VOTE: dann
You just made a critical mistake I'll tell you post game serious vote.
VOTE: dann
VOTE: random nurseIn post 14, Dannflor wrote:In post 11, Random Nurse in this game wrote: I wonder what kind of heat Scum's packing this game.In post 11, Random Nurse in Mini Normal 2317 wrote: I'm surprised there's an IC in this game, so Scum is probably packing heat?
VOTE: KeyLaga
VOTE: Random Nurse
Mans started cooking out the gate. Are you just reading the thread and assuming everyone is telling the truth? Because what I quoted can't be interpreted in any meaningful way and what I said should therefore be known to be an rvs vote plus I was seeing what damn would say. Trying to solve the game here. are you? Tsk tsk. Egmeoy good doctorIn post 20, Doctor Drew wrote:What happened to the critical mistake?In post 12, Political Clout wrote:VOTE: dann
You just made a critical mistake I'll tell you post game serious vote.
Lol I like that thanks.In post 26, Doctor Drew wrote:I read this like you just did a line of coke before posting this.In post 23, Political Clout wrote:Mans started cooking out the gate. Are you just reading the thread and assuming everyone is telling the truth? Because what I quoted can't be interpreted in any meaningful way and what I said should therefore be known to be an rvs vote plus I was seeing what damn would say. Trying to solve the game here. are you? Tsk tsk. Egmeoy good doctorIn post 20, Doctor Drew wrote:What happened to the critical mistake?In post 12, Political Clout wrote:VOTE: dann
You just made a critical mistake I'll tell you post game serious vote.
You good homie?
Damn, you're old.In post 27, Psyche wrote: clout pls this is our first game together how will we be able to savor it when your posts read like a mesh between boomhauer from king of the hill and one of the spies from spy vs spy
VOTE: political clout
He caught you fair and square no taksie backsies.In post 31, Random Nurse wrote:In post 28, Doctor Drew wrote:I was talking about Dann's vote on you vs my vote on Psyche.In post 25, Random Nurse wrote:In post 19, Doctor Drew wrote:Wouldn't you rather have some sort of reasoning behind the vote instead of just randomly voting Psyche for no reason?In post 15, Random Nurse wrote:In post 14, Dannflor wrote:In post 11, Random Nurse in this game wrote: I wonder what kind of heat Scum's packing this game.In post 11, Random Nurse in Mini Normal 2317 wrote: I'm surprised there's an IC in this game, so Scum is probably packing heat?
VOTE: KeyLaga
VOTE: Random Nurse
That'syour reasoning for voting me this game?
Who does that?
I haven't voted for anyone this game.
Would you prefer more rvs shit posting instead of votes with reasoning behind it?
I'm saying he's reaching, and I'm not sure if it comes from paranoid-Town or something else. I don't necessarily Scumread Dann for pulling that out of the butt, but I'll be monitoring what else is said. As for my past Scum post I don't even remember that post, and as Dann will realize post-game coincidences do exist.
I liked the joke lol.In post 33, Psyche wrote: it’s settled my political clout scumread is sincere and now im not allowed to attempt any more jokes for the rest of the game
Just tell me post game lmaoIn post 38, Psyche wrote: im genuinely seriouss
literally every post so far pings me
in line with tradition ill explain ex posto facto in a few pages
Make it make sense.
Two scum reads already and no vote :^)
I agreeIn post 97, Hu Tao wrote: It was a good vote imo. No regrets there and would do it again
UNVOTE:In post 103, Hu Tao wrote: VOTE: NotAScum
I think this is my preferred vote.
I also think I'm more weary of scum being off that wagon. Scum knew RN was town so they probably soft defended to gain townie points
One has nothing to do with the other.In post 105, Hu Tao wrote:You agree but vote me? SusIn post 99, Political Clout wrote:I agreeIn post 97, Hu Tao wrote: It was a good vote imo. No regrets there and would do it again
That doesn't follow with what happened in thread.In post 123, Naerys wrote:I wrote that scum wants to oust town PRs. They didnt know that RN is PR, but they ganged up on a townie to force him to claim.In post 119, Hu Tao wrote: How would scum know RN was a pr? This makes no sense.
