Shaded wrote:5: Hurry to make a lynch. Also defends stab.
9: Tries to make tn to vote Stab.
11: Decides Stab is town! ---- Contradicts with 8-9. Sudden change in opinion (How the hell did i miss this before)
24: Unvotes Marcrell per my defense of him. --- Another sudden change of opinion. Looks too easy.
30: Finds egg is town, pushs Egg to vote for Kodama. Also asks Ragna about Kodama. --- Changes his target to Kodama here.
33: Asks Marcrell about randommidget agaaain (3) . Why does he keep asking same thing to Marcrell. Does not tell any suspicion about randommidget.
34: Votes Arma -- Another sudden change of target, after Ragna's post. This may be a bussing attempt when he saw the Cop's crumb.
37: Frustrated with awe's gambit. Suspicion of me. --- Another change of target.
37-38-39-40-41: Finds boonskies town because he was replaced. Claims that Ragna did not have a guilty result. --- Looks extremely suspicios to me. Cop crumb was too obvious. Also doing this in 4 consecutive posts makes it more artificial.
5: The "can we please lynch scum already" comment was a joke and clearly referring to the mod's comment in post 80. And I wasn't defending Stabs- if you read my post again, you'll see that I actually pointed something out which I found suspicious about Stabs. You clearly ignored context, didn't read clearly.
9: Not true.
11: The change in opinion is a result of Stabs' claim. DUH. I suspected Stabs before he claimed, but it was clear that he was town after he claimed.
24: There were three scum in the game. Not gonna focus all my energy on one person when I could be wrong, when people disagree, and when there are two or three other players I could target instead.
30: Note that that's the first time I changed my target.
33: I keep asking Marcrell the same question over and over again because Marcrell never answered the first two times. DUH. What am I just supposed to drop the question because I don't get a response?
34: Note that that's the second time I changed my target. Also, wasn't the supposed cop crumb at the beginning of day 2 - if I noticed, then why would I have waited until then to vote? I wouldn't have.
37: Third change in target.
38-41: Again, it wasn't obvious to me when he changed his vote. In general, when somebody does something completely contrary to what I'd expect, I'm hesitant to call it confirmation.
Shaded wrote:Analysis:
1) Too many and sudden target changes. Stab, Marcrell, Randommidget (possibly?), Kodama, Arma, Shaded. He looks like creating suspicions around while trying to stay off-the-wagon on cases created by others. His reasons are generally generic, crap and does not seem geninue to me.
2) His Arma vote when tn lynch seemed imminent looks like a distancing attempt (as he realized Ragna is Cop and had a guilty result on Arma at that point)
3) His over-explained "how Ragna did not have a guilty result on Arma" is a desperate attempt to save Arma at last minute.
1) Firstly, I never really targeted Stab or random. Secondly, there is nothing wrong with changing targets especially when I didn't change my target that often. I try to spread my attention by asking questions, voting different people and expressing suspicion because I need to develop reads on everyone. That's how the game is played. I'm not doing anything wrong. Thirdly, my reasons are not crap - it is crappy how you now find them bad and suspicious. Convenient timing.
2) This is ridiculous. You think I knew Ragnarok was cop before he had even died. And you think I voted Armageddon towards the end of day 2 because of a supposed cop crumb at the beginning of day 2. Unrealistic.
3) I wasn't trying to save Armageddon. I made it clear that I was going to vote Armageddon regardless.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. -Wayne Gretzky"
-Wickedestjr