Mini 1642: The Burning (GAME OVER FLAMES HAVE ENGULFED TOWN)
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 868, Elbirn wrote:Pieguhn (hope I spelled that right), have you had time to read into the thread? I'd like to hear your thoughts as well.
I've been busy as hell recently so I haven't read yet. I have some free time now, so I'm gonna see how far I get before I pass out.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
i'm on page 14
town: Formerfish, Cheetory6, MM576, maybe eektor
scum: acryon, TF
I'm seeing a lot of scumreads on MM576. while I 100% agree he's saying a lot of things that are logically incorrect, inconsistent, or deflections, I do not think this is scummy. why? I have one game of experience with him and he demonstrated basically all of these behaviors on a consistent basis, got lynched D1, and was town; so I don't think this kind of play is unusual for him. as for the rest of what he's done, I've seen some minor things I think are more likely to come from town than scum, so I don't feel particularly optimistic about him being scum.
will finish catching up and then fully elaborate on reads-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
can we please let me finish reading before we go lynching anyone
I don't particularly feel optimistic about the Elbirn wagon. I'm still at p24 but I've seen a few things I liked about her play and the way she's reacting to RC is at the very least giving me some additional pause about lynching her.
I think TF is scum. based on the other reads I have at this point, I think he's getting bussed here. I want a chance to fully form/post my reads before anyone gets lynched, since I'm currently feeling pretty good about this.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
god. at the end of D1 and what the fuck is 647/651?
do not lynch anyone until I finish catching up. I'm fairly sure TF is scum here - that solidified the read for me, but there's a lot more and I don't want to have any risk of someone derphammering before I post it. also, I'm fairly sure the VDA/MM576 wagon split was TvT and scum were divided between the 2 wagons.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
i am caught up
TOWN (S->W): Cheetory6, FF <gap> MM576 <gap> Boon, Elbirn
SCUM (W->S): acryon, eektor <gap> TF
Cheetory6/FF:both obvtown; I do have some amount of paranoia about FF, but it's nothing worth pursuing. not really going to bother explaining this unless asked given most ppl seem to agree here.
MM576:the tl;dr of the MM576 read is that I fully agree that his play isn't remotely helpful; however, overall I find his conviction at various points in the game town and I think some of the stances he took at various points look town once you look past how often he flip flops and contradicts himself (which, as I said before, isn't a scum tell for him). more on this:
Spoiler:
Boon:I don't particularly mind Boon's play. a good portion of the stances he took throughout the game mirrored mine as I was reading through it. now, again, obviously none of these are strong tells by themselves, but it's part of a overall body of work that suggests his play is coming from a consistently town mindset. ex:
Spoiler:
Elbirn:
Spoiler:-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
acryon/eektor:these are mostly POE reads, but tl;dr here is that I don't see the town in their posts. it feels more like they're just attempting to coast and go with the flow, rather than making waves in the game. I don't remember anything either of them did particularly resonating or seeing anything that made me think they were legitimately trying to game solve.
in particular, I agree acryon's take on VDA v. copper was bad; it was basically textbook scum "at least one of xxx and yyy are scum but I don't know which"
with eektor, it's mostly that he's not doing anything that draws attention to himself; I remember basically nothing he's actually done that stood out as a town thought process, and most of the questions he's asked aren't particularly relevant. he's also been a huge non-presence this game in general.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
TF:
Spoiler:
on top of all this, I don't remember a single town thought process anywhere in his ISO. there is a distinct lack of scumhunting, full stop - there's no attempts to extract information from players, and most of what he's posted has been surface level analysis and an overly large focus on associatives which comes across as forced given he's trying to link large amounts of players together with basically no information.
he is fucking scum. kill it with fucking fire
VOTE: TF-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
I think it makes sense for TF to be bussed here given he's basically entirely dead weight. there is no way in hell he would be able to make it more than 1 or 2 more game days past here. it makes sense that he would be bussed sooner than later.
