Mini 1792: Baccano! Mafia [Game Over]
-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Read the setup, this looks kind of amusing.
Looks like in a perfect world the assassin guy should claim, act pro town, and help bag one Mafia in exchange for getting to eat the King dude, yeah?
That would make only Mafia the losers - and allow two of three factions their win.
Has the assassin claimed yet?
Also, why are we lynching camntsuki? I wanna be able to leap on that wagon super quick to look pro town by sheeping someone's case.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
In post 311, Cerberus v666 wrote:L-1 47 hours from game start. :/
Why does that concern you?
What are we waiting for?
In post 308, AlpacaAlpaca wrote:In my opinion Camntsuki has done nothing but shirk off Fate's accusations and than proceed to be hooked by Flores. By ducking out when Fate was attacking him he was able to quickly shift the doubt that Fate had cast onto Flores again who in my opinion has a townread until future thought and/or slipups.
Why is Flores so towny to you?
Also, how did Camntsuki shift attention other than just by not being around (basically I'm asking, how do you know it was an intentional strategy as opposed to 'derp, I'mma lurking!'?)-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
In post 313, Cerberus v666 wrote:At least get camn back here. *shrug* I don't actually see any sort of case on him, but it's D1, that like...as strong of a case as you can expect.
Who would you rather we lynch and why?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
In post 316, WhiteLight wrote:
It is in the town's best interest to use day one to work on the case. Nothing good comes from having shortened days as this is when we can work out the gameIn post 314, Thor665 wrote:What are we waiting for?
Okay.
What do you think we should work out?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
In post 319, Aristophanes wrote:This...isn't the worst of plans actually!
Of course it isn't, I'm sexy and have a big beard.
In post 321, WhiteLight wrote:I remain suspicious of the entire Flors situation. I am aware that is not a popular opinion, however I remain that his posts feel scummy to me.
Why do they feel scummy?
In post 321, WhiteLight wrote:Yet, I support the Camn lynch. I just worry about rushing the flow of the game.
Is there anyone thus far whose lynch you would oppose?
In post 322, AlpacaAlpaca wrote:So far he is the only one that I can fully see being possible scum because aside from I think 2 serious posts the rest of his have been emotes and shrugging off what people have told him.
So your concept is fail at scumhunting = worthy of lynch.
That sounds like a valid case to me.
In post 322, AlpacaAlpaca wrote:pedit: I personally thought that Flores made a scumslip at the begining along with some other people however than the mod confirmed that there was a mistake and so he actually didn't know the identity of Maiza at the time. However although this confirms he isn't assassin it also doesn't confirm he isn't scum I just think that there isn't enough proof yet so in my mind he there isn't much sketchy about him and it just so happened there was an unfortunate mistake. Regarding the contradiction I honestly view it as a stupid mistake on his part where he got defensive and than afterwards realized that he doesn't have the ID on Maiza and than messaged the mod to get it straightened out.
So, basically, you don't see any value in a FLores lynch at this stage.
In post 322, AlpacaAlpaca wrote:With Camntsuki even when he was around he didn't make many serious posts often just quoting others and adding emotes even when those quotes were staight accusations from others. Aside from his points on Flores he hasn't really done any I can think of as pro town
Did his attack on Flores look townish though? You seem to be suggesting that here.
In post 323, AlpacaAlpaca wrote:Also would it be anti town to help the assassin eat Maiza or would it just be a pro strat so that 2/3 groups can win?
It would straight up not be anti town.
Like, if it was 5 alive, King, Assassin, and 1 Mafia - it would be straight up pro town for the King to openly claim and allow the Assassin to eat him.
Also, quite frankly, it is pro-assassin and pro-town for the assassin to claim. The assassin doesn't care about the Mafia, since they can't hurt him, in fact his primary goal is just getting to a situation he can eat the King. The King wants Mafia to lose, but there is nothing in his role that prevents him from winning if eaten - so if he can kill Mafia and be eaten or not eaten it is all the same to him. An Assassin early claim allows town to trust the Assassin's scumhunting, prevents the Assassin from fear of lynch (wherein a late Assassin claim does not) and functionally serves as an Innocent Child for town.
An early Assassin claim would be anti-scum, and make no other difference to the game as far as I can see - because town has better things to do than lynch Assassin.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Let's see, I suppose the only theory negative to the plan is scum might waste a shot shooting the Assassin...
