Mischief managed.In post 5, Joan of Arc wrote:I solemnly swear that I am up to no good.
VOTE: Joan of Arc
Mischief managed.In post 5, Joan of Arc wrote:I solemnly swear that I am up to no good.
Is this a reference to a past game?In post 77, pisskop wrote:ButIn post 76, Flubbernugget wrote:Anyway. I'm a miller that commutes on odd nightsI'man odd night miller compulsive commuter[/i]
Fps?In post 111, yurkin wrote:Knowing Flubbernugget probably fps
In post 111, yurkin wrote:Knowing Flubbernugget probably fps
Miller claims are the perfect candidate for a vig shot, and it’s because Miller claims are difficult to prove to be true.In post 109, Egix96 wrote:If the claim is true though, isn't it a waste of a vigshot?In post 95, pisskop wrote:Sorry.
Flubber claimed miller, a town who return as investigated mafia.
He then claimed to commute on odd nights.
So we send a happy and friendly vigilante bullet his way tonight. Its a start.
It's not dumb. Being left alone and staying under the radar has obvious benefits if you have strong Night actions.In post 137, Flubbernugget wrote:Dumb postIn post 135, Very cool and not mafia wrote:leaves you alond, duhIn post 131, Flubbernugget wrote:Let's say I am trying to he left alone today. What good does that do me as either alignment?
I don't know if you realized it but there's 2 different people addressing Pisskop in this quote chain so I'm not sure which player's inquiry you're calling disingenuous.In post 146, Doctor Drew wrote:You want them to explain their meta to you?In post 140, Crimson97 wrote:Your recent meta would be the most useful I think.In post 40, pisskop wrote:I 'like' scum roles, and enjoy them on occasion.In post 38, yurkin wrote:Pisskop tell me about your meta, are you considered scummy player?
I 'lurk' or 'shitpost' a lot as either alignment.
I have a pretty good grasp on my meta, though with so many games under my belt I could theoretically cherrypick several games for any selfmeta.
idk what you want, are you asking me for self meta or an honest analysis?
You realize how easy, and pisskop more or less admitted, that they know their meta..... to manipulate your own meta. What are we gaining from you asking them to provide?
If you really want it, search out their games. But your 'meta inquiry' comes off as disingenuous to me
In post 150, Blatant Scum wrote:HEAL: FlubbernuggetIn post 148, Alchemist21 wrote:It's not dumb. Being left alone and staying under the radar has obvious benefits if you have strong Night actions.In post 137, Flubbernugget wrote:Dumb postIn post 135, Very cool and not mafia wrote:leaves you alond, duhIn post 131, Flubbernugget wrote:Let's say I am trying to he left alone today. What good does that do me as either alignment?
Now you can engage.
Well there’s the RVS unvote followed by a weak FOS.In post 168, Very cool and not mafia wrote:what is so questionable in yurkin's posts? seems fine to me.
This plus the meta inquiry both look like they don’t actually intend to scumhunt, just look like they are.In post 37, yurkin wrote:FoS on you, stiff entranceIn post 25, Yodavader wrote:Hello everybody. VOTE: pisskop because you are at the top of the player list and I wanted that spot.
What posts exactly do you think are good content from them?In post 205, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:In post 204, Very cool and not mafia wrote:TSE, why do you think yurkin is town then?Well take a look at my walls of Numbers.In post 204, Very cool and not mafia wrote:TSE, why do you think yurkin is town then?
You’ll see Yurkin is in a Town Number Side.
Why you ask?
Because they have good content.
Most of Their posts have been really Townie.
I don’t see any wolfy posts in their ISO.
Not sure why Alchemist is pushing them TBH.
Their ISO is Null for Me RN as allot of their posts were not alignment indicative or they balanced out to Null.
I’ll Definitely Consider voting between Alchemist/Yurkin when Flubbernugget is lynched.
Although if I’m being completely honest. I’d rather vote Alchemist Over Yurkin almost always here.