In post 931, RadiantCowbells wrote:So you don't approve of my search for statements that don't fit a persons mental state
and instead go for a safe lynch-all-lurkers pov?
lol-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 940, RadiantCowbells wrote:Pie, please unvote. We have 10 more days and I want to use them.
is TF being at L-2 really that much of a problem? I don't want to unvote.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 944, Formerfish wrote:After reading Pie's most recent walls I see that I might be under some confbias towards Monkey.
where do you stand on TF atm?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 950, Formerfish wrote:I mean shit, Monkey gets a pass for his rvs shit because he knew it would draw attention so therefore he can't be scum, but Toon "claims scum" with an obviously shitty reads list? They both seem like the same thing but we're treating the slots very different.
it's not really the same thing imo
MM didn't really make much sense, but he threw himself out there early and his pushes actually had conviction behind them. I agree what he was saying was bad, but I still think it comes from a similar town mindset.
that's a big difference from what TF did. there was no pointed questioning, no conviction, or nothing similar to that that I'd expect from town. and then there was no follow-up on half of his reads. there's nothing here that indicates he's doing anything that he thinks will game solve. do you disagree?
In post 957, acryon wrote:I didn't say this. I voted for Victor because I was quite certain he was scum. It was "I think Victor is scum and I think copper may also be scum." Very different from what you tried to put on me above.
How does this change your reads knowing you were incorrect on this?
I'm pretty sure this:
In post 226, acryon wrote:I don't think VictorvCopper is TvT. Just not sure which side is which.
is saying basically what I said. anyway, the point here is mainly that your stance looked opportunistic; it looked like a stance where scum could easily be on whichever of the {VDA, copper} wagons was more likely to go through.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 955, eektor wrote:Basically there appears to be a better probability that Elbirn is scum than Toon.
what are your thoughts on my reasons for townreading Elbirn?
is the Elbirn scum read based entirely off his end-of-D1 play? I'm looking through your ISO and that's all I can find. if not, why?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 976, Elbirn wrote:I'd like to hear what you think about FF.
is this referring to my paranoia or my reasons for thinking he's town?
my paranoia mostly came from 381. FF usually posts a lot of content, but it felt like there was a lack of effort there when he actually committed to a vote; gut told me it could be scum who was coasting through the VDA/copper shitstorm. that's really the only thing that pinged for me and the rest of his play has been consistently town, so I'm not interested in pursuing it
@FF:still interested in your thoughts on this:
In post 963, pieguyn wrote:it's not really the same thing imo
MM didn't really make much sense, but he threw himself out there early and his pushes actually had conviction behind them. I agree what he was saying was bad, but I still think it comes from a similar town mindset.
that's a big difference from what TF did. there was no pointed questioning, no conviction, or nothing similar to that that I'd expect from town. and then there was no follow-up on half of his reads. there's nothing here that indicates he's doing anything that he thinks will game solve. do you disagree?
p-edit:
In post 982, eektor wrote:Actually from the beginning it looks like you have a pretty weak town read on him. Then you mentioned that you are biased toward reading Elbirn as town because he correctly identified the Victor vs copper as town vs town. What I see later on after he said that was he eventually voted for copper and then ended up voting for Victor. So that point holds no weight for me. Actions speak louder than words and in this case votes hold more weight than what people say in posts.
that's not what I meant. what I was saying was that I think his take on VDA v. copper looked town, despite the fact he didn't identify it as TvT.
In post 982, eektor wrote:RC's push on Elbirn and his reaction. I agree with you that RC's push was not very good, but I disagree with you on Elbirn's reaction. I didn't like Elbirn's reaction to RC's push.
why didn't you like it?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 986, acryon wrote:That was like one of the very first things I said on the topic. I very clearly drew lines after that. I'll give you a pass if you were just reading through and hadn't gotten there yet.
well yeah, but either way
1. if VDA got ran up, you could join the wagon.
2. if it looked like VDA wouldn't go through, but copper would, you could say "I think copper is VDA's buddy" and join the wagon anyway.
it's a stance that would allow you to join either wagon regardless of which was likely to go through. there's not much point in arguing over this given the only real explanations are you're either town who was wrong or scum taking advantage of the situation, without much room for argument; I happen to think it's the latter.