But I'm not seeing that as equivalent to the gain of taking a lynch off the table immediately.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Yeah, I'd rather have the Assassin in the open and accept the extra scum kill rather than deal with an Assassin trying to stay under the radar and thinking not hunting for scum is worth much.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Because, at the end of the day, all the King is good for is maybe magically absorbing a shot from scum and, oh gosh, Mafia already know who that player is so...y'know, all the King is for us is a body.In post 331, Florestan wrote:Why would we not just lynch the assassin once he outs? Keep our immune IC alive?
You could argue it is unnecessary - but it is distinctly not anti-town in any way at all. Unless you want to share a deep insight with me?In post 353, Cerberus v666 wrote:The merit in Thors suggestion is NOT in the idea of an early claim of the assassin. That part is unnecessary, and distinctly anti-town.
Yeah, but the clear is more valuable.In post 353, Cerberus v666 wrote:The value is in considering that the Assassin CAN act in a pro-town fashion, and thus shouldn't be considered an auto-lynch, but rather, a free clear, the same way Maiza is.
What would you rather have in a game - an Innocent Child who is kill immune, or a BP?
Take your time.
I don't even care if he scumhunts brilliantly (though I think he should regardless) I just want one less body to sweat to make scumhunting even more focused from Day 1.
Fear of being lynched if he sucks.In post 356, Florestan wrote:Why does an outed Silizard actually give a crap about scumhunting again?
Also, by early claim and effort - he avoids getting to the point in the game where town wants to lynch him due to fear of him axing the King at a mylo situation.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Oooh, also, an outed Assassin helps any other PRs town may or may not have target more accurately.
Docs/Jailkeeps could avoid wasting time protecting/jailing him.
Trackers/Cops could duck wasting an investigate.
It is such a fething pro-town plan it bleeds.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Yeah, but the Assassin doesn't have a "kill all town" wincon, does he?In post 370, Florestan wrote:Do you know what also is super proTown? Mafia outing their partner. Doesn't mean it happens though
Apples and oranges.
I looked at this.In post 371, AlpacaAlpaca wrote:Wait, Thor did we confirm that scum know who Maiza is or are you just assuming, because I don't remember us knowing unless I missed something.
Seems pretty durn likely Mafia is in the informed group moreso than an uninformed group that may or may not exist.In post 2, The Daily Days wrote:By default, each player's role PM will inform them that you possess the "Maiza Avaro" flavor.
Also, with the Mod publicly confirming that Florestan's role should know who the King is - I would be willing to wager any amount of money you wish that Mafia is informed.
The King role is BP to prevent the Assassin from auto losing due to a Mafia kill.
The King is informed to the town to prevent the Assassin from auto losing if town/mafia lynches the King.
Otherwise the Assassin role would be a "screw you" role - I don't think a "screw you" role exists in this game - do you?
So the King will never absorb a Mafia kill.
The Assassin might.
A wise King would want to allow themselves to be dead prior to mylo to prevent a sudden Assassin guess from losing town the game.
Ergo - early Assassin reveal and a day or two of honest scumhunting from them should equate to King reveal and eating to aid town win con.
I would trade one town for a confirmed non-scum slot without the waste of a lynch any day prior to mylo/lylo.In post 372, heuristically_alone wrote:It's anti town because it kills off an extra town member giving mafia the advantage.
You...wouldn't?
I mean, that's the point of the entire lynch process "are you scumz!?!" that's all we lynch for - that's the point, that's how we win.
Having a slot that is not scumz and this being known is pro-town.
Haing a slot that town PRs know for a fact they can safely ignore is pro-town.
Having a town die is "pro-scum" but the above benefits outweigh that to such a degree it is silly to me that people are debating it.
Are you Mafia or an Assassin who doesn't get it?
Ario is town.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Why do you think that Mafia would get a benefit while the King is alive?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
That just sounds like an advantage to Mafia in getting the King dead, which increases my suggestion that Assassin outing and allying with town earlier is better for town.In post 422, WhiteLight wrote:
In twilight after being lynched the mafia could just reveal who the king is. I agree with you without a doubt the mafia know but considering how easy it is for the mafia to out the King I can't see them not having some form of encouragement to keep them hidden.In post 421, Thor665 wrote:Why do you think that Mafia would get a benefit while the King is alive?