You were willing to place a vote for no reason, so why, while your vote was not on anyone, did you not vote someone you had suspicion on?In post 227, yurkin wrote:Uuh what has the FoS to do with Anything?
I’ve already answered this.In post 230, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:I’d say all of them that I remember.In post 225, Alchemist21 wrote:What posts exactly do you think are good content from them?In post 205, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:In post 204, Very cool and not mafia wrote:TSE, why do you think yurkin is town then?Well take a look at my walls of Numbers.In post 204, Very cool and not mafia wrote:TSE, why do you think yurkin is town then?
You’ll see Yurkin is in a Town Number Side.
Why you ask?
Because they have good content.
Most of Their posts have been really Townie.
I don’t see any wolfy posts in their ISO.
Not sure why Alchemist is pushing them TBH.
Their ISO is Null for Me RN as allot of their posts were not alignment indicative or they balanced out to Null.
I’ll Definitely Consider voting between Alchemist/Yurkin when Flubbernugget is lynched.
Although if I’m being completely honest. I’d rather vote Alchemist Over Yurkin almost always here.
What’s something that they actually said that pings them scummy to you?
In post 239, yurkin wrote:Doesn't mafiascum has random vote stage existing? Calling rvs pointless and meaningless really doesn't mean much of anything as argument. Already answered that minute ago.In post 236, Alchemist21 wrote:You were willing to place a vote for no reason, so why, while your vote was not on anyone, did you not vote someone you had suspicion on?In post 227, yurkin wrote:Uuh what has the FoS to do with Anything?
You can explain the unvote too but the unvote is the least relevant part of my argument; the unvote just highlights the fact that you had no reason not to vote the person you FOS’d because your vote was not tied to anyone.
Also I vote whenever I please
I'd say you focus on something else, I still can't figure out if that's town concert or scum faking solving
Again you failed to address the main point of my argument. Why did you FOS instead of vote?In post 240, yurkin wrote:Really, insulting your own random vote stage is no good. Tho I'd admit I've done so before years on MC, my current opinion sees it as lazy backing up of arguments
You’re just bullshitting at this point. You know that FOS is indefensible; that’s why when pressed on it you tried to shift focus away from it to your RVS actions and citing this unspecified reason when you couldn’t shift the focus.In post 249, yurkin wrote:It doesn't concerns youIn post 247, Alchemist21 wrote:What is that reason?
It showed that you were willing to place a vote and that your vote was not on anybody when you made the FOS.In post 259, yurkin wrote:I'd like some explanation why you were that stuck to why I have voted/unvoted, like no other players exist in this game
FoS exist to replace voting at some places, trying to excuse my FoS lmao
Because that’s what I was pushing you for.In post 261, yurkin wrote:Why the hell do I need to defend a FoSIn post 250, Alchemist21 wrote:You’re just bullshitting at this point. You know that FOS is indefensible; that’s why when pressed on it you tried to shift focus away from it to your RVS actions and citing this unspecified reason when you couldn’t shift the focus.In post 249, yurkin wrote:It doesn't concerns youIn post 247, Alchemist21 wrote:What is that reason?
I do but they’re not what I’m focusing on right now.In post 264, yurkin wrote:You cling to that FoS on mine, do you even have opinions outside of me.In post 262, Alchemist21 wrote:It showed that you were willing to place a vote and that your vote was not on anybody when you made the FOS.In post 259, yurkin wrote:I'd like some explanation why you were that stuck to why I have voted/unvoted, like no other players exist in this game
FoS exist to replace voting at some places, trying to excuse my FoS lmao
This is not the first time I have said this.
If the next votecount shows that your claim is true then I will take my vote off of you.
