game. Slightly before or after this, they also make a point about how they aren't afraid of L-2, but I'm not sure if this is consistent with the original battle they had with nonny about putting people at L-2.In post 341, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:
An OH COME ON post, followed by an attempt to defend myself.In post 340, foodcoats wrote:
Humour us. What would you say if Yyotta voted for you right now?In post 339, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:
L-2 isn’t really that bad in my eyes. I’d only really get worried at L-1.In post 338, the worst wrote:Jumble, how do you feel about the votes on you?
In comparison, nonny sums up why their move on Yyotta in a much townier way:
There's no easy lynch in my opinion, but I think Jumble is the best option.In post 36, nonny wrote:This isn’t yyortacat’s first game, saw that before I voted. Pretty sure he knew about lynch numbers before voting. So wanted to find out if there was motivation.
TW: not really concern as such, saw it as opprutunity to start learning about players, better than the RVS only. Also, the new players (2 of them apparently) may not know lynching rules and possibly had a quick lynch which is not great way to start a game with no info. Yes, could have pointed this out without the vote but would not have gotten nearly as much in return.
VOTE: Jumble-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
Ah, didn't notice ID18 is also being replaced. Wow.In post 418, Vorkuta wrote:-pushing for a modkill = making scum life easier
-trying to make it impossible for town to come to an informed conclusion regarding the 3 (of which 2 aren't even announced and we don't know if they'll appear in the remaining 2 days) replaced in slots
I have to wonder if we'd have less dropouts if the game length wasn't a week long.-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
Welcome CheekyTeeky. Glad to have you! I've been in an echo chamber with Urist and Vorkuta for a few days now; we're like grumpy old men arguing Mets vs. Yankees or Star Trek vs. Star Wars or something. Suffice to say I don't have a lot more to add at this point, and I look forward to seeing what you and pintu (and the next sub - we still need one more I believe) think of the game.
Pintu, I've considered this line of thought as well, but I'm not convinced it's a good enough reason to lynch Yyotta. I'd rather try to lynch scum, or lynch someone who feels actively anti-town, than lynch someone who just isn't useful to town.In post 452, pinturicchio wrote: And finally Yvotta: too scummy to be scum is a thing, and I've read Yvotta in other games where she acted the same, so I trust her feeling of "seems like I'm always a scumlean", but c'mon... We should solve that slot this day when there's not much at risk, 'cause believe me, if I were scum, she would be one of my townreads until LyLo/MyLo and lynch the hell out of her.
VOTE: YvottaCat-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
This is an easy mark to make because they represent a lion's share of posts.In post 492, CheekyTeeky wrote:
Scratch that. Team is Vorkuta and PvtUrist. More confident in PvtUrist but interactions make the most sense as SvS out of Jumble/Vorkuta/PvtUrist.In post 157, PvtUrist wrote:UNVOTE: YyottaCat VOTE: NotAJumbleOfNumbers
Still no harsh evidence beyond basic hunches, bringing it up to L-2 to see if anything concrete comes up.
Also, I think PvtUrist is unlikely to be scum. Urist is tunneling me like a maniac, angry that I've destroyed all their arguments that I'm scum and they are unable to bring any more against me, but still not giving up their vendetta. scum!Urist would be in a really bad spot when I flipped town and I get the impression scum!Urist would be clever enough to understand they couldn't tunnel a townie this hard.-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
Thanks for bringing this back up Cheeky.In post 471, CheekyTeeky wrote:
Why do you keep promising this?In post 321, Vorkuta wrote:Proper and serious (color-coded) readlist will come in a bit, once more content shows up (although you guys probably already know where I stand on most things)
I leaned off my read on you earlier as I did appreciate your perspective that all the lurkers were possible scum and it was worth grilling them. But it's been a few days now and I don't think you've actually done anything that helps the rest of us actually understand your POE yet.@Vorkuta
Give to us thememesreads.-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
In post 421, YyottaCat wrote:foodcoats is currently townread for me
the worst is gone
nonny is gone
id18 is gone but that spot is scumlean
volxen is inactive
hope it's understandableCan you please give us a bit of a breakdown of why you read me as town and why you read the ID18 slot as scum? This will help us understand your logic and clear you as town.@YyottaCat-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
This larger interaction between nonny (i.e. you/Cheeky) and Jumble regarding Yyotta is why I think the scum team might actually be Jumble and Yyotta. Yikes. It's one of the only really "telling" interactions in the game thus far.In post 433, CheekyTeeky wrote:
WhiteKnighting scum?In post 29, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:
Newbies still might be getting used to the game and a single vote may be enough to scare them in some cases.In post 28, nonny wrote:Where’s the pressure? It was page 1 and 1 vote. The response is interesting
I'd rather lynch Jumble first because if we isolate Yyotta she is unlikely to sway town away from lynching her.-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
Yeah, I might be. I've tried to avoid going OMGUS on PvtUrist because I'm so obviously town (amirite?) that their continued attack on me is absurd. I've been sitting on doing Urist's ISO for a while because I want to do in an unbiased manner.In post 506, CheekyTeeky wrote:I feel like you're making too many assumptions to clear Urist.