~Bee
After a Mafia dies - town should be fine with a Dead King and a winning Assassin in any case.
What are you planning to do to get conversation back on scumhunting as opposed to complaining about how people are discussing an aspect of the game you don't think is helpful but which (unlike complaining) is at least proactiveIn post 424, Florestan wrote:
No, and I do have some reads (which I've already espoused), but the constant mechanics discussion are super not telling. I want to call the people doing it scum by ILOA but town are definitely doing it as well so that doesn't work.In post 417, Aristophanes wrote:You haven't seen anyone interacting about anything other than mechanics?
Here, let me help you - I called Ario town; do you agree or disagree?
Fate dropped his Camn push like a wet blanket to push on WhiteLight - does that give you a positive or negative vibe on Fate's alignment?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Do you find me to be doing this.In post 431, Nahdia wrote:I find scum often just dwell on mechanics posts for annoyingly long on d1 to seem like they're town without actually hunting.
Because people are kind of saying that I am - but I'm curious why they think this, as I'm not.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
I mean - for ease of your assessment;
I've been in the game less than 24 hours.
At the time you said that I had 12 posts in the game.
Not all of my posts were about mechanics, though I'll agree 9 of them had mechanic based thoughts or questions in them, though about half of those also had non-mechanic based thoughts in them.
Describe how that is "annoyingly long" at your leisure.
I'll wait.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
So your issue isn't that I talked about mechanics - it's that I made long posts about it and/or that an unreasonable percentage of my posts (all in less than 24 hours of joining the game) were about setup other than having brilliant scumhunting less than a day after joining the game (even though I did do scumhunting, I just didn't do it in the correct percentage)
Do I have that right?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
I also went back and looked.
What classifies, in your mind, as the "long post(s?)" I did about mechanics.
I know Dwlee said that I had done so (in my mind, he was wrong) but you agree with him - which post was it?
Or was it never the length, just the mechanics percentage?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Why can't you defend your own thoughts?In post 443, Nahdia wrote:I'm not going to argue semantics and intricate details with you. I'm really not in the mood to get into such a senseless dbeate. You made a lot of mechs posts that stuck out in my mind. That's a scumtell in my mind. I'm scumreading you for it.
Let's say you're right - why are you trying to lynch him?In post 444, camntsuki wrote:
LOL well we've been waiting to sort whether Fate was mafia or Szilard, but ya thanks for claiming 3P Fate!In post 425, Thor665 wrote: Fate dropped his Camn push like a wet blanket to push on WhiteLight - does that give you a positive or negative vibe on Fate's alignment?
EHEHEHAHAHAUAHUAHUEHAUHAUA-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
No - you haven't, you have expressed one thought, had it questioned, clarified it into 1 or 2 alternate reasons (and not clarified whether you mean both or just the second) and then kind of hand waved when I pointed out that factually you really didn't have a basis to hold the belief you stated with "don' wanna debate!"In post 450, Nahdia wrote:
I already have.In post 447, Thor665 wrote:
Why can't you defend your own thoughts?In post 443, Nahdia wrote:I'm not going to argue semantics and intricate details with you. I'm really not in the mood to get into such a senseless dbeate. You made a lot of mechs posts that stuck out in my mind. That's a scumtell in my mind. I'm scumreading you for it.
You've actually gone out of your way to occlude and hide from explaining your thoughts.
Which, incidentally, is why people think you're scum.
If you thought that was optimal play you would have claimed early.In post 479, Fate wrote:I am nota threat to town
The lack of early claim shows that town's win was not particularly high in your value calls.
In fact - you tried to call me scum and get me lynched for suggesting that town/you should ally up. Which, y'know, shows that you drastically do not believe what you're now selling.
Vote: Fate
Maybe you should toss out a lot of reads right now?
Does your PM indicate this as your loss condition?In post 456, Nosferatu wrote:It's just that since Maiza has a king modifier, I'm worried that his loss is a town loss but I wanted to ask the mod but they apparently don't like me
Aristo is not a decent vote - and what changed your read of him to being worse than me, as I'm still percentage wise heavy on the mechanics talk?In post 490, Nahdia wrote:Anyway in all seriousness, shouldn't we like, not lynch the 3p that doesn't have any nightkills?
Also I completely buy camm's claim as town tho so that's radical.