In post 999, eektor wrote:3. There's been twice I've seen people accuse you and you throw up a post of "who cares". That type of behavior I see as coming more from scum who feels like they got caught.
I agree with Cheetory here. can you either back this up, or otherwise explain *why* you think this behavior is scum motivated as opposed to town motivated? this is extremely vague.
I'm guessing one of them was his reaction to RC, but I also don't get much of a "who cares" vibe from that either. he was actively calling RC out, which feels like the opposite reaction (as opposed to just trying to write it off). walk me through this?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1002, Elbirn wrote:See bolded. Did I just catch you in a lie? Because I think I just caught you in a lie.
also I don't see how this is a lie, but I wanna see what Boon says first before explaining it-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
actually I'm looking through acryon's ISO
D1 happens and he pushes both VDA and copper. D2 happens and he pushes TF claiming he doesn't want to push 2 people at once, but he still has a pretty apparent soft-push going on Elbirn ("I still don't like Elbirn, but Toon needs to hang").
seems legit
In post 840, acryon wrote:My initial instincts are leaning toward Elbirn and ToonFighter. Going to look into some VCA, because with the way the wagons worked yesterday, it seems like it may be really valuable.
have you made any progress on this, btw? I'm also wondering if you think FF/Elbirn asking you supposedly terrible questions is an alignment tell or more based on playstyle.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1009, Boonskiies wrote:Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe I said Toon shouldn't be lynched. In fact, I specifically said that Toon Fighter is my #2 choice for a lynch. I believe you're slipping up, bro. I think you scum slipped with that. Making stuff up, rattling around, not checking facts before a case, and trying to pull attention from yourself onto someone else.
why do you think it's indicative of scum BS'ing?
it is more likely Elbirn just misread your post. although I suppose that could happen regardless of alignment, but it's still not a "scum slip"-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1011, Boonskiies wrote:I guess it's not a scum slip, but I feel it's scummy! I just don't feel like his push towards me is him actually doing anything rather than just forcibly looking for an argument. It's fluffy, and I don't necessarily understand it coming from town.
meh
I tend to misread/misinterpret posts all the time as town, so that's not what I'm getting from it at all.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1016, acryon wrote:Considering I explained right off the bat that I had no interest in repeating my mistakes yesterday, I figured that was clear. This post from you seems to indicate you would prefer me pushing two people day one who both ended up flipping town and then moving on and pushing another set of two people? Which is the very thing you are criticizing me for?
what I'm saying is, your stances this game have been the most opportunistic out of everyone in the game. you were open for both of the lynch targets D1, and I don't like the way you're soft-pushing the Elbirn wagon while claiming you don't want to push 2 people again today; pushing a wagon from the sideline while not getting too involved in it is a textbook scum play
why _do_ you have Elbirn as scum, anyway? I looked through your ISO and couldn't find it.
explain this. the last time you mentioned eektor was in 844, where you listed him as possible scum. what "good points" has he made since then? also, what happened to the Cheetory scum read?
In post 1046, acryon wrote:In post 1045, Toon Fighter wrote:I said IF. We are in the realm of possibilities. If I were to flip town, who would you think is scum? If I were scum, who would you think was my partner?
Come on guys. Let's lynch this.
mm, I think TF is scum, but this is not the reason he's scum. he's either asking this as town or asked this as scum bc he thought he would ask it as town. what do you think is scummy about this?
In post 1052, Boonskiies wrote:In post 1043, Elbirn wrote:Jesus dude, what is the connection between acryon and monkey? Why do you think they are scum buddies?
Voting patterns and general interactions. I really don't have a big case on Acryon, that's why I have my been pushing him. Sure, I'm scum reading it, but i can't really explain it, and unless you want me to say if have a gut feeling, then there's nothing I'm going to say yet. Only reason I brought it up in the first place was because someone asked me about my reads. I had no intention of pushing Acryon, as I'm basing it off of my monkey read. After monkey flips scum, that's when I wanted to push Acryon. (This is considering there isn't a major change of play in Acryon.)
when did you start thinking this?
