Isn’t Tea in a way just Flavor Leaf?
![Image](https://i.redd.it/qvwoto3ctgt21.jpg)
This seems validIn post 30, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Layla's RVS vote has too much justification behind it. Only scum cares about justifying and "explaining" their RVS vote.In post 14, Layla wrote:VOTE: davesaz because his username doesn't start with a capital letter. splitfarve doesn't either but I only have one vote.
Btw youIn post 39, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Actually no, Layla's excuse can easily be made by scum. So since Gamma so kindly started the wagon, i'll put some more "oomph" behind it.In post 33, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I guess it’s NAI then.
VOTE: Layla
Tbh why did you ask this. Like there’s a very simple answer already evident.In post 41, splitfarvle wrote:Why didn’t you start the wagon?In post 39, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Actually no, Layla's excuse can easily be made by scum. So since Gamma so kindly started the wagon, i'll put some more "oomph" behind it.In post 33, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I guess it’s NAI then.
VOTE: Layla
Even if you do that, there’s the chance you may change it. And having to explain away an exclusion like that looks scummy.In post 54, Layla wrote:?In post 52, Gamma Emerald wrote:The problem is your explanation explains nothing regarding the reason you were poked about it. How does deciding your RVS pre-game affect your given logic?
Someone said my RVS post had too much explanation and only scum do that.
I said I craft my RVS post before alignment was given. (Well not 100% copypaste craft. I look at the playerlist and think of a reason to vote someone for RVS, or what to say in general.)
If this doesn't explain it, I don't know what will.
Do you think everyone else will forget about them if you do?In post 98, NorwegianboyEE wrote:The difficult thing about this setup is that i'm most definitely going to forget at least a couple of people here, especially the inactive ones. So if they're scum they can just coast along undetected because there are so many distractions.
You are a total loser.In post 109, Zote the Mighty wrote:Guess who fucked up and posted under the wrong account!
I was kinda liking Layla taking such a solid position on a null read then she posted thisIn post 120, Layla wrote:Although I could see them being scummy.
Alright, Emperor Flavor LeafIn post 142, Flavor Leaf wrote:I prefer if you preface “Flavor Leaf” with The Awesome, the mighty, Emperor, or sexy.In post 135, Zote the Mighty wrote:So you want more votes on Flavor Leaf yet you don't vote for him yourself?In post 131, Vorkuta wrote:Oh boy a post # discussion.
Wake me when something spicy happens, and more votes on papa leaf in the meanwhile please and thank you
Also VOTE: Tea
Cut out Flavor, and add Papa will suffice as well.
Weird question for a weird post. You seem to be rather self-centered in your approach currently.In post 166, NorwegianboyEE wrote:What a weird question.In post 149, Gamma Emerald wrote:Do you think everyone else will forget about them if you do?In post 98, NorwegianboyEE wrote:The difficult thing about this setup is that i'm most definitely going to forget at least a couple of people here, especially the inactive ones. So if they're scum they can just coast along undetected because there are so many distractions.
Explain?In post 175, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Actually re-reading the game. This post is BIG yikes! Holy shit.In post 144, Flavor Leaf wrote:i have a weird gut feeling we hit scum in Tea for completely wrong reasons and now we’re in a holding pattern because scum’s awkward.
I don’t actually have a Tea read myself
Feel like this is a town thought processIn post 182, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I read the game again to evaluate whether i really was on the right wagon here, because the one on Tea built up really fast.In post 181, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Please explain your progression from your last four posts all of which happened in about 30 minutes.
You assume that just because someone will elude your suspicions means the same will happen with everyone else. At least that’s what I get out of what you said.In post 190, NorwegianboyEE wrote:In what way?In post 185, Gamma Emerald wrote:You seem to be rather self-centered in your approach currently.
Yeah I agree that it’s kinda weird to have that kind of opinion on a wagon you don’t have a read on. My main concern is whether there is scum motivation in it, which you sorta lay out here.In post 189, NorwegianboyEE wrote:It's a bad post because Leaf is lightly shading Tea by claiming we "hit scum" and it's only the reasoning behind the wagon that's not good enough. Yet at the same time he claims he has no opinion on Tea at all. If so:In post 186, Gamma Emerald wrote:Explain?In post 175, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Actually re-reading the game. This post is BIG yikes! Holy shit.In post 144, Flavor Leaf wrote:i have a weird gut feeling we hit scum in Tea for completely wrong reasons and now we’re in a holding pattern because scum’s awkward.
