to save the mod from having to replace him.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol2.gif)
repeat the town wincon for us.In post 30, Alisae wrote:I can't be scum if my role pm has a town win condition
Why do you feel the need to lulzaly fake claim? on one hand I feel like your just annoying town but then I think scum try to be all cute and friendly and you could be doing that.In post 46, UC Voyager wrote:lol.....all my games are on going
In post 55, AxleGreaser wrote:sheeping this reason
TBF, Alisae was just trying to be all cutesy and likeable and I think that's possible from scum but I don't think her reads were serious and I get gut reactions from early posts all the time.In post 64, UC Voyager wrote:Ok. those early reads based on full page one is weird, and not even listing the reasons they believe those reads
25% what?In post 74, AxleGreaser wrote:I have CABD at about 25%.
What if you are scum with Alisae and are saying this to get me lynched when/if Alisae flips scum?In post 83, UC Voyager wrote:I have a scum read on Alisea. That claim makes me think she is scum trying to find an early excuse for Cop coming back guilty!
I have a scum read on Nero. The early interactions with Alisea makes me think this
What was the point in claiming this?In post 76, Cabd wrote:I too have a role that is not expicitly normal. Which is allowed by the rules.
In post 92, beeboy wrote:so I have to drop my post restriction :'(
this wording seems weird to me. I also didn't like his claiming a non-normal role but not explaining why he did so and I can't think of a town motivation reason why he'd do that.In post 102, AxleGreaser wrote:Is that vote an indication the strength of you read went up?
I don't think that happened?In post 106, Whiskers wrote:FOS Cabd for the soft Vig/SK claim
agree. Town fake claims/WIFOM is annoying. I'll never understand why town does that.In post 109, Whiskers wrote:disctracting from real scumhunting
I have, twice. His claim was also kinda like an afterthought. The timing was a bit odd as in I had just called him scum. Kinda like your point about the macho part.In post 110, beeboy wrote:have never seen scum fake claim miller actually....
and to add to this, she has an anime avatar and I'm always up for lynching those people.In post 488, Nero Cain wrote:I think that my biggest problem with Nauci is that her first post was mainly CABD related and that feels like a safe conversation to hang her hat on.
vote: Nauci
just my gut. Could you sum up your case on him for me?In post 495, Cabd wrote:People who townread 2iam; explain why plz kthnx.
like I get the whole "CABD is a killing role he's town." (day sk? lol) but if Nauci is scum wouldn't "CABD is town!" stance be a good way to get town cred?In post 493, beeboy wrote:that Nauci took a more "Cabd is town" approach from it which i kinda liked more
it's not and I think its pretty obvious that I wasn't being very serious.In post 502, UC Voyager wrote:i thought it was a rule yu couldn't use things like avatar's as reason to vote someone or make a case against them
Thank you for the correct type of vote count.In post 500, pienyan wrote:
I mean, TBF your thing about CABD not claiming a normal role despite the fact that he claimed non-normal was kinda derpy and I can maybe understand CABD thinking that is from bad scum but I also think that you are a decent push/hedge and that the push on you in skin deep as best. I think CABD could still be possibly scum that's gambiting (but we'll see where things go) and Dunker is just bad.In post 520, TwoInAMillion wrote:I am getting pushed because I am active and OMG I AM QUESTIONING CAMD!
Right now I am just pushing theories around and seeing where everything fits I don't think CAMD is scum at this point.
on a skim, it might not be all that common. Like I'm not all up in your grill about it but I could see where someone goes "I CLAIMED NON-NORMAL, YOU MUST BE SCUM TO THINK THAT I CLAIMED NORMAL!"In post 530, TwoInAMillion wrote:Even if that's the case, a reaction test is worth pursuing.In post 528, Nero Cain wrote:its actually pretty common I think.
I actually think the opposite. Scum him would pay more attention than recklessly flailing around. I continue to be unimpressed by your content.In post 532, Cabd wrote:Once again. You are not reading the goddamn thread. Know who doesn't bother reading the thread? People who already know all the fucking alignments.In post 100, pienyan wrote:
In post 542, AxleGreaser wrote:@nero
I was here when you made 119
I didnt like it. as in meh.
