Mini 1633 ~ Non-normal Mafias Mafia OVER!!!
-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 103, Om of the Nom wrote:you dont think his posts are awkward and trying to blend in?
because thats exactly what im getting from his iso
also the whole spiel about setup spec and then calling someone out for rolefishing doesnt sit right
Not seeing the awkward, just seeing brand new game where no one knows exactly what to say. But I agree about the setup spec stuff. It's a distraction from scumhunting. But, again, we're only a few pages in. Mathdino merits some suspicion, but not as much as you seem to think.
I have no idea what Sonic's anime questions are for and why the hell did he vote MTD?
TN is 100% right about Sonic looking like he's trying to force a townbloc. Vote stays for now.
I really don't think we're going to need that much of January in order to complete day 1. December, due to the holidays, is probably iffy either way, but we won't need more than 12 or 14 days in January.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
Actually, upon further review, Mathdino's setup spec looks perfectly legit. It was a conversation about Eye's roleclaim, and it makes a lot of sense. And then Dino cuts short further role speculation, which is good.
Townpoints for Mathdino, scumpoints for Om for misrepping the discussion. And some suspicion for all those reads that really aren't warranted this early, especially without any justification.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 167, FourTrouble wrote:The best move for scum is often pro-town (e.g. bussing when they don't have to). Of course, that blurs the line between pro-town and pro-scum moves. Forming townblocs blurs the line between pro-town and pro-scum, because you don't know if the player forming the townbloc is scum or town. That lack of knowledge doesn't mean the act of creating a townbloc is scummy -- it's null, unless you have independent evidence that the player forming the townbloc is town or scum, in which case the player is town or scum based on something other than the act of forming the townbloc. Point is, forming townblocs is null. Whether they end up having a pro-town or pro-scum effect depends on whether the player forming it is scum.
As for Mastin's "lecture," Mastin's point is more about probability of success or failure -- townblocs formed early fail more often than townblocs formed later; townblocs that form organically without trying succeed more often than townblocs that form consciously. The original lecture -- I looked into it -- was in response to the question, "What's the best way to form townblocs." The question wasn't whether forming townblocs is scummy, and Mastin's answer has to be read in that context. I don't agree 100% with Mastin's analysis, either.
In my experience, I've never seen a townie say to themselves, "X is town because X formed a townbloc," so forming townblocs doesn't have much value as far as tricking townies into thinking you're town. I've also never seen any evidence that people who "force" townblocs are scum more often than town. In fact, in my experience, the vast majority of folks forming the townblocs are town.
I'm not saying Metal is town. I don't know. I think as a matter of scumhunting, a better approach is asking Metal why he thinks Om and TN are town. Trying to understand his thought-process, etc.
Making townblocs is a good way to create mutual townreads when they aren't warranted, and linking yourself to other players who are generally acknowledged to look like town is a good way to protect yourself. That's why forming townblocs can be seen as suspect. However, as games progress, townblocs often form naturally. Determining whether it is natural or duplicitous is pretty much the trick.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 177, Mathdino wrote:Why not? Scum likely knows what the setup's like already (if they have 2 members there's another scumteam or the setup is shit).
Also we'll know by tomorrow anyway, so I don't see how it's anti-town to reveal the info eyestott and I have about the setup.
Everything points to there being not just one killing faction in the game, and I think it's useful to keep that in mind when scumhunting.
I agree. That's useful information. And it is likewise useful to consider that the scum will likely be doing legitimate scumhunting, since they will be looking for other teams or the arsonist.
In post 189, Metal Sonic wrote:THIS GUY IS TOWN
Uh... no. Reciting theory is not a towntell.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 252, Om of the Nom wrote:also actually im gonna openly hate on all the metal sonic votes
And the only better idea you have is to vote for newb lynchbait?-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 299, eyestott wrote:I dont like it. Math is normally active, but theres probably a reasonable explanation.
Everything is fuzzy around holidays.
In post 312, Om of the Nom wrote:if pasch would be associated with anyone right now i think it would be with a zombeh scumflip
For wanting decent reasons before I vote? Suuuuuure. I'm totally scum for not sheeping your gut reads.
In post 314, tn5421 wrote:VOTE: Zombehs
Please try to play the game or signify that you want to replace out.
Lurker lynches on day 1 are pretty pathetic.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
Fine, but we're on day 1, nowhere near LyLo. A lurker lynch likely won't give us any useful information from the wagon, since it's completely policy choice, not based on the player's content. It's easy to just nod along with policy or feign outrage over it, so you won't find scum from who did or didn't vote a lurker. It's a wasted day.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 326, Om of the Nom wrote:In post 321, Paschendale wrote:In post 312, Om of the Nom wrote:if pasch would be associated with anyone right now i think it would be with a zombeh scumflip
For wanting decent reasons before I vote? Suuuuuure. I'm totally scum for not sheeping your gut reads.
you have been against the wagon quite a lot without even reading zombehs as town and you have expressed your own dislike at some of zombeh's actions.
you are clearly taking no stance on zombehs other than you dont want him to be lynched but you arent pushing anyone else while you do it
this lynch is not a wasted lynch if it hits scum and the only defense you can give to the reasons i've outlined is that its a newbtell, which says absolutely nothing as to why it cant be scum
My problem with it is that it's no more likely to hit scum than a random dice roll, and I don't like to play that way. I don't want to encourage such bad play.