VOTE: Aristo
Decent vote.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Reading their abilities, it looks like a Mafia kill and a Vig kill to me, with odd coincidence of night targets.
I sorta suspect Nahdia was Vigged and WL was Mafia-ed.
Vote: Camntsuki-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Thanks for that update, I was unaware of this information.In post 555, AlpacaAlpaca wrote:So one town lynch and 2 town kills day one. This isn't turning out well-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Why Heuristically Alone over Camn?
Camn is a filthy liar, so there's that.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
So, you're saying as scum he didn't want to commit to calling it a scumslip because he knew it wasn't as opposed to town just being unsure of a tell?In post 560, Staeg wrote:This, mostly. "Could" be a scumslip. ok.
Yes.In post 560, Staeg wrote:What did camn lie about? the daytime secret assassin guilty?
Fate did, and Camn also claimed a fake investigate prior to that.In post 565, Dwlee99 wrote:Smurf policy lynches, man. fate claimed 3p idk when
Do you trust the Camn slot? Because I hate the policy lynch buzzword stuff - you don't fake an investigative. I would loathe having the Camn slot in anything even close to a mylo because the slot already has shown it is untrustworthy. Call it a policy if you wish, it remains a good lynch explicitly because they FAKED A GUILTY. There's no way you allow that slot to live after that, you don't.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
If that's scummy, then why am I doing it and not being voted?In post 570, camntsuki wrote:
It was Fate's fault for trying to out our role!In post 562, Cerberus v666 wrote:
For the record, I kinda don't care if we lose because of this, because fuck fake guilties from town.In post 559, Thor665 wrote:Why Heuristically Alone over Camn?
Camn is a filthy liar, so there's that.
VOTE: camntsuki
And Fate implicitly claimed 3p. Your push is bad, and is a good place for us to start as we head out for the day to drink.
VOTE: CERBERUS
You played pro-scum, I don't care if Fate trolled later, after his troll your proper response was 'I was just kidding, but now I'm not' instead you let it slide.
@Cerberus - if you don't care about the game, replace out. Otherwise you're playing as bad as Camn. If you do care about the game, then don't lie about it in thread for play advantage.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
If you refuse to replace out then don't sell me a bill of good on outrage at someone's play.In post 574, Cerberus v666 wrote:I refuse to replace out. Mods lives are hard enough already. I'll get over over my loathing of camn as soon as that slot is gone, and possibly a bit later if they end up surviving.
Vote them because you think they're scum or not at all - I don't want you on this wagon otherwise.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
In post 579, Cerberus v666 wrote:It's amazing how little I care what you want. You would be astonished, really.Unvote: Camn
Vote: Cerberus-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
@Aristo - remind me again why you were voting Fate?In post 547, The Daily Days wrote:Fate (7): Dwlee99, camntsuki, WhiteLight, Nahdia,, Thor665, FlorestanAristophanes-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
What's wrong with a policy lynch?In post 591, Nosferatu wrote:isn't essentially a policy lynch-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
So it's laughably bad that people believed Camn's claim of an investigative role, but it makes sense to think Fate claimed 3rd party in response to it?In post 599, Aristophanes wrote:Because he also feigned being 3P, and I thought he had essentially claimed it at one point.
Like, through the night phase, I was kicking myself for being on that wagon, not because I didn't think it was a good one, but because Nahdia was a better one. She flipped town too though, so...
He was acting scummy , essentially claimed 3P, and refused to work with us. I don't know why he did it.
How does that make sense?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
I have never seen a policy lynch applied to anything that isn't excessive lurking, lying, or solid anti-town play.In post 602, Nosferatu wrote:
I don't like to lynch people for non alignment indicative things if I can help it.In post 600, Thor665 wrote:
What's wrong with a policy lynch?In post 591, Nosferatu wrote:isn't essentially a policy lynch
If someone is actively playing in a way that benefits scum (which is why it's called anti-town) isn't that alignment indicative of them being less likely town?
But if you found Camn a joke, why did you think Fate's claim made sense?In post 605, Aristophanes wrote:
It made sense to me at the time, and I thought it was a legit claim.In post 601, Thor665 wrote:
So it's laughably bad that people believed Camn's claim of an investigative role, but it makes sense to think Fate claimed 3rd party in response to it?In post 599, Aristophanes wrote:Because he also feigned being 3P, and I thought he had essentially claimed it at one point.