His entire ISO is slimy and he's tunneling you like newb scum. Do you think he believes your wagon is going through? Because that's a pretty safe spot for scum to sit looking active. If you don't flip then he doesn't look any worse does he?-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
LOL. Give us that after a clear, concise reads list though.In post 508, Vorkuta wrote:
Expanding brain/mind format works for you?In post 504, foodcoats wrote:Give to us the memes-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
volxen / pinturrichio is the lead wagon right now!?!
Can someone explain to me what is actually scummy about that slot? I tried to turn up the heat on volxen to get some activity but I don't actually read a scum agenda there, other than pintu pushing hard to lynch Yyotta which I don't love. I believe Cheeky brought up some meta stuff but it's hard to weigh that without some in-game clues as well.-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
I had a vibe from nonny that they were town, never did an ISO because there was too little material, but with Cheeky subbing in I decided I should do one. Cheeky has kind of a stream-of-consciousness thing going that I tend to find difficult to read. I am inclined to fear Cheeky in the same way I fear TW: lots of questions that seem townie, but are potentially just good deep cover.
I'm guilty of trying to do my own meta-reads, but as an early post from Cheeky this looks scummy. I think meta stuff is useful when making tough decisions, but quickly painting someone from their vibe can be risky. At the very least it's not an argument I'm inclined to listen to unless I need that last bit of convincing one way or another.In post 457, CheekyTeeky wrote:Ok so to be a bit more transparent - I am familiar with Volxen and I don't believe her posting in this game is in line with her town meta. Pint can be a bit of this and that but I'm also familiar with him. He isn't this LAMIST as town and his posting is much more nuanced and on point unlike his reads here in his waffly catch up post. If you want me to break down his posts I will but pretty sure that slot is scum.
This seems scummy. I've said elsewhere I think that town should be more concerned with who is scum, not who is lynchable. But this may just be to prod Jumble and get a reaction.In post 502, CheekyTeeky wrote:
So tell me who you think is lynchable today?In post 500, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:It was an OMGUS vote, of course it wasn’t going to be well supported. Again, it was just venting.
I agree with the tone here - I think Urist in general is tunneling a lot and is struggling to allow people's arguments to sway them. But this is actually why I think Urist is town. Although, as Cheeky said elsewhere, I might be allowing myself to think that the people in this game are much more skilled than they are. scum!Urist could think that sustained attack is the best way to get mislynches.In post 653, CheekyTeeky wrote:Now it's interesting that you (PvtUrist) ignore the way I've been sorting, all my content and instead rely on my read on you to hinge your read on me upon. It is not on me to sort myself for you, the onus is on you. Why does your read on me depend entirely on my read of you?
But in terms of what this says about Cheeky: I think her reaction is townie. She's annoyed that she put in work to do a read and Urist just ignores it. I think scum!Cheeky would try a new tack instead of sustaining the disagreement with Urist and standing by her previous post.
The read list gives us a trail and lets us compare notes as town, so I like this.In post 655, CheekyTeeky wrote:Ok I'm done irritating you all here are my actual reads...
I lean towards Cheeky being town.-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
On to URAP2. I originally read ID18 as town but had them re-evaluated to scum, based on discussing the issue with Vorkuta and a second take at their ISO. ID18 was parroting and wasn't evolving their reads.
URAP2 actually does not look much better...
I think this is the most substantial post by URAP2 and it seems mostly focused on diffusing Cheeky's attack. I do, however, like the arguments to read Cheeky as scum.In post 559, u r a person 2 wrote:Actually, let's table the discussion on YY.
Cheeky, a narrative
>Comes in to thread hot. Calls half the game scum in her first few posts, and throws shade on a couple of others.
>Doesn't provide reasoning, which is not a scumtell by itself
>Repeatedly calls into question the actions of Vortuka. This accounts for a large percentage of her posts but does not result in a vote at any point - including her most recent post in which she claims to prefer his lynch today.
