[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 5323066 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Open 529 -- Picking Simplicity -- Game Over - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #467 (isolation #1) » Mon Sep 30, 2013 6:52 am
Postby Maenara »
Terry Pratchett wrote:'Multiple exclamation marks,' he went on, shaking his head, 'are a sure sign of a diseased mind.'
Still, humor me. I may or may not be reading the thread, and in doing so, I may or may not interpret your no-doubt authoritative opinions incorrectly. So tell me, based on what you think right this moment: Why lynch the people on your list?
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #470 (isolation #2) » Mon Sep 30, 2013 7:14 am
Postby Maenara »
You do acknowledge that not contributing by means of engaging in theory discussion is anti-Town behavior, Wake88? You DO want people to give reads and not activeLurk, right?
Cases. Please.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #479 (isolation #4) » Mon Sep 30, 2013 8:03 am
Postby Maenara »
Consistent with the fact that he's roleclaimed and not voted at all, then.
Fine.
VOTE: Aptil.
10 days without moving your RVS vote? Really?
P-EDIT:
Okay, listen, I'm going to be nice here, m'kay?
Stop that there. Right now. I mean, really, it's pitiful - What, you're trying to take control of town, and you haven't even cast a bloody vote? You
intend
to be lynched? Nobody but a bloody jester should
intend
to get lynched, that's against the bloody site rules, and there isn't any jester in this game. And claiming? Honestly, that does nothing but make it easier for the
two
night-kills to hit a bloody PR.
Keep it up and I'll support bloody policy lynching you.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #521 (isolation #7) » Mon Sep 30, 2013 5:38 pm
Postby Maenara »
How is voting for Wake bad? He posts nothing but this incessant drivel; adding nothing to the game and cluttering it up beyond repair. He's not producing anything for town, he's not even voting, and if we let him live, he'll just go on to LyLo, because scum sure as hell aren't gonna kill him. And what'll we do if he's scum himself, or a SK? Just go "Oh, well, he's just Wake being a VI; better not waste a lynch there"? That's exactly how you allow scum to coast.
Seriously, this is, like, a textbook example of "When to Policy Lynch".
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #527 (isolation #8) » Tue Oct 01, 2013 3:06 am
Postby Maenara »
Right, so nobody is actually doing anything right now. Just an awful lot of "Hey you other people should be active". So screw that, Imma spout some bull and see if y'all react.
First of all, lynch Wake88. Not "please do this", not "do this for reasons". Just do it. I've already said why, and policy lynches are bloody
necessary
, both for the sake of this individual game - not letting him live to LyLo, not having a cop waste an investigation on him - and for the sake of improving play on the site in general. VIs are not supposed to be allowed to just lollygag.
SO, we're not doing that, though, are we? No, we're not, because nobody ever bloody policy lynches. Instead, let's take a look at the other wagons, if only so
someone
will finally say
something
.
Skull, first. Ain't seeing it, to be honest. Too much actual content to be likely scum, and their being voted for seems to be 96% abrasiveness, 4% legit suspicion. Dumb wagon, opportunistic, and with nothing to really press for. Bad.
Don, I'm honestly seeing as much the same. Now, mind you, I'm not actually
reading
either of their posts, because, honestly, who is? Too much stuff there, and it's dated by now. Gut feel is a bit more scummy than Skull, but I can't point to any other reason than lack of capital letters, which isn't particularly sound. I'll slot him as 'null, leaning town', for now. COntent, at the very least, is a good thing.
Elle... Yeah, I guess I can see that. Still a lot of content - Gee, I'm sensing a pattern in this here town's past voting habits - but honestly, a lot of it is just basically saying "So what do you think", which is a really useful way to seem useful and townie without ever committing to anything. Hint: Don't. Not gonna vote for you, 'cause you'll either keep this rate up, in which case your alignment should just get all that much clearer later on, or you'll start being inconsistent, which is nice and scummy in itself.
Skullduggery wrote:If there are enough people who are on-board with policy lynching Wake88, you will have my support.
Pseudo-Voting Time!
Happy fun-times all around, kids! The magical pirate ship has sailed into our airport, and while the EMTs carry away the bodies, it is time to decide
if
that
we want to lynch its dear captain!
Here are the rules: Everyone, within their next three posts, decides whether or not Wake88 needs to walk the metaphorical plank. Available choices are "Yes", "No", and, indeed, "Blank", but the choice needs to be explicit, kids, or the frustration-fairy will drop by and pull out your teeth through your toes. Remember, within three posts! And make it clear and explicit, lest the fairy gets confused - It is easily befuddled, and really doesn't care much for the feeling.
TL;DR: Within your next post, everyone please pseudo-vote for "Policy Lynch Wake" "Do Not Policy Lynch Wake" or "I Am Incapable of Forming Opinions of My Own". If you want to be really nice, make this vote green.
Pseudo: Policy Lynch
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #537 (isolation #10) » Tue Oct 01, 2013 10:37 am
Postby Maenara »
Fact 1: I want to policy lynch Wake88.
Fact 2: At least one player has expressed reluctance to support this idea based on low amount of support for such.
Conclusion: To avoid having everyone go all "I'd better keep my vote on someone better until enough support for this shows up", thus ensuring that none ever does, I'm having people say whether they want him lynched or not, regardless of the people they're actually voting for.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
There aren't really any other people starting with a 'B' who have a 'P' in their names, now are there?
In other news Skull and Don are still both town, and Lora still needs to die. They've been way too cautiously probing the situation, trying to avoid attention intentionally.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
There aren't really any other people starting with a 'B' who have a 'P' in their names, now are there?
In other news Skull and Don are still both town, and Lora still needs to die. They've been way too cautiously probing the situation, trying to avoid attention intentionally.
I think this post came as a logical consequence of Rainbowdash's post:
In post 557, Rainbowdash wrote:Manera (until I looked at OP thought he replaced HGH) isn't the worst lynch ever (the reaction to aptil is horrible, TNE wasn't too bad but that just really sets off an alarm), but I would rather lynch stronger scum reads who look like scum with them (elle and Aero)
saying she thought she (Maenera) was HGH's replacement. Therefore she (Maenera) figured RD didn't notice me because of lack of attentionwhoring on my part, so she uses it as an additional reason (along with that incantation) for her vote and to shift attention from her to me.
Panic much?
If you're gonna OMGUS, OMGUS. Don't try to pull this bull here.
Trying to avoid attention is exactly the reason
why
scum so often sticks to trying to engage in polite inquiry and otherwise refrains from making definitive statements. You know, the exact thing I accused you of
before
RBD's post?
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #637 (isolation #14) » Wed Oct 02, 2013 7:57 pm
Postby Maenara »
I've got a couple of hours free today where I won't be listening to mathematicians or writing up my entire life story for my shrinks. I'll try to add intelligent input there.
For now, would people
please
stop responding to Wake, unless it's absolutely necessary? I'd really rather just skip his posts, but if people keep responding to them, I can't.
Oh, and would someone kindly read Lora and vote for them already? Or tell me why not?
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #647 (isolation #15) » Thu Oct 03, 2013 3:45 am
Postby Maenara »
In about an hour or two. Lectures at various times between 8:30 and 17:00 on Thursdays. Responding is possible; actually going through the thread proper-like isn't. I'll be home in about an hour, so once I've managed to fix something to eat, I'll make this my priority.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #649 (isolation #16) » Thu Oct 03, 2013 3:49 am
Postby Maenara »
I actually did comment on that, in that I said it's utter bull. I don't care whose replacement RD thought I was - I hadn't even realized who HGH was; there are like 20 players and I'm not about to go combing through inactives when we have perfectly valid issues to focus on here and now - the bit about your trying to avoid attention had already been stated prior to that comment, so it doesn't matter.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
In post 649, Maenara wrote:I actually did comment on that, in that I said it's utter bull. I don't care whose replacement RD thought I was - I hadn't even realized who HGH was; there are like 20 players and I'm not about to go combing through inactives when we have perfectly valid issues to focus on here and now - the bit about your trying to avoid attention had already been stated prior to that comment, so it doesn't matter.
by whom?
By me. As in, the post you went "I know what this is" at.
In post 649, Maenara wrote:I actually did comment on that, in that I said it's utter bull. I don't care whose replacement RD thought I was - I hadn't even realized who HGH was; there are like 20 players and I'm not about to go combing through inactives when we have perfectly valid issues to focus on here and now - the bit about your trying to avoid attention had already been stated prior to that comment, so it doesn't matter.
We cant leave the inactives alone, we need to make sure they know that it isnt tolerated, if we dont then scumming gets too easy as they can just hide in the nothingness and that takes zero skill. This can go hand in hand with the current issues we have...that I really need to get a stronger feel for.
Yeah, we can't leave them alone, but we shouldn't spend D1 hunting them down, because that's a waste of valuable time,
Post
Post #656 (isolation #18) » Thu Oct 03, 2013 5:57 am
Postby Maenara »
Right, so, first up, we need to focus. Like, srsl. About two thirds of the time has been wasted already, and people can't even agree on three leading wagons. We don't have a single bloody wagon with more than three people on it, but we do have a total of 11 wagons.
In a 20 player game.
Hopefully, I shouldn't need to point out why this is dumb. Hence, I suggest everyone currently voting make a case on their votee, and everyone who can't (or won't) unvotes. Immediately. And then votes for someone on whom there's actually a case with which they somewhat agree.
That, at least, should get us to a point where we can get this thing rolling, apply some pressure, etc.