I'll keep that in mind then. I just meant it under the workday definition I guess. Starting stuff. A better thing would be how you define you are doing it.In post 127, Klick wrote: What does being an 'instigator' mean
Under some definitions of that word that's definitely something I'm doing but I view it as a pro-town force
Gotcha gotcha hmmmmm. If that's just how you play that might have been what pinged me. I think I might move on then when more people check in.In post 134, Klick wrote: I'm generally posting with the intent of producing a gamestate that will accurately sort people into town and scum
Part of that is posting stuff that provokes reactions
I liked you going after rn showed chutzpah. I liked it. Am I wrong?In post 137, Dannflor wrote: why am i town political clout
Not to this extent no. Am I wrong?In post 141, Dannflor wrote:do you have the idea that i wouldn't show chutzpah as scum?In post 138, Political Clout wrote:I liked you going after rn showed chutzpah. I liked it. Am I wrong?In post 137, Dannflor wrote: why am i town political clout
If you want more insight you have to post more. Specifically what you're thinking and why you're doing something.In post 147, Dannflor wrote:i've been pretty reserved in my posting so far and i think it's reasonable to assume my initial push on RN may have had nefarious intentions, so it feels mildly TMI to try to build a town coalition with me in itIn post 142, Klick wrote: @Dann can I get a decent summary of what you're currently thinking about Political Clout
i hoped PC's reason for town reading me would be something a little deeper than that I "showed chutzpah" because i'm not sure that's alignment indicative unless you have very specific meta on a player
93 and 125 both feel kind of performative in how they are written
im wary of the way 126 is trying to take control of the gamestate
that's about the extent of my thoughts so far
In post 158, Psyche wrote: from the feeling so threatened by a page 3 wagon that you burn a PR to the selfvote+"Eliminate me and vote her out tomorrow!" the whole playerlist seems awfully melodramatic this game
In post 161, Psyche wrote:that's really dumb! why would anyone agree to that? has an entire town ever agreed to that?In post 159, Hu Tao wrote: It is worth the sacrifice to get 1 scum out the game. But only if it is agreed that she is the elimination tomorrow
This is all just fluff.In post 162, Psyche wrote: 9 times out of 10 the person who is mislimmed D1 is completely forgotten and ignored past the first page of D2. i feel like you must have been in enough games by now to know this
No idea what this meansIn post 183, NotAScum wrote:https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Self-votingIn post 155, Hu Tao wrote: I'm so confident Naerys flips scum this game. Eliminate me and vote her out tomorrow. I agree with this.
VOTE: hu tao
She's contradicting herself. She does this as scum. She literally I'd saying the thing she did as town last game is now scummy when I do it.
VOTE: Hu Tao
So just to be clear you caught naerys multiple times with this or is this all in just one game?In post 188, Hu Tao wrote:In post 52, Naerys wrote: Kinda tempted to troll hammer tbhIn post 53, Naerys wrote::lol:This is Naerys reaction as town when it was E-1 on page 3 in last game. Drastically different this game. I wonder why? :giggle:In post 55, Naerys wrote: My fingers are itching
Maybe you're right is the correct word filler then? It looked like you wanted to say something but didn't know what to say but wanted to post, and just made 3 posts about nothing. Where could that theoretical conversation with hu tao possibly go, nowhere.In post 211, Psyche wrote:none of those posts were fluffIn post 182, Political Clout wrote:In post 158, Psyche wrote: from the feeling so threatened by a page 3 wagon that you burn a PR to the selfvote+"Eliminate me and vote her out tomorrow!" the whole playerlist seems awfully melodramatic this gameIn post 161, Psyche wrote:that's really dumb! why would anyone agree to that? has an entire town ever agreed to that?In post 159, Hu Tao wrote: It is worth the sacrifice to get 1 scum out the game. But only if it is agreed that she is the elimination tomorrowThis is all just fluff.In post 162, Psyche wrote: 9 times out of 10 the person who is mislimmed D1 is completely forgotten and ignored past the first page of D2. i feel like you must have been in enough games by now to know this
What was your conclusionIn post 227, Psyche wrote: i knew what i wanted to say and said exactly all those things. that conversation w hu tao was probing the rationale and/or sincerity behind the self vote.
In post 158, Psyche wrote:from the feeling so threatened by a page 3 wagon that you burn a PR to the selfvote+"Eliminate me and vote her out tomorrow!" the whole playerlist seems awfully melodramatic this game[1]
In post 159, Hu Tao wrote: It is worth the sacrifice to get 1 scum out the game. But only if it is agreed that she is the elimination tomorrow
In post 160, Hu Tao wrote:Different things. I agree he shouldn't have done that on e-2 3 pages in. But in the last game I was in with him, i was hammered on page 3. So I get his reasoning for doing so if he felt the need to. Also Naerys was also in that game which is why her reasoning makes 0 senseIn post 158, Psyche wrote: from the feeling so threatened by a page 3 wagon that you burn a PR to the selfvote+"Eliminate me and vote her out tomorrow!" the whole playerlist seems awfully melodramatic this game
In post 161, Psyche wrote:In post 159, Hu Tao wrote: It is worth the sacrifice to get 1 scum out the game. But only if it is agreed that she is the elimination tomorrowthat's really dumb! why would anyone agree to that? has an entire town ever agreed to that?[2]
1. no intent other than to vent from my point of viewIn post 162, Psyche wrote:9 times out of 10 the person who is mislimmed D1 is completely forgotten and ignored past the first page of D2. i feel like you must have been in enough games by now to know this[3]
am I making a mountain out of a molehill? If i am lmk I can move on and take what you said at face valueIn post 227, Psyche wrote: i knew what i wanted to say and said exactly all those things.that conversation w hu tao was probing the rationale and/or sincerity behind the self vote.
a bit hyperbolic imo. essentially you don't believe hu tao was emotional you think there was nefarious reasons and that's why you engaged when you did to find hidden intent. your read so far is mixed or it is contradictory. Why is your read ambivalent i.e. mixed or contradictory? what has hu tao done that on the one hand I assume makes you town read them and on the other scum read them.In post 236, Psyche wrote: i still can't understand how someone w hu tao's professed beliefs/personality exists in this world. it's a very incoherent sequence set in between an otherwise clear-thinking iso. when the read is not ambivalent, i'll announce it like a normal person.
