Mini Normal 1952: Dragon's Dance [OVER - PERFECT SCUM WIN]
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
Thank you for the explanation.In post 28, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
Why were you considering claiming right away?In post 25, Lalendra wrote:Not on board with the LQ lunch because I'm also VT and was considering claiming it straight out the gate.
Can someone elaborate on the policy lynch? I must be missing something.
A policy lynch is the act of lynching a player who is not found to be particularly scummy, but because their bad play will hurt the town later on.
I was considering claiming right away because I've never used this tactic before and I wanted to see how it played out. I'm still fairly new to mafia. So, it was interesting to me that someone else had the exact same idea.-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
Okay I'm a fan of readlists, especially this early in the game, so here goes.
Spoiler:
I don't have any super strong reads yet but currently, Tacos and Schadd are probably my biggest scumreads simply because they have posted without actually saying or contributing much. Players who have more experience with them (or just in general) are welcome to tell me if they think I'm wrong on those.
Mumble and Egg, where you at?
P-Edit: Not a bad vote from TSQ for LQ. I am open to jumping on this wagon, depending on where it goes.-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
I don't really have any stronger reasoning at the moment, hence why there isn't much. The readslist was mostly me thinking out loud and hoping that it would generate some discussion.In post 98, acidphoenix wrote:VOTE: tchill
also >explanations with your readslist
unexplained readslist = goat
Why did you vote tchill?-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
Can you elaborate on what this means? I'm also confused about why you voted me and then continue your dialogue with TSQ. If you think what he is doing is scummy/bad play, why wouldn't you vote him instead? (Not saying I think you should, I'm not getting a strong scumlean on him; just trying to understand your thought process here.)
Havo - Are you serious about Mumble? If so, why not vote him?-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
I mean, I would consider doing a reaction test to end RVS and get into real play a tactic, not sure why you put it in quotes. But, that was my purpose.In post 139, Egg wrote:Lalendra, you called claiming immediately a "tactic". Can you explain what the goal of doing so would be?
Actually that was my phone autocorrecting lynch to lunch. I caught it the second time, but not the first. Reading way too much into autocorrect lol. Plus you can look at my history on this site to see how many games I've played, I think it's maybe six? (Not taking the time to check right now) I would consider myself a newbie compared to most others on this site, yes.In post 143, LicketyQuickety wrote:First, she says lunch, which means she has played before, and its not typical of people on this site to say Lunch as much as elsewhere on the net.
I never claimed to be good. It was an approach I had never tried, and really, why would two VT claims be any less effective than one? It gives people more to talk about, if anything.In post 143, LicketyQuickety wrote:Second, She says she is not on board with my lynch... because she was also considering claiming VT straight out of the gate... Wut? Like I feel she is trying to say its Townie of me to point out that it could be a reaction test, but instead she goes into full detail of giving too much info about her role for zero reason. I can see how VT might want to claim to survive longer, but as I already stated, the fact someone else already claimed VT it takes away any ability to use "I'm VT" as a reaction test. So given that she HAS played before (assuming she played a newbie game here) Its likely she already knows not to just claim your role for zero reason. That's why I posited that either she is just a poor player or is Scum in so many words.
Why not? It helps me organize my thought process and get feedback from other people, maybe consider angles I hadn't yet. Not sure why that makes me not a newb.In post 143, LicketyQuickety wrote:"I'm a fan of reads list, especially this early" This is not something a newb should be saying... like.. at all.
I was at work and have other shit to do?In post 143, LicketyQuickety wrote:In her read on Chill, she is basically saying she disagrees with someone who is much more experienced than herself. Then she says she hasn't done a meta dive on Chill yet. OK, but like, what are you waiting for?
Pretty sure I flat out said that I wasn't super confident in any of my reads yet and that's why I didn't vote.In post 143, LicketyQuickety wrote:Their read on me... "I'm thinking Town, but not sure" Does it get any more hedgy than that?
Okay? I'm not sure how "on that one" is a coverup, can you elaborate?In post 143, LicketyQuickety wrote:tsq... Take not of the "on that one" This looks like it could be a kind of coverup based on word choice. Not to mention that generating content is what you aresupposedto do as either alignment.
