@Beast -
Let's watch the mod wriggle at Nero's question though.
In post 5175, Aegor wrote:Flubbernugget is V/LA indefinitely
In post 5263, goodmorning wrote:Lynching beast tells us more than lynching reinoe does. Lynching beast tells us about both beast and reinoe. Lynching reinoe only tells us about reinoe.
In post 5271, reinoe wrote:Why do you think someone with an illness in the family and going on v/la in all their games should be vigged?
In post 5273, Nero Cain wrote:In post 5255, Thor665 wrote:Beast's new claim is so bad he's kind of selling me.
Are you saying that you don't think scum would change their claim like that?
In post 5273, Nero Cain wrote:Iz is good but I'd also be fine with bullets for GM.
In post 5277, goodmorning wrote:I wish DGB were here to slap some sense into you.
In post 5342, Izariael wrote:There's no way gm was tunneling that hard unless something was up with him. No way in hell.
In post 5412, AxleGreaser wrote:I suppose I could push you if I really wanted exciting, but Id prefer to push, vote and lynch my best most likely to flip scum suspect.
In post 5412, AxleGreaser wrote:As i recall,
You havent liked (voted) my push on Josh B, how come today?
In post 5426, Flubbernugget wrote:I ask everyone again why they are town reading thor.
In post 5481, Slandaar wrote:The two most active players currently are both town and trying to lynch each other... ughh.
In post 5499, Nero Cain wrote:TBF, he did. He was sheeping/shadowing IZ's "reasoning" that GM had night action information that you were scum. Not that that's anymore townie than not explaining but ya know, lets be factually correct here.
In post 5504, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 5500, Thor665 wrote:In post 5499, Nero Cain wrote:TBF, he did. He was sheeping/shadowing IZ's "reasoning" that GM had night action information that you were scum. Not that that's anymore townie than not explaining but ya know, lets be factually correct here.
I asked him to explain how that worked - he dodged doing that.
Po-tay-to po-tah-to.
When a pr has an awkward read on someone it's usually a crumb or soft guilty. I've already said this and I don't understand why I even had to say it the first time.
In post 5510, Shiro wrote:Also I cannot see Iz can someone explain please?
In post 5513, Flubbernugget wrote:Had you have been cleared she would have dropped.
In post 5513, Flubbernugget wrote:You're also convinently ignoring the fact that Muffin verbally ripped you a new Smurfhole and then flipped town.
In post 5513, Flubbernugget wrote:Also you tried arguing with him using the same semantic bullSmurf you mislynched Pere with.
In post 5516, Shiro wrote:If say she got a move from you at n2, it would be quite inciminating
In post 5518, AxleGreaser wrote:Other than frustration (not playing) do you have reasons for voting Josh_B.
(I had/have reasons but theye didnt seem to fly last time i ran with them...)
whats up?
In post 5521, Flubbernugget wrote:What do you think gm's motivation was behind her tunnel on you?
In post 5521, Flubbernugget wrote:I like that muffin wouldn't play lawyer with you and called you out on it.
In post 5521, Flubbernugget wrote:And will you stop with these Smurfing numbers because you had a 1/2 chance of lynching scum between that cc so whatever tactics you want to say you're using to scumhunt don't hold water with that lynch.
In post 5523, Shiro wrote:In post 5520, Thor665 wrote:I would agree - but nothing present in thread supports that hypothesis, so...do you think we should debate something that has no evidence supporting it happened?
Do you see me debating that it is worth lynching you ? Do you see my vote being place on you screaming "guys lynch thor"? I believe the answer it is pretty self explanatory.
In post 5526, Shiro wrote:Cause you said there was no way for her to ever clear you.
Kinda didn't want to just leave it to that so I added the fact that she could have however found incriminating stuff after day 2 thus coninuing pushing you. It not something I want to push but a consideration since she parked her vote on you even though lynching you was impossible. So I expressed so.
In post 5527, Flubbernugget wrote:The whole argument with Muffin was for you to not use wordplay as a case.
In post 5528, AxleGreaser wrote:@Thor. Feel free to instead argue that your push on Shiro and the reasons for it were actually goodandalignment indicative.
In post 5548, Pine wrote:Salutations
I'll do some catch up, will not be reading the whole thread
What do I need to know
In post 5564, Slandaar wrote: TSO must be due replacement, Iz must be due something too, Pineage needs to post something of worth.
In post 5565, Shiro wrote:I do not remember any significant interaction between them to point anywhere. Why do you think so ?
In post 5566, Nero Cain wrote:I mean how can you guys actually think Axle is not mafia after his rubbish of a "reason" for not wanting to lynch Ren?
In post 5577, Nero Cain wrote:You mean other than the fact that he's blatantly trying to lynch one faction over the other? And his reason for doing so is quite silly. He's worried that Beast will be seen as town and not shot at night. That looks like a scum whine to me. I think the only argument you could make is that he wouldn't do something so obviously scummy. Is that what you think? What do you think is the town motivation here?
In post 5581, Nero Cain wrote:In post 5578, Thor665 wrote:I wasn't aware that he was blatantly trying to lynch one faction over the other - which faction is he focused on?