I haven’t stated any additional opinions because they’re weaker and were less important than pushing a suspicious slot and getting an early wagon going. Your reaction was horrible and I’m obviously not going to just let you go because of “reasons that are of no concern to me.”In post 269, yurkin wrote:Mhm did I missed somethingIn post 266, Alchemist21 wrote:I do but they’re not what I’m focusing on right now.In post 264, yurkin wrote:You cling to that FoS on mine, do you even have opinions outside of me.In post 262, Alchemist21 wrote:It showed that you were willing to place a vote and that your vote was not on anybody when you made the FOS.In post 259, yurkin wrote:I'd like some explanation why you were that stuck to why I have voted/unvoted, like no other players exist in this game
FoS exist to replace voting at some places, trying to excuse my FoS lmao
This is not the first time I have said this.
If the next votecount shows that your claim is true then I will take my vote off of you.
In a good way or a bad way?In post 268, pisskop wrote:Alchemist has been present and forceful I feel
I said I would unvote if his claim was proven true. Knowing he’s a doublevoter, I can understand why he did what he did.In post 316, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Yet you were so keen to Lynch Yurkin, now you stop when the wagon gets going?In post 311, Alchemist21 wrote:I’m going to sheep Drew and Cool on Crimson.
VOTE: Crimson
I could vote TrueSoul too but I’d rather build actual wagons instead of vanity vote and also on revisiting their ISO I kinda liked their case on Flubber in [post]156[/v].
“Could vote TrueSoul too” LOL.
IMO keeping Flubbernugget around will hurt Town more then it’ll help.
This puzzles me too because they joined the site 2 years ago and should know better, but after interacting with her I think her logical ability is bad enough that she actually thought she could hide it.In post 331, Very cool and not mafia wrote:also how did you expect to hide this for a long time
Is that really the reason? Or is there something else?In post 383, Egix96 wrote:But he's the Mafia Jailkeeper, remember? He even said so himselfIn post 382, Very cool and not mafia wrote:gyro scum? he hasnt done anything yet, do you think its scum indicative for them or did you see anything in particular?
I haven't played a game with them before, so no, it's not meta or anything.
It feels like Egix isn’t really trying though. I asked about their reads because they’ve been around but not doing much.In post 393, Doctor Drew wrote:In a weird way, I get town vibes from Egix. I would think scum would at least throw something together when trying to explain a 'scum read'.In post 388, Egix96 wrote:Admittedly, yes.In post 384, Alchemist21 wrote:Is that really the reason?In post 383, Egix96 wrote:But he's the Mafia Jailkeeper, remember? He even said so himselfIn post 382, Very cool and not mafia wrote:gyro scum? he hasnt done anything yet, do you think its scum indicative for them or did you see anything in particular?
I haven't played a game with them before, so no, it's not meta or anything.
We’ve got to do something to get their activity up though. Right now there are too many lurkers and there isn’t enough content being put into the game. I know actually lynching them all isn’t viable but the threat of doing so should spur some of them into action. I personally would rather they post more voluntarily but we can’t let the game stay stagnant.In post 427, Doctor Drew wrote:Ah ok, I do remember that now.....thanks.
That being said, never like that strategy.
Vig the lurkers ok, but never like lynch all lurkers.
What is it? You can’t just drop this and leave us hanging.In post 465, Flubbernugget wrote:Yo i finally found something that caught my interest you fuckers need to post now
I have 2 or 3 games with Pisskop but I can’t remember if he was scum in any of them.In post 571, Doctor Drew wrote:Do you have experience with scum Pisskop?In post 570, Alchemist21 wrote:I’ve played with Gamma lots of times as both alignments. This doesn’t seem out of the ordinary to me.
What’s scummy about that? It’s a reasonable reaction to an accusation based on incorrect meta.In post 590, pisskop wrote:Gams, the truth is i dont have a case on you.
but sure as hell do you have a defense
There’s nothing from Flippy that makes me want to change my vote and I don’t think the large wagon is a bad thing.In post 620, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:I feel like emperor is getting way too much Vote appeal.
At this point I don’t think he’s scum.
I think a recent player being voted is however scum.
Like Gyro, Flubbernugget or PK.
