![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol2.gif)
Anyway, just to say I'm here..
VOTE: Titus
She's drunk, yet she's voting "wake", so obviously has no intention to sober up soon
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
Hi, shannon. I seem to remember the name but not recall what game we played together before. Care to refresh my rusty memory?
OK.. I get it. So it's a prerequisite to be DRUNK in order to vote WAKE. Right?
In post 22, Transcend wrote:same
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_KmNZNT5xw[/youtube]In post 24, Transcend wrote:same
In post 40, Sickofit1138 wrote:VOTE: Trancend... Because lApsa only posted 11 smilies .... Then Trancend posted 12!!!!!
First *Sick* attempt at distancing detected. (Pun intended)
You're gonna fry for this. Not only that, but you're gonna fry for this. ("Thompson & Thompson", aka "Dupond et Dupont" style)In post 47, Performer wrote:Hi all , just checking in for now. I'm so glad I got on the replacement list for this large normal, as they consistently need replacements. Didn't expect to replace in so quickly though. Anyway.
@Lapsa dude. I was surprised that you were also a PR in that game where I was 2-shot Cop . I hope you learned very much from games , to improve your townplay!
VOTE: no lynch voting no lynch for now.
I see familiar faces in this game as well as new ones. I don't want to say anyone else's name, specifically for fear of painting targets on their backs. I do see we have at least two people who've been ICs before or currently are ICs?
I don't know podoq at all, but I first need you to obv!town for me to sheep you on people I don't know. I know you can be tricky yourself if you're scum, so excuse me for not following your lead just yet.In post 67, Titus wrote:My vote on Wake is serious based on group dynamic.
I know him well, but only as a mod, and I wouldn't want to mess with him lest he hands me a lousy role in his next game.In post 73, Zachstralkita wrote:So this game is Honey Bunches of Clusterfuck already.
VOTE: Varsoon
I don't know him personally, but he's definitely shifty.
SICK logic (again, pun intended). Although NAI, the logic is faulty bc scum wouldn't want to stand out so early either.In post 89, Sickofit1138 wrote:ummm town wouldnt type a post to stand out, that outs attention on them and away from hunting actual scum. ... so it sounds like you are insinuating that he is scum. i think it could be that you are scum pushing against an early mislynch.
OK.. I kind of forgot I played with you ONCE before. You were offed N1 though, but the caps reminded me of that game (Borderlands). Yup.. was too fast paced too, and I started playing pretty much towards the end of D1 so that one slipped my mind.In post 91, Varsoon wrote:I HAVEN'T READ ANYTHING.
WHAT'S UP MY N-WORDS?
DON'T WORRY, I'M TOWN
I'VE GOT YOUR BACK.
I've only watched the opening 13 sec. Those sum up what I wanted to say!In post 98, Titus wrote:Use only the part after the = sign in the [youtube] boxes.
Not sure what you're talking about. Neither am I voting podoq nor is he voting me (at least on my count)In post 99, Wake1 wrote:Almost50 ———✶ I question podoboq's current vote. What do you think?
Because you're a good town leader IF you're town???In post 112, Titus wrote:Why would you consider voting with me?
It was my RVS, so I could not have developed any reads at that point. NO.In post 112, Titus wrote:You're currently voting me, which means you're scumreading me no?
If I did I would have been voting with you already regardless. A good case is a good case, besides I don't even know if this is single-ball, multi-ball, single-ball with 3P ..etc.In post 112, Titus wrote:If you think that my case might be sheepable,
yeah, but when you're scum you obv!scum sooner than later (at least to me).In post 112, Titus wrote:Doubly so given I don't have an obvtown gene and you know this.
Good for you! I was wondering when THAT will happen, actually!
Not really, no. But I know we need to keep the pressure on PV to keep him from lurking for the entire game!
Unfortunately I don't have a read on you nor on him. I don't think I've played with either of you before, so it may take me a bit longer to get a read on either/both of you.In post 126, Wake1 wrote:His current vote on me. What do you think about it?
I don't know how well you know Titus' play, but she does act stubborn at times. It's NAI of her. I'm looking for a couple of other things to get a better read on her though, so bear with me while I try to figure her out. (I do mean it when I say she's stubborn. She may even deliberately try to make herself hard to read for me just to prove me wrong if she though I was bragging I can read her or so. I've seen her get mod-killed on D1 along with RC bc BOTH were so stubborn to let go of a previous incident in a previous game. Oh, and both were town on that game if it matters at all).In post 133, Wake1 wrote:Almost50, do you see that Titus is avoiding my point against her?
More people need to be aware of this.
In post 137, podoboq wrote:@Almost50In post 71, AGar wrote:Me.In post 69, Titus wrote:Who said anything about speed murdering him?
His playstyle is beyond abrasive, it's centered on division of the town and generally just not fun to play with.My post was intended as a tongue in cheek respose to 71. I've never played with Wake before.
We lost that game regardless, but that's not the point. The point is you can be stubborn when you "want to be", and can be open-minded when you feel like it. That's all I'm saying. You can decide to play "with" the team, or you can decide to "play the team" in your own prerogative. At least that's how I perceive you. *Shrug*In post 138, Titus wrote:I was modkilled. I didn't get modkilled. RC was using outside sources that were unattainable, and that was determined to be cheating. I was modkilled because modkilling RC without modkilling me would have framed me as scum and caused the town to burn a mislynch.
OK, who is NOT mafia in this game? Cuz you've voted or pointed the FoS on almost everything that moves thus far.In post 180, Dunnstral wrote:ok Zach mafia with either Shannon or Transcend
I don't wish to distract or interrupt the game here, so here's the story of THAT game if you're interested:In post 207, Performer wrote:...............I would think it'd be harder to win after you fake claim, then hard claim on day 1. I believe Aeronaut hosted a game this year where PRs outed themselves early on . Scum won that game.