In my own case, that's Lora. Why Lora, y'all (don't) ask? Well, not for the same reasons as RachMarie and JMO, that's for sure, 'cause they haven't moved their votes since back when it was HGE, which is, like, massively anti-town (Though admittedly more lazy than scummy). No, I'm voting for Lora 'cause of his own content. There's quite a bit of it, compared to others, and it's mostly the same style: Namely, a cautious one.
He started out fine, with a bit of aggressiveness, being all "Whoop de whoop, here I am", but he rather worryingly quieted down a few posts in, taking the non-confrontational route. He doesn't say "You're scum", or "This is scummy", but goes all "This seems", "I believe", "I think", "If you think" and so on and so forth. In a study group, that'd be politeness. In Mafia, it's scum trying to make sure that they haven't made definitive statements, and that they haven't pissed off anyone. He's not actually moving the game forward; he's just creating self-sustaining conversation leading nowhere.
So that's Lora, for whom you should, by the way, all vote.
More to follow, on other topics.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #676 (isolation #19) » Thu Oct 03, 2013 11:40 am
Postby Maenara »
So, I've been asked - multiple times - to do a read on Antihero.
First of all, get an avatar. A picture's worth a thousand words, and seeing as nobody's gonna read a thousand words in a single post, you're losing out on half your data output. Seriously, it's just hard to get a feel for people if they don't have one consistent avatar.
But on to the read: He trash-posts. Like, a lot. Yeah, some of it could plausibly be read as an attempt at aggression, but all in all, it just seems like he's lethargically attempting to poke at each and everyone. The early attempts at cutesy don't help either; they look like an attempt to seem disarming, which, y'know, isn't really what town wants to do. You want to get people to raise their heckles, so that they'll reply with, I don't know, gusto or something. You want to get people emotional, is what I'm saying. It's essentially the same problem as with Lora; it feels artificial and like they're not actually trying to scumhunt. I mean, come on, ISO him. How many of those posts have a single bloody bit of content?
Speaking of which, Stål, post less. Your posting ratio is far too high, right now. Condense it, or you'll block out any chance of us getting good reads on others.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #677 (isolation #20) » Thu Oct 03, 2013 11:47 am
Postby Maenara »
Okay, actually, after writing this post I saw the no-avatar-oh-noes thread through some arcane chain of events starting in the no-context-quotes thread. Never mind the avatar bit then. The rest still stands.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #733 (isolation #21) » Sat Oct 05, 2013 12:50 am
Postby Maenara »
Okay, no, boop this. He's annoying, he's disruptive, he might be a SK, and nobody seems to be willing to agree on another lynch today.
Back where we started;
VOTE: Wake88
Everyone who is voting for Svenskt Stål or Skullduggery needs to reread the entire game. Anyone voting for a person for whom nobody else is voting needs to get real, right now. I should think that amongst Boro, Lora and Wake, everyone should be able to find
someone
they're willing to vote for.
Please don't make me have to start calling out individual players to avoid the bystander effect.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #736 (isolation #22) » Sat Oct 05, 2013 1:19 am
Postby Maenara »
Okay, yeah, well, save the protests about ending the day too early 'till we actually have eight people on a wagon. I'm not trying to get anyone specific lynched right this hour; I'm trying to get enough people on a single wagon - or better yet, a couple of them - for it to seem like a credible threat.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #744 (isolation #24) » Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:14 am
Postby Maenara »
In post 743, Titus wrote:Ugh. Wake does have a point about this suspicious vote hopping. The problem is both Manera and Sthal do it. I don't like Stal's bargaining. Very scummy. Town should be focused on persuasion. Stal and Manera also seem too close for his point in the game.
I'm sorry?
Did I fail to properly convey the fact that
we have six days left
, and we still don't have anything looking like viable wagons, which in turn means we can't get any bloody pressure, thus resulting in a freaking dearth of information?
Yeah I'm vote hopping. To, y'know, try to get
something
to happen.
We need 11 players to vote for 1 person. Right now, the most we have is 4. If we want a chance to change our mind before a lynch, we need to get this pressure on
right now
.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #746 (isolation #25) » Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:22 am
Postby Maenara »
In post 745, Titus wrote:Manera, I wasn't saying you were scum by that. There's a legitimate possibility you believe that. I was just seeing something iff there, more likely wih Stal. He appears to be buddying you. His rapid vote shifts don't make senses. Yours are odd and will need reevaluation later but are not necessarily scummy.
Okay what is this post?
"Oh I'm sorry I called you scum I mean you're not scum but there's a chance that you're scum and this guy is probably more scum but hey I'm just sayin ..."
Decide. Commit. Don't try to balance buddying me up and trying to get me lynched in the same post. It's not gonna work.
And @TheSvensktStålThing, yeah, duh, there's blatant buddying going on, but that's sorta needed right now, if we want to make anything happen.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #883 (isolation #26) » Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:20 am
Postby Maenara »
I'm really sorry about the lack of activity guys, I promise that whatever happens, I'll post
something
of relevance tomorrow, once I'm done being out of my bloody mind over everything, and I'll respond to everyone who's said something to me, there are just too many people for me to have been able to do a half-assed job of it.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #928 (isolation #27) » Tue Oct 08, 2013 5:40 am
Postby Maenara »
*ALERT* Incoming Wall
Okay, first off, UNVOTE: Loranthaceae
They're town.
Now, as a preamble to this post, I'll say this: I start, in this post, by responding to people's posts, primarily those directed at me, supplemented by those I believe to have valuable things to add, or which I find need attention they have not received, in chronological order. I will thereafter, in a new post, attempt to summarize my views of various people, and evaluate whether or not I think they're scum. Following this, I will suggest a plan of action based on this, as well as on other people's reads, and which wagons are likely to get sufficient traction in the time we have left. However, in spite of the fact that I will finish up with a conclusion, I'd like people to look at the wall, too, or at least CTRL-F for their own name, that they may answer questions that I pose.
Skelda: I would like to look at BP, but he was an early town read of mine due to his reactions to me. can you point out where he is ignoring things and maybe one or two of these "blind" votes?
The case on Lora, such as it was, was an argument based on playing style. His initial posts consisted of what seemed to me to be a combination of attempted signalling and insincere data gathering aimed more towards finding out who to please and how, than at determining people's alignments. His defense, when I confronted him, did little to convince me otherwise, and so he seemed like an ideal candidate for a lynch: With sufficient pressure, he'd either continue to flunder - as scum - and net town one less person to worry about, or he'd have to actually get a grip and start providing some content.
That aside, I'm worried about the vagueness of your statements with regards to BoroPhil. Vagueness in general is bad, and I cannot see how BP in particular has done anything to merit being read as town.
In post 764, Rainbowdash wrote:@BP - What pointless questions? You say that when you call somepony "scum from the start" it means they weren't scum when you said that, but you don't unvote him for about four pages after you make that comment.
Also yes I still don't think your comment on Wake is joking. Unless around the time that players were getting annoyed with Wake you suddenly decided to make your first joke of the game... not a joke.
Lora wagon is bad in large part because Manera is on it and they are scum for the really awkward way they are treating Wake with a very "im not sure how this is going to go" push on the policy lynch that just reeks of scum who is afraid they are going to take flack for it. Whenever his attacks get countered he just keeps ending up there as well and dismisses the entire push on him from Lora as "OMGUS" without actually responding to it.
The only semi-decent point on Lora is the odd push on Titus for "faking towntells" but when you consider HGH was probably town its a wagon that wont happen. Ive seen enough games to know that even when vocal players push a wagon it actually has to have merit or another vocal (me) will just tear it down. There is no merit here.
With regards to the Wake deal, I'm still in favour of lynching him. I just see no point in wasting everybody's time screaming in their faces instead of scumhunting. Had everybody followed my suggestion and made their stance on a policy lynch clear in their following post, in the proposed format, we'd already know whether or not we were lynching him, and it'd be a done deal. As that wasn't happening, however, why would I stick around instead of applying myself to something more useful?
In post 771, Titus wrote:Her interactions with Wake. Either it is ridiculous whiteknighting or RBD is town. I can't see scum being that melodramatic in defending others. Plus, if Wake flipped mafia scum, the target on RBD's back would be huge.
Funny how you mention that other game. In context, you had made a half-serious, half-not serious joke. I still don't quite understand it. I would have moved on if I was town but I figured I had a good chance at getting you lynched with it. Too bad Jennifer Nked me. It seems like a subtle meta manipulation, when I never asked for it. Scummy.
I don't see the link between Wake and RBD. Mind you, I'm pretty sure RBD
is
town, and Wake is a VI no matter what his alignment, but your logic is flawed.
In post 782, Rainbowdash wrote:Last few BP posts have me wondering a bit, it makes it seem like he did something without even realizing it so im not as sure on him being scum. He just reacted badly to me saying he wants a policy lynch without knowing what one is (which is odd to start).
Yeah looking at replacements I probably wouldn't even touch the Loren wagon to have a lynch happen, its at best null-scum players. Same reason im a little wary of SS wagon although he is kinda scummy.
@Titus - Wake lynch is bad. Most of the time a "slip" is overblown. When there is basically a zero change (which if I listed all players Wake would be dead last) for him being mafia, its just a bad lynch given that if the slip is wrong we are lynching town.
Vote Manera
BP can backburner for a while.
Better wagon go.
BP not knowing what a policy lynch is is BS. He's played this game for long enough to know; he has to. "Did something without realizing it" is possibly the worst excuse for doing something scummy I've ever heard.
Him or BoroPhil. I've narrowed it down to those two.
Narrowed it down in what fashion? I don't disagree with either lynch, per se, but it's for radically different reasons, and you seem to be equating them.