If you're aggressively pro-town as scum, it's risky because it can be transparent. Trying TOO HARD to be town. If you're aggressively pro-town as town, it can lead to you being mistaken as scum who is trying too hard.In post 143, LicketyQuickety wrote:How the absolute FUCK is playing as aggressively Pro-Town risky? Like that is what you are supposed to do to get a Town read, right?
I didn't say that, but nice way to spin via paraphrasing.In post 143, LicketyQuickety wrote:She wraps up her reads saying "The people that have contributed a goose egg are my Scum reads" when earlier she said she had no read on those players.
In post 143, LicketyQuickety wrote:Then in her P-Edit she does exactly what tsq accused me of doing, but does tsq even look at Lalenda? Why not? Because they are a newb so all is forgiven?
I said I was open to the idea if I was presented with more evidence, but obviously was not confident enough to vote, because...well, because I didn't.
I didn't think I was defensive in this post, I was just responding to something that was said.In post 143, LicketyQuickety wrote: Then she takes Acids harmless comment as an accusation and finds the need to defend themselves. Why do you feel the need to defend yourself against that?
How is that LAMIST?In post 143, LicketyQuickety wrote:
LAMIST.In post 114, Lalendra wrote:Can you elaborate on what this means? I'm also confused about why you voted me and then continue your dialogue with TSQ. If you think what he is doing is scummy/bad play, why wouldn't you vote him instead? (Not saying I think you should, I'm not getting a strong scumlean on him; just trying to understand your thought process here.)
Havo - Are you serious about Mumble? If so, why not vote him?-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
Okay then, answer my question. If it wasn't fear of OMGUS what was it?In post 178, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Funny guy. I can see why you like the name egg. Nope not afraid of OMGUS, I've done it a few times (ask Uzi).In post 151, Egg wrote:
Lickety is probably worried OMGUSing would look bad.Lelandra wrote:Can you elaborate on what this means? I'm also confused about why you voted me and then continue your dialogue with TSQ. If you think what he is doing is scummy/bad play, why wouldn't you vote him instead? (Not saying I think you should, I'm not getting a strong scumlean on him; just trying to understand your thought process here.)
I played like two games on another site, three years ago I think? MS is the only other site I've been on.In post 178, LicketyQuickety wrote:Lalendra, have you played off site?
98 was more of a suggestion than a question, but I was asking a question in return (not sure I got an answer actually).In post 178, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Did Acid ask a question to Lalendra? I forget.In post 151, Egg wrote:
Maybe it's just me but that felt more like acknowledging a request that Acid made than a defense.Lickety wrote:Then she takes Acids harmless comment as an accusation and finds the need to defend themselves. Why do you feel the need to defend yourself against that?-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
In post 196, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Hang on a minute. I did ask you a few questions in my response.In post 192, Lalendra wrote:I'm satisfied with my dialogue with LQ for the moment. I'm getting tired and it seems like I thought some stuff was directed at me that wasn't so tell me if there were any questions that I didn't answer.
Where were the questions?In post 187, LicketyQuickety wrote:Not sure I got this question from you the first time around. Not quite sure why you think it was YOUR question when Egg was the person who made that comment. We will see how good Uzi's memory is shortly.
Thanks for the info.
OK-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
VOTE: LicketyQuickety
It just seems, at this point, like you're belaboring some pretty bad points and tunneling on me when I feel like I've explained myself pretty thoroughly. The "lunch" thing was REALLY reaching as a scumtell, and I think you're kind of making a mountain out of a molehill with other things. It seems to me as though you see others leaning potential scum on me, or debating "scumtell vs. newbie mistake", so you are pushing for me to be scum without any real concrete reasons.-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
In post 252, Thestatusquo wrote:mumble is not really playing the game, though from listening to you guys talk about it that seems pretty normal for them? I'd like them to die if I didn't think LQ were scum.
Only normal for scum-mumble (scumble?) if tchill is to be believed.In post 236, Tchill13 wrote:as far as scum tending to lurk goes mumble would fall underneath that category-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
In post 111, Mumble wrote:Hi.In post 188, Mumble wrote:Obviously 3-4 of the ones you listed. Not sure yet.In post 190, Mumble wrote:Welp. Not sure yet. Not enough info.In post 198, Mumble wrote:Disagree. Clearing town is much more effective than thinking you've found mafia.In post 257, Mumble wrote:I don't. Do you?In post 258, Mumble wrote:Messed up that quoting some how...