As for a better suspect, I'm starting to suspect you. You're so dead set on quicklynching a newbie. Of course, scum knows if its a mislynch and so will fight for it harder, and know that it will stifle useful discussion.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 330, Om of the Nom wrote:UNLESS YOU ARE EXPLICITLY READING ZOMBEHS AS TOWN YOU SHOULDNT BE DEFENDING THE WAGON
calling it a newblynch is just a fucking cop out to get yourself out of needing to form a read on him
That is complete and utter horseshit. If a lynch looks bad, I will certainly work to prevent it, even if I have a null read on its target. Meanwhile, the things you say are scummy about Zombehs aren't scummy. No matter how many times you say they are, it won't become true. You're just making up bullshit to justify your predetermined conclusion.
In post 331, FourTrouble wrote:I feel like he's going through the motions -- asking questions, taking a couple positions -- but doesn't care what happens. Part of this comes from his overuse of qualifiers like damn and fuck; overemphasizing points that don't need that emphasis makes the emotion feel very fake.
This is an interesting point and I'm gonna go back and look at Ghost's posts with this in mind.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
Yeah, some of Ghost's emotional bits look empty. His analytic stuff is also dead wrong. We should not be lurker lynching on day 1.
Om... of course newbies can be scum. But nothing he's doing is scummy. It's just random alignment neutral newb stuff. You are simply equating the two. I am trying to show you that these points do not create a scumread. They're null. They're just indications of experience, not alignment. Your hellbent tunneling on a new player for a handful of posts is pretty suspect. You have no case. You have only a rant against a newbie for being a newbie. There's no good reason to think that you've found scum, and you're completely failing to sell it to me.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 360, Ghostlin wrote:In post 359, Paschendale wrote:So, I think our biggest concern in the game right now is how much of the playerbase isn't playing. Ika has 1 post, MTD only has 4, Fud 5, and Zombeh 7. I don't want to lynch lurkers, but they'd better start contributing or else that might change.
This is incredibly wishy-washy. If you believe their actions are hurting Town and not contributing, why the fuck not?
Take Zombeh's post count for instance. Unless those seven posts are substantive, that's almost begging to be under the radar. (Ditto, Fud) At least with Ika you could make the argument with one post he's just not HERE.
Because I expect them to start contributing. This game started right around Christmas. A lot of people simply aren't playing it yet. We shouldn't limit our lynch choices based on activity so early in the game. We have plenty of time and should be encouraging people to play, rather than trying to quicklynch. We are in no hurry. I'll take Zombeh for instance. He's not really playing. Those seven posts aren't substantive. So, instead of lynching him for not yet playing this game, I want him to start posting some substance and start playing. Then we can make an informed read of his alignment.
In post 361, Ghostlin wrote:Oh, and for those of you who hate the whole 'lets not lynch lurkers or VIs Day 1' (MS was closer to a VI than a lurker and there's definitely a difference there), at least I have a fucking stance about it and I'm not going to to bullshit you on 'you better get active before I look your way'.
And what exactly is your superior method to encourage contribution? Threats seem to be the only way to get people to pay attention in my experience.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 367, Ghostlin wrote:And expect any of us to take you seriously. It's almost like you created this whole reasoning of 'I don't want to lynch lurkers Day 1' to seem Town and then went the other way to seem even more Town. At best, you're being hypocritical because you don't plan on proposing a lynch below the radar AT ALL but you want to get lurkers to contribute which is null, and at worst, this shows a desire to keep your options open, only adapting a position as long as it suits your purposes, which is scum.
So what's your better idea? Yes, it's hypocritical to threaten lurkers at the same time blasting lurker lynches. But in the absence of a better approach to lurkers, I don't see an alternative. Do you have a better idea, or are you just being a pain in the ass?-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 370, tn5421 wrote:He's telling you that you can't have it both ways.
I'm well aware, but I'm also not aware of any actual way besides prods and replacement to get inactive players to be more active. Do you? Threats are pretty much the only way, and I don't want to decide the day's lynch based on activity rather than content.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 375, tn5421 wrote:Do you have somepossiblymisguided hope that they'll get into the game like good scummers?
Yes. That is exactly what I hope will happen. It's not even about those specific players. I just really hate when a game's tone is dictated by the people not playing it. We're forced to alter how we want to play based on people who aren't even posting. I really hate that. It ruins the game and makes it not fun to play.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 399, Om of the Nom wrote:do you really think i'd let a zombehs lynch happen so fast
do you rreally think i would cut the day super short when half the playerlist hasnt posted outside RVS with any meaningful content
its hurtful you think i would be so impulsive
You've certainly been arguing in favor of these things and calling me scum for opposing you doing them. So yes, I do think those things.
In post 410, Om of the Nom wrote:if we had to lynch purely from lurkers then id go
Zombehs>MTD>FuD>Dino>Ghostlin>Four
Definitely interesting that you leave Metal Sonic out of that list. Was all of this just an attempt to diffuse the wagon there?-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 420, Om of the Nom wrote:ika has made only one post nd that was a confirm post which is vry hard to get reads off of
therefore ika has no place in that list but ika needs to post more
also i swear to god pasch i hope you are just super horribly misguided and not scum with those attacks
please i honestly want you to tell me why im scum for pushing a lynch with my heart and soul when nobody else is pushing any other wagons with any sort of gusto other than saying i want them lynched and everyone else who is on the zombeh wagon sheeped me on to it
I'm mostly just saying you're making bad choices. I'm also saying that you're making arguments that damage your credibility. I haven't suggested that you are scum, not yet. I have shown how some of the things you're doing definitely can come from scum motivation. But that doesn't necessarily mean they do.