Like, through the night phase, I was kicking myself for being on that wagon, not because I didn't think it was a good one, but because Nahdia was a better one. She flipped town too though, so...
He was acting scummy , essentially claimed 3P, and refused to work with us. I don't know why he did it.
How does that make sense?
I already offered my thoughts on this - what are yours?In post 607, camntsuki wrote:PS, was that a Vig shot? or did the "best friends" die together lover-style?
I didn't forget it, I still never read it - why do you think it makes him more likely town than not?In post 609, heuristically_alone wrote:Did you forget that Cerberus claimed page one? Even if Cerb didn't care about the game, we shouldn't just vote out someone that is more likely town-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
So we can agree that the player plays in a way that hurts town when they are town, and hurts town when they are scum.In post 611, Nosferatu wrote:No. There are townies that just act in anti town ways. Policy lynches are just lynches for a reason other than the content of their posts. Something better if avoided.
I fail to see how the idea of lynching them then doesn't pay attention to the content of their posts.
If a player is hurting my wincon, then they're a good lynch, yeah?
Depends on the claim.In post 614, heuristically_alone wrote:I find that when someone claims immediately right at the beginning and there is no counter claim, they are most likely town. Would you disagree?
I am willing to accept that they are ascetic if you'd like - but I don't see why that should inform me of their alignment. Clarify?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
@Nosferatu - Why not answer his core question instead of playing a dance, who is your current top lynch desire?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
1. You literally just described why my opinion could be taken as valid.In post 638, Cerberus v666 wrote:You are not a special snowflake, Thor. I'm treating you the same way I'm treating everyone else, and if my disregard for your opinions bothers you, perhaps you should give me more reason to value your opinion than an isolated, though admittedly competent, bit of optimization.
2. If you find faking PRs to be policy lynch worthy I am not sure why you think refusal to unvote someone you're not scum reading isn't policy lynch worthy.
What are you planning to do about that?In post 645, Nosferatu wrote:
don't have one atmIn post 628, Thor665 wrote:@Nosferatu - Why not answer his core question instead of playing a dance, who is your current top lynch desire?
You feel like you're doing nothing - are you doing something?
Ario is no longer a town read for me.
Flore is a valid lynch option for me now.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
1. Oh, snap, sorry, didn't realize I need to continually prove that I don't drool on myself.
2. I said unvote him if you weren't - you told me to sod off, if by that you meant 'but I am scuma-reading him!' then I submit you need to work on how you express your beliefs.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
No, use some smaller words please.In post 663, Cerberus v666 wrote:I'll spell it out for you: I'm scumreading him, but Smurf you if you think I give a damn about whether or not you want me on a wagon.
Is that clear enough now?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
That presumes a lot on the Vig.In post 669, camntsuki wrote:policy lynching is stupid when it seems there is a vig in the game.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Unvote: Cerberus666
Vote: heuristically_alone
Let's talk about only HA and Dwlee.
Or about Cerberus leaving his vote on Camn while asking for us not to only talk about two slots while continuing to only talk about two slots(but, gosh, he's open if people want to ask him questions!).
Not sure why Ario is getting so much town shade - can someone explain to me why he looks town?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
I've seen it done, so it's not unheard of.
At the end of the day it's like a Miller claim - you judge based on play.
At least you're supposed to, it's why I don't claim Miller anymore.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Because someone helped kibosh Day 1, so we're still in Day 1 on Day 2.In post 730, camntsuki wrote:why is this game so slow?
@Staeg - I don't see the contradiction I think you're implying exists in those posts - can you walk me through it?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
So the issue is you think he just looks like an empty prattler?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
I sort of see that logic in the 3rd post - I don't see it at all in the first two.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Doesn't even really read that way to me - he is sort of asking an open 'does anyone believe that?' sort of thing to my perception.In post 739, Staeg wrote:I mean - how does someone who's assigning townpoints for an early claim not consider that it might be faked within seconds of the original thought?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
I answered that question at Daystart - if it's exciting to you why not ask me about my conclusions?In post 748, Dwlee99 wrote:I started looking through nahdia's iso a bit. I dont think it will really help though. Nahdia said something about being scum read so maybe they were the vig.kill. Idk why people wont just answer their opinion..?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
You're pointing out sloppy play from them.
