In post 178, Barleycorn wrote:what conclusions have you drawn from that conversation about dog's alignment?
Conclusions RE: DogWatch's play
I think DogWatch is going to be an easy player to lynch on THIS site.
In post 44, DogWatch wrote:Fire has three votes now with zero reasoning behind them. Can the three of you explain?
If I was scum I would have jumped on this like:
Why would scum-DogWatch want us to pick apart 3 naked/unsupported RVS votes?
I read it better as: DogWatch didn't understand the true nature of mafiascum RVS and wanted to find out if he'd overlooked something.
DogWatch is not a new player to mafia, thus, I cannot see scum-DogWatch playing 'dumb'.
DogWatch later says:
DogWatch is seeking the SUPPORTING REASONS behind people's naked votes and unexplained suspicions.
I do not think this behaviour is scum-indicative.
Conclusions RE: Shadow_step's rhetorical question
In post 48, Shadow_step wrote: In post 44, DogWatch wrote:Fire has three votes now with zero reasoning behind them. Can the three of you explain? We're getting out of the rvs stage at this point. Which reminds me to remove my random vote
UNVOTE:
Concerned townie much?
- I read this as Shadow Step implying that DogWatch was playing the LAMIST card. There was no need for anyone to answer this question. Only agree or disagree with the implied observation.
- DogWatch's question was so ridiculous to my ears that Shadow Step is allowed to flag this as suspicious (I DO NOT agree with his conclusion though).
- I think DogWatch is stuck in confirmation bias here. In regard to Dogwatch's vote, Shadow Step described it as: "Scum are survivalistic, town are less so. As town you're not as worried about getting lynched as you are as scum. As scum you quickly want a CW.". THUS, Shadow was reading Dogwatch's non-alignment play as scummy.
Why can't town vote for someone when they are under pressure? Why can't town be survivalist?
- bottom line: I lean on stubborn-town Shadow projecting what he thinks is conclusively scum-indicative on DayWatch's non-scummy play.