In post 421, Om of the Nom wrote:
i dont think scum om would blatantly lead the town and be the only one producing content that people actually discuss when i could just up and lurk and nobody would be any wiser about it
So, you say that scum you would be quiet and lurk to be overlooked. A lot of people don't do that. A lot of people have different kinds of scum play. Some try to take charge. Some try to imitate their town game as much as possible. Some try to push their town game towards their scum game until neither alignment is easy to read.
im sorry but it rlly annoys me when people are being so stupidly paranoid just because im the only one actually doing things around here
eyestott may seem like hes doing stuff but a lot of his posts are him agreeing with me and discussing theory
pasch is just putting suspicion on me for the stupidest reasons and arguing against lurker lynches
tn is literally floating on a fence because he's doing all of the above and being all round unmemorable in anything he's said
You're not the only one doing anything around here. Many of us are trying as well, and you're just shouting loud enough to drown us out. That, by the way is something that scum do a lot. Eye's doing okay. He's just not in a hurry like you're lying about not being in. I'm suspecting you for the consequences we'd face if we listened to you. Tn is bring careful because he doesn't want to rush a lynch.
want solid good reasons for a push on metal sonic taking aside the townblock argument because literally that can be chalked up to his style of play without a doubt
I want him to come back or get replaced and so explain himself.
In post 422, Om of the Nom wrote:if you're gonna fucking call me scum for pushing a lynch on zombeh because oh no zombeh is a newb or oh no zombeh is a lurker then fucking just vote me and push for my lynch dont just fricking dilly dally around these accusations i literally couldnt give a shit about that even if i tried
I'm not calling you scum yet. But if I do, it will because of the poor choices you're making, and the anti-town consequences of following them.
In post 445, ika wrote:tn change of vote to me to get my attention (yes im aware of your vote and i delibertly ignored it)
also tn posts a LOT less as scum (tn should recall our open game where i replaced in)
im iso phach again and so far i have seen potshot attack on players and passiveness while tn is actialy trying to do stuff
I have absolutely not been passive. I've been trying to push the game from a crapshoot lurker killing game based on dice rolls to a game where we actually figure this out. You'd best come at me with more than this nonsense.
After this there's all just way too much nonsense and I am very tired. I'll catch up some more tomorrow.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 516, Flubbernugget wrote:Just to wagon someone for the sake of wagoning them is all I have.
Not a good idea when we aren't about to hit the deadline.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
Upon further reflection, I think Om genuinely is my top scumread right now. Actively trying to prevent the town from using any kind of deductive skills and giving scum a free day? Yeah, that's pretty scummy. Imagine if we had done what she wanted? We'd have some random person dead right now and basically no information from the wagon to analyze. We'd be starting day 2 with a pair of dead town (unless we got really lucky, but who the hell wants to count on that?) and being basically back at RVS, since the lynch would have been solely based on policy and not content. What would we do then, lynch another lurker? This whole notion relies on the misguided idea that somehow scum are just going to lurk. That's absurd. People ignore games for many different reasons and it's seldom alignment indicative. There is absolutely no reason to think that we'd hit a scum with such a random shot. Compounding this is that Om apparently feels qualified to rank the lurkers despite their lack of content, and makes the assumption that someone who isn't active right now will continue to do that a month from now. There's just too many unfounded assumptions and assertions for this to fly. It's a tactical choice, and one that benefits scum a lot more than town.
VOTE: Om-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 525, Ghostlin wrote:Alright, the answer I got about the guns is fucking nuts. According to the mod, there is 1 gun in the game right now.
Could you explain some of your ability more? What does this result actually mean? Although you seem just as confused about it as I am...
Opportunist bandwagoning.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
This latest setup spec doesn't seem to be helping us much. I suppose it's useful to know that scum are going to be scumhunting other killing roles, so they'll look more like town. I'm not sure how that helps, though. It's filling my brain with WIFOM. Also my brain has been full of actual wine a lot lately. Happy New Year!-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 572, eyestott wrote:Mathdino has made 32 posts in other topics since he declared LA.
Seriously.
Let me ask you this. What motivation does Mathdino have to do this for this specific game as scum that he does not have as town? I won't disagree at all that this is weird. But your implication is that it is an intentional strategy. So, what is the purpose of said strategy?-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 579, Ghostlin wrote:In post 578, Paschendale wrote:In post 572, eyestott wrote:Mathdino has made 32 posts in other topics since he declared LA.
Seriously.
Let me ask you this. What motivation does Mathdino have to do this for this specific game as scum that he does not have as town? I won't disagree at all that this is weird. But your implication is that it is an intentional strategy. So, what is the purpose of said strategy?