Pretty sure sloppy play doesn't assure us of scum, or of them being in cahoots with their cunning ploy of playing sloppy.
No you didn't ask, you silly boy - at daySTART I already said who my presumed Vig/scum shots were - ages before you "asked".In post 772, Dwlee99 wrote:
I did ask. niwuehiuthgIn post 770, Thor665 wrote:
I answered that question at Daystart - if it's exciting to you why not ask me about my conclusions?In post 748, Dwlee99 wrote:I started looking through nahdia's iso a bit. I dont think it will really help though. Nahdia said something about being scum read so maybe they were the vig.kill. Idk why people wont just answer their opinion..?
Lemme try again. Thor, do you think Nahdia or whitelight got vigged?
Even now, you're "asking" me while being unaware of who I even said I thought the Vig shot was - so what the hell are you smoking?
Like, seriously, if this interested you - why didn't it interest you when I was theorizing on it?
As to your question, for starters, Nahdia is who I suggested was Vigged.
For reasons - um...did you town read her Day 1? She was a top lynch choice for a period of time even. Whereas White Light wasn't, at all.
If scum shot Nahdia, scum are dumb. Seems self evident, really.
WHo did you think the Vig shot?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
I will agree that after i had already stated my thoughts you addressed a question to the thread about it without addressing my already presented thoughts - I'm pretty sure that's what I was already saying, but I'll repeat it for you all you want.In post 775, Dwlee99 wrote:For the record I did ask you because I asked everyone in the thread who they thought was the vig shot. I think the vig shot was whitelight because nahdia softclaimed. I think scum probably picked up on that.
Why would a Vig shoot White Light?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
I don't find the case against you very impressive at all.In post 789, Dwlee99 wrote:while ignoring everything that makes me town.
That said - what are they ignoring? I don't think your slot has done anything that looks particularly pro-town, and certainly not enought that ignoring/missing it is strange or suspect.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Is that the extent of the value you think you're bringing - a "right now" trying to figure stuff out (wherein I would tend to side with their value call of it not being impressive rather than yours of it looking particularly pro-town - nothing you are doing is even slightly out of basic scum fake scumhunting efforts, y'know).In post 801, Dwlee99 wrote:they're ignoring me trying to figure stuff out right now.
I don't get why you're calling them out for that.
Well, it is hard to do on Day 1, I'll agree.In post 803, Staeg wrote:dude you're doing night kill analysis on day 2.
I don't get where you're coming from mocking his contributions inherently. Maybe they're not great - but they do exist, and I have no issue with NK analysis Day 2, hell, it's something I did, and, frankly, is about 33% of all I've swung thus far this phase - where's the fire?
Pedit - so the issue is that it will be more helpful later. Meh.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
I'll admit I'm weird - but verbal stutters expressed in typed form always make me want to lynch the person doing them.In post 809, Staeg wrote:That said, I would reallly enjoy more people in this thread and-
wait a second,-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
What do you think you should do?In post 813, Dwlee99 wrote:I'm still at L-1, do you guys want me to claim or will someone unvote before there is a derp hammer?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Then don't claim and stop asking about it - you're only at L-1.In post 823, Dwlee99 wrote:oh you mean claim or not. I mean I could claim but that probably wouldn't be the best outcome. We could just have people unvote me lol-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
There was a lengthy discussion about this already, and multiple people linked and discussed the post in question.In post 835, Dwlee99 wrote:ok thor. Can someone tell me when camn claimed the guilty? Like what post?
I have little interest in that discussion much to begin with, and much less for starting it up a second time.
Your reading is making you a valid lynch just by dint of 'I can;t imagine him helping us win, even if he is town, because he doesn't care enough about the game to play it'.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
When you don't care enough to read the game at all while being actively in it, I consider that an insult to me and a suggestion that you don't care.In post 840, Dwlee99 wrote:
are you for real. WHY DO YOU PEOPLE SAY I DONT CARE ABOUT THE GAME WHEN I AM FINDING SCUM RNIn post 837, Thor665 wrote:
There was a lengthy discussion about this already, and multiple people linked and discussed the post in question.In post 835, Dwlee99 wrote:ok thor. Can someone tell me when camn claimed the guilty? Like what post?
I have little interest in that discussion much to begin with, and much less for starting it up a second time.
Your reading is making you a valid lynch just by dint of 'I can;t imagine him helping us win, even if he is town, because he doesn't care enough about the game to play it'.