(I’m loyal to my Flubbernugget vote)
@Yurkin can you please vote someone who isn’t Debil.
I am aware you to believe Debil is scum but there is 4 scum in this game.
We could always Lynch Debil later if you still believe them to be scum.
But right now, Town needs their Double Voter!
What are your reads?In post 698, Blatant Scum wrote:Hurry up with the lynch. Decide in 2 days, please.In post 450, The Baker wrote:
Day 1 ends on November 13th, 2019 at 12:00am EST in (expired on 2019-11-13 00:00:00)
I don't want to see what is happening in Calendar mafia in this game too.
It doesn’t help to just tell everyone to hurry up with the lynch and not give any significant push towards a lynch yourself. It’s also harder to read you without you trying to form reads.In post 755, Blatant Scum wrote:Awww, why everyone forces me to do reads? I am a bad reader.In post 716, Alchemist21 wrote:What are your reads?In post 698, Blatant Scum wrote:Hurry up with the lynch. Decide in 2 days, please.In post 450, The Baker wrote:
Day 1 ends on November 13th, 2019 at 12:00am EST in (expired on 2019-11-13 00:00:00)
I don't want to see what is happening in Calendar mafia in this game too.
Additionally, I feel very lost in this game in particular, because there is no mayor/ leader.
I’m one of the ones who said it.In post 758, pisskop wrote:who said gams is playing like always? show me so that I might call them liarsIn post 750, Crimson97 wrote:VOTE: pisskop
I'd have to check Gamma's metal but if two people say he always plays like he's playing, i believe it. Scum wouldn't expose themselves like that.
In post 710, pisskop wrote:it's when I am universally townread that you should be concernedAlso i don't like these.In post 711, pisskop wrote:not when i aim to offend as a habit
Aww. I really liked that guy.In post 760, The Baker wrote:Seeking replacement for Very cool and not mafia, since they didn't pick up their prod.
Looker is slightly Towny to me.In post 825, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 753, Blatant Scum wrote:4.In post 606, Looker wrote:No.In post 520, pisskop wrote:looker, do you agree with me re:flub?
For Anyone Willing To Answer
- Are we allowed to ask and/or discuss how many mafia members we think there are?
- If you were scum, what lengths would you go to derail a bandwagon? This is assuming it's on one of your less experienced scum members.
I would try to defend my partner a little. But I am more focusing on behaving towny than defending my team as scum.HmIn post 754, Blatant Scum wrote:People who spam usually spam as eitehr alignment, so spamming is NAI.In post 649, Looker wrote:Is spamming an effective scum tactic to decrease town engagement in the thread?
And yes, spamming help scum, because it makes it harder for town to catch up.
I kinda think Looker is a decent counter to EFN
Questioning just feels empty to me
VOTE: Looker
Is this a serious vote or are we reverting back to RVS?In post 1002, Lavender wrote:In post 998, Blatant Scum wrote:Nah, I am too scummy to be a scum.Indeed, VOTE: Blatant Scum for admitting they were scummy.In post 999, jjh927 wrote:There is no such thing as being too scummy to be scum
The game was advertised as Deb-level bastard. I have no idea what qualifies as Deb-level.In post 1023, Doctor Drew wrote:Jesus Lavender....you are voting the leading wagon partially because RVS?
I can't process this, crazily is a town tell now for me. I can't see a scum lavender being so brazen.
Would DEB put in a jester? Was this known as bastardy going in?
This has been my thinking as well and I don’t like the votes that got put on him because of it.In post 1050, Crimson97 wrote:I read that as a joke tbh, since BS had just been sheep voted by Titus.
Yes. We have 2 days left.In post 1132, Lavender wrote:Sounds fun.In post 1130, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Who wants me to make a Gut Reads list?
Has the timer thing started up again?
Well if you’re some kind of Flavor Cop it’s still flavor, just maybe more useful than in 99% of other games.In post 1248, JacksonVirgo wrote:Because if it is, my ability is completely useless and that isn't true