[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 10627606 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Newbie 1909 | Scheme | Over - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #12 (isolation #1) » Thu Dec 27, 2018 2:10 am
Postby Loopdan »
1. A couple years ago I played frequently. I took a hiatus and just came back.
2. As town I like to post often and seriously. I ask questions and pressure players who are inactive or anti-town. I'm not afraid to take a stand if I disagree with the way others are reading the game. Activity lessens if my RL is busy.
3. As scum I try to play my town-game.
4. This depends on the player, and I'd rather not give specific answers to this and help out scum who may be in their first game.
Post
Post #14 (isolation #3) » Thu Dec 27, 2018 2:23 am
Postby Loopdan »
In post 10, dicideaq wrote:1. I'm new
2.I guess I'd listen to everyone else and make no accusations.
3. I guess I'd stay quiet
4. I think scum usually puts a lot of accusations, whereas most town will be quiet
Wow talk about scum claiming in your first post! Get 'em boys.
Post
Post #63 (isolation #15) » Thu Dec 27, 2018 12:08 pm
Postby Loopdan »
In post 57, EGL wrote:Don't you think it would have been better to talk about what you perceived as a dicideaq scumslip rather than your self-voting?
Not really. There was no scumslip. I was just hoping to give an excuse for the other experienced players to pile on a newbie player for some pressure. Pretty sure they could tell that wasn't a serious vote. But newer players see me say I saw a scumclaim and want answers (like you did) or sometimes use it as an excuse to jump on a wagon. These are all helpful.
RVS is not very helpful (although I actually kinda like Teacher's questions). I like to take the game to unusual places to see how players respond. And here we are.
I mean I like to live dangerously and all but I feel that was too much and proving a point???? I’m past useful today but we should make sure there is a tomorrow et al.
Post
Post #83 (isolation #26) » Thu Dec 27, 2018 4:33 pm
Postby Loopdan »
If you didn't want me at L-1 because you feared a mislynch, why not unvote? If you wanted me lynched because you think I'm scum, why demand I unvote to get me off L-1?
And it also makes no sense that you'd insist I unvote myself but refuse to unvote me.
because there's so much sense in self-voting to l-1, right?
you're saying words but all i hear is "scum wouldnt do that, there for i'm town, right, guys? guys??"
I've never said or implied that scum wouldn't do this. In fact I'll make it clear: I've seen scum self-vote more often than town. But you are trying to change the subject instead of just explaining your thinking.
Post
Post #126 (isolation #34) » Fri Dec 28, 2018 7:16 am
Postby Loopdan »
In post 123, teacher wrote:I do scumread Dicideaq's answers to the question ,and I thought Dan did too
Yeah I did find dicideaq's answers (10) the worst of anybody's, but I obviously oversold it as a scumslip. Why was it bad? It looks like he is pre-emptively making excuses for not scum-hunting and saying that's what he thinks town would do.
And this naked vote isn't great, given there is much to talk about between dici's two posts.
Post
Post #129 (isolation #36) » Fri Dec 28, 2018 9:04 am
Postby Loopdan »
In post 124, Amzela wrote:@Teacher, is it kosher to vote yourself in RVS for shits and giggles or is that still really scummy?
I won't make you wait for Teacher to reply to get your answer. The answer is no, you shouldn't self-vote for shits and giggles. It's almost always anti-town.
Obviously I thought it would help me sort players, and it was still an RVS wagon, so I didn't think it would be harmful. I gave it some thought. For example, I wouldn't have put myself at L-1 if Teacher wasn't already on the wagon, because he had already said he was drinking heavily, and if he was scum he might have been able to get away with a "drunk-hammer." Yes, I've seen that happen.
One last note then I'm moving on from this... I would not have done it if I was the IC, because it really isn't something we should be encouraging newer players to emulate. Clem and I were once in a game where Hark (who was a newer player and was town) scum-claimed in his first post and it destroyed any hope of town finding each other day1.
Post
Post #172 (isolation #44) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 5:53 am
Postby Loopdan »
Child knew TTTT was my alt at least four hours before he posted 168, which means he had read post 137. But when he was typing 168 he somehow hadn't read 129 on the same page as 137.
Yet 168 looks like he is developing reads as he is going through the game post by post.
I think it's more likely he is manufacturing his reads in 168 than he legitimately only read post 137 on page 6.