This is 2/3 of your content. It's not page count that matters, it's what you're actually saying. I don't need to recap for you what I've said with my 17 posts, you can ISO me like I just did to you if you want to know what I've posted. But the "my posts have been helping ME" argument is difficult for me to swallow when I look at what you've actually posted.In post 260, Mumble wrote:Better.-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
Okay I'm still not sure what your question was; was it why I attacked you for being a lurker when by your definition you weren't lurking, because you posted twice? My response to that, in case it wasn't clear enough, was that I still think you're lurking because AGAIN, it's not the FREQUENCY of your posts, but the CONTENT. You're being an active lurker. If that doesn't answer your question, please rephrase it and I will try answering it again.
VOTE: Mumble
Comfortable with this for now.
I'm not taking Taco seriously, he's not posting anything worthwhile yet either but I can't pin him down quite yet. Plus, my attention was drawn to you due to tchill's comment. I don't think the interaction between you and Taco is genuine, anymore than Taco's defense of me was genuine, he's just amusing himself afaict.-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
In post 406, Mumble wrote:wut?
I don't know why this is so funny to me.In post 407, acidphoenix wrote:wut what
I have to admire mumble though, I've never seen anyone so committed to not giving a fuck in this game.-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
Mumble is really reacting, to me, like scum that has been found out and is trying to limit the damage by not giving any associative tells. If that's true, then the limited interactions he DID have (like voting havo) give us a decent amount of information. If not, then his death will be in vain because he hasn't helped us do any scum hunting whatsoever, and I'm not going to be very happy.-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
Ok? At least I'm actually trying to find scum.In post 424, Mumble wrote:
Haha. I won my only scum game. This is a bad post.In post 418, Lalendra wrote:Mumble is really reacting, to me, like scum that has been found out and is trying to limit the damage by not giving any associative tells. If that's true, then the limited interactions he DID have (like voting havo) give us a decent amount of information. If not, then his death will be in vain because he hasn't helped us do any scum hunting whatsoever, and I'm not going to be very happy.-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
He already did, which was kind of what cemented the scumread for me.In post 463, Egg wrote:Please don't vote yourself unless you are scum.-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
ffs
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
Just...everything. I don't really know how to explain it, I'm just not finding that I'm satisfied with any of his responses. None of them make me go "Hmm, okay, maybe he IS town." My vote is staying on Mumble though because I am convinced he's scum, and even if he's not scum, his defeatist attitude, lack of real scumhunting and active lurking are not going to help town.In post 520, Tchill13 wrote:
You said mumble self voting cemented your scum read for him. What is it about LQ that's strong enough to question voting LQ instead of mumble?In post 509, Lalendra wrote:I'm torn between LQ and mumble.-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
Obviously I'll take the results of your flip into consideration when voting tomorrow, but I'm not sure that you flipping town would give me any reason NOT to vote LQ, as the interaction between the two of you has been minimal iirc (ISOing now)In post 644, Mumble wrote:You're dropping with your LQ lynch lineup, btw. If you are town, take into consideration my town flip and the night kill before guns blazing tomorrow.-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
Okay, yeah, my opinion hasn't really changed. Mumble doesn't really engage with LQ much at all, aside from a couple of comments about playstyle and strategy; Mumble is notably absent from LQ's readslist in 64, and LQ doesn't even really address Mumble until much later on. Instead he spends a lot of time disagreeing with my points on Mumble without ever really even mentioning him until after post 300, which is weird to me. I'm still not sold on the idea that this isn't distancing. I will need to really wait until one of them (whoever gets lynched D1) flips before I can really make much of this association.-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
I'm pretty confident in Mumbles/LQ, I'm not sure about the third yet.In post 727, Tchill13 wrote:Lalendra are you stating you think mumble,LQ,havo could be the scum team?-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
In post 801, Tchill13 wrote:In post 643, Lalendra wrote:
So true, scum never bus when a buddy is irredeemably fucked. Much town, such wowmumble wrote: think Havo is town now because he's voting me upon request.In post 650, Lalendra wrote:Okay, yeah, my opinion hasn't really changed. Mumble doesn't really engage with LQ much at all, aside from a couple of comments about playstyle and strategy; Mumble is notably absent from LQ's readslist in 64, and LQ doesn't even really address Mumble until much later on. Instead he spends a lot of time disagreeing with my points on Mumble without ever really even mentioning him until after post 300, which is weird to me. I'm still not sold on the idea that this isn't distancing. I will need to really wait until one of them (whoever gets lynched D1) flips before I can really make much of this association.