>Attempts to control the course of the game during my entrance. Wants to talk about her topic of choice on her timetable. An active wolf attempts to steer the game, and a new player is a new variable that must be controlled for. Town, conversely, has a tendency to step back and absorb the new information.
>Further, when I pushed back against her aggression, she backed off. Such an aggressive town player will often (though not always) push harder in response. I don't expect scum voting and aiming to mislynch pin to push for a fight.
all pop psych, of course. But isn't that why we play?
URAP2's history so far is mostly filler posts like this, and I believe they are made up to bolster this notion URAP2 is trying to sell: I am friendly, therefore I am town. It's true that charisma is a great weapon in this game, but it's absolutely NAI. This sounds like an argument that is trying to gather up the allegiance of some of the more easily-convinced players. This goes along with URAP2's relatively high volume of banter, like asking about the weather. Perhaps I am a terrible person for scum-leaning on URAP2 for being polite and convivial, but I think it's more that there isIn post 626, u r a person 2 wrote:From a meta standpoint, friendliness should be town read (def not scum read at least) if for no other reason than as a quality of life improvement. That's a convo for another time.too much politenessto be townie.
This is the only other scum-read I really think URAP2 is clear on, but it's just agreeing with someone else's assessment. If I have any hope of being consistent, this is the same thing we were nailing ID18 for. It's funny that URAP2 says Jumble made a smooth scum distraction, because it seems like this post may be a smooth scum distraction.In post 643, u r a person 2 wrote:wait hold on are we saying that jumble got
> called scum
> claimed an omgus vote because they were frustrated their extra effort wasn't paying dividends
>completely avoids original reason they were being scumread to begin with
that's a smooth scum distraction and I would be jelly of such skills
I lean scum on URAP2 / ID18.-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
Just did a read of pin. Like I said I never really leaned scum on volxen, I just had difficulty trying to figure them out and was grasping for straws - this game was totally dead for a while.
This sounds townie to me. I think scum are thinking more short term: they need to survive the day and get a mislynch. Town wants that more long-term view because they know a mislynch is basically inevitable and they want to be ready to deduce more from a mislynch when it happens. pin is more experienced I guess so they could be cleverly inserting the idea of solving into their posts, but this crops up in future posts too. pin is kind of taking a wide lens, trying to solve the whole game, that I think it is harder for scum to do.In post 463, pinturicchio wrote:
Yvotta disengaging any kind of interaction seems to come from scum. She's a wild card, but I've seen her as town being more confrontational. Also, I have a pretty solid townbloc right now, I think that by getting one more solid townread this game would be solved, but Yvotta is a hazard to that win by being LyLo material if we do get to that worst case scenario. I'm scumreading Vorkuta more than Yvotta, but as I said, we should solve that slot right now and not leave it 'till the end. And by solving I don't mean necessarily lynching her, but she needs to step up if she's actually town.In post 461, CheekyTeeky wrote:Pint talk about your vote, it will help.
I actually really like this quote here. It reinforces my feeling that pin really is interested in solving. They are trying to lock together a bunch of pieces like a puzzle. That's a townie approach. I think you can contrast this directly to Vorkuta, who is getting a lot of scum reads because they are doing the direct opposite, constantly breaking the puzzle and flipping the table.In post 472, pinturicchio wrote:
No, you're misreping me badly. I said that with one more townread it would be solved, and obviously that's from my pov, I would have to convince everyone else in my townbloc that the rest of them are town too. So no, I don't think I've solved it, and also you're mixing two different things in one. You're just not reading what I say at all at this point. So voting her for pressure is not a fair way of voting? I always do that, and has always worked for me. And IN THAT SAME POST I explained that Yvotta HAS scum equity; you're just tunneling.In post 468, CheekyTeeky wrote:
I mean like here you're hedgy as hell. "I think I've solved it but need to get rid of Yyotta as a hazard" "doesn't mean I want to lynch her" But you're voting her?? Why not vote the people you've PoE'd it down to if you're pretty confident on your town reads instead of advocating a policy lynch which in your logic will lead us to one less mislynch in future? You're going about it all wrong, If you were town you should be pushing people with high scum equity - not lylo liabilities D1.In post 463, pinturicchio wrote:
Yvotta disengaging any kind of interaction seems to come from scum. She's a wild card, but I've seen her as town being more confrontational. Also, I have a pretty solid townbloc right now, I think that by getting one more solid townread this game would be solved, but Yvotta is a hazard to that win by being LyLo material if we do get to that worst case scenario. I'm scumreading Vorkuta more than Yvotta, but as I said, we should solve that slot right now and not leave it 'till the end. And by solving I don't mean necessarily lynching her, but she needs to step up if she's actually town.In post 461, CheekyTeeky wrote:Pint talk about your vote, it will help.
