I'll go through the player list and share the thoughts that I have gathered from my lurking
Now some inquiries:
. Also is this just how cool people indent?
UNVOTE:
Lapsa wrote:Gliffie, did Aero told you his alignment from the very start of this game?
In post 447, bji wrote:Why don't you just come out and say what you think instead of hinting like this?
SilverWolf wrote:Welcome Gliffie!!
How did Aero flip?
I couldn't really read Aero well due to catch up type posts and 1v1's with pisskop. Perhaps you could shed some light on this for us? Don't quote your role PM.
pisskop wrote:@Giffie
. Not really much I can ask you atm. Aero's posting caused my read; his attituide and approach.
Am I crazy? Do you agree with his opinion/pushes?
.There's not much I can hold you accountable for answering, save perhaps why you think your predecessor was blatently ignoring every point that didn't have a pro-town answer.
In post 456, Count Dooku wrote:In post 445, Gliffie wrote:Dooku - Fine except for his Nickname vote reasoning. That's dumb
Why?
Did you read post 397?
If so, and you indeed think that my vote is bad, tell me why do you think it, please.
Count Dooku wrote:Yes, maybe he had RL shit, maybe he couldn't keep up with the game etc. But. Why did he sign up? Why didn't he read some other games to see whether people swear? If he knew that he will be having a lot of RL things to do, why did he sign up? Why did he request replacement only after people started to scumread him?
In post 471, Aristophanes wrote:@Gliffie
Johnny seems to be doing his regular poking. I like his poking. I see nothing wrong with him this far.
He's a null-town lean. I'm not super town reading him for anything, but I don't see anything wrong with his posts, which makes me like him.
In post 499, Aristophanes wrote:I have been townreading [SW] the whole time.
If you wanna fight, I can, just see no need
In post 503, Gliffie wrote:In post 499, Aristophanes wrote:I have been townreading [SW] the whole time.
If you wanna fight, I can, just see no need
Hmm, why not argue with town reads?
VOTE: Aristophanes <-- guess why
In post 507, Aristophanes wrote:Gliff
I would like you to actually aay why you're voting me.
Is it because I seem "appeasy"?
Is it because I didn't argue with SW?
If the latter, that is because they have good points, which, along with a town lean, lead to myaelf having no reason to question them right now.
In post 511, Lapsa wrote:In post 503, Gliffie wrote:Johnny is more than capable enough to not do anything "wrong" this early, especially when he's not doing much. It seems even Johnny agrees he's not the most town player at the moment (475). Not very pleased with this answer.
@Gliffie, how much have you played together, could you describe Johnny a bit more?
In post 524, bji wrote:My vote is worse than a Prolapsed Brain vote. I'd be willing to vote Prolapsed Brain but only because with a clear scum choice, I'd be as happy to see PB go as anyone.
I would also be willing to vote for evilpacman18, VictorDeAngelo, and Gliffie.
I'm trying to pick middle of the road players who do not seem to scummy nor non-scummy. I expect that this is how the scum are hiding.
In post 567, bji wrote:I don't have a particularly good defense against this other than being new and bad at this game. I have tried to be as skeptical as I could be about everyone from very early on which led to exaggerating my arguments just to see where they would go. That's why I found something scummy in almost everyone. Anyone could be scum, so why wouldn't I be looking for something scummy in everyone anyway?
Post 408 was my attempt at making something stick on evilpacman18. Maybe it was all weak arguments (West9 especially doesn't like that I tried to make evilpacman18's statement about wanting to see Nickname lynched on Day 1 into a contradiction with his discomfort with the "vote happy" nature that he ascribed to town in the post that 408 responds to), but it was an attempt at trying to see if I could catch a scum. Weak sauce, maybe, but that seems to be the only sauce at my disposal.
In post 571, Gliffie wrote:Changed my avatar, but I assure you that's it's for %100 scum reasons.
In post 575, bji wrote:I have failed horribly, several times already, it's in the thread history. I pushed on pisskop, and on evilpacman18, and perhaps most ludicrously of all, on West9.
