Ah, sorry.In post 6880, Datisi wrote:i asked for no hammer until mena is back.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: S_S
How long are we waiting?
Ah, sorry.In post 6880, Datisi wrote:i asked for no hammer until mena is back.
I was busy yesterday but wouldn’t say I was lurking? Also the game has been at a standstill for a number of to days now. If voting Menalque gets the game to progress I was willing to do that. I think Menalque is more likely town than scum but I’m prepared for the possibility that I’m wrong.In post 6886, Frogsterking wrote:Dease why did you lurk out and then pop in here all casual to get your vote on the Menalque wagon?
S_S remains my favoured elimination and was where I was before. I am happy to follow Datisi’s request to wait for Mena for nowIn post 6889, Frogsterking wrote:In post 6882, DeasVail wrote:Ah, sorry.In post 6880, Datisi wrote:i asked for no hammer until mena is back.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: S_S
How long are we waiting?In post 6884, Frogsterking wrote:Dease suspicious behavior is reinforcing my belief in the scum flip FYI.And then vote S_S instead? What are you doing..In post 6886, Frogsterking wrote:Dease why did you lurk out and then pop in here all casual to get your vote on the Menalque wagon?
Only for a little bit longer, but my scumread on S_S does not come from deep analysis.In post 6971, Menalque wrote:DV, you still around? I’ve browsed your ISO but I don’t rly understand your preference for an S_S lim
What would be so different for fb about being scum in this playerlist vs. town?In post 6979, Menalque wrote:Okay, let me go back and reread his D2 play for that, but I still really don’t think that fb plays this way, in this PL, and then reps out if he got scumIn post 6974, DeasVail wrote:Only for a little bit longer, but my scumread on S_S does not come from deep analysis.In post 6971, Menalque wrote:DV, you still around? I’ve browsed your ISO but I don’t rly understand your preference for an S_S lim
My main reasons are that I think he was trying to keep the option of my elimination open Day 2 whilst there was indecision regarding the Gamma/MT slot, withoutlookinglike he was hoping for my elimination.
The play D3 is also just... flat. And incongruous with the hero Nero vote and trying to sell that as something scum-him wouldn't do. It feels more performative than actually trying to work reads out. Why isn't he working out whether I'm scum or not? After he seemed so open to that idea yesterday?
Also everyone else I can convince myself into finding a reason for them to be town. I can't with S_S
I think it's worth noting that at the time I was looking like the most viable alternative wagon to Gamma/MT. Thus, the posts you've quoted are very much leaving me open as an option, but the fact that there is not more about me from S_S indicates a weird hesitation from him to consider the main alternative to MT, despite being not pro-MT lim.In post 6984, Menalque wrote:In post 5113, Something_Smart wrote:In post 969, DeasVail wrote:Nero, you seem quite bothered by my posts. Do you think I’m scum?In post 971, Nero Cain wrote:probably, yesIn post 973, Nero Cain wrote:????I mildly like this sequence from DVIn post 976, DeasVail wrote:Your scumread on me seems superficial but not inauthenticIn post 5118, Something_Smart wrote:DV seems generally pretty careful and deliberate with his posting, it could be partially for optics or it could just be his style. Aside from the sequence I quoted I didn't see a lot that deviated from "scum playing a standard solid-ish scumgame". Since there are surely other people who also fit that description, I guess he's on the chopping block for low activity?
His progression on me doesn't really make a lot of sense, it seemed like he had me as town for mild efforting when it was potentially possible to get towncred from WK'ing, and now that my wagon has collapsed he wants to keep open the option of re-starting it. Or he just happened to have weakly-justified reads that followed that pattern.As far as I can see, these are the only S_S posts on you from D2, DV and tbh I’m not seeing it?In post 5204, Something_Smart wrote:I would think so. At this point scum-Deas has license to go for a risky-ish play.In post 5201, Frogsterking wrote:I'm guessing that #5185 and #5186 are within Dease's scum range?
He seems to have been fairly openly not pro-MT lim but I think this is far too little to conclude that he’s hoping it might get you limmed instead
As for why he’s not as interested in you today, that I am curious about but I have an idea of what it could be, although I’d like to see S_S respond first
Menalque’s weak reasoning for townreading Firebringer feels a bit blatant for scumIn post 7015, scamper wrote:is there a particular reason u believe they are unaligned?In post 7014, DeasVail wrote:I’m at the stage where I think both S_S and Menalque are scummy but I don’t necessarily think they’re scum together and I don’t know how to feel about that.