Okay, so, all of this is so incredibly fake. I mean, I can't even described how forced all of this seems. You're not actually going in depth, you're just making sure that you have a wee bit to say about everyone. That's not pro-town, that's so scummy it hurts. I mean, are you even putting in effort? Have
read
any posts? I'm not saying that any of what you wrote is false, as such, as much as it's just incredibly useless. There's no content, here. It's just noise.
In post 788, Svenskt Stål wrote:Also, regarding mae, I think her lack of giving a fuck, in terms of others feelings and her own perception, puts her donw on most lists. Disregard that and try to look at what she tries to do.
Like how she insisted that we cant use any reads (which were scum) on who she replaced attacking whoever mentioned that, then pushed for a policy lynch, when that wasn't working backed way off and she got attacked backed off, then tried again in a very subtle manner saying "so who would want one" such that she gets far less heat for trying to push it?
Those things which she is trying to do and make her scum?
Althou I cant belive she told you not to use reads, and that it would be scummy.
I can see motive for the policy lynch...
Alot of what you typed I cant understand. But clearly we are getting two seperate signals from what she does, could it be that she is bossy? I mean everything she does you put in a bad light, or that the feeling I get, and I cnt see how anyone can come to that conclusion objectively.
In post 797, Rainbowdash wrote:
Its that's she is trying to push the policy lynch in a way that town would not push it. She is afraid of the perception of herself or she would have pushed the policy lynch instead of trying to see what type of suspicion she could drum up for it.
Plus TNE who she replaced WAS scummy. All she has done is come in and tried to push a policy lynch ignoring my reason as to why Wake is town. You don't policy lynch town. I have stated why Wake is town, there has been no case counter, just continued pushing of policy im going to call that scummy.
Green.
To me she come of as constructive. She didnt get enough traction on a wake lynch, abandoned it and moved to something else. In fact she is telling us not who to vote, but how. She has repeatedly asked us to not stray vote but instead get major wagons going. There is some frustration in there which I feel is genuine aswell.
Red.
While one should not completly disregard previous player who played the same slot I do feel that ifyou take it into too high account it limits the success of the read. Its like saying, X is kinda town the last 1000 posts but X was
really
scummy the first 100 posts. You are constantly given more information and the more you get the less you can focus on a bit of the past.
I have never played with Mae but I think that if she is town then she will be a huge source of contribution and that town will lose alot of value in an early mae lynch,
Chance of you joining the jmo wagon?
[If the above is not 100% faithfully replicated, I apologize; editing this post was hell on wheels]
Like I said earlier, I pushed the policy lynch the way I did
because
I was risk-averse. I won't deny that. But the risk in this case is the risk of a no-lynch, which is, I'll have to say, a fairly worrying proposition. I made it plenty clear that I think we should lynch Wake, and I explicitly asked for everyone to corporate in determining whether or not it ought to happen. Assuming that everyone actually read the post, which I find to be a fair assumption, I'd be hard pressed to see how they could've missed the bloody lime green. And yet virtually nobody opted in to the scheme. With that little interest amongst town, trying to sway anyone to lynch the guy was futile: Working hard to convince your audience is one thing, but it's a fair bit harder when the audience ain't listening in the first place.
And gee, I'm not too happy with people attacking me for what my predecessors did, no freaking kidding. How exactly am I supposed to respond to that? "Well, I imagine he behaved like scum 'cause he was a bit of a freakin' tosser, honestly"? I doubt that'll go over well (And it'd be ableist to boot, but you get the point).
In post 801, BoroPhil wrote:and yeah this might all come across as a bit OMGUSy so I'm happy for people to tell me where I'm going wrong. but it just smells off to me.
In post 802, BoroPhil wrote:btw what was interesting from my big post was 2 people who either don't have 2 votes atm or aren't voting for one of those, so are flying under the radar somewhat: aptil and Brian.
I would vote the other null/slight scum reads to stop lynches of town reads (like Loren/Wake) though. Not voting ER either, would aptil falls into the "kinda okay" votes but is town if BS/Manera are scum so don't really love that lynch.
Can we seriously kill elle who has just completely stopped posting as of late? She is scum to start then comes the massive lurk move when stuff starts happening.
What exactly
is
your problem with Brian Skies? I haven't been able to find a summary. To me, he seems like just another inactive.
I really don't like your accusations of RBD here. Nothing of her play reeks of desperation at all.
Shouldn't you have more to say about this guy? This seems like such a laughably small part of his posting to focus on.
In post 823, BoroPhil wrote:and like I said, if policy was the reason then why me? there was plenty of people advocating it. Skelda still is ffs
Trashpost.
In post 833, Titus wrote:I don't see anything Skelda has done as misrepping. When he first game in, we had an interesting dialogue where I had to be sure Skelda wasn't just saying what was easy. He passed. Skelda's town. There's just no way to mirror a process as warped as my own.
BoroPhil, just because my vote is on you doesn't make it odd. From my perspective, you have been pushing my town reads for reasons that make no sense. So I voted to apply pressure and I wasn't getting my Wake lynch (despite my firm belief it would be for the best).
Skelda, I understand that. For some reason, people like to make up stuff about me when I am town (doesn't happen much as scum though). Easy on the buddying though. :S
Please cease to engage in pleasant dialogue with scum. A good offense is the best offense.
In post 839, don_johnson wrote:his avoidance. I've asked pretty simple things of him. I can't remember where or when he posted any of the things he claims to have posted. if someone said to me: hey dj, where was your case on so and so? I would say "post 76" or whatever. not be like "i'm not answering and you're bothering me." it could be a playstyle difference, but couple it with Tcold's "easyrider" wagoning and it says scum to me. all sven has to do is engage, but he refuses. I see no town motivation not to engage.
Dude, Stål is actually generating content. I'm well aware that nobody is guaranteed town, but he's actually taking stances and provoking people. That's, like, the epitome of towniness given the current situation. Pick another target.
In post 840, Titus wrote:Sven, what do you think of BoroPhil? Don?
If you were king of the town, who would you lynch? Why? Where have you pointed out their scumminess previously.
No prob with boro
Don has brought nothing of value since I subbed in and his latest contributions have all been sobfests couse he got told no. I think his lack of participation speaks badly for him, so its lack of content and not the content itself mostly.
Right now if I was big boss i would create thee strong wagons, and i would aim them at people i know little or nothing about. Aptil, skelda and don.
If i had to nuke someone i would nuke aptil based on a crossedfinger, 6 pack gut read.
You have no problem with BoroPhil?
You have
no
problem with BoroPhil? Excuse me, look, you've been willing to go for Lora when I'm doing it, and Boro is doing the same, only a million times worse. Don, yeah, alright, not generating the best content, but like I said to him about you, it's still content, and that's what matters right now. Gives us something to work with tomorrow, when we try to catch up after this positively abysmal day. BoroPhil has done no such thing, and yet you're fine with him.
In post 840, Titus wrote:Sven, what do you think of BoroPhil? Don?
If you were king of the town, who would you lynch? Why? Where have you pointed out their scumminess previously.
sven. in the post two posts ago. before that I mentioned my thoughts on the VCA in post 344. see how easy that was?
oh and look. ad hom attacks from sven.
skelda: what behavior? since when is asking "hey, what are your reads and/or please point them out to me any type of "behavior"?
read on BP: I would have to go back and reread a bit. seemed town to me from our initial interactions. if someone wants to direct me to the case on him I will gladly read it.
Dude, how can he possibly seem town? What has he done that is town-worthy? He does the exact same thing Lora did earlier, only he hasn't actually improved since!
In post 847, Titus wrote:Sven, the reason for aptil is why it looks like Don has a point. Even then, your biggest King of the World target is a lurker. Your posts seem to have the goal of not antagonizing. The one person you should want to lynch is a scum read someone you'd want to have information on. For instance, mine would be Wake because I think he's the SK if I'm in a self-centric mood. If I was feeling more community minded, I'd probably do BoroPhil or Loran. Yours seem to be self-centered with no real evidence to back them up.
Why is Aptil a worse lurker than other lurkers?
I know how the game works, and i find the active posters more or less towny, that makes me want to get inactive players into the discussion to create a more complete picture.
In post 846, Svenskt Stål wrote:No I am refusing stating things that I have allready stated, especially to someone who contributes as little as you.
if you have a question for me, just ask. currently I am contributing what is shaping up to be a pretty damn good case on your slot. i'm not even asking you to restate things. you can just give me post numbers to read if you want. I am pressuring you to explain yourself. instead of standing up for what you claim to think, you are folding under that pressure. I guess you just really want my vote.
Lol.
The reason you have to ask about stuff is because you are disconnected from the thread, you leave no constructive thoughts instead you ask useless questions.
Yes your pressure is fierce bro.
Listen, you've misunderstood something.
Severely.
Activity isn't town. Yes, yes, it signifies town, but it's not by its own merit that it does so. Content-generation is what makes you pro-town, and activity is usually a good indicator thereof. Usually is the key word, though, and in cases where people are outputting solely noise, thus keeping their activity high but their content low, they're not just being as bad as inactives: They're actively
trying
to give themselves a false appearance of towniness, and moreover, they're sabotaging town's ability to get reads by cluttering up the thread. That's definitely not pro-town.
In post 854, Brian Skies wrote:So, I started catching up like 9 hours ago. Too many players to analyze. I need to visit this thread more often.
It's a giant Wall-Post and some players might hate it, but I did warn you:
In post 230, Brian Skies wrote:Also, I'm in a bunch of games right now so I will post infrequently and in walls. Also, Day 1 isn't my thing, but it might be this game. Who knows?