I'm willing to let it go and say I was wrong if you answer what side that interaction landed hu tao in more scum or more town and why?In post 264, Psyche wrote: clout's post is too big for me to reply from mobile. just gonna say i think it's bunk and full of misreadings
Fair point imoIn post 276, Naerys wrote:? you said i might be scum and then started to "prove" it so i dont see anything falseIn post 275, Hu Tao wrote: Well this is just false
You think I'm wrong?
You extrapolated that from 5 posts?In post 657, Psyche wrote: again, my case isn't that NAS was wrong about what the wiki says.
my case is that NAS lied about how
1) he came to believe self-voting is scummy and
2) why he decided to vote for hu tao.
Might actually be the best vote imo
My bad apologies. Fixed now I think.In post 825, Aristeia wrote:my pronouns are she/herIn post 816, Political Clout wrote: don't mind them guys they drank some hatorade this morning. I was thinking it might be she way back when I made my dumb prediction post at work because I had nothing better to do then someone quoted wait dr. drew I think that would scum make that post and quoted she like idk third post or something I'm hard guessing. but klick also quoted it way back. anyways I was thinking nah scum don't make that post. then I was thinking I haven't seen she then I started reading back and saw that she were going after gera now. It felt WEIRD. that's where I'm at with she.
if you have questions for me you can just ask me
No shotIn post 922, Dannflor wrote: if i were to put together a reads list, it would look something like this:
{Klick, kayjayqueue, hu tao}
{Psyche, davesaz, naerys}
{aristeia}
{NotAScum, Titus}
{Political Clout, geraintm}
Alright they're scum checkmate atheists.In post 926, Dannflor wrote:the post seems to stem more from PC wanting to show off their natural stream of consciousness thought process than having a genuine read on aristea that PC wants to shareIn post 816, Political Clout wrote: don't mind them guys they drank some hatorade this morning. I was thinking it might be aristea way back when I made my dumb prediction post at work because I had nothing better to do then someone quoted wait dr. drew I think that would scum make that post and quoted aristea lke idk third post or something I'm hard guessing. but klick also quoted it way back. anyways I was thinking nah scum don't make that post. then I was thinking I haven't seen them then I started reading back and saw that they were going after gera now. It felt WEIRD. that's where I'm at with aristea.
Me not wanting to share which way I'm leaning is completely fair in that situation. Since I am ultimately unsure. You're nitpicking.In post 929, Dannflor wrote: yeah no shot
My point still stands. You're definitely nitpicking.In post 931, Dannflor wrote: that's not my issue with that post
LolIn post 933, Dannflor wrote: you're nitpicking and biased bai bai
Alright let's say I agree with you. And let's say that a statical analysis was done and it was determined yes that post was performative. I ask you to what end? To not to give a read on her? Gun to my head she is probably scum. Because the whole point of the being performative was that you wanted to make your next contention that I didn't want to give a read on her. Which imo was your main point. So where are we now I gave you my read on herIn post 935, Dannflor wrote: i don't think it's nitpicking to read a post as performative
How are people even seeing these things. I'm baffled. No way you can extrapolate that from this small of an interaction with Dann.In post 936, Hu Tao wrote: Last game I played with PC they were giving way more reads and were more engaged than whatever they are doing now. I can see some partner equity in Dann based on how they converse but that's a small read. I'd be fine with PC today
Fair enough you got me.In post 940, Hu Tao wrote: I'm psychic
In what way contrived.In post 942, Hu Tao wrote: It just feels contrived, but that could be you just being scum.
Because we went from both of us might be scum to only me being scum. Sounds like your mind isn't made up in fact as Dann would say this whole post seems performative.In post 942, Hu Tao wrote: It just feels contrived, but that could be you just being scum.
To be continued.In post 947, Hu Tao wrote:In post 936, Hu Tao wrote: Last game I played with PC they were giving way more reads and were more engaged than whatever they are doing now. I can see some partner equity in Dann based on how they converse but that's a small read. I'd be fine with PC today
sounds like you might have known all along tbh.In post 905, Klick wrote:In post 861, Random Nurse wrote: And there was like NO resistance to my fail wagon until I played Uno Reverse card.Klick enters the chat
you're right. I misread.In post 947, Hu Tao wrote:In post 936, Hu Tao wrote: Last game I played with PC they were giving way more reads and were more engaged than whatever they are doing now. I can see some partner equity in Dann based on how they converse but that's a small read. I'd be fine with PC today
VOTE: aristeia for the omgus