I wanted to see where it went.
wasn't impressed by the utility of it. as in meh.
but that is kind of over with now.
Lets see where you go from here
UNVOTE: Nero
I've already kinda answered this. I am voting Nauci.I said I wouldn't really oppose a lynch on 2iam. I', also considering a policy lynch on the miller claim and Axel feels like he's active lurking. I'd prob be ok with any of those.In post 547, Whiskers wrote:@nero who do you think the "second lynch" should be? Or rather, who do you think the two lynches, in no particular order should be?
sure, why was it scummy that I was pushing CABD?In post 548, AxleGreaser wrote:If you notice something about my play that peaks your interest, do ask questions.
she seems more newb than noob but why should I not push her today but pushing her tomorrow is ok?In post 555, Whiskers wrote:Nauci is noob. if you still think she's a problem, attempt lynch tomorrow. Not inherently scummy nor more scummy than many we've seen.
I'm pretty sure that NO ONE was talking about CABD until I asked about him. I felt like his soft claiming a non-normal pr and then not explaining why he randomly blurted that out was a bit scummy. He had also done nothing (and really still hasn't). I mean maybe he's doing one of those honeypot traps or something. Like in hindsight, I'll buy the "he's not teamscum" but I'm doing what any town should be doing: scumhunting.In post 557, AxleGreaser wrote:yes literally talking about in the part I looked at after it, was also my problem with it.
yeah, he's horrible. He's like an extra scum member. He's prob town as are you and UC.In post 571, Joey_ wrote:here we go again lolIn post 569, gerryoat wrote:it would be great if you could vote the scum known as UCIn post 563, Joey_ wrote:hi gerryboat, i hope you dont scumread me for defending and being associated with two towns this game
true, you didn't but I felt like your 542 implies that you were legit scumreading me at some point or another. We are 20+ pages in. Do you have any reads at this point?In post 574, AxleGreaser wrote:If I did say that please tell me where I did.
In post 578, gerryoat wrote:yeah, he's horrible. He's like an extra scum member
Why does he need to post?In post 584, Nauci wrote:Awaiting more Cabd contributions to the thread for now!
re-reading your post I think I buy the joke thing but that's not really the reason that I was voting you in the first place.In post 593, Nauci wrote:I understand why my joke about dunking lurkers sounds scummy if not taken as a joke. As I said before, the bits analyzing my read on Cabd get rather WIFOM when I was just offering up my perspective on something important to us.
like, there wasn't much of an original thought and I was a bit concerned about that.In post 488, Nero Cain wrote:I think that my biggest problem with Nauci is that her first post was mainly CABD related and that feels like a safe conversation to hang her hat on.
In post 501, Nero Cain wrote:like I get the whole "CABD is a killing role he's town." (day sk? lol) but if Nauci is scum wouldn't "CABD is town!" stance be a good way to get town cred?In post 493, beeboy wrote:that Nauci took a more "Cabd is town" approach from it which i kinda liked more
In post 516, Nero Cain wrote:Maybe but she's also new. I think new scum could be subdued and passive. Town also OMGUS SUPER HARD. Pushing ppl is always a risk. I could see scum her not pushing anyone so she doesn't get OMGUS scum read.
And this feels buddyishy or to use the jargon of you offsiters...pocketing.In post 586, Nero Cain wrote:Why does he need to post?In post 584, Nauci wrote:Awaiting more Cabd contributions to the thread for now!
YOU ARE A MARRIED MAN!In post 698, I Am Innocent wrote:But those who know me know I <3 the mod
reportedIn post 825, pienyan wrote:j
I mean, TBF, my opinion of most players is pretty low. I also think a player is still a newb until they've ATLEAST been on this site like a year.In post 834, AxleGreaser wrote:Do you two need talk?
In post 830, Nero Cain wrote:My thoughts on Quick/LQ are that his content and reactions are that of immaturenewby town.In post 799, Nauci wrote:Unvoting because quick's behavior thus far has been pretty typical of anornery veteran, and my initial reaction was largely based on the Oct 2017 join date.