Spoiler:
In post 172, Titus wrote:I'm confident the scum is HGH and that Aptil was a counterwagon. HGH is ignoring questions inside the thread. The wagon on A appears out of nowhere and takes off while HGH's stagnates.
Anti-hero started the wagon. Did you think he was scum at this point? Did you think anyone else on the wagon was scum, and who?
In post 191, Titus wrote:I'm fine with a Skullduggery wagon here. Skull seems to be hostile and trying to manipulate the conversation to his whims rather than reality. Not sure if he's scum or town but I'd like to know relatively quickly.
Really? I can see how you thought this on the first read-through. But what do you think of the conversation now? I'm leaning towards Elle manipulating the conversation. Skull is just being abrasive. Not hostile though.
In post 212, Skelda wrote:I also do not like her case on Elle, and she seems to be twisting things around to suit her.
Same question to Titus from above. What do you think of the conversation now?
In post 212, Skelda wrote:However, I do love his 172 since I thought precisely the same thing when I saw the Aptil wagon. Yup, town thoughts! His Skull vote is fine, too, but I still like HGH better.
Same question to Titus from above.
Anti-hero started the wagon. Did you think he was scum at this point?
(Answered in Post 253) Did you think anyone else on the wagon was scum, and who?
In post 218, Titus wrote:I want to see your antihero read to verify you aren't sheeping popular opinion, but the mirroring in thought processes really siggests town.
This was a good catch against Skelda's entrance reads. During my re-read, I felt Skelda could have been a parrot. +Townpoints.
In post 186, TCold wrote:The stupid argument between elle and skull is making me think one of them is scum. But atm it's just a gut feeling.
Looks town v town to me.
I'm leaning this way as well. I didn't like Skull's initial approach to the anti-town thing in the beginning of the game, but I'm liking his defense against Elle. I like Elle's argument thus far for the most part, but there are some word choices and arguments that feel out of place. These include the "you don't seem to like questions" and "definite townreads" arguments. She's generating discussion and pushing Skull. I'm leaning more town on Skull up to this point.
In post 237, jmo16mla wrote:Willing to bet at least one out of tcold and aeronaut are scum. Anyone follow?
Still liking this point. I'm leaning towards Aeronaut being scum between the two. Possibly both.
In post 285, Titus wrote:@Skelda, I have to disagree with the no motivation to cut the day short. If the town is aligned and agrees upon a plan, scum can manipulate to cause disagreement. Also regarding Anti-Hero, if you tried to twist your read of him, that's VERY hard to do. If you had just agreed with popular opinion (which you did) you would have at least commented with some hostility that I was suspecting you might sheep your reads. Objecting about being ignored by someone other than your scum read is a town indicator to me which both Wake and Anti-Hero displayed so I'm putting them as town tentatively.
I'm not comprehending this. Please clarify what you were thinking at the time.
I didn't do a good job of reading through all 10 pages (the first 3 were all a crap load of RVS and somewhere in there was a typo and arguments about it; was it jmo or someone who people tried to beat up for it?), so I didn't pick up anything I liked. I did ISO the lead wagon of Skulldudgerry and I don't know other people's reasonings for being on it, but for me:
What's your gambit going with "if you think I'm scum, vote me?" Who, honestly, as any town, invites that upon themselves? To me it's just an excuse to try to buy town credit.
I don't like either of these two votes. At least one of you is scum.
I also don't think Skull is scum. The interaction with Elle makes me think town v town and the way the wagon grew.. I think it's likely we have a town-skull than a scum-skull.
In post 299, don_johnson wrote:sorry. been busy. I don't think skull is town. she disappeared as the wagon grew. maybe trying to shed the pressure? I don't know. i'll have to go back and read a bit more. skimming most of these longer posts. here's where i'm at:
townie:
Aeronaut
aptil
BoroPhil
elleheathen
Rainbowdash
Titus
RachMarie
JacobSavage
TCold
null:
Evil Regals
HGH7193
jmo16mla
Skelda
thenewearth
Antihero
uctriton00
scum:
Wake88
Brian Skies
Skullduggery
not necessarily seeing these three as scum together, just each a little scummy in their own right. I don't like brian skies post from atop this page. wake, well, that should be obvious. and skull. well, they are my top suspect at the moment. I see no reason to diffuse the wagon on them. the players running around yelling "skull is town! what is happening!" are making themselves look worse regardless of skull's flip. I see no reason to whine about an existing wagon on day one unless the accused is obvtown, which no one seems to be saying or proving. the best argument made yet is that the argument was town v. town, but that's sketchy and no one has explained why.
I will try and stay active a bit more often, just got a lot going on right now. those of you who know me know I am rarely prodded.
This reads list from Don_Johnson still stands out to me. I've bolded the ones I feel are off. I feel like some of the reads in the town list conflict with some of the reads in the null list. Some of them are similar to me and I don't understand how some got town reads over others.
Not saying he's scum for it, as he does explain his thoughts later on. But I'm going to point it out now for later reference.
In post 330, elleheathen wrote:But I could see why you wouldn't want to see a Skull flip, regardless of alignment considering the assocative tell:
In post 181, elleheathen wrote:This is exactly why I find your town read of them to be fabricated, not only because I can't see at all what is town about the two things that you quote but because it looks like a scum throwing out bogus town reads just to look town.
Has Ranawey flipped yet? Do you know his alignment already?
What does this have to do with Ranawey flipping? Are you saying that Ranawey's flip will prove that it
is
fabricated? Just because I think you've made a fabricated town read on Ranawey as scum, doesn't mean that I necessarily think that Ranawey is scum because of it.
The defense and misrep by Ranawey in 185 strikes me as a subtle attempt to discredit what I was actually saying about a read being definite. So this whole attempt here is festering that. And because I at least want to say this before we even get close to night falling. Whether it is today, tomorrow or whenever - when Skull flips scum, look into this, imo.
Hmmm? Maybe. I'll just keep this here for later reference.
In post 344, don_johnson wrote:first thing which stands out to me is that brianskies is on both early HGH, then aptil, hasn't voted skull, but seems to be fencesitting the wagon. i.e. refusing to take a stance on skull's alignment, but calling the wagon "scummy" irrelevant of the alignment of the target. this may change, but its the first thing which stands out.
Tcold is on all three.
that's all that stands out in a cursory glance. this does not include any votes in context either. might be worth looking into it further.
Does this make TCold scum or town?
Answered with a vote and pushed lynch on Page 19.
In post 349, Antihero wrote:/I talk about jmo's scummy behavior
/no one cares
In post 349, Antihero wrote:Not 100% (because there are no absolutes), but pretty close. There's way some major scumlord candidates floating around (jmo and don, just to name a couple) that I would rather vote for than Skull.
Okay, I admit I was ignoring you, even on this re-read. I'm not going to iso Jmo right now (especially since it would require ANOTHER re-read), but I've been reading his actions as town. Is he scum? Possible, but I'm leaning town on him. I also think there are better lynches to be had up to this point in the thread. You have beef with Don_Johnson - care to explain?
In post 350, Skelda wrote:Alright, I'm here. And I am not liking Don's recent posting. Firstly, his reads list in 299 is seriously a bunch of random names, and his defense of it in 301 isn't much better. That does nothing for the game, and his logic is seriously horrible. He's like, "this one is obvious, this one has a wagon already, this one has a post that annoys that I refuse to specify or tell what annoys me about it". It is ridiculous! And, when he says, "I only lynch out of my null pile if neccesary." shouldn't the nulls be the people leaning neither way who you are on the fence about? Not the players you just personally haven't played with before? Also his, "I'm not going to waste time or energy Day 1" seems like excusing lack of anything, which is just stupidity.
And don't even get me started on 319, that is illogical! What kind of person stops posting on the whole site for one game? I'm starting to think Skull is town because of how quickly the wagon sprung up and Don's horrible logic against her.
So, I'm going to VOTE: don_johnson. My favorite wagon of the game, hands down!
Good argument. Pretty much what I was thinking regarding the reads list. +Townpoints.
In post 355, jmo16mla wrote:It's still barely even a wagon. Two votes. How many have joined the wagon since? One. Hm. Sounds like it stalled out. Possibly because he's scum.
More pushing on HGH, and I'm liking the logic. There's a possible 3 person scumteam here, but calling out scumteams on Day 1 without a flip is ambitious and bad, especially for me. Also, I'm reading two of them as town up to this point, so I'm not giving it any weight right now.
In post 362, Rainbowdash wrote:@elle - Yes or no, there is nothing apart from the fact that Skull said "This is town" that you think he is scum for.
Also you entire missed the fact that you originally say "the SK comment came from town or SK" intentionally eliminating mafia. Then when I come in and attack you suddenly you start talking about interactions and how I should not be paid attention to because if he is scum you think I might be.
Why are you implying that her reads can't change? You're chainsawing Skull up to this point and it does make you suspicious by association. Especially since Skull gave your predecessor a townread for two posts that I don't think deserves a townread at all.
In post 388, don_johnson wrote:brianskies: I can agree to move on. your posting style is difficult for me to decipher. every time you post I feel like you are contradicting something you said earlier, but then when I go back to look, you just aren't. if you're scum, you're doing a great job.
Or I'm town and there's no reason for me to contradict myself to being with.