I think scum would be very tempted to take the opportunity here to bias URAP2's position. This makes me feel that pin is legitimately more interested in hearing what URAP2 has to say than in pushing their own agenda - which is in line with town, who don't have all the information and so need to hear a variety of perspectives to solve the game.In post 537, pinturicchio wrote:
I call myself Pin for short so that's ok.In post 531, u r a person 2 wrote:Pin - I'm going to call you Pin because I'm trying to build a rapport with you - anything in this game you want to make sure I don't miss?
I actually don't like doing this since I'm slanted to my own interpretations and don't want to influence your opinion by saying what you should and shouldn't look. Try to read as much as you can and after that hit me up
Pretty good town lean on pin.-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
Yes Urist, my position has evolved over the course of the game.In post 672, PvtUrist wrote:In post 668, the worst wrote: Please show me what is between the lines
I don't understand why you made this postFCrefers to lynches as scum if they're not justified/looking for scum.
Previously votes on Vorkuta, saying "we need someone to lynch" without a good reason
ninja'd
Why hasn't yours? Is it because you already know who is town?-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
You tunneling me at the expense of any other consideration definitely does not benefit town.In post 688, PvtUrist wrote:"Does the this post's content truly benefits town, or does it solely improves one's position?"
Let's try another tack. Who do you think is scum with me?-
-
foodcoats
-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
I think I've been ignoring something for a few days because I've been stuck in an echo chamber with Urist and Vorkuta.In post 704, pinturicchio wrote:And one last thing: the magical thing to solve the game is a mechanic of the game that I didn't come up with. It's a fucking Nash equilibrium, a "proposed solution to a non-cooperative game". Basic strategy.
Both Urist and Vorkuta are more or less arguing that the townier you are, the more likely it is you are scum. They have different approaches - Urist is attacking me almost uniquely, and Vorkuta is attacking everyone (except they're pretty soft on Urist). But they have the same focus: distrust and disunity.
Maybe they are the scum team after all. I'll need to do new ISOs on both and then bring their threads together and compare their interaction tonight after work.-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
Vorkuta convinced me off her/his wagon a few days ago on the argument of, more or less, "would scum act this scummy?" As aggravating as she/he is, the approach of Vorkuta so far is to call everyone scum... and I'm not sure that's scummy.In post 751, CheekyTeeky wrote: I'd like to lynch U2 first with people keeping up with Vorkuta tomorrow.
What convinces you about her/him?-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
I will, I actually thought this was really townie - like if I'm going to die, town you should do this after my death... I tend to find town does this whereas mafia focus on not being killed:In post 755, u r a person 2 wrote:foodcoats, i'm reading you as town. Please do me a solid at some point in the next day.
Assume I'm town, and read cheeky's argument for my lynch in that light. i'm getting railroaded here.
Thanks mate <3
same to you, duck
In post 745, u r a person 2 wrote:also, if i am actually lynched today, throw out my reads on the worst and FC because they're sitting on prime scum seats on my wagon. decent bet one would be in the two-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
I'll have to look at that. I get the feeling Urist is really afraid and paranoid and I don't know if that's more newb town or scummy.In post 758, CheekyTeeky wrote: As a side note I found it quote scummy when Urist backed off his scumread of me - his line of questionning was an obvious lead up to a jump on my wagon, the hesitation after heavy emphasis on my scummy actions is worse than jumping on with no reason. I also disliked how he was engaging with Pint - Pint tried to offer him an olive branch by giving him another thing to interact about - his other scum reads and Urist said the interrogation is on you. That kind of viewpoint seems heavily defensive and shuts down Urist having to contribute instead of subtly attacking like I've witnessed him do earlier.-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
If URAP2/ID18 is scum I think Vork is basically clear.In post 764, the worst wrote:I would say Cheeky is scum before Vor, sure, but I don't think either of them are scum before you here.
at the airport now, I'll be around for a little before I need to leave. Lucky we've got a minute before the deadline. Anyone want to jam?
I wonder what our errant Cat and Jumble think.-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
-
-
foodcoats Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 240
- Joined: December 3, 2018
-