He wants to lynch wolves.
In post 5589, Slandaar wrote:In post 5571, Thor665 wrote:What is your current read on those three slots?
Do you really need me to answer this?
In post 5592, Flubbernugget wrote:Recent complete games show garmr as playing to his town meta here.
In post 5594, AxleGreaser wrote:Exactly how does someone so sure they caught so many scum.. and not just making stuff up. Decide to replace out?
In post 5596, Slandaar wrote:
T/S/S in that order.
I assume you have obtained something useful from this?
In post 5596, Slandaar wrote:My connection to the game doesn't really exist currently as I don't have the time. I have tried to keep somewhat active though. Dislike it, but what has it got to do with anything?
In post 5597, AxleGreaser wrote:In post 5595, Thor665 wrote:In post 5594, AxleGreaser wrote:Exactly how does someone so sure they caught so many scum.. and not just making stuff up. Decide to replace out?
no idea what you are neutral about...
In post 5600, AxleGreaser wrote:I found his state of mind to be inconsistent with someone who claims to have just caught 3 scum.
So why are you voting him?
In post 5618, Nero Cain wrote: <----my face after learning that DGB replaced into a game with hoods after making a big fuss about games with hoods.
In post 5626, Pine wrote:I've been watching what's going on lately, though. Trying to view this as an outsider, but everyone's so entrenched it's hard to read anything decent.
In post 5627, Slandaar wrote:Garmr had a contradiction in his mentality where he was acting survivalistic but then decided to act like he isn't.
In post 5637, Pine wrote:There's less utility in reading a backlog than you think. By now, people have entrenched opinions. Scum can often be secure in a Townread, Town can often be screwed due to confirmation bias. The replacement's role is to look at things with new eyes, and that isn't helped if I rehash the old disputes and draw similar conclusions
So I'm holding off on going archive diving.
In post 5639, DrippingGoofball wrote:Flubber seems legit.
In post 5641, Pine wrote:Thor, asking people for their opinions lets me know what the established lines are without contaminating my thought process with the backstory that caused them to get there. It also pushes people to commit to a read.
In post 5641, Pine wrote:At no point have I said I plan to do a full reread.
In post 5641, Pine wrote:The only people I'm even going to read in any detail are flipped scum, and I've had about four hours of sleep in the last three days. It's not happening until tomorrow at least
In post 5644, DrippingGoofball wrote:Fluber's thoughts seem honest.
Yeah I do need a claim summary, thank you very much.
In post 5593, Thor665 wrote:In post 5592, Flubbernugget wrote:Recent complete games show garmr as playing to his town meta here.
Expand on this please?
In post 5699, Pine wrote:I can see NC and Thor scum though, they've been obstructive and have sought to discredit fresh perspectives
In post 5717, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 5684, Thor665 wrote:In post 5593, Thor665 wrote:In post 5592, Flubbernugget wrote:Recent complete games show garmr as playing to his town meta here.
Expand on this please?
@Flubber - Still hoping for expansion on this.
I think he's town based on his meta and you can do a metadive yourself if you disagree
In post 5728, DrippingGoofball wrote:CONCLUSION
I am willing and able to lynch Flubber or Pine.
Which do you guys want?
In post 5743, AxleGreaser wrote:well if by leading tyhe push you mnean first vote on the vca wagon then yes you are leading.
if meaning you are actively trying to get him to be the lynch of the day, I dont see that so much.
In post 5750, DrippingGoofball wrote:He's conftown 4 sho
In post 5732, Aegor wrote:[2]Izariael: Slandaar, Boonskiies
[2]Pine: Thor665, Shiro
[1]Boonskiies: Flubbernugget
[1]DrippingGoofball: Nero Cain
[4] Not Voting: Pine, T S O, AxleGreaser, DrippingGoofball
With 10 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.
Day 4 deadline: 2 days, 16 hours, 4 minutes
In post 5763, DrippingGoofball wrote:In post 5761, DrippingGoofball wrote:To keep you up to date, I voted Pine and so did AxleGreaser.
Earlier you asked me specifically if Flubber was scum, and you (or someone else) brought up that there was a lot of suspicion n Flubber. How come you or anyone else is voting Flubber???
Also Nero Cain is NOW voting Flubber.
In post 5762, DrippingGoofball wrote:EBWOP How come you or anyone else is voting Flubber???
How come neither you or anyone else is voting Flubber???
In post 5764, Slandaar wrote:It's not like I had been quiet the previous X days I was in the game. If you felt it had anything to do with alignment you should have waited until the Christmas period ended and seen how I acted then. It's 'unexpected' because it has no purpose and timed badly, what is it you find suspicious about these circumstances?
In post 5771, DrippingGoofball wrote:In post 5769, Thor665 wrote:But, to clarify, you are saying three people were voting you, in Multiball, and all of them, and yourself, are town?
Yes, but a 3-wagon person at the height of the Xmas season means little, especially since NeroCain troll-voted me when I replaced in.
In post 5772, DrippingGoofball wrote:In post 5769, Thor665 wrote:What's your take on the current Pine push?
I'm part of it, what do you think my take is? Are you paying attention at all???