Scumdon'ttry to fly under the radar? That's news to me. A lack of contribution seems to indicate to me, at least an unwillingness to evenfakescum hunting. Also, the inactivity present in this game finds a good place for people to hide. Shit, there's really not a reason for me to not:
But that's a piss poor job of flying under the radar. It's blatantly obvious to all of us that Mathdino isn't posting here. None of us are going to miss that. If he was really trying to fly under the radar, wouldn't he avoid something so noticeable and so easily discoverable?-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 585, Om of the Nom wrote:hard defending every lynch choice is not a good way to garner townreads if thats what ur after
I just oppose the bad choices that are probably being pushed by scum. Are you preoccupied with being townread? Seems like the sort of thing that someone with no allies would be doing. Are you a faction all by yourself?-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 587, ika wrote:In post 586, Paschendale wrote:In post 585, Om of the Nom wrote:hard defending every lynch choice is not a good way to garner townreads if thats what ur after
I just oppose the bad choices that are probably being pushed by scum. Are you preoccupied with being townread? Seems like the sort of thing that someone with no allies would be doing. Are you a faction all by yourself?
how about you be productive and tell us who the scum on the waogn is. you have yet to even answer half of the things om asked.
its not too late to join us and redeem youself
You do see that I have a vote cast, don't you? You should join me. Vote for Om. She's trying very hard to find reasons to lynch people based on anything besides an analysis of their actual play and is overly concerned with other people townreading her. We already have reason to think that there are solo factions in this game, such as an arsonist. She's playing exactly like a third party survivor should play. She's not creating actual analysis than can be used against her later and she is trying to get people onto her side.
Oh, and badgering people with pointless questions is a pretty scummy tactic, too. I'm hardly going to convince her of the case against her, and all it does it provide the opportunity for useless nitpicking. If you have questions about my case on her, by all means ask, but I'm not in the habit of entertaining nonsense from my scumreads.
Oh, and deflection. Look at the post right after yours. We have established that there are solo factions, but Om makes a joke out of it. She has no answer, just deflection.
And, of course, she can't actually make a good argument for why I should agree with her, so she resorts to threats and bullying.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 612, ika wrote:In post 611, Paschendale wrote:How about "why isn't everyone sheeping Pasch when he's obviously right?"
how about "why havent you responded to ohms rebuttal yet?"
What rebuttal? Keep mind, a rebuttal is a well founded argument, not just deflection or nonsense. Om has yet to do anything other than ask me to quote her not saying things. That's not a rebuttal.
Hey, why are you defending Om so hard? See? I can pull that one, too.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 619, Om of the Nom wrote:i said provide examples and you have failed to do so
as far as im concerned you are pulling things out of ur ass
You demanded examples of you not doing things. Do you realize that this is insane? Honestly, I don't care what you say. I have no interest in what you think of why I know that you're scum. I don't need your approval to show your alignment to everyone else. I don't know why anyone cares about your whining and yelling about it. Your "defense" has been little more than saying "nuh uh!"
So listen up everyone else, Om is going to lie in her defense. There is no doubt of that. If you, who might actually be town and legitimately interested in scumhunting, have questions about why I think she's scum, go ahead. I'd be happy to answer actual questions. But her questions aren't questions. They're stall tactics and attempts at deflection. We all saw her barreling ahead to get lynches in as fast as possible. She said NOTHING about holding off or not going ahead with these lynches until she was called out on it. The caution she claims to have had wasn't there. She isn't pushing lynches based on actual content. She is avoiding that at all costs. She's spent a week pushing what essentially amounts to policy lynches. Apparently, she townreads EVERYONE WHO IS POSTING (except me because I'm going after her). Seriously? That's complete bullshit. She's scum. She was trying to play it safe. And then she doubled down too hard on her scum tactics.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 650, Flubbernugget wrote:I see most of what you're saying as bad play over scum play. Except maybe the policy lynches
I've played with Om a few times before. Bad play would be surprising from her. It looks deliberate to me.
In post 651, Ghostlin wrote:Question: do you feel that pushing for policy lynches is innately scummy? Please give me more than a 'yes' or 'no' to this question; I need to see the thought process.
No. I see pushing for policy lynches so steadfastly in this circumstance to be scummy. I see a complete refusal to analyze and examine content to be scummy. I see the move to push lynches that are based on policy as a pro-scum tactic, since it results in less information the next day. You can't really analyze a wagon if it's based on policy. Anyone who simply said "yes, that's good policy" could be scum taking advantage of a policy lynch on someone they know isn't their ally. And it is not simply the advocacy of a policy lynch that has made me think that Om is scum. It is the advocacy for several in a row and the refusal to start analyzing content that has. We're on page 27. We should have more than enough content to find an actual scum. Do we take a risk because all the scum might just be lurking? Yes. Should we forgo all of our usual scumhunting because of this risk? Hell no. But that is what Om is asking us to do. That is a move that absolutely hurts town and helps scum.
I do agree you cannot arguably prove a negative, that's why they call it a fucking negative. Can you give a point of reference for the dumb kids in the back of the class (ie, me) that demonstrate the behaviors we're listing off?
I'm not even really sure how to do this. One of the "arguments" she made was that she wasn't really trying to get a lynch to happen to end the day so quickly. There is no evidence of a timetable at all. She never addressed this. She simply advocated that people vote for a few specific people. What she is asking us to believe is that she would somehow have put a stop to the whole thing if it neared a lynch quickly. I see no reason to make this assumption on her behalf. When she finally did address this issue (when someone else brought it up), it was too little too late. Had more people gone along with her, we'd be in day 2 already with a quick lurker lynch. She can claim what her intent was all she likes, but that is the result that her actions would lead to.
I'm not sure what to give as a "point of reference" for this. There is no specific post addressing this. This is the sum total of many posts and the pace and tone she adopted throughout them in her attempts to push her lynches. She wanted no discussion, she wanted no analysis. She just wanted votes, and she gave every impression that she wanted them right now.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 654, tn5421 wrote:You say that you've got a fine read on om implying that he is trying to rush lynches through. Would you mind quoting a post or two of what you feel are the most overt examples and walk us through how you arrived at scum!om?
No, I'm not pouncing on individual posts. I'm discussing what they add up to.