In post 399, Wake1 wrote:*Seems to be coasting with an easy vote on Aptil. (140)
*Unvotes Aptil. (192)
*Aeronaut scolds Skullduggery. He did consider putting Skull at L-1. (214)
*Points out that Skull doesn't like questions much. Votes her. (219)
*Makes an odd post that doesn't make much sense. (241)
*Mentions how Jmo voted for HGH in response to my claim to hammer Skull. (273)
*Potential misunderstanding/slip by Aeronaut regarding Jmo and I on reactions. (277)
*Says in response to Uct that he didn't like putting Skull at L-1 because of how quickly her wagon formed. (361)
Serious contradiction here on Aero's part.
In post 400, Titus wrote:@Wake, that's a damn good wall. Where is the vote?
In post 421, Wake1 wrote:It seems you don't want to go into detail. When I ask for people's reads of me, I'm gauging their responses. Providing very little context, instead of going into detail, well, sends mixed signals.
You too, Skelda, Antihero and Loranthaceae.
Why?
I think you demanding people to read is either town or cocky scum. But you don't seem cocky. Other than that, I find you somewhat difficult to read. I don't know what it i, but I noticed it when I was making my introductory read list.
Also, I don't like your unexplained suspicion of me, but I don't like being suspected in general. I swear if I could be an Innocent Child every game I would...
Why not just answer the question?
In post 446, BoroPhil wrote:Titus - agreed with him at 191 (as above), but then his vote states that we need more content from DJ. bit bizarre this as DJ has been pretty prominent (and posted reads for everyone)
It's not bizarre. Don_Johnson posted reads and people had issues with his reasoning. Some people still think he's scummy. It's already been said before, but posting is not the same as content.
WTF? Where have I been all game? I'm barely halfway through and I'm still missing.
In post 466, Wake1 wrote:Players who deliberately ignore my direct posts are automatic lynchbait. Throughout the game I'll be gunning for those on the Lynch List. If that's the way it is, then that is the way it will be. Meaning, don't fucking ignore me. I encourage everybody to go after those on my list for being anti-Town.
Lynch List:
Aptil
Borophil
Jacob
Don
Skelda
Aeronaut
Respond to me truthfully and thoroughly or I'll lead your lynch!!!
Please read through the thread, Maenara.
Who died and made you king? If anti-hero used the same logic, we'd be lynching most of the players list.
In post 470, Maenara wrote:You do acknowledge that not contributing by means of engaging in theory discussion is anti-Town behavior, Wake88? You DO want people to give reads and not activeLurk, right?
Cases. Please.
Oooh. I was kind of liking your predecessor, but this post screams town to me. Please be town so I can win a game on this site.
In post 471, Wake1 wrote:Seven, point out my supposed anti-Town behavior, please.
Too many gambits, not enough discussion on other game events. Plus, you tend to push lurkers and people who ignore you. It seems too easy.
Can't tell if Aptil is bad town or...
The whole Wake, Boro, Aptil, Maenara escapade makes me laugh, noting this for future reference
In post 484, aptil wrote:Now it seems to me you are really asking how i could not have free time last week. i think that is personal question and i had a good reason for doing that i am not going to answer that at all.
Okay, so when are you going to generate content for us?
In post 487, Wake1 wrote:Since Maenara has apparently gotten off on the wrong path, I'm hoping everyone remembers her initial vote on me. She has the guts to try to twist my words against me as Scum. If she were wise, she'd go with the flow and actually answer questions. I'm now 51% sure she's Scum.
Really? Where? I'm reading the slot as town right now.
What do I think, I think your full of shit personally.
I think maera's vote is justified and her reasonings are pretty soild.
Hell, I can't believe I didn't do this already.
VOTE: Wake88
How the hell do I not read this as opportunistic? You even push a fake policy lynch later. Soooooooo scummy.
RainbowPony gets townier and townier
In post 514, Evil Regals wrote:The fact you claimed early to help town doesn't help town. It hurts town in a way actually because it lessens the playing field for scum to find PRs.
For those of you who care, the current chances of scum finding a PR increases from 2/15 (13.33%) to 2/14 (14.29%) by Day 1's end. The chances of scum finding a PR increases with increasing days, but early on, the difference is pretty negligible.
In post 527, Maenara wrote:Lora: Questions questions polite interrogation setup speculation scum
VOTE: Loranthaceae
You redeem the towniness you lost during that policy lynch business.
Ugh! My townreads are pseudo-lynching one of my townreads. You will not have my support on this pseudo-wagon of yours.
In post 542, JacobSavage wrote:I find wake a distraction, unreadable and just generally useless.
Wake you are spamming, you need to understand this:
Too little content allows scum to dominate.
More content allows town to scum-hunt better
Too much content overwhelms town
Its a U shaped curve.
Your falling into the latter catagory. See NY 161 for an example of this
So stop it.
And where does your content fall into this U-shaped curve of yours?
In post 549, Rainbowdash wrote:Side note BS just crashed and burned out of my town read column in a single post.
Yeah, it was pretty bad. But +more townpoints for RainbowPony. Regarding the Aptil comment, the issue I had wasn't so much the vote, but that the person wasn't going to be able to defend himself based on what the previous person did. It sounded a lot better at the time. I'm not going to defend the rest of it though, because it was what I was thinking at the time.
In post 565, Maenara wrote:In other news Skull and Don are still both town, and Lora still needs to die. They've been way too cautiously probing the situation, trying to avoid attention intentionally.
The Don_Johnson case keeps popping up and I keep forgetting what it is so it's not coming together in my head. I'll need to re-read later to figure it out. I do agree with the Skull and Lora reads though.
JS is scummy as shit up to this point. Why is he not up for a lynch?
Lora is a bit over-defensive and it doesn't look town to me.
In post 579, aptil wrote:Also lost in the post : Why did people not pursue this further ? (this means the questionable decisions of TNE at the start).
I read it as town. TNE was giving his analysis on someone else's opinions regarding a wagon. I don't have a problem with his vote.
In post 587, Titus wrote:I don't like Brian's lack of lack of analysis. He usually posts a lot more content. His recent posting lacks this.
I didn't take you for a meta person. Anyhow, I'm linking (again) my only completed game thus far: Mismatched Mafia.
I had a heavy game-load and my play-style has been somewhat adjusted. It's kind of reverting back though.
Starting to see what Anti-hero is saying about Jmo only talking about surface-level stuff.
In post 642, Loranthaceae wrote:^ What spot, the early-game asskissing spot? Deja vu. I told you then and I'll say it again. Townies have scum reads not townreads. SCUMREADS!
There are players who townhunt and find scum through PoE as well. I kind of use this strategy.
In post 644, Titus wrote:What the hell? Wake practically admits he is the sk and everyone ignores this? No reasoning why I am wrong or right? Major scum points for everyone above me.
There's no guarantee he's the SK, and if he is, he's dumb. There's no reason to keep him to Lylo without a clear and Mafia should be targeting him if they think he's the SK. The gambit makes me think he's more likely to be town than scum, and he can be dealt with later.
In post 653, Antihero wrote:sven: mae+skull+me+you+rainbowdash sounds like a solid townblock to me. now, a big part of the awesomeness of a townblock comes from the fact that they vote scum together. I say we vote for BP or jmo (for reasons that RBD and I have already stated). I would also roll with a jacob wagon. But what does anyone else think?
I think you have a good townbloc assuming you and Sven are town. I think you all could be town, so I don't have a problem with it currently.
I prefer the JS wagon personally. A BP wagon is alright. I'm going to need a case because I can't remember what he's done up to this point. I'm still conflicted - leaning town on Jmo. Make a case and I might consider it.
In post 659, Evil Regals wrote:Maybe I should replace out and I will if others want me too, but I was excited to play this game. I have no problem playing it when my RL calms down which should hopefully be in a few days
If you want to play this game so bad, then do your best to create content and stay in. I don't see you as a possible Day 1 lynch up to this point, so I think you're fine for now.
Svenst sounds town with that "you can't earn my trust that easily" tidbit.
JS throws down an RVS-style vote onto Svenst. Like, seriously, how is this not lynched yet?
Ignoring Titus at this point.
In post 695, Titus wrote:Except that post is not begging the mafia to kill him. Rather, it suggests alignment with the mafia. Keep me alive mafia and I'll find discrepancies. It seems like he'd lead their mislynches. Why not direct anything at the SK? Either he is the SK or he absolutely wants us to think he is. I'm thinking the former as I can't see any rational player wanting the town to think he is the SK. He was likely trying to communicate that to the mafia. The problem is he wasn't subtle enough.
In post 629, Wake1 wrote:Mafia, you tempted to kill me tonight? You'd be unwise to write me off as detrimental to Town. If there are anomalies throughout the Days, I'll find them.
Okay, I lied. I couldn't help commenting on this.
Wake is explicitly egging the Mafia on to kill him tonight. He is literally asking them to shoot him or risk being caught by him.
I find Titus to be a little illogical at times, so the misrep is a null-tell for me right now.
Skipped Wake's wall-posts right before my prod on page 29.
In post 727, Svenskt Stål wrote:No one currently with votes attracts me, but wake, jacob and jmo are in my eyes acceptable. Wake because i dont understand him, jacob seems to be in troll mode and jmo is inactive.
JS? Out of this list so far, I'm liking Lora and JS the most. Maybe boro or Aptil.
In post 742, Wake1 wrote:Do you find it odd that, after I mention and vote for Uctriton, you then post three seperate reads on various players? It seems like a diversion.
Noted. But Uct is in his voting list, so I don't think it's that weird at all.
In post 753, Rainbowdash wrote:I would vote Sven or Manera (preferably Manera who is actually up to about my third pick for scum) here in a heartbeat over Loren and Wake.
This is interesting.
Is there a particular reason or is it because they're blatantly buddying?
Also, Wake might as well be temporary-confirmed town at this point, so that part makes sense.