I don’t actually have a Tea read myself
1: Why claim the wagon "hit scum" if he apparently doesn't have any opinion about Tea's alignment.
2: Why is he sure we "hit scum" in the first place. What sort of logic is he thinking here?
3: Does town have any reason to make this post? This seems like the sort of post scum makes to encourage a wagon on town, but not wanting to take any responsibility for the outcome.
That’s what he was avoiding :thonk:In post 210, davesaz wrote:You shouldn't refer to ongoing games.In post 194, Tea wrote:I've been waiting for Nomination Mafia to end
I'm pretty sure PMysterious is town and I think it's fairly likely Norwegian is playing similarly to how he played there.
Idk. Btw if anyone thinks mod meta might help just a note that the one who originally created the setup was pienyan. I know she has at least 2 games modding experience by the fact I saw she had modded a large in 2017In post 233, Wake1 wrote:So taking a cursory glance at the game, I have a few developing reads, but not much yet. In general I really hate Day 1 and do much better on Day 2 and onward, because I have solid information to work with.
Before I post my reads I have a question because it's not clear: are we dealing with more than one Scum faction? Because the way I read it in the OP it feels like there being two Scum factions is definitely possible.
What’s your take on the Tea wagon?In post 248, Chemist1422 wrote:Good morning I've dragged myself out of the abyss AMA
Off of I believe 1 postIn post 279, Tea wrote:Sigh
I have literally misread Chemist once and thats if you generously count "I compromise lynched him because deadline/people didnt care/i could expose my actual scumread tomorrow anyway" as misreading.
Yes there's not much about Chemist but gut feels, man, gut feel.
What is the point of thisIn post 297, Tea wrote:...separated by the line...In post 285, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You claim there’s a pretty big difference between the tiers, but your top TR is just a "gut read" on someone that’s posted like 2-3 posts by the time you made this...In post 262, Tea wrote:town
{Chemist Billy}
{Layla GE}
---
{Luca Reundo}
{Vork Norwegian}
scum
there's a pretty big difference between the tiers separated by the line btw.
ok
Nope I changed my mind about things when Tea just stopped making sense but I think you thinking this way is kinda townyIn post 329, Flavor Leaf wrote:Gamma’s play’s poppin out at me too. He was voting me, forgot who he was voting and reassured his tea vote, who I was on.
Early game jitters and lack of investment so you forget? Possibly. Might be town points.
Just wait until a replacement blows the place upIn post 345, davesaz wrote:In case you missed it. A "large" game with post numbers still in the 300's and a week-ish(??) in? Inconceivable!In post 232, davesaz wrote:Good news: not drowning in stuff.
Bad news: not much spicy to guess at motivations from.
And you didn’t explicitly bring this up WHY???In post 383, Tea wrote:I agree with this.In post 378, PMysterious wrote:Okay, so now that Nomination Mafia actually ended, I can finally establish the point I wanted to make earlier. In Nomination Mafia, NorwegianboyEE made similar aggressive statements as he did in the quote I posted recently. It turns out that he was Mafia that game, and because of that, I'm not comfortable about Norwegian's aggressive play in the quote I mentioned. I thought I'd have to wait until Day 2 or 3 to bring it up because of the "no ongoing games rule" put in place, but lucky me, the game ended before the day expired.In post 228, Gamma Emerald wrote:That’s what he was avoiding :thonk:In post 210, davesaz wrote:You shouldn't refer to ongoing games.In post 194, Tea wrote:I've been waiting for Nomination Mafia to end
I'm pretty sure PMysterious is town and I think it's fairly likely Norwegian is playing similarly to how he played there.
Anyway, back to looking through this game and figuring out what to do next.
The monkey is def townIn post 398, Almost50 wrote:In post 19, Gamma Emerald wrote:I have experience with all except like 4 names on the list
I canthem more if you like?go overThe Bank always wins. Sorry, Gamma.
Your bets, please..
I mean that’s fairIn post 408, Almost50 wrote:Allow me to intervene. Like, let's imagine DEB was in here. I probably would have voted him for doublecrossing the town in Korina's GIM. I would have done it regardless of whether I rolled Town or Scum here, because it was decided since Korina's game ended. Both the vote target AND the reason were decided BEFORE I would have known my role/alignment in THIS game.In post 52, Gamma Emerald wrote:The problem is your explanation explains nothing regarding the reason you were poked about it. How does deciding your RVS pre-game affect your given logic?
Sp far I have Gamma. Layla and Zorte as Town Leans, and only Nor as a mild scum lean.