Yeah it’s a good point you make and I hadn’t really gone fully down the path of “if they’re scum together how would they act”, but idk neither of them are playing in a way that’s likely to cause anything else to happen.In post 7017, GuiltyLion wrote:idk I kinda feel likeifthey're both scum, then they're in a position where they're forced to defend each other. bussing at this stage isn't gonna net significant towncred and they wouldn't really have a team left, possibly losing outright if both are flipped.
that's not an argumentforthem being scum together, but I don't see this "townread and refuse to vote each other" play as clearing or T-S if one flips red
I’m only able to engage superficially rn but I think it’s pretty reasonable to be looking at slots with suspicion after the townflip of someone I suspected to be scum.In post 7206, Menalque wrote:Okay cliffnotes version, I have class soon:
(1) his reasons for SRing S_S going from D2 don’t really seem to be borne out at all when reading S_S posts — specifically that he said S_S was trying to keep him viable vs MT/gamma!slot without looking like he was doing so. Go look at S_S’ ISO for yourself, there’s like 3 posts even about DV iirc and I don’t think you could characterise any of them as “trying to keep DV available without looking like it to maybe save MT/gamma!slot”
(2) I don’t like that while he was happy to riff with me and gave a shaky sort of TR on my slot, the moment that I put him in my scum group he shifted to calling me scum and is now trying to characterise my play from yesterday as something he had issue with— only I think we can all agree I barely played yesterday and so what shifted for my play being something that merited a soft townread “when he thought about it” to being something he wants to “look at further today” or whatever the exact phrasing was when the content is all basically the same and the only thing that’s changed is that my orientation towards him went from playful->suspicious
In post 7378, Thestatusquo wrote:Just throwing out random "x feels why" or "oh i think x is town now" with no reasoning or anything is just... Not how i seriously see town approach real rereads.
Usually there's quotes. Or specific posts or specific thoughts on things that happened. There's none of that here. There's just random asides on alignment.
It just feels so fake. I'm going to see if i can track down a fire game where there did a reread as town and see if it looks anything like this because i remember them saying they're on mobile before but idk man.
It doesn't seem as strange to me, because a lot of the time I will form a read of someone in my head before working out how to articulate it, and if I'm doing a re-read I may not feel the need to immediately (or ever) articulate exactly what's making me feel a certain read. Sometimes I will want to explain myself for the sake of justifying my thoughts or facilitating discussion, but sometimes for me it's enough to have decided on a read, and that's satisfying enough.In post 7379, Thestatusquo wrote:Am I crazy? Has anyone seen a town reread before that looked like this?
How should I be interpreting Menalque's expressed suspicion of me?In post 7384, Datisi wrote:zzz
VOTE: menalque
mena feels less dead this game than in the last game i've seen scum!him, but uh. this is still a far cry from what i'd expect town!mena to actually do here. so let's give a bit more motivation, then?
this is also a reminder to @menalque that i want explanations for all of the reads in the readslist that happened yesterday. was it yesterday? idk this game is blurring together but there's probably only one readslist so whatever
i also agree that fire's reread isn't Great but also at this point i think i'd need much much more from him to change my opinion of him on this game
uhh, who said that frogs can post like this as scum, was it @shea? (if it wasn't, whoever it was) do you still hold that view? bc i am really struggling to imagine scum-frogs posting with this much... i don't know non-rude words to describe it, but you know what i mean.
I mean, Nero will inevitably be right eventuallyIn post 7536, Menalque wrote:I’m glad to see that Nero’s approach of simply always SRing me no matter how many times he’s wrong sails on a steady course tho
I don’t think it’s Frog. He seemed legitimately worked up about me being scum and I think if he were faking that he would have kept on suspecting me instead of dropping the suspicion like he hasIn post 7631, fireisredsir wrote:i think ive been p clear lately that i think its frog/mena/GL but maybe not idkIn post 7627, scamper wrote:(i don't think he's scum either i just wanted to get fire to give an actual answer)In post 7626, Dannflor wrote:I mean I don't think it's shea
It might have been me. I think I had CSF as not completely top town at one pointIn post 7809, GuiltyLion wrote:gah does anyone remember this or am I just making it up? I feel like somebody at some point threw shade at CSF or had her in their scumreads, and then someone else was like "uhhh did you forget her claim" and then it was dropped and I want to find that and reread it in light of potential scum!CSF, but I don't remember who it was or when it happened and have no idea how to trawl through the thread to find it, especially since my memory of it is so vague
does anybody remember the thing I'm talking about
p-edit: oh maybe it was that
That’s okay. We would look more genuine that wayIn post 7999, Titus wrote:Our hydra as scum would have constant dissonance. I don't like bussing lolIn post 7998, DeasVail wrote:I feel like theoretically bussing is just always a good idea as scum but it tends to make people upset so I avoid it.
Also good night all
Elaboration would probably be helpful because I’m not sure who is scum from here and you’re one of the possibilitiesIn post 8078, Frogsterking wrote:I got better at playing forum mafia since this game started. I can elaborate more if you want me too.In post 8077, DeasVail wrote:Frogster, earlier in the game you were going on about how I’ve often been the “deepwolf” in scum games I’ve played and that seemed to be a big part of your suspicion on me. Why are you not concerned about me atm?