In post 306, Dunnstral wrote:Alright let me break this one down for you
[Titus, Lapsa]
[Boem_u_dusi, implosion, Wake88]
[Nosferatu, Performer, Varsoon, Mirhawk]
[Airick10, Agar, podoboq, PeregrineV, shannon]
[Transcend, Almost50]
[Zachstralkita, Sickofit1138]
hardly suggests you're town reading him too.
Not gonna address the first 2 bc I've already said what I want to say in that post.In post 330, Dunnstral wrote:I don't like 325 because:
I never suspected Wake
I never suspected Nosferatu
My vote on podoboq was clearly an rvs wagon vote
My stuff on shannon is only if Zach is mafia
You can say I implied whatever but it's not true
Wait for Dunn's response, please. We may have better lynching options depending on the contents of said response.In post 332, Transcend wrote:Let's rope boem, imo.
Bad town play ^^
More so. Less townish though ^^
Not unless he towns up in MY eyes.In post 350, Boem_u_dusi wrote:You need to take a chill pill. And to unvote Dunnstral.
Use a text file to keep notes on individuals. Some put detailed remarks, others just use a point system or +/- rating or whatever. (I use colour shades)In post 352, shannon wrote:A meta question, how the hell do you remember everyone, much less organise them in to a list like that? I am still experiencing overwhelm with the sheer volume of posts and unfamiliar names.
In post 360, Zachstralkita wrote:not to mention Titus and Lapsa have made it really fucking difficult for people to believe me when I say I'M the one with a Macho role modifier.
In post 507, Titus wrote:My entire wagon but for Zach and maybe PodoIn post 504, Lapsa wrote:@titus, who's the townbeard here?
This is like the worst misrep I have ever encountered in a mafia game, ever! And it was just a few posts below (i.e. on the same page) too!!!In post 516, Lapsa wrote:In post 504, Lapsa wrote:@titus, who's the townbeard here?so there's no scum?In post 507, Titus wrote:My entire wagon
i find your reply incoherent
Who are you an alt of? Cuz I don't recall you being in Borderlands at all!In post 526, Zachstralkita wrote:Remember how Dwlee got did in Borderlands Mafia? That's what you're doing to me right now.
WHAT THE ... *Slaps forehead*In post 758, Dunnstral wrote:He's an RC alt
In post 760, Dunnstral wrote:I want both varsoon and Mirhawk dead.
WHY are you messing up almost ALL my town reads??In post 761, Dunnstral wrote:Investigative roles on zach or Shannon
First of all, yes.. PV would lurk as both alignments, so it's NAI. HOWEVER, his town lurking usually stems from lack of interest. Prodding him with pressure and interaction may actually work in keeping him interested enough to -at least- post more frequently. Otherwise, he's just dead weight.In post 1025, Performer wrote:If he is a well-documented lurker, I don't see the point of voting him like this? I've seen pressure votes work and not work, against lurkers. Peregrine, from what I recall of seeing games of his - he'll post when he wants. I foresee an incoming prod on him soon anyway. I don't see the point of your vote on him here, Almost.
Sorry to upset you, but if it feels better..
I would most definitely ag... WHO??????
I always thought "due time" IS when you call for someone's lynch out of nowhere!In post 1277, Transcend wrote:i'll make a long post in due time.
Except for me, so here goes: Could you please help me bring back PV in this game or throw him out of it permanently?? Thanks in advance, special one!In post 1403, Boem_u_dusi wrote:Everybody has been asking favors from me all over the place, wow. I am feeling so special now.
Jah! Please don't pull a Ranger on us now. Just use your magic to get more votes on PV already.In post 1483, Dunnstral wrote:Like I'm dead tonight anyway
Varsoon; I firmly believe you're town by now, but I think you're mistaking about Titus here (and consequently on Dunn, although to a less degree of confidence in my own view). It's not beyond Titus to do crazy gambits like this one. I don't feel like going all the way town casing her, but Titus is NOT stupid. Stubborn, yes. Stupid?? Absolutely not.In post 2290, Varsoon wrote:VOTE: Titus
If only because absolutely no one has any love for my Dunnstral wagon.
Fuck like
You morons, I CALLED OUT SOMEONE FAKE-CLAIMING MASONS, CAUGHT THEM, AND EXPOSED HOW ANTI-TOWN THEY WERE AND YOU'RE STILL TOWNREADING THEM!?!
We've already lost before we've begun.
I'm neutral on that lynch. That sot has not provided much through either of it's occupiers. I guess I'll go with it if it's between Vedith & Titus though. I'd much rather Peregrine still, but I'm the only one who thinks PV is lurking scum.In post 2313, Transcend wrote:a50, opinions on a vedith lynch?
That IS my problem with this game. And too much flip-flopping on votes too. It's going to be a pain analyzing all this.In post 2326, Transcend wrote:My fucking God people. Almost 100 pages and D1 isn't over. Absurd.
I'm not even going to THINK about doing an ISO right now to show what gave me town vibes about you. If I'm still alive on the next day I might be tempted to try to do it (at least I will know some of us are dead and won't be adding more posts when I'm done ISOing them for connections). Otherwise, I really hope someone would save me the pain and actually take me out at night so I won't have to do that reread anyway.In post 2337, Performer wrote:How come you tr me
The reason I'm Ok with a Sick lynch is he posted a grand total of just 11 times!! I also recall what I had perceived to be an attempt at distancing with Transcend, so a flip here would help define my stance on Transcend (who himself is a much more active player than Sick).In post 2377, Zachstralkita wrote:Fuck no, I want Vedith.