I wasn't really saying anything about Havo's alignment in 643, I was more making fun of the fact that Mumbles was willing to town-read Havo just for "voting him upon request." I don't really find that to be alignment-indicative, it could be bussing or it could be a PL or it could be that they find the behavior truly scummy. Without a lot of context it's hard to tell. I just didn't like the reasoning there.In post 802, Tchill13 wrote:lalendra's posts here seem to imply she thinks havo, mumble, LQ is the scum team and that's why i was asking.
I agree 100%, this did more for my townread on Havo than all of their other posts combined. Regardless of whether Mumble flips scum or town (even if I think it will be scum), we will get a lot more information from the flip and be able to start making some more informed decisions once we're out of D1 circlejerk.In post 832, Havo wrote:I think the game itself has bogged down and stagnated to a large degree. I think we need to move on to Day 2 honestly and I'm looking forward to the night.
I think Mumble is the best lynch right now and we need to finish this lynch and get to Day 2.
I assumed you're talking about what I said about you, and not what I said about Mumbles, because I felt like that was pretty clear. As far as my read on you, yes, that's "about as much in to detail that I am capable of", because as I said, it's not a solid read. It's a gut feeling.In post 873, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Like... This post is about as much in to detail that you are capable of or...In post 526, Lalendra wrote:
Just...everything. I don't really know how to explain it, I'm just not finding that I'm satisfied with any of his responses. None of them make me go "Hmm, okay, maybe he IS town." My vote is staying on Mumble though because I am convinced he's scum, and even if he's not scum, his defeatist attitude, lack of real scumhunting and active lurking are not going to help town.In post 520, Tchill13 wrote:
You said mumble self voting cemented your scum read for him. What is it about LQ that's strong enough to question voting LQ instead of mumble?In post 509, Lalendra wrote:I'm torn between LQ and mumble.-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
...Okay? Can't really counter "You're wrong." Because I might really be wrong, or you might be scum who is just saying that. I don't really have any way of knowing at this stage.In post 884, LicketyQuickety wrote:Well your gut is wrong. What is your counter argument?-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
It wasn't that I didn't see your point, it was that I had already stated that it was a gut read, so fishing for more concrete reasons is fruitless when I already admitted that I didn't have them. I was pretty transparent when I said that it was a gut read so your digging is pointless. Blood and turnips and what-have-you.-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
Yeah as much as I hate to say it I'm with LQ on this one lmaoIn post 939, LicketyQuickety wrote:Yeah, that's... not how it works.-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
Okay as of right now I have:
Mumble(6): Lalendra, Errantparabola, Tchill13, Boonskiies, Havo, Sergtacos (L-1)
LicketyQuickety(3): Thestatusquo, Egg, Lil Uzi Vert, (L-4)
Thestatusquo(1): schadd_
Havo(1): acidphoenix
Sergtacos(1): LicketyQuickety
Nobody(1): Mumble
It would be super great if everyone not on the mumble wagon could explain why they are voting the way they are because it would be super chill to hammer and at best kill scum, at least have something to go on for D2.-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
Can you elaborate? Nothing Havo has said or done has pinged me as exceptionally scummy, and I agreed with several of his points, but I'd like to hear why you think so.In post 975, Errantparabola wrote:I have and we should be getting a resolution shortly. In any case-- I think Havo is a better wagon than Mumbles.-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
What information do you feel I haven't considered? Because I have yet to hear a better argument than "you're wrong".In post 968, Mumble wrote:Lalendra is either dumb town or scum because she has refused to consider any information this entire game.-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
You're right, it's obviously my fault you failed to convince me.In post 983, Mumble wrote:
Nah, I'm not going to read for you. Stop being lazy. It's out there within the past few pages.In post 980, Lalendra wrote:What information do you feel I haven't considered? Because I have yet to hear a better argument than "you're wrong".-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
Didn't have any intention of it - busy weekend.In post 1271, Thestatusquo wrote:Where is lalendra? I'm not willing to let them skate by today.