Furthermore, could you explain how removing a lurker from the game can in any way considered to be a loss? It removes a negative utility player from the game, something that scum will NEVER do intentionally. I would honestly say the situation since 359 hasn't changed much. How long are we going to run around in circles before eventually deciding to lynch the most prolific lurker, anyway? Not that I'm against argument, but this one does not seem like it will be productive any time soon. We've established that you disagree about what sort of things to do on day one and that you feel anyone using a d1 theory that you aren't is your top scumread because Fucking Moon Logic. I would even say that pasch/om is doing more to slow down the game than the recent holiday season did.
I see, so you don't actually want to lynch a scum today. We have thirteen players in this game. Maybe four qualify as lurking. Why would we limit ourselves to a random guess out of four people, of whom we don't have any reason to suspect that any are scum at all? Why shouldn't we deal with the players that we can actually make informed judgments about? Of course, to you, that's "fucking moon logic".
I also disagree with the idea that scum don't push lurker lynches. I've seen it before. And for the reasons I've given. It's a safe push. It's a way to push a mislynch without creating content, and it's a way to get some towncred out of the less discerning players. That's why scum talk policy on day one, so they can avoid talking about the important things.
In post 656, Om of the Nom wrote:pasch started his tirade by not agreeing with me on zombeh-scum
and somewhere down the line he turned it into zombeh=policy lynch
when i was clearly advocating zombeh as a scum lynch, with still some utility even if town bc got rid of a questionable player
now that titus is here and producing a lot of controversy in the thread and sparking action a lynch on that slot is less effective
with all the people posting now a lynch on an active slot wouldnt be damning
but at the time when i made the zombeh argument only about 5 people were regularly posting
and i dont understand why pasch was forcing himself to choose scum out of those 5 people
and i also dont understand why he thinks im not analyzing content
ive been scumhunting the whole game
i just got a little lazy as of late because everyone is taking care of this fight for me
Why is no one else calling Om out on the obviousness of the lie above? That there was any reason to call Zombeh scum? Seriously? That's complete nonsense. That was 100% policy no matter how you dress it up. And the biggest lie... that the players who are active at one moment will always have that activity. She assumes that those who weren't active when she decided to kill a lurker would always be inactive, and seems to think that I think the same thing. I stopped her push for a quick lynch on a lurker because I knew that people would start showing up. And they have. But all Om can do is keep reinforcing this lie.
In post 662, Titus wrote:As for why sheeping, I cannot help but read the page I say hello on. It happens. Without context, Om looked bad. Plus a calm and reserved player like Paschendale generally does not tunnel like that. So sheeping would at least get me reads and see how everyone else felt. It gets us away ftom policy and towards discussion.
I wouldn't call it a tunnel. But Om is stepping so far out of line that I can't let it go.
In post 669, FourTrouble wrote:Please explain. I'm like 99% certain eye is town.
The more I look at it, that post from Midget looked more like looking for allies than actual reads.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
Om, what the hell in seven posts gives you that much of a case? The self-vote that was a new player giving up on a game they weren't ready for? You saw obviously newb actions and declared them scum. You had nothing to back it up. All you did was try to railroad a new player who clearly had no idea what they were doing. You had no case. You had an easy target that you tried to make a quick mislynch out of.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 687, Om of the Nom wrote:i really dont fucking understand
why the heck you come up with the assertion that new players are infallible
otherwise literally the only people who would roll scum in newbie games would be IC's and SE's
newbs can be scum
end of fucking argument
i am not pushing policy lynches on that basis
i am pushing scum lynches
I never said that newbies can't be scum. I said there's no reason to conclude scum from Zombeh's few posts. You declared them to be scummy without actually saying why. You never made a case. You just jumped on a newbie to paint him as scummy so you could push a mislynch. You hoped no one would notice that you weren't actually arguing any kinds of good reasons to vote along with you. Stop lying. The issue isn't over whether or not a newbie can be scum. The issue is over whether or not there's a good reason to think that THIS newbie is scum. And there isn't. And you never offered one. Stop trying to distract with this nonsense over "infallible newbies". I'm not saying anything like that.
In post 688, Om of the Nom wrote:you have failed to fucking tell me why he is town
instead you resort to shitty buzzwords (lurker and policy and newb)
you argue that he is just new
new could mean either
so therefore you have no reason to think it's on a townie without a doubt
easy targets dont just mean town
scum can be super shit too
The argument here is that we should default assume that Zombehs was scum. If we have to prove that a newb is town in order not to lynch him... guess what, that's a policy lynch! Instead, you prove he's scum, and we're going to take up the "innocent until proven guilty" stance until you do something to change our minds. You haven't done anything close to that except attempt to shift the burden of proof. I don't need to prove him town. He's quite demonstrably null to everyone but you. You need to prove why he's scum, instead of just assuming it and declaring it and pretending that the discussion is over.
In post 691, Om of the Nom wrote:you are either way at this point, but im enjoying the idea of scum you more and more
flubber is town
four is town
fud is a lurkershit
ghostlin is town
ika is town
dino could still be scum prolly more than the rest of the lurkers
mtd is a lurkerfuck
pasch is extremely controversial and obv bc hes against me i want to call him scum but im not sure on that based on his insistence
random is town
titus is scum
tn is likely town
What an astoundingly self-serving readlist. The only scum are her detractors, and I'm too dangerous that if she goes after me she'll go down in the conflict.
In post 699, eyestott wrote:People who have played with Om before: Is this something town Om does, something scum Om does, both, or neither?