fwiw, I still don't think this is a slip, but I might as well ask.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
I don't like most of TF's reads. it feels more like they're derived from the general impression of the gamestate at this point (FF, me town, Boon, Elbirn scum), and there's a bunch of flip flops from his previous reads with little/no explanation
I could see TF getting thrown under the bus here. I'd be up for acryon if TF doesn't happen.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
@Elbirn:what do you make of my recent thoughts re: TF?
cos the thing is, i don't disagree TF's wagon weirds me out, but TF has done basically nothing town and i have a lot of town reads elsewhere. and i think acryon's and TF's pushes on each other look fake; acryon for reasons already mentioned, and TF basically because there was no *actual* push until his recent posts and there was still hardly anything there. (iirc. correct me if i'm wrong, on phone so haven't checked this)
basically i still think TF being bussed here makes the most sense-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1065, Toon Fighter wrote:What's with boon and the quickhammers? Would you hammer any player?
@pieguyn: I didn't mention eektor because he was contingent on MM being scum. Cheeto looks better than on D2 but is still worth a look
that still doesn't answer what "good points" you think eektor made recently. i also want to know *why* Cheetory looks better (and why he's still worth a look).-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
@Boon:still want your response to this:
In post 1053, pieguyn wrote:In post 1052, Boonskiies wrote:In post 1043, Elbirn wrote:Jesus dude, what is the connection between acryon and monkey? Why do you think they are scum buddies?
Voting patterns and general interactions. I really don't have a big case on Acryon, that's why I have my been pushing him. Sure, I'm scum reading it, but i can't really explain it, and unless you want me to say if have a gut feeling, then there's nothing I'm going to say yet. Only reason I brought it up in the first place was because someone asked me about my reads. I had no intention of pushing Acryon, as I'm basing it off of my monkey read. After monkey flips scum, that's when I wanted to push Acryon. (This is considering there isn't a major change of play in Acryon.)
when did you start thinking this?
fwiw, I still don't think this is a slip, but I might as well ask.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1076, Cheetory6 wrote:This is the kind of shit that I knew I was going to have to deal with that was demotivating my reread q.q
This is, on the surface, one of the scummiest looking posts I've ever seen. Lol.
I think I'm an idiot because my reaction is kind of "this is too bad to be scum. There's no way scum would say something this ridiculous."
Stuff like this doesn't make me hate the idea of a Toon lynch and I can understand how anyone would want it, but it just feels kind of too easy.
Okay.
actually, hold the fuck on.
TF's whole reason for you being scum was that you were taking advantage of the VDA/copper shitstorm. but there was (*again*) absolutely no follow-through with it after both of them flipped town. like, he had you in his MM scumteam, but then after he started pushing MM as town he went straight to Elbirn and...... forgot all about it?
@TF, explain this.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1133, MonkeyMan576 wrote:What exactly do you think doesn't make sense from me pie? Maybe I can clarify.
most of your play in general
as just one example, on a playstyle level, I dislike the way you react to pressure. it is good play to directly answer questions/cases against you instead of deflecting in the way that you do. the point is that I don't think most of what TF is doing this game can be easily explained via playstyle.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1072, acryon wrote:I am playing so bad this game. I had weird feelings about Elbirn following the flip, and didn't particularly like some of the way he handled questions and responses today, but now I think he's town. Most of my scum-read on him was related to that and gut, so I went back through his ISO to find what about it was actually pinging me, and I found some things, especially from D1 that make no sense as Elbirn-scum given Copper/Victor/Futan-town. The way he questions aspects of the wagons D1 seem very town. Even his reason for the compromise lynch of Victor in 728 makes a lot of sense.
. . .
I'm looking through this and the only time you addressed Elbirn D2 up to that point was.... when you called him out for asking you terrible questions. and you just told me you'd be reluctant to call that an alignment tell and that it was mostly play style. the only other thing I noticed is where you said his Boon post wasn't backed up by a Boon vote, but I'm guessing that itself wouldn't be a strong enough reason for a scum read.
is there more to this that I'm missing? if there is, elaborate.