I didn't think I was skating by D1, if you do let's chat!
As of right now, Tchill is my strongest townread because so far I like all of his thinking, and I especially like the way he handled the claiming. I don't think PRs should claim unless they have to, and I would have been hesitant to do so in his shoes as well. It has literally nothing (something) to do with the fact that I love his avatar.-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
Like I'm currently townleaning Tchill and Havo, both of whom were on board with a Mumble lynch, even though he flipped town. Acid made some non-points about mumble which seemed like they were trying to generate discussion without a lot of original content, and I'm on the fence about what that means, because that also seems to be acid's playstyle. Then there were the weird and pointless interactions with Tacos, which mean nothing now that he also flipped town and gave us basically nothing to work with. LQ and Luv were the ones who argued with me about Mumble the most, but though they had differing points of view, their reasoning appeared town to me.-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
For me it was a combo. Like I said, I found his behavior scummy and wanted to lynch him for that, but by about halfway through I started to not care if he was scum and wanted to lynch him for his anti-town attitude and play. The fact that he openly stated that he would only be detrimental to town if he lived didn't help. So my stance on the issue evolved as the day went on.-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
If you look back at my ISO you'll see that I stated both of those reasons for lynching him. My story didn't change.In post 1295, Tchill13 wrote:so egg pointed out 2 dead townies were on the mumbles wagon when i quoted it. Not counting those players it's just me and Lalendra. Not sure if this is just random timing for Lalendra to post this right before egg pointed that out but i'm not crazy about lalendra stating her vote was half PL/ half scum vibes.
It's me admitting that I had some doubt about whether he was scum or not, because while I scumread him, I'm not confident enough in my reads to say that he is definitely scum, as opposed to just apathetic/bad townie.In post 1303, Egg wrote:
Just noting that this was said so some kind of follow up hopefully happened after the flip. Otherwise it feels like justifying a mislynch before it happens.Lalendra wrote:Regardless of whether Mumble flips scum or town (even if I think it will be scum), we will get a lot more information from the flip and be able to start making some more informed decisions once we're out of D1 circlejerk.
It shouldn't, it was sincere. Being a mislynch sucks, regardless of how scummy/bad your play might have been, and he reacted emotionally to the pushing a few times, so I felt the apology, in the case of a ML, was warranted. BecauseIn post 1303, Egg wrote:
Did this feel weird to anyone else?Lalendra wrote:Mumble, my sincere apologies if we were wrong about you.Lickety wrote:Town should always have some doubt.
I was 100% okay with the shot because even though he was town, he was doing nothing to help the gamestate. He was a warm body that favored our numbers, yes, but ultimately was more of a liability than anything, just like Mumble.In post 1303, Egg wrote:I like the shot. He had a reasonable chance of being scum and wasn't helping us as town. It's not policy if the shot came from someone who was even slightly leaning scum. I actually can't think of a better shot. But does it actually matter after the fact if it was the right shot or not?
In post 1303, Egg wrote:
It doesn't but he stuck to his guns when Boon started changing the details of his "result".Lil wrote:Hard claiming miller doesn’t make you confirmed town
Agreed, Chill's reaction in the face of Boon's test was what cemented the TR for me.In post 1305, Egg wrote:scum tchill would probably go "oh fuck" and say something stupid. I like him sticking to miller after that.-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
I'd like to think that I'd play better than that as scum.In post 1307, Egg wrote:She's either very impressionable or scum looking to just agree to every lynch.
VOTE: Schadd-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States
My thought process currently is this: Mumble, EP and Taco are obviously conftown. Chill is as good as conftown for me. I'm leaning town on boon, havo, LQ and Luv, and don't yet know how I feel about acid, egg or TSQ. That leaves Schadd as the only reasonable vote for me, and unless the pressure generates more content that helps my SR subside, I'm fine with leaving it there. Obviously since we haven't caught any scum yet, at least two of my townlean/null reads are wrong, so I'm hoping I'm right about schadd.-
-
Lalendra Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: January 2, 2015
- Location: East Coast, United States