As far as I recall, neither.
In post 728, Om of the Nom wrote:my weakness in mafia is not being presented well enough so that is more of a burden to me
ive had games in the past when ive called out scumteams within 5 pages and never been able to push them to lynch before the end of the game, even when i still believe them
As a matter of friendly advice for future games, you should try to gather your thoughts more coherently, write in proper English, and explain your positions in a concise manner. Also cut the spamposting.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 739, Titus wrote:On the contrary if Om is not scum, Pasch has explaining to do. Still people should interact with Pascher outside his tunnel.
@Pasch, suppose you are right, who is Om's team? And if you are wrong who is scum?
What exactly do I have to explain about pursuing my strongest scumread? How about you explain why you're not doing that? Also, if you read any of the argument that you're sheeping, you would see that I called Om third party. Who else is scum? I dunno. You might be. Now, do you wanna contribute or just snark at me because it's day fucking one and how the hell do you think I'd have everyone who isn't town pinned down when we don't even know how many people that is? It's not pro-town to poke the only person with an actual case with a stick and act like he should have all the answers.
In post 742, Om of the Nom wrote:you managed to form a read on me without even interacting directly with me
Direct interaction mostly just creates arguments, not reads.
i'll excuse you for not being able to read MTD Fud or Dino tho since they are lurker fucks
but everyone else has a presence in this game
That's funny because you don't have a meaningful read on anyone else.
In post 744, eyestott wrote:I thought Id get home earlier, but its now 11:30.
I will say this:
We need to not lynch Om.
He is the one at the forefront of pretty much all discussion. Lynching him, even if he's scum, would likely do more harm than good to the town, given the current state of the game (A bunch of missing players)
So who do you propose we lynch instead?
That's two people now who are just poo pooing the existing ideas without adding any of their own.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 751, Om of the Nom wrote:That's funny because you don't have a meaningful read on anyone else.
you
are tunneling town
without even reconsidering anything
and you are tellingmethat my reads arent meaningful?
i hope you fucking realise how much of an idiot you are being[/quote]
I'm saying that you have failed to make any well founded arguments for anyone's alignment. And you haven't. You might think you're super duper special and that you're making good points. But you aren't. You gave exactly nothing to support Zombehs as scum and have done nothing else but push lurker lynches since then. So no, I'm not being an idiot. And I'm certainly considering lots of things. But I'm not tunneling town. I'm chasing a scum.
In post 755, tn5421 wrote:muh apathy
how much longer is om/pasch gonna be a thing before we can get back to playing?
When one of you dipships stops complaining about it and offers something else. Or you do something constructive and vote for Om so we can have a dead scum.
In post 760, eyestott wrote:What, not agreeing with you is "poo pooing the existing ideas"? I'm only disagreeing with one thing, but I find it interesting how youre trying to spin it as me being contrary to everything.
No, I'm accurately pointing out that the people who apparently don't like my case on Om don't have any cases of their own.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 802, Titus wrote:Deadline wagons give zero info. Doubly so if no one actually scum reads the target. It is one thing to have a last second compromise.
All this does is lynch ika for no reason.
I don't disagree in principle, but we have a week until the deadline. Why do you ignore the good reasons to lynch Ika? He is basically steadfastly refusing to participate in the game. He's avoiding discussions, will only entertain lynching lurkers for the consequence free lynches, and is self-voting. He is acting against the interests of town and continues to do so. He's basically pulling a scum Varsoon play.
In post 810, Om of the Nom wrote:i dont even care about who makes sense as buddies anymore i just want this day to fucking end i hate how everyone is buying into the buddy suspicions of a guy who has literally been trying to tie himself to me every single chance he gets since the original Zombeh wagon im fucking tired of the fact that i am literally pouring out every single feeling of mine into all these posts and you guys are fucking believing the bullshit tunnels laid forth by pasch im fuckin tired of the fact that titus over here is being blatantly useless and hypocritical and everyone in this game is too fucking apathetic (which by the way was not helped in the slightest by the actions of Titus) to actually notice the fact that people other than myself, pasch and eye actually may have a chance at being scum and i swear to god i am just so fucking angry at town for being useless fucks i am angry at the fact that half the playerlist had to be replaced already this game makes me so fucking mad i swear to god
Maybe if you made a compelling case instead of yelling at us we'd go along with you. I opposed you because you did literally nothing to make me believe the authenticity of your suspicions on Zombehs or Mathdino. You failed to sell your cases, and they both looked completely disingenuous. The only person you should be angry at is yourself.
I agree about the replacements and inactivity though. I hate letting inactivity determine how a game goes. Of course, your blanket idea to just lynch lurkers means letting inactivity determine how the game goes. Funny how you are "angry" about that, yet you try to take advantage of it for a free lynch.
In post 813, Om of the Nom wrote:just everyone get the fuck on titus i dont even care to argue my points anymore at this time
And this is even less compelling than your previous attacks on people. Why exactly should I listen to you?
In post 816, Titus wrote:Shit this is town.
A temper tantrum is all it takes to get you to change your mind? Seriously? This is the only scummy thing I've seen you do, but it's a doozy.
In post 823, Om of the Nom wrote:titus you have still failed to fucking give a read on anyone else but myself an eye and you have given an entirely myself-alignment-dependent read on pasch you are coasting you are coasting you are coasting and nobody is doing anything about it because they are buying into the fucking paranoia about my towniness that you laid forth
PEDIT: eye get on her if you dont want to be the lynch for today
The lack of reads on many other players is unsurprising since few of them are talking. If you want that to change, you should clam up for a while since half this game is you talking or people responding to you.