A50’s percentages are just considering each option equally possible. Tea is saying that’s not the right approach. I think Tea has a point with the numbers.In post 422, Flavor Leaf wrote:I don’t understand the stats
In post 453, Almost50 wrote:Ah! You mean a little white monkey with 2 gallons of gasoline and a set of matches?In post 349, Gamma Emerald wrote:Just wait until a replacement blows the place up
You know it’s gonna happen
Could you vote at least?In post 459, Almost50 wrote:@Nor: There are a whole lot more explanations for it, both from a Town PoV or from Scum PoV. Like, maybe he forgot about his read on Layla? That would have been a good explanation, but he didn't say that. (That was for Town). For Scum, how about he voted and realized he was voting next to his scum p, or there were 2 scums already on the wagon and he was the third, or hr forgot the partner he voted was the stronger Scum PR... I could go on, you know.
But what bothers me more is you making a big deal of it. I have yet to even vote either of you, Luca or Tea. I havejust nowfinished catching up. I'm still undecided on which of you is the scummiest, and I haven't yet considered which lynch would yield more info. Also, it takes 10 to lynch and the largest wagon is only halfway through. What exactly is your problem with my expressed reads?
I also still have no reads on 5 slots (namely; Pm/Wake/FM/Billy/Dunn), so I'm far from decided on a lynch.
BleurghIn post 464, Vorkuta wrote: I'm always down to policy drunken monkey for existing and because I don't want to put up with his screeching, but he can stay for now
I super doubt this. The benefit of the greylist being canned is that if a role isn’t explicitly possible in a Normal game, there’s no more need for guessing games. I don’t think there are any Day roles currently in Normal games that need N0 powers.In post 470, Vorkuta wrote:YesIn post 468, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Vork what are you talking about? D1 modifier?
You have a pretty good point tbh, I caught scum trying the same thing Tea is doing before, and this looks like deja vu all over again.In post 498, NorwegianboyEE wrote:There’s too many people in this game for me to case perfectly. I’m fine with getting voted as long as long as it’ll ultimately help the town catch scum. But god that case Tea has on me is so horrendous. What you’re doing is look at my posts and apply them to your own already established narrative, but it’s simply wrong. I’m wondering if you’re a town grasping at straws here or whether it feels so artificial because you’re scum attempting to metanalyze.
That’s understandable that you wouldn’t agree but until I start thinking otherwise on A50 I’m willing to go to great lengths to defend him. The way he’s been engaging with me and approaching the game in general feels like his town gameIn post 504, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Gamma Emerald has a very logical and coherent though process which i can understand so his slot screams town to me. I think the only thing i don't really agree with is his TR on A50.
A50 still kinda sketchy lookin to me.
Btw Nor is townIn post 513, NorwegianboyEE wrote:It was for the MEMES!
Why did you ignore my call-out?In post 519, Vorkuta wrote:Fuck I thought there was going to be 0 resistance on this oneIn post 516, Dunnstral wrote:Vorkuta is distracting from real wagons/avoiding them by fakeclaiming a n0 result in a normal game
Talk about Zote and maybe Luca.In post 528, davesaz wrote:Saw a request for town reads -- here you go, no particular order for strength other than knowing my alignment.
davesaz
Luca Blight
Almost50
Gamma Emerald
Zote the Mighty
Norwegian might be town. I didn't like the early reluctance to vote, when at that time a vote meant very little. Later posting is good but I tend to have reservations about the possibility that it's a recovery tactic.
In post 540, splitfarvle wrote:This pings me a bit, dave listing himself as a townread apropos of nothing. Like, of course you read yourself as towm, and you’ll say you do even if you aren’t town. It seems, I don’t know, overcompensating in a way?In post 528, davesaz wrote:Saw a request for town reads -- here you go, no particular order for strength other than knowing my alignment.
davesaz
Luca Blight
Almost50
Gamma Emerald
Zote the Mighty
Norwegian might be town. I didn't like the early reluctance to vote, when at that time a vote meant very little. Later posting is good but I tend to have reservations about the possibility that it's a recovery tactic.
You know this
I consider it a personality thing vs a style thingIn post 544, Chemist1422 wrote:Again, stylistic choiceIn post 543, splitfarvle wrote:Maybe, but he didn’t just list himself he has an explanation for why he listed himself. Of course he knows his own alignment. Everyone knows their own alignment, but dave feels the need to let us know his alignment without any pressure on him. It looks like he is overcompensating for rolling scum.