You are repeatedly admitting/showing that you're not reading anything.
I consider that the same as not caring.
If you cared - you'd read.
Missing me talking the NKA and the *pages* about Camn's claim (And to a lesser extent, not being willing to quest through her iso for info you want, when you had to be able to know roughly what stage of yesterday it happened in) just reeks of 'don't care'.
Why do you think it should look like caring?
Can you describe what he's doing that is impressive in any way at all?In post 842, Cerberus v666 wrote:Yeah. Dwlee is clearly trying. I don't understand how you guys are sayng he isn't. Idk if he's trying cause he's town, or cause he's scum tryng to prevent his lynch, but he's doing more than 80% of the game right now.
Or even valid proof of trying.
I'll agree he's doing more than 80% of the game - but that's because most of the game isn't posting at all, so he has them beat there.
But it's perfectly valid to suggest he isn't doing anything with all his posts. Because he isn't. He's just tossing out empty questions, and empty analysis.
And I'm not voting him, and don't find the case on him impressive - but I can be honest about his contributions.
Then unvote him?In post 843, Aristophanes wrote:Also, that Dwlee isn't being defended by, like, anyone, makes me nervous.
What even is this?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
In post 898, heuristically_alone wrote:
Yet you claimed that you had some sort of ability, so not useless. I am 100% serious here. We need to force Dwlee to claim so that you will all see he is scum when I flip town, or even better decide to just get rid of him now.In post 895, Dwlee99 wrote:"If scum know I exist it's just lol" means Im useless, not that it doesnt matter. I guess that wasnt very clear but nice rolefish m9-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Here, I highlighted the parts I'm making the face about.In post 901, Thor665 wrote:In post 898, heuristically_alone wrote:
Yet you claimed that you had some sort of ability, so not useless. I am 100% serious here. We need to force Dwlee to claimIn post 895, Dwlee99 wrote:"If scum know I exist it's just lol" means Im useless, not that it doesnt matter. I guess that wasnt very clear but nice rolefish m9so that you will all see he is scum when I flip town, or even better decide to just get rid of him now.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Lack of majority votes on a single wagon would be my guess.In post 907, camntsuki wrote:Why are people not dead yet?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
H_A played that hideously - and maybe learned a lesson about 'reading is tech'.
Alpaca's comments are meaningless.
People *jumping* on Alpaca over meaningless comments is even weirder than that.
@Camn - sell me on Aristo and Florestan being townbloc material. I don't feel either of those.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Okay - I might like to hear some of those pegs if you can. Meta unsupported is also called 'gut'.
You also forgot 50% of the players I asked about - I also asked about Florestan. Anything there?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
I find him straight up opportunistic and not very giving in reads.In post 946, camntsuki wrote:Florestan I think is giving me townfeels on positions. It seems like he agrees with us a lot, and that is the kind of player we think is town.
But I could totally swing on THAT slot. because it could be a cognitive fallacy, I know.
Why are our takes on that slot so shockingly different?
I agree that Day 1 he looked pretty good.In post 946, camntsuki wrote:Aristo we are way firmer on.
It not JUST deep meta- there is something shiningly town about his interactions day 1. Other than you, he is the most-left on my spreadsheet. I want to see him alive in LYLO for reals.
Do me a favor and look at him just in Day 2 - does it feel the same?-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
Can we all stop talking about H_A now?
That is literally useless on every scale of useless.
I'm looking at you Staeg, Florestan, and Alpaca - just stahp.
Naw?In post 957, Dwlee99 wrote:thor are you considering voting flore or naw?
Yes, I would consider voting Flore.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
I don't think you should be trying to stand on the shoulders of H_A's reads in this game while talking in a serious voice.In post 980, Aristophanes wrote:HA tried to eat me.
Which means he thought I was Maiza.
Who is conftown.-
-
Thor665 Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Papa Smurf
- Posts: 33454
- Joined: October 11, 2009
- Location: Venice, FL
That seems a random value to call scummy.In post 993, Staeg wrote:
This is the driving force behind my vote btwIn post 991, Aristophanes wrote:I swear to you, get me to lylo and we have a 100% winrate. (We being town.) I strongly believe that if we follow Camntsuki's list, we will win prior to that though, and Lylo will not be necessary.
What's your read on Flore?