In post 754, Loranthaceae wrote:Rach iand Maenara are town. The rest of the clowns on my wagon are scum, imo.
Sven makes the most compelling case of the game on antihero and yet he votes for his scumbuddy only to jump off him at the fist occasion.
How did you get a townread on Rach? The second part is interesting, but it just looks like Sven settling on a wagon he likes. What makes you think Jmo and Sven are scumbuddies?
In post 770, Rainbowdash wrote:I would also love an elle or BS lynch at this point. Both are aggressively avoiding this game.
Um, no. Pretty sure Elle asked for replacement. And I haven't been aggressively avoiding this game. I took on a heavy game load and put this one on the back-burner based on deadlines.
And why are you pushing lynches on inactives instead of scumreads? How is this different than your push on BP's policy lynch on Wake?
Apparently Elle and I are scumreads.
BP's wagon analysis is pretty good. I'm kind of sad I'm never mentioned, but seeing as how I haven't voted anyone and have been inactive, it's understandable. The only problem I have at a quick glance is him voting the scumread with the smallest wagon.
In post 797, Rainbowdash wrote:Actually when I went to pull the quote it was BS defending her (which is why I think they are both scum in part)
I tend to defend people when I shouldn't. Kind of like you. If you think that's scummy, then it's just whatever.
Eh? That's not how I feel about TNE. Difference in opinion I guess.
Skelda, why do you say scummy things? I'll sort you later.
Nothing else up to this point has caught my interest.
Other thoughts:
Elle - Post 181 feels wrong. Continues to push the "definitive read" argument against Skull in 217.
Wake - Using too many gambits early on when discussion is already being generated. Comment on the discussion. Stop baiting people to earn slimy towncred. Still liking his analyses and whatnot, so he's still town for me.
Jmo - Ignored him for the most part the first time through.
Looks succint and towny on the re-read.
Starting to see what Anti-hero means about Jmo only touching surface-level stuff. Still like him for town, though.
Uctriton - Seems to pop-up in weird spots for me (as in, I can never remember what I'm thinking of the slot before he comes in). But his reaction to Wake's VT claim and other posts read town for me. His reaction to Wake being an SK does not.
Skull - The more people push this slot and misrep him, the more I think he's town.
Voting List
Aero - The "you don't like questions" argument against Skull in Post 220 feels wrong. Wake has a pretty good argument against this slot in Post 399.
Aptil - I'm a bit wary because I think this slot could just be badtown. But there hasn't been any content generated.
Loran - I've liked the cases brought up against this slot.
JS - This slot is scummy.
I'd consider but I need a case
BP
DJ
Uct
Jmo
Maybeeeeee Anti-hero
Anyhow, of the people from my voting list, Loran has the most votes.
VOTE: Loran
THIS PEOPLE
THIS THIS THIS
That's content. That's bloody content. Tomorrow, the day after, the day after again, we can go back and look at this post. We can look at all the things he said, weigh 'em up against his later actions, weigh 'em up against the flips, and actually USE it. THAT's content, and that's what we bloody well need.
That said, two things. First of all, you need to summarize better. Reading the post is hell, and while I realize the sweet irony of saying this halfway through a wall of my own, user friendliness is the name of the game. If we want town to work, we need to all have stuff that we can actually make each other read. Secondly, I think you're focusing overmuch on the inactives. Like some of the very people you're saying are voteable, inactives have a tendency to get replaced. Even if they don't, we can always lynch them on a day when we need a filler kill, and trust me, in a 20 player game, we will. At the moment, we need info, and voting for outright inactives is just not going to get us that.
V/LA: Evil Regals through Monday October 7; uctriton00 through Monday October 7; don_johnson through Sunday October 6
A few people are making the most of the noise here.
I'd like to hear more from:
Rach, don - your votes are on replaced players. what do you think of their replacements?
Skull, jmo, aptil, wake, Brian (and I think uct now?) - you have votes on people with 0/1 votes. are you planning on moving these somewhere else; if not you must have a great case against those players? let's hear it.
SEE THIS HERE? See it? That's exactly what I've been talking about the whole time! He's trashposting, asking questions, throwing out vague, non-committal statements, and never ever making a stand on anything! This is what we need to get rid of.
In post 862, Svenskt Stål wrote:I mean uct is just coasting. No concerns about who is voted or any thoughts about the game, says he will post tommorow, good vote
What the hell was that?
My case on JS? He hasn't provided any content. Pretty simple.
He hasn't provided noise either. Chances are, voting for him won't change anything rapidly enough for our needs.
@Stål's UCT thing, yeah, UCT needs to shape up, but he's not our main target ATM.
In post 867, don_johnson wrote:yes, it is quite ironic that sven's only contribution is being upset because people are "not contributing".
vote sven. you won't be disappointed.
brian: don't ever do that again.
Dude. DUDE. Stop it. You're supporting the diametrical opposites of what we need.
My honest impression of this game: this game has a lot of people in it, and there are people calling us "the lurker queue" in some manner. I was on VLA so that's my excuse, not sure what everyone else's excuse is. For me it's personally hard to keep track of all these votes.
Here are my own personal thoughts that I have going on in my head about people I voted in this game:
Wake = terrible gambiting and is not helping anyone with that approach. It basically tells scum to leave him alone (which is terrible in itself because he basically tells the game "well i never die at night because scum don't want to hurt me"), and he buys himself a town card by claiming himself as VT Day 1. Yeah I've done that before when I was a new player back in the day, but I never EVER told anyone to vote for me before. I was willing to let him slide just to see if we could get a better picture of him, but then I think it was either DJ or Titus who said that an SK role can clearly benefit from this strategy. I'm willing to roll that dice that he is an SK, or if not, it calls him on his own damn bluff of "hey guys vote me out!".
Skull = that was my early vote which was spawned from sheeping. The game went by so fast (I didn't even get to read the game before it was at several pages). I went to ISO the lead wagon and it looked good. But my gut says a Day 1 mislynch would be way easy to get in a big game, so we should stop.
DJ = After feeling that Skull was thus town, I sheeped the Skull read on DJ. It looked good (I was vague about it DJ but I can point out sentences in detail about what posts I found suspicious). The vote came off because the SK Wake theory came up and I like it way more.
Titus = My impression of him will depend greatly on it.
Sven = I have ZERO clue what that vote and unvote was for on me. Tell me, Sven.
I've only played with a few other people in this game but haven't picked up on anything yet.
Pretty sure I'm going to get **** on by the "active" bloc in this game but these are honestly my opinions right now.
Too little, too superficial. Add more input on people who are less prominent. Add more depth to the people who are this prominent. Add something that hasn't been said before.
In post 874, Wake1 wrote:And now Uctriton lies again by saying I'm angry.
In post 870, Titus wrote:Wake, this discussion will continue when more evidence appears. If it is evidence of you being the sk, we will discuss further then. If you are magically cleared, then I will apologize. I doubt the latter will happen. It is important to catch scum first. I am fine moving to my less certain reads for now because you are not likely to be lynched.
No, you can argue it right now regardless of new evidence, and continue doing so when new info comes up.
There's no need to apologize for Scumhunting, either.
If you feel so damned certain I'm the Serial Killer, then go for it. You've got time. I think you should put your time and effort towards the one you're most certain about,
regardless
of what the majority thinks.
Normally, I'd agree with this. However, with the division in the town, number of players and lack of any major trains forming suggests I don't have the time to do that.
This guy gets it. We're running out of time.
In post 882, RachMarie wrote:Dashie I have you as a town read but why are you pushing on Elle who is not playing any more instead we are waiting for a replacement for that slot and one more? It is not like you to push on low hanging fruit instead of trying to find out who else is more scummy amongst those who are active and actually playing.
Brian could you not do teeny font please? I had an impossible time trying to read a chunk of your wall post under the spoiler because it was so small. I already have my browser way zoomed in since I am 70% blind, so that is not really a possibility to do again.
So far I have not seen a lot to want me to change my mind off of HGH/Loran
So I have been focusing on getting some town reads to by PoE make the potential scum list smaller to find more scum.
Excuse me? You read this thread closely enough that you've actually
read
Brian's post, and yet you still can't add more than this? Yeah, fair point on Ellie, but really? We need activity so badly, and you're not even trying to pressure anyone. Fix that.
In post 884, Skelda wrote:How is uci lying? And Sven is starting to irritate me, his lurker suspicion doesn't feel justified.
Brian, you reminded me about the DM read list thingy? Why didn't that wagon take off again? I'm still suspicious of him and BP.
Loran, I'm sort of unsure about. I'm not convinced, though. Can someone explain why she is so much more scummy than DM and BP? And Titus, I do think if you really feel strongly about Wake, go for it. Changing your vote because of pressure is a scumtell for me.
They were equally scummy. Then Lora shaped up and started providing actual content, without it being solely for the sake of self-defence. That makes them less scummy.
In post 883, Maenara wrote:I'm really sorry about the lack of activity guys, I promise that whatever happens, I'll post
something
of relevance tomorrow, once I'm done being out of my bloody mind over everything, and I'll respond to everyone who's said something to me, there are just too many people for me to have been able to do a half-assed job of it.
Objectively speaking, is there a correlation between activity and alignment in your game?
Current games aside, my meta - what little of it exists - is half a year old. I tend to have a problem with activity in general; it doesn't really matter if I'm town or scum. Generally, the less of a clue I have of what to do, or the more work has piled up in front of me, the less I post. So, pretty typical there.
In post 889, Evil Regals wrote:Wow the wagons chilling at even votes makes me think that scum aren't in danger currently or else the votes would look a lot different. I'm still reading or read the skull slot town.