What I found in my previous games is that scum try to be active, but not too active; to be argumentative, but not too argumentative; to be thoughtful but not too thoughtful; basically the tendency is to try not to stray too far towards any extreme. I'm trying to identify those people in this game and focus on them. I haven't done a great job of that.
In my first game, I was a complete newbie scum who didn't read any strategy guides and hardly knew how the game worked (I didn't even know what the power roles were/did until early Day 2 when I bothered to read them). And yet, my scum partner and myself completely fooled a bevy of more experienced players and won. I just don't feel confident that as a newbie townie against more experienced scum, I'll have any hope of detecting them. I tried to come out guns blazing but I feel like I just got nowhere.
Wah wah, I know. Just being real.
In post 585, pisskop wrote:While providing Disney-Tiered levels of inspiration, there is no content being generated out of a slot in which a fairly competent player displayed such clear scumtells. Why am I the only one here?
Lapsa wrote:this is my intent to hammer Titus
In post 852, Lapsa wrote:In post 847, Gliffie wrote:Good luck with that. Do you have two votes?
got yours
In post 855, pisskop wrote:Sooo much anime. Too many pictures.
pisskop wrote:Okay. So you were. It strikes me as highly unlikely on this site, however.
I read prolasped naked vote a survivalism.
Lapsa wrote:
sorry, Gliffie aka town slip of the century, but you are wrong - it is just a big conspiracy
pisskop was right on #728
In post 728, pisskop wrote:We should lynch Titus or Gliffie.
do it
lynch Titus!
In post 849, Titus wrote:I will suppose the latter is for G there as I have never been a neighborizer.
I will chill for a day or two to calm down and refocus.
In post 862, bji wrote:Hi Gliffie. Yeah, I'm back. Sorry to disappoint you!
Can you reiterate your case on Ari? I read your ISO to try to understand it. I honestly fail to see why it's more compelling than the evidence against SW/Titus. It seems to boil pretty much entirely down to believing that Ari backed off of arguments too quickly and was too "appeasy" as appears to be the popular word for it. Do you have anything else?
In post 863, bji wrote:Here's what Gliffie said about SW's exit in post 704:
"Besides, feigning outrage to that degree as scum would be close to what I deem unethical play."
Is that common consensus? I kind of missed that on first read of post 704 but I have to admit it is very interesting. Is it accepted that replacing out as a ploy to disguise scumminess is unethical? I believe that if it's unethical, SilverWolf wouldn't do it. She didn't seem like that kind of person.
Titus wrote:Whoops... come vote Brain with me. Make him give reads or die.
In post 874, West9 wrote:yeah. It makes more sense to say that its compelling evidence towards pisskops other points about titus.
In post 877, pisskop wrote:Titus' response/ her being incorrect is compelling, however.
In post 884, pisskop wrote:AFA Ari neighborizers scum. That would only really work if Ari felt capable of sorting them.
pisskop wrote:
As in, he's next on the chopping block for most of the town. Many players will do whatever keeps them alive, either alignment.
In post 1020, bji wrote:Why hasn't Ari stated who he is going to neighborize? A lynch could happen at any time now and he hasn't declared his target.
bji wrote:Sorry did Sri already name his target? Must have missed it. I'm on my phone and can hardly navigate this site at the moment.
In post 1025, Titus wrote:Scum
PB and Tjoe
Pisskop by play
Piskop by claim
Gliffee
Johnny farrar/Pacman/West9/Count Dooku
Lapsa/VDA/bji
In post 1021, Prolapsed Brain wrote:In post 1017, Gliffie wrote:(Someone please vote Ari with me).
Okay!
VOTE: Aristotle
In post 1030, Titus wrote:@G VDA is top town due to the consistency in his posts andhighlighted something I had not seen.
In post 1833, Titus wrote:@Gliffe, what do you mean?
In post 1846, JohnnyFarrar wrote:In post 1838, Gliffie wrote:I think we all say we would have killed PB now, but we are all equally guilty of letting that shit slide all game.
I voted him more than once baby girl