In post 1072, acryon wrote:But I quoted his follow-up because it wasn't a good answer for it. This question from Toon just makes zero sense as town. If Toon is town, then he is telling Elbirn to engage in a thought process that is absolutely a complete waste of time and energy. Why would you ask someone to give you associative tells based on an alignment-red that youknowis incorrect? From a scum-perspective, this kind of question allows Toon/other scum to have extra information on where Toon's reads are at. There is literally zero town reason to ask this question.
disagree. the town reason for asking that is to make sure Elbirn is *actually* legitimately scum hunting and forming a complete picture of the game; while it would necessarily be wrong, cases usually say more about the person making the case than the person the case is about.
I'm assuming you meant Elbirn's reads. why would scum specifically focus on getting reads from Elbirn? usually "fishing out reads" isn't actually done often in practice, and when it is it's usually done to someone who's perceived as a large threat (and no offense but I don't exactly think Elbirn fits here).
I still don't follow your logic here.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1100, Elbirn wrote:@ToonFighter, redirecting this queston to you. You said yesterday that Cheety is likely scum with Vic-town and Copper-town. Why didn't you follow up on that? You haven't pushed Cheeto, voted him, asked him any questions, or anything today. Instead you started the day voting Monkey, and then me. Why?
oh lol, it seems I've reached the same conclusion as Elbirn.
In post 1119, eektor wrote:Also, recently when he asked someone's opinion on who his partners would be if he flips scum. Why would town ever ask something like that?
again, I don't like this
I think a lot of people are using TF asking this as an easy thing to take a potshot at, without critically thinking about it. what do you think the scum motivation is in asking that question?
I'm also wondering who you think the scum lining TF up for lynch are, and why you'd get back onto the TF wagon at the request of someone you think is possible scum if you thought scum was lining TF up for lynch.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
acryon is saying TF asked you that "if I'm scum who else is scum" question so that scum would get more information about your reads (that is, they'd get an idea for what you'd do after TF flipped scum)
which I'm not sure about cos it's not smth I usually see scum actually do. and even if they were interested in what your reads were, it wouldn't be hard to make a good enough guess based on what you had already posted in the game thread
usually the only time I ever see scum actually make an explicit attempt to learn more about someone's reads, it's done to someone who is extremely good at pushing the lynch they want, and mostly accurate, but doesn't elaborate on most of their reads outside of that. even if there was someone in this game who was that good at strong-arming lynches, no one fits since most of the people here are pretty open with reads anyway-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1141, Flames682 wrote:In post 1062, pieguyn wrote:pseudo vote Acryon(with no colon)
i want acryon lynched but i do not want to see Boon in here quickhammering with 9 days left
Please don't do this and use FOS instead. If I see a vote without a colon I'll add one.
Spoiler:-
-
pieguyn
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
ftr
In post 1150, Elbirn wrote:So...Thinking it over. We could lynch Toon, and he could flip whatever he flips, and then no matter what I'm going to want Acryon's blood D3. Or we could lynch Acryon who I'm confident will flip scum regardless. Acryon's death would also be more helpful in terms of information imo. If he's town, my proposed scumteam pretty much falls apart and I need to go rethink my life. If he's scum, odds of Boon scum go up, odds of Monkeyman scum go up.
Agree/Disagree?
I somewhat agree with this and this is one of the reasons I was somewhat open to an acryon lynch. it's somewhat difficult to tell in a vacuum if and who was bussing TF here; although I have some ideas based on my reads, if they end up being wrong (or if God forbid TF is actually town), meh
I haven't looked into acryon interactions much. given the way the wagons today ended up, a lot of it will depend on what TF flips.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
imo
TF scum -> probably being bussed; based on my reads I would guess acryon + eektor
TF town -> today was likely a scum (acryon) wagon town-counter wagon scenario. given the timing of the votes Boon would be my immediate guess here.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1144, eektor wrote:Where is the town motivation in that? You know you won't flip scum.