Stal's response the last one looks Crüel to me to Titus. With that in mind without reading what I missed I don't think I would shed a tear if you got rope.
Do you still exist? Why are you here? Should you not be replacing out, or, I don't know, posting?
And thats the problem with some players, you vote with feelings, not reason
In post 892, Titus wrote:Again, you are implying those who are voting for you are unreasonable. We ask you for reasoning. You refuse and call us dunces. That's not an effective strategy regardless of alignment.
In post 893, Svenskt Stål wrote:There is zero resoning to vote me if you are a analytical town player, i am active, i post my thoughts when i have them.
I dont agree with your reasonings and your cases, that does not mean i cant belive that you nelive in them, you are one of my strongest townreads and i agree with about zero of your conclusions
Voting Stål is bad. This is not to say that I agree with him on everything - obviously - but he's a really bad vote right now.
In post 882, RachMarie wrote:Dashie I have you as a town read but why are you pushing on Elle who is not playing any more instead we are waiting for a replacement for that slot and one more? It is not like you to push on low hanging fruit instead of trying to find out who else is more scummy amongst those who are active and actually playing.
Never realized he was being reaplaced until it was pointed out. Replacing or not they are still by far the scummiest slot in the game though.
jmo and sven both looking like very good counters to Loren right now.
uctri would be nice if we had time as well.
vote jmo
While I get more caught up. Somewhat shameless joining of the wagon town reads like.
Stål is still a bad wagon. JMO is just... I don't know, lazy? I mean, okay, he's pretty far down on my list, but I don't think he sinks below a null. What is wrong with him, specifically?
Your move. Change your vote and he is tied for most.
Come on. Look at his posts. What is voting him going to help right now? He's already defeatist. We can't change that in this few days, and he's not scummy enough to merit a lynch for anything other than inactivity.
Your move. Change your vote and he is tied for most.
I am one of your two likliest scum, and now we are cooperating? VOTE: Uctri
Guys? Guys. No.
This is the wrong way to go about things. He won't provide you with info, and he's not sufficiently scummy on his own. Or at least provide a bloody case saying that he is.
In post 898, Titus wrote:Stal, why the change though? It seems as if you're in favor of whichever lurker wagon is best.
Hmm look, an innactive player is someone i cant have much of a solid case on... So it becomes more of a flavor of the month, one post can tip the scale.
Now say that it was an active player, then it would take more because i would have a more solid case and suspicion.
And uctritons post was god awfull.
Yes, yes, it was awful. But you're still looking wrong at the activity deal. It's not the activity itself that matters, it's the content. Consider that, and everything changes.
I'm happy with jmo as it stands but uct is also a good lynch. Ridiculous really that some of the others have had no attention on them, but there you go
Sven if I go down, can you pleeeeeeeeeeeeease go down next? Anyone? Scum if you're listening, can you seriously take him down hard? Or at least town take him down hard next round?
Seriously you think you're running the game and think you have it all figured out.
And you don't like my vote on Loran? Here's my thought process:
- As pointed out, we are running out of time
- ISOed the largest wagon
- Found something that's scummy
- Latched onto it
As for everyone else voting me (or at least putting me in a lynch pool), my flaw is that I haven't been active in this game because it just went TOO ******* FAST for me and I never got caught up or into it. That's seriously why I've done a crapload of sheeping and tunnelling.
I'm going to take a stand for my "lurker" block, and say that the case Sven puts out of all active people being town is either a naiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiive as **** town, or a scum who is scratching himself as he chuckles.
I'm not going to be anti-town and vote myself or advocate people voting me, so here is my lynch pool:
Sven, for being ridiculous and saying "everyone active is town to me, so let's kill off lurkers"
Wake, for his terrible anti-town gambits.
Or my current vote,
Loran
, because it's the most lynchable pool, and my theory is that he "read up" on his predecessor slot because he needed to carefully see how scum laid it out his story so that he doesn't get caught up in any inconsistencies. My guess is that as town, you just go into the game and not care what your previous townie slot said. By going back and reading back what HGH said, he is trying to be careful and calculative.
Okay. This is good. I don't actually agree with all of it - the 'read up on predecessor' thing is flimsy at best - but yes, Sven needs to reconsider the lurker thing. And this is content. That's good. Continue like this.
Ever had a townread on someone who wasn't in danger of getting lynched.
Brought up the speed of a wagon build-up as a valid argument for scumhuning, and whoever reponded to it without calling out for the bullshit it is.
Who failed to provide good reasons for voting someone who has a fairly adequate amount of posts.
Made a list of people who he wants to lynch consisting of easy targets.
I have yet to add up everything but I'm looking at Brian Skies, Titus, jmo, Sven, RD, BP
I suggest everyone proceeds in this manner because listing people, flip flopping, massive-catchup-posting and such are not productive.
This is a good post. I don't agree that people should
only
do this, but they should definitely do this too. It's necessary. You can be town for now.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #932 (isolation #28) » Tue Oct 08, 2013 5:55 am
Postby Maenara »
So, what can we say about people, then?
Well, we have a block of contributing-enough-to-count-as-town-for-now: Stål, Rainbowdash, Skull, Don, Titus, and yours truly. Then there are the people who don't say enough, but whose posts have made me sincerely believe they are town: Brian, Lora, Skelda. That's a total of nine players. That's not even enough for a lynch. That's bad. I could comment on each of these players, and I will, in time, but they've been engaged in enough banter that I think it scarcely necessary for now.
Bearing that in mind, there are a couple of other groups:
BoroPhil stands on his own, and I'll just go ahead and vote for him immediately: VOTE: BoroPhil
He has the third greatest number of posts, and yet he has contributed zero content. Like, at all. He's not gonna be town. If you look at my wall, you'll a choice few places where I've quoted him, and see that he does nothing but throw out superficial statements about who-knows-what, then vanishing back to the dark pit whence he cameth. He doesn't take a stand on anything. He doesn't try to pursue anyone. He's not playing to our wincondition.
Another category of his own is Wake. Wake is an idiot. He needs to die. Don't listen to him.
Then there are the lurkers. They are legion. Jacob, Aptil, Anti, Aero, Evil, Rach. The late Elle, but now she's replaced, fortunately. We can't use them for anything, but voting them is stupid. We won't gain anything from that.
And then there are the semi-lurkers. It is on these that we need to rely, which is sort of ironic, 'cause these are the people who are the most scummy. Still, we need at least two of them to get enough votes for a lynch - one, if we can get Albert in the active group - and that requires an unanimous decision amongst all the actives. The semi-lurkers, of course, are Uct and JMO. Neither has said enough to be active, but I don't think it's quite fair to call them lurkers either. Thus, we need to engage them. And they need to vote. Right now.
Personally, I propose three different solutions. The ideal one would be lynching Boro. He's supremely scummy right now, so he sort of deserves it. Of course, it also seems like half the town block have him as town, which I find a bit odd, so if y'all would be so kind as to explain why in the name of sweet Hastur he isn't scum, I'd appreciate that. The other solution would be to lynch Wake, because honestly, we need him gone. He's disruptive. He's top of the posting chart, and he hasn't done anything pro-town at all. But that one already fizzled. The third solution is to vote for one of the two semi-actives. That, at least, might stir them into action, and if it doesn't, well, they're refusing to act pro-town, and thus deserve the lynch.
As you can see, I've already chosen one of the three for myself, but I'm willing to do either one, and I suggest that everyone do the same.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
I did say I would do something constructive today. Besides, my shrinks had given me the wrong time, so I've missed my appointment and won't get a new one 'till November. I have a bit of frustration to work with in the meantime, and it so happens that I'm channeling it here.
Please read it, though. I have a lot of things for you, in particular.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #937 (isolation #31) » Tue Oct 08, 2013 6:04 am
Postby Maenara »
Peh, I'm not gonna have much luck convincing you about it here and now. Remind me to discuss content vs. activity with you post-game. Theory-crafting creates too much clutter here.
P-EDIT: Normally, I'd agree with you, but given the time-frame here, we don't have the time for a reaction wagon. We need a lynch, quickly.
(And yes, three days is quickly in a 20-player game)
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #957 (isolation #32) » Tue Oct 08, 2013 8:23 am
Postby Maenara »
Don't recall other claims than Wake claiming VT. He's an idiot, by the way, and his posts can be skipped easily, unless you're searching for a SK, which some people think he might be.
Don't bother waiting for reasons for the other wagons; it'll take more than a day to get them, and by that time, we can't marshal up enough to lynch 'em. I've given my three suggestions in #932.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #958 (isolation #33) » Tue Oct 08, 2013 8:47 am
Postby Maenara »
In post 953, BoroPhil wrote:So Meanara you say you don't disagree with my 786 yet you still slate me for it? what a load of bollocks.
and I don't/didn't know what a policy lynch was. I've heard it banded around a lot but didn't know what it was.
what exactly do you mean by I'm not pursuing anyone? I'm a hell of a lot more active than you who has done basically fuck all for most of the game then comes along with that. Fine, you don't think my scumhunting is any good, but at least I am trying to do something in this game which is more than I can say for 85% of the players, including you for the majority.
First off, I played against you
before
my half-year-hiatus. If you haven't learned what a policy lynch is in that time,
you
should be policy lynched.
Secondly, as I've stated a few bloody billion times already, you're not generating content. You're not scumhunting. You're making superficial statements that anyone and their adopted grandmother could've made while reading the thread upside down in a tornado.
