In post 435, VP Baltar wrote:
Kind of like this thought. Can you tell me more why you think that's unlikely from them specifically?
There's no way it's just vpb/s_s/xof right
In post 474, VP Baltar wrote: In post 401, Ausuka wrote: In post 399, VP Baltar wrote: In post 394, Irrelephant11 wrote:This feels like a wildly out-of-nowhere take?? Like even if you think Ausuka's wrong I'm not sure why it's so unbelievable that her wrong read would be based on vibes
Mostly because Nero hadn't done anything out of normal range there, fmpov, so I wanted to press a little bit and see if she had any deeper reasoning for making a town read there. She did not.
I think pushing on flimsy reads early on in a game can be a fruitful way to catch scum before they find their footing.
And you think town don't have these 'flimsy' reads in the early game or
Like if that's the logic we're going on you are looking very very bad right now
Sure, town can be flimsy.
But they probably have a complete thought process at least. I still don't understand your Nero town ping.
My instinct is that VPB would be less likely to press me so hard on having a Nero townping if Nero is scum here?? And like, I was townreading him anyway, so...
In post 376, Ydrasse wrote: In post 373, VP Baltar wrote: In post 237, Datisi wrote:ari can maybe be town if she saw something that i also saw. ok no point in being vague when i didn't out too many reads, if she noticed that baltar not voting me is weird, then yeah +town
Red flag.
You think I'm obligated to vote you as my rvs?
i feel like the other reasons so far to suspect datisi feel a bit... better than this
why is this a red flag? datisi feeling entitled to an rvs vote?
I liked this at the time because it felt like a genuine thing to think when reading the thread and was something I agreed with. VPB flipping red reinforces this read. Scum often do distance early but like... idk I don't feel like ydrasse was doing that??
In post 527, VP Baltar wrote:
eh, I wouldn't say it was super serious. I liked GuiltyLion's approach and felt like applying minor pressure. But I would put scamper in the null pile if I'm being intellectually honest.
this is maybe +scum for scamper
In post 637, VP Baltar wrote:I'm not sure I'm scum reading marci. Seems like alot of meta complaints mostly? Someone correct me if that's not right
This looks like marci is town because I really do not get the feeling VPB cares about her at all when reading this post.
This makes it feel like there are scum in the lurkers because it seems so weird to me? Like, I don't buy that he genuinely just does not realise there are lurkers in this game. Maybe he's just trying to look like he's not Thinking Strategically And Therefore Town but maybe he wants to create distance from lurky partners because for a second my reaction
was 'oh maybe his partners are active players'
VPB starts the FB wagon. While he could be distancing here, I don't think it's likely? Mostly because rather than like being theatrical, VPB doesn't really draw attention to the vote and doesn't even explain his scumread on FB until Datisi asks him to. So like, if he's distancing he's doing it in quite an underwhelming way considering he would hypothetically have started the wagon in this scenario.
Datisi and VPB both voting FB at the same time is maybe worth noting but not sure if that's AI for experienced scum players who know that's not really risky
VPB has a phase where he asks a bunch of questions (to GL, DV, Dunnstral slot who is Frog now, FB, scamper, skitter slot who is obscure now) which don't really appear to have much followup or, anything actually. I feel like a couple of these people should be partnered with VPB? Because it seems like a super easy way to make interactions with partners without having to like, actually do anything.
In post 1054, VP Baltar wrote: In post 1049, Aristeia wrote: In post 1046, VP Baltar wrote:
Anything? We are 42 pages in here. Time to start moving the game in a semi serious direction.
is there anything specific you expected to see from Town!FB that you're not seeing or is this just a generalized "he has no takes" thing?
I didn't say FB has no takes, though they are few and far between. It's more of the fact their takes don't go anywhere. I don't have a strong FB meta, but I don't take anyone this game as a complete slouch.
I get the working a lot thing. I have put in 8 hours Sunday, 14 Monday, and 12 yesterday at work. It sucks and makes it hard to stay up on everything in a mafia game or pursue threads as deeply as you may like. That being said, I do still think it's possible to semi-read along and have some kind of viewpoint.
You think this is typical town!FB behavior?
This felt like scum making an easy push earlier. it still does now and I don't feel like this is partnered with S_S.
In post 1045, VP Baltar wrote: In post 1043, Datisi wrote: In post 1040, VP Baltar wrote: In post 1038, skitter30 wrote:@vpb again i dont really know if his vote on me is indicative of 'lack of viewpoint/conviction'
(Or at least, is unusual or scum-indicative for him ...)