Post
Post #190 (isolation #47) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 8:15 am
Postby Loopdan »
In post 184, EGL wrote:@loop How exactly does that prove Clemency isn't his partner again? Scummates will often try to distance themselves from one another in case one of them gets caught, won't they? And since you asked him to do it for that very reason... Are you thinking scum clem would follow along with your request in an attempt at passing as town?
I want some more votes on Child and Clem is the kind of player who isn't afraid to sheep (some people think this makes them look weak, but Clem is a memey player so I don't think he minds). The only insight it really provides is that it looks like his read changed on me, since I was his prior vote.
Post
Post #191 (isolation #48) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 8:20 am
Postby Loopdan »
In post 179, u r a person 2 wrote:Hey, I'm looking forward to playing with everyone. yadda yadda, I'm on the last day of my vacation and doing an 18 hour drive tomorrow so I'm going to semi active and then I'm going to be not at all active and then I'm going to be active.
Jumping right in, can you give me the full walk through here because I'm trying to see what you're talking about and I'm not.
In post 172, Loopdan wrote:Child knew TTTT was my alt at least four hours before he posted 168, which means he had read post 137. But when he was typing 168 he somehow hadn't read 129 on the same page as 137.
I'll try explaining it the other way around.
Child came into the game and immediately said hi TTTT (one of my alts). Teacher is like how'd you know that so quick have you been following the game? Child is like yeah bro I skimmed it. Then 4 hours later Child posts a play-by-play of the game which shows him developing his reads, and replying to other's posts, and not realizing what I was doing with the L-1 self-vote... until he gets to a post on page 6 where I explained it, and he's like damn bro you got me! But I had mentioned I was TTTT a couple posts above that post on page 6, so if he's already read that page why is he acting like he is developing these reads in his play-by-play.
Post
Post #211 (isolation #53) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 10:53 am
Postby Loopdan »
In post 205, u r a person 2 wrote:I don't know your personality, loopdan, but that early self-vote like its cousin the scum-claim has to come more often from scum than town, right?
I don't know if self-voting is more likely to come from scum or not when it's early like that. Scum does self-vote more than town but it's usually the hammer. To be fair, if a new player came in and did what I did, I would probably be all over them until/unless they explained a motive that was consistent with their actions and were playing in a way that made me believe they would do something like that.
In post 130, Loopdan wrote:Amzela's 124 is not what I expected. I mean that in a good way.
I'm still trying to figure out what this means. What?
It looked like a towney post.
In post 213, Amzela wrote:
-- Loop as... scum lean?
>> really, really didn't like that self-vote, no matter how you slice n' dice it. 87 feels like a weird defense against Clem. 129 is an agreement, but I still don't get the whole thing about Teacher drunk hammering and how that would help town.
I was just saying that if Teacher wasn't on my wagon already I wouldn't have put myself at L-1. I said that because I wanted people to realize I wasn't being careless, as I tried to think through the possible outcomes.
In post 213, Amzela wrote:
The aggression towards Child seems unwarranted, explaining below.
So do you think unwarranted aggression is more likely to be scum than town?
In post 213, Amzela wrote:
On top of that the 210 push on Teacher to comment on Dici's L-1 instead of IC-posting feels weird. I get that may be an "is Teacher actually town or no?" line of questioning.
You are going to have to get used to people asking questions that aren't nice and/or polite. It's how alignments are sorted. If you are town here, I'm kinda worried that all scum will have to do is befriend you and you'll be in their pocket.
In post 213, Amzela wrote:Mama-Amz would be angry because I have a feeling Dici's scared/on holiday. On the other hand, I also reeeeeeeally wanna hammer this too because I'm bad at reading people as well.
This and the rest of your commentary on dici reads really scummy to me.
If dici flips red, this looks like the partner
Amzela in this post: I really scum read him, too, but he's probably just newb!town but I really want to hammer him because I'm bad at reading people.
Post
Post #227 (isolation #57) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 2:34 pm
Postby Loopdan »
@Teach, just to be clear I'm not saying you should have made an IC post about protocol for L-1s. I was just surprised to see you post after the L-1 vote without saying anything about the possible lynch of dici. You were the first vote on him after all, so I'm curious how that wagon forming up on an absent player works for you.
Post
Post #255 (isolation #58) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 5:15 pm
Postby Loopdan »
For whatever it's worth I'm not a big fan of "one on, one off." Yes, it's probably true the majority of the time on day1 in Newbie Q games, but there are exceptions and I'd advise not gambling a lynch on it being true, especially with lurkers who aren't voting.