And thirdly, concerning 786, you may have heard of a common criticism of string theory being that "It isn't even wrong". That's pretty much what applies here. It's not wrong, because there's nothing in it. 's like, clean water doesn't taste bad; that doesn't mean whoever invented it was good at designing tastes. Just means it tastes like bugger all. And that's exactly why what you're doing is scummy: When you're only making statements that are so blindingly obvious as to be straightforward and uncontroversial, you're keeping yourself out of harm's way, but not adding to town's hunt for scum at all.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #1121 (isolation #34) » Wed Oct 09, 2013 7:43 am
Postby Maenara »
Okay, seriously, screw this game. No coordination, no nothing, and Wake just
won't
shut
up.
Stål, Albert, Brian, and all other actives currently voting for some ridiculous tiny wagon, why are you not on one of the big ones? And why freaking Aptil? That's just yet another bloody lurker.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #1126 (isolation #35) » Wed Oct 09, 2013 7:56 am
Postby Maenara »
Fine I'll go along with the bloody Aptil wagon too.
If everyone would please get their precious lazy behinds over on this here wagon so we can at least get rid of someone who has yet to do anything pro-town and thus get this FUBAR day over with, that'd be might appreciated.
That goes for you, too.
Yes, you.
Vote.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
In post 1121, Maenara wrote:Okay, seriously, screw this game. No coordination, no nothing, and Wake just
won't
shut
up.
Stål, Albert, Brian, and all other actives currently voting for some ridiculous tiny wagon, why are you not on one of the big ones? And why freaking Aptil? That's just yet another bloody lurker.
you obviously need to read.
You obviously need to shut up, think, then start talking again, this time about the game and all the lovely ways you're planning on starting contributing right this moment.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #1135 (isolation #38) » Wed Oct 09, 2013 8:50 am
Postby Maenara »
No
NO NO NO
Wrong move.
Vote for Aptil. We need a wagon right now. No spreading the votes. Vote Aptil.
I am so unimpressed by your continuous ability to ignore half of what has been stated repeatedly, in bold pink text. Actually, make that impressed. It's impressive.
Revote.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #1337 (isolation #42) » Mon Oct 14, 2013 4:44 am
Postby Maenara »
So, chances are that at least one of {Stål, Rampage, Titus, Johnson} are scum, but honestly, I'm not really seeing any of them as particularly scummy in themselves, nor any of them particularly worse than any of the others - though Titus is quite a bit more townie than the rest of them, so probably not her, particularly given the early vote - so I really don't care to try to figure out which of them it is at this point of today.
Instead, I'm just gonna ask y'all to
maybe
cast your nets a wee bit wider, or at least stop clogging up the bloody thread, 'cause having to read nine quadruple-posts in a row is seriously sapping my will to comment on this game.
At the moment, I want pressure on Evil. This is early in the day, which is the best time to put pressure on lurkers, and not only did they promise us some freaking reads that we've yet to get, they were also one of the Johnny-vote-latelies on the scumwagon, which is a pretty good sign.
TL;DR: Less flood-of-posts, more pressure-the-non-contributors.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #1338 (isolation #43) » Mon Oct 14, 2013 4:45 am
Postby Maenara »
EDIT: Okay, that's actually a lie, Albert feels pretty scummy, but I honestly just don't want to argue with him right now because that'll bring this game nowhere useful.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #1399 (isolation #45) » Tue Oct 15, 2013 2:35 pm
Postby Maenara »
Fuck.
Quadruple.
Posts.
Stål I swear to fucking Hastur I don't know what to do with you. Your buddying is creepy as hell, and at this point I'm at my wits' end, but so in awe of your ability to just keep on posting things that make virtually zero sense that I frankly want to see how far this trainwreck goes. Your posts since the start of this day have just been spiralling ever-more-quickly down towards what I
assume
is your happy-place, but which the rest of us call Sweet Hades.
@TheTrainWreckThatIsThisCopClaim
Why would you claim this early? WHY would you claim this early? This is NOT the correct move! You crumb your result
heavily
, then hope to live another day to search on! That way, if scum kills you, town still gets your result, but if scum doesn't, you actually have a chance of catching two. How is this
not
obvious to people?
And yes, for the cheap seats, if Lora isn't the cop, the real cop shouldn't counter-claim, because that'd be bloody dumb.
VOTE: Wake
Oh my goodness have I wanted to do this again for a long time.
I'll try to actually read this thread when it's not 3:34 AM and I haven't been spending the entire night reading dumb fanfiction.
And UCT is massively scumming it up in here right now what the hell is even up with that.
And Evil is still not cleared.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #1400 (isolation #46) » Tue Oct 15, 2013 2:36 pm
Postby Maenara »
EDIT: In case it wasn't obvious enough the I'll-read-the-thread-tomorrow thing means Please Don't Hammer, because even though we have a result, and thus know who to lynch, we shouldn't be idiots and waste the remainder of a perfectly useful day.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #1405 (isolation #49) » Tue Oct 15, 2013 2:54 pm
Postby Maenara »
I mean actually I hadn't really considered the doc before; that makes it an almost-okay-move, 'cause now we can totally play follow-the-cop until the doc dies.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #1505 (isolation #52) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:03 am
Postby Maenara »
Right, I've read.
So, I'm not even going to bother analysing all the talk back and forth about Wake/Lora yet. Lora has been acting totally outlandishly about this whole affair, but honestly, at this point, following RBD's plan is the brightest idea. All but, like, three or four people have posted after that post, so presumably we'll know soon if anyone's counterclaiming or not. Whatever the case, lynch Wake - yeah, he may have been playing better today, but he's not exactly been such a saint that we'll miss 'im, and besides, it's the only sensible way with the PR interaction being as it is. TBH, no more needs to be said about the whole deal that isn't "I'm ready for this day to end", "I still need to read and discuss the others some more", "Vote: Wake" or "I'm cop".
So, the rest, then. Right. ABR has been playing lazily. He has barely been contributing, and for all that it may be BOP speaking, I'm finding that majorly suspicious. Him following my lead doesn't help either. Stål is still surprising everyone with his tremendous feats of mental acrobatics, and honestly would do well to just pipe down for a while and consider that alternate scenarios to his proposed ones do exist. Don has been Don, no change there. RBD has proven themselves to be über-town. UCT is either incredibly scummy or incredibly lazy and I'm starting to get sufficiently annoyed to not care which it is. Jacob is still MIA. Rach-Marie is doing the same as JMO is doing the same as Antihero is doing the same as UCT, and Evil is like totalscumpleasedie (unless they softclaimed cop earlier, which I'm thinking that they did, and I sorta want that confirmed/deconfirmed now, given that we're awaiting a potential counterclaim), and still haven't really provided the reads that they promised. Aptil is a lurker like the previously mentioned quartet, only their reluctance to vote makes them look potentially even worse. Aaand I think that's everyone.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #1506 (isolation #53) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:06 am
Postby Maenara »
Summary: Await posts from those whose latest pre-date Rainbow's to see if there's a CC, lynch Wake, then if town, lynch Lora, or if scum, lynch new result if postive, otherwise, extra pressure on Evil>Aptil>OtherLurkers>Albert>Stål>Skull>Titus>RBD
Oh, yeah, I forgot TItus in the above post. She's still being townie town mctown.
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #1508 (isolation #54) » Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:15 am
Postby Maenara »
...well, in truth, it's not so much that they're scum as in that they have an incredibly low content level and has been making promises to provide more that they have yet to cash in.
Point being that I'd said Evil needed pressure 'cause she'd promised reads and reading and whatnot late in D1 after a metric ton of lurking, and her few meagre posts D2 hadn't been enough to clear her of that. Also, so not buying the Doctor thing that RBD said; it anything, she was softclaiming cop with the "I have my reasons for Wake being town but totes won't be revealing them" crap (how would the doc even know that?), and seeing as we now
know
who the cop is, that makes it pretty clear that she's been scumming it up.
Oh, and she claims in her 23rd post - out of 1369 posts in the game - that she's not a lurker. Let's see, 1369 divided by 20, times I'm-studying-maths, divided by are-you-bloody-kidding, plus this-is-grade-school-level-come-on gives us an average posting rate of about fifty posts more than her. Now, granted, nobody should
be
at the level that Wake and Stål are, 'cause they've been threadcrapping and quadruple-posting, and 210 posts is just dumb, but I know for one that I've been less active than I really oughta, and I still have double her posts prior to posting this. So c'mon, don't claim you're not a lurker. Make excuses, sure, they might even be true, but don't flat-out lie, it doesn't suit
anyone
.
I want some analysis, or at the very least some thorough reads, from Evil. Right now. No more of this faking-it-'till-you-make-it bull. Lurkers are bad enough. Don't say you'll read up, then keep on lurking, then claim you're not lurking. That's just sad.
And we're back to VOTE: Evil Regals
Now she's in purple, now she's the turtle~
"I'll be more enthusiastic about encouraging thinking outside the box when there's evidence of any thinking going on inside it."
Post
Post #1586 (isolation #58) » Thu Oct 17, 2013 9:12 pm
Postby Maenara »
Didn't sleep this night either. Schedule is starting to become interesting. Contemplating buying & reading GURPS Zombies for maximum effect.
Lor is cop; if not, cop should counterclaim. If they do so, lynch Lor, but honestly, at this point, everyone's had their chance, so unlikely to happen. Assuming nobody counterclaims, doc protects Lor, no matter how inane the play, because Lor is confirmed cop, and not protecting that would be dumb as hell.
Nobody should beg to be investigated; we have an inv-immune SK, so a non-guilty just means "not faction-scum". Bragging about being investigated is dumb unless you want us to lynch you for being the SK.