It's more than the vote on you. That was just an example. There doesn't seem to be much conviction from FB on anything.
do you have conviction on anything right now
Wtf are you talking about? I'm voting and pursuing plenty of threads. You think I have no conviction, or you just pointlessly shading?
I think this interaction feels really fake.
In post 1093, VP Baltar wrote:I think when you're scum with datisi, it's easier to just say townbin early and not risk his wrath.
Ok so
I had the thought that this was a freudian slip and he's saying "you're scum with datisi" because he is in fact scum with datisi
Upon thinking about this further I think it's a massive stretch but I'm leaving it in the post because at the very least I think it's funny.
In post 1171, VP Baltar wrote:
What an incredibly vague question.
I am voting FB. You should too or push a more serious alternative.
There's a lot of faffing going on this game and I'm kinda bored
I still don't think scum bussing act like this, especially talking about how bored he is which I think just feels more blunt than I'd expect a bus to be.
In post 1222, VP Baltar wrote:
Part of it is cumulative vibes from you being an asshat, which is consistent with my town experience with you obv. (Though certainly fakeable)
For example, your fight with ari seemed absolutely unnecessary.
I also remember feeling better about you when you said something about HEM's list being kind of wishy washy, because that was my same gut reaction when I read it.
If this is a scum/scum interaction I will be shocked
In post 1218, VP Baltar wrote:
Do you think it makes sense to say 'you vote first and I'll join you'?
Like if your whole deal is getting numerous votes on a wagon, then the logical play is to vote first and directly ask people to join. It's backwards to be like " well let's count the votes first to make sure we have enough before we do this for real 48 hours into D1".
You're acting like I'm a dumb shit here, but you're not making any sense about how you're pursuing wagons. If you scum read me, then vote and stop being a coward about it.
Make a case even. But don't tell me it really makes sense to go to someone you maybe scum read and then seek a coalition of 2 before voting.
Pedit - you're right. I'm so dumb. Good point.
Don't think this is either
In post 1228, VP Baltar wrote:
Did you read ari's post? It was definitely a defense.
More importantly, what is the point of this semantics argument though?
I think this genuinely reads as fed up of the interaction and is probably +town for Gamma because I think a scum distancing thing is more likely to be interesting for Baltar
In post 1310, VP Baltar wrote:
FB scum. Scamper maybe scum (but I should actually read this elephant case). Ausuka maybe scum. Probably one in the super lurk squad or a deep wolf, you can pick your favorite there.
Game solve, lock it in.
Hmm I don't think he really ever talks about scamper before this in constrast to both me and FB. When asked about it he posts
1314 which is a longwinded way to say "I have no good vibes from you" - I mean who actually talks about how interesting people are instead of the content of their read? This could just be a 'Baltar wolf doing wolf things' read I guess but scamper is not a top tier townread for me anymore
I don't want to quote VPB's dannflor wall to keep this post less wally, but it's
2144. I'm not fond of VPB kinda waffling on Dann but making sure to tack some distancing on near the end, and then later saying he's against the Dann wagon and 'super not feeling it.'
I don't think the interaction with GL feels partnered. Like Ari said it feels like the Joker vs Batman in that GL feels right and makes sense and VPB is just trying to find any angle to attack him from?
Whew that was long. Finally I'm going to look at his Datisi interactions more holistically. I think the fact VPB and Datisi had their fallout
after
Aristeia called them out as potentially partners, Aristeia still calling them partners towards the end of the day, Aristeia dying and Datisi talking about 'oh i would never interact with vpb like that as scum' even though Aristeia is the person who I know reads Datisi best is super scummy imo. I think his push on Datisi just totally fizzles out in a way I don't like - he thinks scamper is scum over Datisi later despite like never really actually pushing scamper. None of it feels natural to me.
Looking at the other side of things - I think
1939 has a read on VPB which is like... Okay, I guess it COULD come from town datisi, but pivoting into a 'too scummy to be scum' read on vp baltar is SO convenient. Scum had no idea VPB was going to die, so I could see Datisi wanting to be easily able to take VPB out of his limelight and focus on slots like CMM and town in Relly/Dann/Gamma all of which would be fairly easy people for Dats to eliminate since he's charismatic and all of them were pretty common pushes yesterday iirc.
In conclusion, I have decided to die on this hill and we're doing this
VOTE: Datisi
No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.