Yeah I don’t think soIn post 8086, Datisi wrote:if it really was that tweetie replaced in and said "uh oh guys i'm going to die" and scum-guiltylion was like "l know!! i will start writing a case on obscure!!" i am going to screamIn post 6051, Datisi wrote:am i dumb for thinking gl is townie for posting around page 215?
like, i think at that point tweet has probably said "uh oh guys i'm gonna die" in the scum pt and like, i struggle seeing scum!gl then go and write big cases on obscure
I agree, but like you I'm at the point where I can think of reasons for townreading everyone, and I just think the stuff supporting fire-town is the least clearing.In post 8281, Dannflor wrote:right now I think this post is like one of the strongest points for fire!townIn post 3509, Gamma Emerald wrote:okay this is funnyIn post 2844, fireisredsir wrote:prob most interested in looking for scum in dann, shea, SS, marci rn. a slight level below that would be xofelf and gammaIn post 2840, Nero Cain wrote:redfire what are your reads rn?
strongest TRs on ausuka, scamper, you. not quite as strong on datisi, hem, obscure, ydra, frog. then DV and GL are kinda weak townleans ig
i think thats everyone
our strongest TRs line up but aside from that there's notable variance
I think I'll pencil in fire as town for this
I know Ausuka disagrees
but it seems just like SO BAD. aren't you going to be more careful about town reading a buddy?
but this might be gamma specific so I'm going through Gamma's scum games to see if I can find a similar type of read on a buddy
Are there any examples of why you think this?In post 8302, Thestatusquo wrote:The more I read gammas iso the more I don't think fireisred makes a lot of sense with gamma buddy.
Or at the very least if they are buddies gamma played extremely different towards fireisred than she did with all her other buddies.
In post 8315, DeasVail wrote:Are there any examples of why you think this?In post 8302, Thestatusquo wrote:The more I read gammas iso the more I don't think fireisred makes a lot of sense with gamma buddy.
Or at the very least if they are buddies gamma played extremely different towards fireisred than she did with all her other buddies.
Your post implied that there was more. “The more I read gammas iso” etcIn post 8318, Thestatusquo wrote:I already posted them.In post 8315, DeasVail wrote:Are there any examples of why you think this?In post 8302, Thestatusquo wrote:The more I read gammas iso the more I don't think fireisred makes a lot of sense with gamma buddy.
Or at the very least if they are buddies gamma played extremely different towards fireisred than she did with all her other buddies.
FairIn post 8342, Thestatusquo wrote:I don't really have a better idea.In post 8335, DeasVail wrote:Also shea is your uncertainty on fire enough to unvote or not really?
Sorry, I should check this myself but what was frog in bunniesIn post 8423, Datisi wrote:damn, this was a good quoteIn post 3384, Frogsterking wrote:I'm going to steamroll you into the dirt scum!tisi, I want to have your skull embedded in my throne.
anyway
i went to check frogs's behaviour in bunnies when he was getting pushed, and hm. in that game, his behaviour was much more centered around "x y and z are scum! this is why they are scum! please listen to me you fucking idiots!" while his behaviour here is more like "these cases of me are utter shit! you're town but i am gonna be spending so much time making fun of the cases against me!"
do i have strong conclusions here? not exactly. sample size 1 etc etc. but i wanna see frogs answer my q in 8417.
I more mean that my experience of Frogster-scum is one where he is less inclined to piss off people whose votes he needs, but I agree that provocative is not a reason to townread himIn post 8531, Dannflor wrote:I mean everything he's posted has been provactiveIn post 8527, DeasVail wrote:It is so provocative to be targeting his most likely ally like that
it's definitely not out of style
I think it's not out of the question for scum to do that sort of thing. It has the advantage of looking like townie effort (plus there was already some amount of suspicion around fire's reread not being townie enough), plus I don't think it's so much of a stretch for fire-scum to think "what would I do if I didn't know that CSF was scum?"In post 8582, GuiltyLion wrote:I guess it's less that fireisred reversed tack once CSF was outed and more that he wrote an enormous case on me that he would know has an expiry date in the first place. Like CSF was in full anti-spew mode from the get, why go through the effort of pretending (or actually) rereading the entire game and write an enormous narrative for a fabricated scumread that you're willing to drop at a moment's notice. it's just not intuitive to me as what scum would doIn post 8475, Dannflor wrote:I don't think Guilty Lion's reasons to town read Fire are very good because I don't understand what GL actually expects scum!fire to do differently in this situation. Hard push both Frogster and GL as scum after CSF flips scum? That doesn't really make sense. Fire just needs to leave the door open to go back to suspecting GL later and all he has to do is town flip Frogster to do that. There's only one scum left (or at least there better be), so pushing two people when you want one person to help you this phase seems counterintuitive for scum.
it's possible that you're right. but on an instinctual level it just doesn't align with how I feel scum would play. I think scum would be generally more prone to enacting their long term agenda contingent on CSF going down, not setting up a gameplan that they'd then immediately have to scrap