I read litteraly nothing from last day phase or you can assume that way. (I read a very little parts from it)In post 9671, MathBlade wrote:And it’s actually more than 9.
God damn it
No one actually read my math posts
so you may also repeat.
I read litteraly nothing from last day phase or you can assume that way. (I read a very little parts from it)In post 9671, MathBlade wrote:And it’s actually more than 9.
God damn it
No one actually read my math posts
If they block/nagate the detonate all the kills will be stoppedIn post 9695, Toranaga wrote:tell me what's wrong with this idea:
we have the lock town players getting powers
we have one of these players using self detonate on a target
we have all the other players using power echo on the self detonate player, and direct it to other targets
what's the flaw in this?
yeah that was what I was trying to say. math was trying to say we have enough lynch to clear the game even if someone gets framed by a block though.In post 9706, Toranaga wrote:if scum has power negation and we are giving 3 townies bombs to explode themselves with, the scum will only let the TvT kills go through. if scum is one of the people we elect to use the bomb, they will just use power echo instead, or get some other ability and create WIFOM when neither side dies at night.In post 9697, Frozen Angel wrote:If they block/nagate the detonate all the kills will be stoppedIn post 9695, Toranaga wrote:tell me what's wrong with this idea:
we have the lock town players getting powers
we have one of these players using self detonate on a target
we have all the other players using power echo on the self detonate player, and direct it to other targets
what's the flaw in this?
My wording was way wrong. I didn't mean what I said there at all. can you please not make a big deal out of it. I love you math. Please <3In post 9760, MathBlade wrote:What a joy to come back to this.In post 9722, Frozen Angel wrote:Math I will literally kill you irl if you petrify anyone unless if only one scum is remaining. Hopefully there is also a healer around to revert the effect then for a safe victory
FA this post is way over a line. I get that you and I disagree on setup. You have officially killed my will to care about anything in this game. I understand you are a passionate player. I know you as a person and I don’t think you would actually do this. However the mere fact you would threaten my in body persona of a game in order to win it is downright disgusting.
Especially to someone who you believe is on your own team. You made your points earlier and I said I was fine with bombing Creature if no Petrification. I took SS in order to try to trick scum into wasting a negate on me because I figured Sakura and you were higher priority targets.
However if I am going to be treated like the person behind the keyboard is not worth breaking simply for a different mechanical stance then even though I think Sakura’s plan is the best I withdraw my support for it. Right now I am trying to convince myself to care about this game as a whole.
If the townblock is going to threaten any voice that disagrees with bodily harm or other things that cross site rules I would rather have fun than continue to discuss the point. It won’t change my belief.
However that being said if we aren’t doing 3 doing none is the safer option after three. Two still doesn’t alleviate the townblock problem (neither does any but zero is still a little bit more risky than three)
Risk ordering: three zero one two
And for those of you who wish to know I am town I have literally nothing to offer you. I have not played this game to townfirm myself only to try to help us win. I broke down all of the math and the numbers and asked several times for input from people who I knew mechanics knowledge are sound and they did not provide a flaw other than what is in the town block.
I just really don’t care right now.
If anyone has any questions let me know. Otherwise I am checking out of this thread before I become a pile of mush.
Man, I'm ridiculously defensive all the time. In first mafia game I ever played (2006 on another site) someone called me the most defensive aggressive player of all times.In post 12784, Sando wrote:In terms of actual reads, FA kept throwing mine right off with the ridiculous defensiveness. I called out both her and Math for it during "the fight", but it was an all-game thing. I was SRing both for it, but when FA went town I kinda forgot about it.
yeah I was town and a pretty good leader though? Nancy was my only wrong choice night 1 that I called scummy later on and math started hard defending her. I also gave math a power but that was the councious read not mineIn post 12847, Sando wrote:Every time I was like "maybe we shouldn't continuously stack leaders on FA" it was "zomg I CANNOT believe you'd say that?! SCUM!".In post 12845, Frozen Angel wrote:Like what do you even call defensive? where was I ever pushed? I was questioned for a while and I tried to answer them. How is that being defensive? what should I have done instead? not answering the questions about my slot?
I suggested that scum were happy to have you as leader and "zomg I CANNOT believe you'd say that?! SCUM!".
I was omgusing you at first thinking you're contradictory. then you started talking out your mindset next day and it started connecting so I changed my idea.In post 12848, Sando wrote:I wasn't even saying you were scummy, I was in fact saying I TRd you, and yet it was still super defensive.