Who I think scum is on TF lynch depends greatly on whether TF flips scum or town. This post by you gives me the impression that you know TF will flip town, yet you are voting for him? Why is that?
er
I don't think TF will flip town. however, I think there's a good chance he was bussed here. the aim of this is to find out who. if I can find a hole in someone's thought process, then it's an indication that they push they were making was forced. in this case, I don't think TF's question is scummy because I think he'd ask the same thing as town (making it a null tell), so I'm trying to find out why people think it's scummy
what in that post gave you the impression I thought TF would flip town? I had outright said already I thought it was likely he was being bussed here.
also, re: 1st question, I previously explained it to acryon (second half of 1135). do you disagree with that?
In post 1147, acryon wrote:Completely disagree. How does it ensure he is actually legitmately scumhunting? All he has to do is come up with a good story from there of who else is scum, which if he is town or scum, he will have.
that's the whole purpose of questioning. it is unlikely from a town POV he would have had anything specific in mind when first asking that, but if he found something contradictory, it would be telling.
besides that, meh. I don't particularly have a problem with your response here, although I don't agree.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1199, Elbirn wrote:On phone. K so I've read up on the "traitor" role. Would traitor know his team mates? Clearly main scum team didn't know the traitor as they derped And killed him. But I wanna know if former knew his teammates, that'll affect the way I read things when I go back and iso Him. But I'm guessing only mod knows that and cannot divulge?
iirc the "normal" implementation of traitor isn't in any way standardized; it can be recruitable/non-recruitable, know its teammates/not know, etc.
personally i think if you're going to run a traitor it should be they know the scum team, and the scum team knows them, but they can't interact with or recruit the traitor. that obviously wasn't the case here, though.
my initial thought is that FF had most of the scum in his scum reads, and that's why he died - it is usually normal traitor play (for a traitor who knows his team) to slightly bus your teammates so they can figure out who you are. this would (again) point to acryon.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1208, MonkeyMan576 wrote:WIFOM!
er..... yeah?
I haven't exactly thought about it much, but off the top of my head that's the first reason I can think of for him dying. do you have a better explanation?
In post 1206, MonkeyMan576 wrote:986 and 1079 make me think Acryon is town. I'm not voting him today.
it's like you didn't even read my post.
one of the reasons I dislike traitor roles is that, in the case where scum do not know the traitor, it completely fucks with interaction analysis. it is possible that is the case here. besides, even if they did know each other, I don't see anything there that is impossible as scum x scum interaction (just a few questions in 986, and there wasn't really much of a hard scum read on him in 1079), so... yay?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
in fact, in the case where scum did know the traitor, I think 1079 is slightly more indicative of acryon-scum than acryon-town, although it's not particularly telling either way.
there was no reason given for pushing FF as scum besides him being absent recently, and no real push on him. it is a textbook distancing play to put a scum partner as "lean scum" while not actually pushing them.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1215, MonkeyMan576 wrote:It's obvious that Fish was going for a quick mislynch day 1, then he was hard pushing Acryon Day 2. I know I am town and I'm guessing that he was trying to mislynch Acryon just like he was me. I don't think it's really helpful to worry about Fish's role that much. The important point is that he was scum and he likely knew who his teammates were.
er..... not really?
I don't remember much of a hard push on acryon from FF, and looking through his ISO his entire push was basically one post where he votes acryon and was primarily sheeping me (correct me if I'm wrong here). and as I literally just said, it is textbook traitor play to weakly bus your teammates
soooo yeah-
-
pieguyn
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1223, RadiantCowbells wrote:Formerfish did not jump on the Elbirn wagon at any point yesterday. He essentially pretended it didn't exist.
this is the first decent thing I've heard from your slot this entire game. can you elaborate more on this?
granted, I still don't find it particularly compelling because I think it's likely FF would be laying down false interactions to throw people off and I still think it makes sense FF was bussing his teammates, but it's worth taking a look at-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1232, RadiantCowbells wrote:Pie, you're scum. go away.
thanks a lot for being fucking useless-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1238, Boonskiies wrote:Why are you 99% sure? FF easily could have done that to his scum buddy. I totally see that as something Formerfish would do.
not interested in elaborating on this yet. I will in a bit.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1244, Cheetory6 wrote:Are you scum Boon? Seriously though. This push is dumb and if you're town you should probably understand why.
^this-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1252, eektor wrote:I'm clearly not on the same time zone as you guys. I go to sleep and wake up to 3 pages of posts.