In post 825, eyestott wrote:Hey, om. If I'm agreeing you, I MUST be white nighting you!
Because according to Titus, I can't agree with someone as its white nightingale if they're town and buddying if they're scum!
Why don't you offer some actual reasons for voting Titus beyond simple OMGUS.
In post 826, Randomnamechange wrote:Can we lynch eyestott? He is probs scum and titus is peob town. I wpuldnt be surprised if Titus got vigged.
And you reach these conclusions... why?
In post 828, Titus wrote:It's this right here that's the issue. The desperation of having no one suspect you is problematic.
Your speech is awkward and over the top. There's no hunting. No questions. No thought. Solely defending with a bit of OMGUS attack.
See, this is why not reading the parts of the game that happened before you arrived is problematic. Eye has been one of the most active players in this game, and he has been contributing the whole time. Maybe he's not doing especially well at the moment, but taken as a whole, his actions aren't the way you're describing them. I don't think you're intentionally misrepping, but you are very clearly working from incomplete information. You should go back and ISO Eye and tell me if you still have this conclusion.
In post 834, MTD wrote:I feel eye as probable scum right now from reading through and I think it's definitely the most reasonable wagon at this point.
Why do you think this?
-------------------
I really don't like this sudden flurry of votes and a striking lack of discussion or support for those votes. There are definitely scum among the current pushes and I'd like to some reasons given so that when we have a flip, we'll actually have the information to figure out who the scum are.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 837, MTD wrote:Or was the question why I think the other wagons are worse?
In that case: ika is town. I've rarely seen scum display this kind of frustration, also ika was basically one of the more town players all game IMO.
next from that is Titus I think? As I said I'm pretty certain that's town-titus and even though zombeh giving up on this sucks, it's not changing my mind there.
I have displayed that much frustration as scum. I also don't have any good meta read on Titus. She's pretty similar as scum and as town, so I'll definitely need more info before reaching a conclusion about her. I definitely don't see town from Ika at all. Either currently or earlier in the day. Can you elaborate on that read?
In post 838, Titus wrote:@Pasch, people can town tell. Right now, the choices are ika and eye. That rage wall is a towntell. I have done it myself. A lot. It cannot be faked.
I have faked it. I have seen others fake it. And no, the choices are not Ika and Eye. We have many more choices. Don't artificially limit our options. And don't lie about fake absolute towntells.
PeEdit: Ghostlin is 100% correct.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 853, MTD wrote:In post 836, MTD wrote:In post 835, Paschendale wrote:Why do you think this?
Reason that stuck in mind were the recent votechanges that seemed really weird (first going on ika which seemed like going for the easy mislynch, then switching to titus which seems like a wagon that isn't going to happen anyway plus it was for meagre reasons) and what Titus said: The posting seems forced and a bit too eager to look good for my liking.
I am not that definitive about this but the other wagons likely to happen are much worse IMO.
this, but scrap the ika part.
Could you sort out the quote tags? I don't really know what you're saying here.
In post 855, Ghostlin wrote:His reasoning seems pretty shallow (if not weird, read his Ika defense) when it exists, his actual defense of Ika has bizarre resonance with the idea that a Vig would kill Ika (Vigs generally do not target folks who will have their ass in the wind soon) and it seems like a really fucking great way to get town cred.
Good point. Midget is avoiding justifying his positions. Shallow is exactly right. I'd be down for a Midget wagon, since the rest of town apparently can't comprehend why I'm right about Ika and Om.
In post 867, FourTrouble wrote:Pasch or tn are the scum on your wagon - possibly both. Pasch's vote was especially scummy.
Please actually justify this conclusion. It seems like you're confusing me with someone else.
Oh look. She calls me town while arguing with me, continually just screams and yells that I shouldn't be so mean to her and how dare I point out that her arguments are terrible, and takes an opportunistic vote at the guy who's advocating her lynch. She's not town voting for a suspect here, she's scum trying to protect herself. Seriously, I don't know why any of you don't want to lynch this.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 869, Paschendale wrote:In post 853, MTD wrote:In post 836, MTD wrote:In post 835, Paschendale wrote:Why do you think this?
Reason that stuck in mind were the recent votechanges that seemed really weird (first going on ika which seemed like going for the easy mislynch, then switching to titus which seems like a wagon that isn't going to happen anyway plus it was for meagre reasons) and what Titus said: The posting seems forced and a bit too eager to look good for my liking.
I am not that definitive about this but the other wagons likely to happen are much worse IMO.
this, but scrap the ika part.
Could you sort out the quote tags? I don't really know what you're saying here.
That's weird, they sorted themselves out when I quoted you.
It sounds like you, like Titus, are reading Eye based on a small part of his play. I don't think that conclusion holds up against the day as a whole. Why not join me in lynching Ika or perhaps Midget?-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 872, FourTrouble wrote:
If self-voting is "never okay," why'd you spend so much energy defending Zombeh?
Because I know the difference between deliberate action and ignorance. I suppose I should have said "intentional self voting is never okay", but I assumed that people reading it understand the difference. Don't you?
And, of course, I never defended Zombehs. I never once asserted that he was town. I (correctly) said that the attempts to lynch that slot were duplicitous. Again, please understand the difference and don't misrep what I've said.
In post 873, Ghostlin wrote:He's pulling a Varsoon play without knowing what the fuck he's doing. And he's STILL getting results from it.