PMyst null, don’t remember anything from that personIn post 549, Almost50 wrote:Do you have reads on the forementioned 5?In post 478, Gamma Emerald wrote:Could you vote at least?In post 459, Almost50 wrote:I also still have no reads on 5 slots (namely; Pm/Wake/FM/Billy/Dunn), so I'm far from decided on a lynch.
VOTE: Nor
Just to make sure I'm voting at EoD, but it may change if I have the time and will (By "will" I mean if I somehow start TRing Nor or if I see someone more likely to flip red)
HowIn post 565, Tea wrote:Hot take tbhIn post 552, Gamma Emerald wrote:Btw Nor is townIn post 513, NorwegianboyEE wrote:It was for the MEMES!
I think that burst of posting was rather earnest
Idk about Vork but between Wake and Tea I definitely prefer lynching Tea. It looked like his wagon has been deflating while others have gained traction.In post 573, Dunnstral wrote:I'd prefer to lynch Wake or Vork
I actually think there is a very solid point against Tea when it comes to how Tea is using meta on Nor. Honestly you need to expand on this because I feel like Tea has looked more scummy.In post 577, Luca Blight wrote:That’s because he’s been looking more Townie.In post 574, Gamma Emerald wrote:Idk about Vork but between Wake and Tea I definitely prefer lynching Tea. It looked like his wagon has been deflating while others have gained traction.In post 573, Dunnstral wrote:I'd prefer to lynch Wake or Vork
I guess with the last VC my concerns there are a little dulled because I felt like Wake specifically got rather popular but I seem to have been wrong thereIn post 579, Dunnstral wrote:That looking at "wagon resistance" at a scale of 1-2 votes being moved when there are 18 players alive is very misguided, at worstIn post 578, Chemist1422 wrote:Sorry but what the heck does this post even meanIn post 576, Dunnstral wrote:Most people alive right now are town, I don't think that means anything
To be clearer, saying that Tea's wagon has been "deflating" isn't a reason to think that tea is scum
And this is a BS readIn post 586, Tea wrote:I no longer feel strongly about my Chemist town read, mostly because his impression on me has gone from town to... nonexistent
If that’s Menalque then I think that raises his scum equityIn post 622, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Well Tea, (or Menalque) clearly doesn't know me that well. He's analyzing my Towngame in Haunted Village vs my scumgame in nomination mafia. The problem is that i was playing much more submissively in Haunted Village as town than i usually do, and now he's using that as a reason to scumread me for playing my normal towngame in this one.
viewtopic.php?f=23&t=80102In post 639, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Interesting. Can you link me that game?In post 638, Gamma Emerald wrote:If that’s Menalque then I think that raises his scum equityIn post 622, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Well Tea, (or Menalque) clearly doesn't know me that well. He's analyzing my Towngame in Haunted Village vs my scumgame in nomination mafia. The problem is that i was playing much more submissively in Haunted Village as town than i usually do, and now he's using that as a reason to scumread me for playing my normal towngame in this one.
His push on you feels similar to his push on me in Pokémon Ruby Mafia
Tbh I’d rather just vote WakeIn post 667, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Maybe it’s just Chemist after all. Always lurking in the background. Probably laughing at us in the scum PT. That FIEND!
What the fickIn post 676, Flavor Leaf wrote:Chennis I can take the time and pet them like a barking Labrador and calm them down.
Menalque’s all fine and dandy until I start to pet him
That’s just roleplayIn post 697, NorwegianboyEE wrote:No it's also your needlessly abrasive language.In post 696, Zote the Mighty wrote:Is this the only reason you find me scummy fool?
What does that stuff about who acts and who doesn’t tell you o wise WakeIn post 709, Wake1 wrote:Like I said, I hate Day 1 for obvious reasons. I've got nothing to work with.
And if THAT's your reason to mislynch me, LOL. You're not going to force me to post when I hate Day 1.
I do, however, notice who acts and who doesn't in response to me saying I don't like Day 1.
Thirding the notion that Wake is avoiding a name and shame for antispew reasonsIn post 730, Tea wrote:oh yeah, thisIn post 726, Luca Blight wrote:Why not ‘take notice’ of those players yourself now?
If you’re Town then you literally have more info than any other town player in the game right now to get stuck into, as there’re 8 players keen on lynching you and you obviously know which way you’re gonna flip.
It feels atm like you’re tentative to name names in case you’re lynched anyway and it gives away more info that can be analyzed D2.
is what i wanted to say, but luca said it better