Based on what the mod said I'm going to guess that the other mafia (it can't be just one so 2) wouldn't know that fish was one of them. It kind of makes sense because I couldn't see any connection for a 3 scum team.
Reading on Fish's ISO, I see a push on Monkey for the whole game (Monkey is most likely town now), voting acryon when there was a Toon wagon (leaning town on acryon), and a buddying with Cheetory. I think out of the 3 people voting acryon right now, 2 of them is scum.
VOTE: Cheetory
why do you think there are specifically 2 scum on the acryon wagon?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
o, so it's based on the reads you gave. I need sleep -.-
*why* does FF voting acryon when there was a TF wagon make acryon town, and *why* is FF buddying Cheetory more indicative of scum x scum as opposed to scum buddying up to town? I don't like how vague you're being (and I particularly want your answer to the 1st question)
p-edit: haven't got that far yet, but iirc Boon (off memory) and you (via POE) are both possibilities. I want to do some rereading before solidifying anything-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
. . . since when was that the reason you unvoted Cheetory?
In post 1253, eektor wrote:On second thought that might be why Fish got killed and make Cheetory more town, although I'll say null because it still did seem that Fish was buddying up to him.
it looks like you said FF's crumb made Cheetory town and that your read at the end was null, which indicates you still think the buddying was indicative of scum. I don't see where in here you're considering FF might have been buddying Cheetory as town. I want to know *why* you're ruling this out.
In post 1259, eektor wrote:Why would scum try to get a buddy lynched when there is an easy town lynch to go after? As far as I was thinking at the end of day 2 was we were probably going to be in lylo today. It just so happens we got lucky with what happened last night. Scum just needed an easy lynch and then try to set themselves up for a mislynch in lylo. I'm not saying that acryon is for sure town, but I'm saying it makes more sense to me that he is town than scum.
strongly disagree with this. there are a fuckton of reasons FF would vote acryon-scum here:
1. it is possible FF did this on purpose in order to mislead. this is even more so the case given he was a traitor and I think both of the other people on the acryon wagon were town
2. it is possible FF didn't think acryon would *actually* get lynched
3. FF might just like bussing in general. there might be no reason for it; some people bus no matter how little sense it makes
.
.
.
you're greatly oversimplifying the logic here. I want to hear your explanation for why you didn't stop to consider stuff like this before declaring acryon was prob town.
In post 1259, eektor wrote:Now if acryon was town, what would be your thoughts on who is scum?
i have no interest in entertaining this hypothetical right now
it will be interesting to see you attempt to get out of this-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
I'm actually somewhat paranoid of FF's interactions with MM576. for the majority of D1, he had a huge scum read on MM576, but was willing to vote copper along with MM576.
not really interested in pursuing this until the acryon thing gets sorted out, plus I think the rest of his play looks town, but it is something I want to look into if it becomes relevant later. might look through some of MM's scum games later as well just to be sure
also think it makes Elbirn slightly more town. he also completely ignored eektor, save for posts where eektor was explicitly addressing him.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
this series of posts:
usually I don't see scum blatantly vote in a bloc like that. plus, with you/FF-scum, FF not voting would make more sense regardless of MM's alignment. he could more evenly split the wagons if both (copper/MM) were town, and hopefully delay or wait out the MM bus if MM was scum.
at the very least, it means you and MM aren't scum together
p-edit: @Elbirn-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1269, eektor wrote:@pie
I unvoted Cheetory because of the crumb he mentioned plus the thought that Fish buddying up with him could actually be scum vs town. So let me see, you want me to bump Cheetory from a null to a town lean, then. Why are you defending Cheetory?
so you thought it might be scum v scum and then changed your mind?
it's difficult to follow what you're saying here, considering that's not what you originally said
In post 1269, eektor wrote:Then you talk about all the ways why FF could vote acryon - scum and say I am oversimplifying things and of course you don't even want to think about the other option which includes all the possibilities in which acryon is town? If you want to show me why acryon scum makes more sense than acryon town, you better show me what you think about acryon - town and why that makes less sense than acryon - scum. Otherwise, I'm content with my vote right now.