And what results are you seeing? I'm seeing scum trying to make people dislike him for style rather than content in an atmosphere where we're trying not to lynch people for that. That's a tactic to make people second guess any scumreads on him.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 889, FourTrouble wrote:Midget, the suspicion on Pasch has nothing to do with Om. Take a look at his votes. He defends Zombeh for self-voting, then jumps on ika when he self-votes. He hasn't done anything significant this game other than attack the reasoning others use - so his play is reactive (just sitting on the outside), inconsistent, and opportunistic (voting ika).
Also, if you actually read what I say, the self vote from Ika was merely the last straw and I have a lot of other problems with Ika's play. The vote was merely the tipping point to take my focus off of Om.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 898, House wrote:In post 896, Paschendale wrote:I suppose I should have said "intentional self voting is never okay"
How does one unintentionally self-vote?
Doing so by not understanding what you're doing or its implications.
In post 899, FourTrouble wrote:Pasch is saying Zombeh was a noon and therefore not scum. So when it comes to Zombeh, Pasch takes into account the specific player ("Zombeh is a noob so self-voting isn't scummy for him") but when it comes to ika, he doesn't ("ika's self-vote is scummy regardless of ika's meta"). Pasch also maintains that he wasn't defending Zombeh, just attacking the players for voting him. That's scummy because Pasch is refusing to tie himself to a position - instead he's focused on attacking or commenting on others reason ing. Town are looking for the scum so they take positions on alignments; scum are looking for ways to look engaged without having to look for scum. Pasch is doing the latter (lots of commentary on what others say but very little attempt to tie that commentary to alignment).
No, I did not say he wasn't scum. I said that the argument for him being scum was crap. That's it. I didn't attack anyone for voting Zombehs. I attacked people for making bad cases. That is my position. Tie me to it all you like. Feel free to criticize what I'm actually doing, but you get nothing for saying I'm doing something else.
You can be damn sure I'm looking for scum. I've found two good candidates so far. I found two instances of players pushing lynches for shallow or faked reasons and getting in the way of genuine scumhunting. Tell me, are you just chainsawing me in order to defend Ika? Cuz that's what it looks like you're doing. You're intentionally misrepping my actions in order to diffuse my case on Ika.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 903, House wrote:Self-voting outside of self-hammering is a null tell. I've seen it happen from frustrated town and scum both. As scum, it's AtE. As town, it's surrender/fukitol.
Instantly writing off self-votes as scummy is scummy.
Self-hammering is an exception because it has an immediate benefit for scum in shutting down communication.
I've actually only ever seen town self-hammer. But I've seen scum self-vote for sympathy pretty often. Either way, the self-vote is only a small part of my case on Ika. It's interesting that FourTrouble is ignoring the entire rest of my case.
In post 906, House wrote:Give him the Amish treatment. They shun troublemakers in their society, refusing to talk to or even look at them.
And if that's his intention? Because that's a scum tactic I've seen before. Why do you automatically dismiss this possibility?
-------------
This whole "defending" thing is complete bullshit. If you "defend" someone, then someone will claim that you're defending a partner. If you don't, you're scum because... actually I have no idea why FourTrouble thinks that this is something scum would do. He just claims it is without saying how it benefits scum to do that. He also lies and says I'm not scumhunting, despite having two suspects that I've been pushing rather hard. And why exactly should I have a strong enough townread on someone that early in the game? Four should know better than this. The "defending" he's expecting is something you don't see that early in the game.
So which is it, Four? You really want to claim that I'm scum because I devoted some, but not most, of my efforts to stopping what I saw as a mislynch? And you're ignoring the majority of my posts which are scumhunting. This is a seriously empty argument you're making. Why are you lying and misrepping so hard? And why are any of the rest of you believing him? Didn't you read the rest of the game?-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
In post 939, FourTrouble wrote:I'm not ignoring Pasch's case. I've asked for it multiple times:
I've given it multiple times. What part is confusing you?
Pasch says he was trying to stop a mislynch. But --
A bad case is more likely to be wrong than a good one. Trumped up bullshit on a null read of mine is probably a mislynch. Don't you care about finding scum and not lynching nullreads?
In post 941, FourTrouble wrote:Also note the scummy loaded questions in 936 ("why are you lying?").
Not loaded. You are lying. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt and assuming you're doing it on purpose rather than you're just being dumb.
In post 946, tn5421 wrote:Then why don't both you and Pasch back me up and you can get to your shitty love/hate argument tomorrow?
I'll take a look at Flubber and get back to you.
In post 947, Om of the Nom wrote:because pasch dying today creates a better non-toxic environment tomorrow
According to Om, scumhunting is toxic.
In post 949, Om of the Nom wrote:if you dont wanna get on pasch then get on titus
i wont accept any other lynch mate
Scumposting
In post 950, House wrote:Why would you choose to argue about whether self-hammering is scummy or not, when it's too late to form a read post-hammer?
I don't like being misrepped.
Not liking how Pasch is promoting giving drama whores an audience. That said, I don't think it's alignment indicative as much as it is a difference of opinion.
I also don't like people trying to avoid scrutiny. That's a number one scumtell to me.-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State
On the subject of Flubber, what the heck is with his votes? Dino for no reason, but apparently he meant Ghost? And then votes me but tries to divest himself of responsibility for that vote in the same post. Yeah, I see duplicity there. And most of his posts are pretty fluffy.
Besides the votes, what stands out the most to you, TN?-
-
Paschendale Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: August 29, 2010
- Location: The Empire State