it is not my goal to convince you. it is my goal to scum hunt your thought process
FF not doing any of the reasons I listed off are assumptions you would have to make in order to come to the conclusion you did, namely FF trying to mislynch acryon. I want to know *why* you didn't consider one of those possibilities, or any possibility similar to that, before coming to the conclusion that acryon had to be town as a result of that interaction; since there is a pretty big gap here and for some other reasons that will soon become apparent.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
oh and @Elbirn:
what that means is that FF basically completely ignored eektor, except for points where he was basically forced to respond to him. usually when scum completely ignores another player, it is worth looking into. this isn't particularly a strong tell, since as I said it's possible FF could have done that on purpose in order to mislead, but meh.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1285, eektor wrote:I don't really see you scum hunting, I see you trying to set me up for a mislynch. Why I don't consider your other possibilities because I see acryon town making more sense than acryon - scum. Which you fail to want to address, so I don't see this going anywhere.
. . .
jesus fucking christ. *why* do you think acryon-town makes the most sense here? what possibilities were you considering and why did you arrive at that conclusion?
like, you explained you think acryon being set up for a mislynch makes the most sense. ok. I want to know *why* this is the case. just saying "it makes the most sense" without explaining the reason tells me fuck all about the thought process you actually had here. when I first asked this you said it was because you didn't think scum would bus with a mislynch on the table, and I provided a few counterarguments to that point, at which point you never answered (instead just saying again you thought acryon-town made more sense), so.... yay?
In post 1286, Elbirn wrote:Ah okay, I was confused because it sounded like you were bringing up me being more town because of FF ignoring me, and then saying the opposite for Eektor. *Headscratch* But in that same train of thought.. Do you not feel that FF ignored me? You said 1223 was a good point. But now you're saying ignoring me could have been done to mislead. Buttt in the context of Eektor you...Seem to think it's more likely a reliable tell? Yeah I know, you pretty much discredited it in 1284, but then why bring it up in the first place?
no, I'm saying ignoring eektor could have been done to mislead
it's not really the same thing; RC was saying that FF ignored you _when you were a viable wagon_, whereas I'm saying FF didn't interact with eektor (as in, he didn't have any posts or conversation directed towards him except responding to posts where eektor was explicitly addressing him).
the former tell with you is generally more indicative because it is an action that can actually affect who gets lynched or not. however, I think the vote pattern pointing towards you being town is a stronger tell, and thus more relevant
the latter tell with eektor is a textbook tell - scum are more likely to outright ignore their partners - but it's fundamentally a weak tell because it's easy to manipulate, especially if you're a traitor where it would be more likely you'd lay down false interactions.
at the end of the day we can't really tell fuck all from most of this. interactions aren't useful by themselves a lot of the time; they're more useful when placed in context in order to get a better picture of the game. so I will still note them in case they become relevant later
In post 1286, Elbirn wrote:My vote switch + FF's vote switch immediately after did in fact even out the wagons between Monkeyman and Victor. Does this mean MM is likely town, in your opinion?
not really. as I said to eektor, it is possible he didn't actually think MM would get lynched, or it is possible he did this on purpose to throw everyone off. do you disagree?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
listen up fuckwit
i have been asking you about this since 1258. you gave a roundabout answer ("why would scum bus with a mislynch on the table"), i gave at least 3 counterpoints to that, and you still haven't argued counter to it.
*you* are the one who is blowing off my question here. your question that i blew off came after mine, and i actually had a reason for it; i blew off your question because, put simply, acryon isn't fucking town here, and you're a huge derp if you're town and can't see that by now.
In post 1293, eektor wrote:Your continued questions at me tell me you want to convince me to vote acryon with you guys, yet you say you are scum hunting and you specifically mentioned you think I'm scum. Shouldn't you try to convince someone else then instead of me? Or do you know I'm town and you need my vote?
this, btw, is pretty fucking awful. you're essentially saying that i can't possibly be questioning a scum read. you're also saying this immediately after i said my intent was to question you as opposed to trying to convince you.
legitimately don't see how anyone can actually think this makes sense
-
-