Big Four Mafia! Game Over!

Alchemist21 · Post Post #250 (ISO) » Wed Oct 30, 2019 6:45 pm

In post 249, yurkin wrote:
In post 247, Alchemist21 wrote:What is that reason?
It doesn't concerns you

You’re just bullshitting at this point. You know that FOS is indefensible; that’s why when pressed on it you tried to shift focus away from it to your RVS actions and citing this unspecified reason when you couldn’t shift the focus.

Very cool and not mafia · Post Post #251 (ISO) » Wed Oct 30, 2019 6:47 pm

In post 248, yurkin wrote:
In post 242, Very cool and not mafia wrote:im literally saying you are scummy and asked TSE why he thinka you are towny.

also TSE, strange that you can show examples on other townleans but when it comes to yurkin you struggle to show examples
I can bring out your iso to show you were not doing that. Game hasn't been all that long are you sure you want to lie

feel free to prove me wrong, i say "yeah i can see your point" and then go on to scumread you
just because i didnt fully agree with his case it doesnt mean its hedging

yurkin · Post Post #252 (ISO) » Wed Oct 30, 2019 6:53 pm

In post 250, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 249, yurkin wrote:
In post 247, Alchemist21 wrote:What is that reason?
It doesn't concerns you
You’re just bullshitting at this point. You know that FOS is indefensible; that’s why when pressed on it you tried to shift focus away from it to your RVS actions and citing this unspecified reason when you couldn’t shift the focus.

No you're being too stubborn

VOTE: very cool and not mafia

I'm double voter, gj making me claim

Very cool and not mafia · Post Post #253 (ISO) » Wed Oct 30, 2019 6:54 pm

also you voted me already earlygame so i dont get why a vote is bad coming from you
unless you have some ability where your second vote auto kills someone i call bullshit

Very cool and not mafia · Post Post #254 (ISO) » Wed Oct 30, 2019 6:56 pm

In post 252, yurkin wrote:
In post 250, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 249, yurkin wrote:
In post 247, Alchemist21 wrote:What is that reason?
It doesn't concerns you
You’re just bullshitting at this point. You know that FOS is indefensible; that’s why when pressed on it you tried to shift focus away from it to your RVS actions and citing this unspecified reason when you couldn’t shift the focus.
No you're being too stubborn

VOTE: very cool and not mafia

I'm double voter, gj making me claim

is the doublevote secret because i feel you made a deal out of nothing/are fakeclaiming
in no way a game reaches l-1 this early where this would even matter

yurkin · Post Post #255 (ISO) » Wed Oct 30, 2019 6:59 pm

In post 251, Very cool and not mafia wrote:
In post 248, yurkin wrote:
In post 242, Very cool and not mafia wrote:im literally saying you are scummy and asked TSE why he thinka you are towny.

also TSE, strange that you can show examples on other townleans but when it comes to yurkin you struggle to show examples
I can bring out your iso to show you were not doing that. Game hasn't been all that long are you sure you want to lie
feel free to prove me wrong, i say "yeah i can see your point" and then go on to scumread you
just because i didnt fully agree with his case it doesnt mean its hedging

You were like
yurkin did x and that's scummy but did y that's towny, that's the definition of hedging
And it started as sheeping and was developed partly but I you don't bring anything new

I don't need to prove anything, no town would think oof am I being pocketed by that unvote

yurkin · Post Post #256 (ISO) » Wed Oct 30, 2019 6:59 pm

In post 254, Very cool and not mafia wrote:
In post 252, yurkin wrote:
In post 250, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 249, yurkin wrote:
In post 247, Alchemist21 wrote:What is that reason?
It doesn't concerns you
You’re just bullshitting at this point. You know that FOS is indefensible; that’s why when pressed on it you tried to shift focus away from it to your RVS actions and citing this unspecified reason when you couldn’t shift the focus.
No you're being too stubborn

VOTE: very cool and not mafia

I'm double voter, gj making me claim
is the doublevote secret because i feel you made a deal out of nothing/are fakeclaiming
in no way a game reaches l-1 this early where this would even matter

It's public

yurkin · Post Post #257 (ISO) » Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:05 pm

In post 250, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 249, yurkin wrote:
In post 247, Alchemist21 wrote:What is that reason?
It doesn't concerns you
You’re just bullshitting at this point.
You know that FOS is indefensible
; that’s why when pressed on it you tried to shift focus away from it to your RVS actions and citing this unspecified reason when you couldn’t shift the focus.

I already explained and unless you refuse to read my posts you should've understood FoS exist for a reason.

Bolded: that's fucking ridiculous. I should have been pushed by you if I wasn't maybe until no end as I don't see desire to reconsider from you at all . You are pushing weak point for who knows what reason, FoS on you

yurkin · Post Post #258 (ISO) » Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:05 pm

If I wasn't PR* ebwop

yurkin · Post Post #259 (ISO) » Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:08 pm

I'd like some explanation why you were that stuck to why I have voted/unvoted, like no other players exist in this game

FoS exist to replace voting at some places, trying to excuse my FoS lmao

yurkin · Post Post #260 (ISO) » Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:14 pm

In post 14, Very cool and not mafia wrote:
In post 8, yurkin wrote:VOTE: very cool and not mafia

probably mafia
no way im mafia, i have an alibi

In post 30, Very cool and not mafia wrote:
In post 20, yurkin wrote:
In post 14, Very cool and not mafia wrote:
In post 8, yurkin wrote:VOTE: very cool and not mafia

probably mafia
no way im mafia, i have an alibi
You are very cool
and not mafia. you got it

In post 31, Very cool and not mafia wrote:
In post 15, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:
In post 14, Very cool and not mafia wrote:
In post 8, yurkin wrote:VOTE: very cool and not mafia

probably mafia
no way im mafia, i have an alibi
Yeah Me.
Were Masons.
why did you reveal this?

The three most towny posts in existence

In post 24, yurkin wrote:UNVOTE:

My best pocket attempt

In post 182, Very cool and not mafia wrote:
In post 180, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 168, Very cool and not mafia wrote:what is so questionable in yurkin's posts? seems fine to me.
Well there’s the RVS unvote followed by a weak FOS.

In post 24, yurkin wrote:UNVOTE:

In post 37, yurkin wrote:
In post 25, Yodavader wrote:Hello everybody. VOTE: pisskop because you are at the top of the player list and I wanted that spot.
FoS on you, stiff entrance
This plus the meta inquiry both look like they don’t actually intend to scumhunt, just look like they are.
yeah, i can see it
i looked deeper into it

unvote i can see as yurkin trying to pocket me
, since we played before, just how i felt like jamelia was trying to pocket/overreacted to egix randomvoting them too
i dont agree with yurkins fos but i dont think its suspicious
meta inquiry i didnt have a problem with at all, there will be people who will be less experienced/more memey and are in general more scummy so asking that i dont see as too bad
what i did have a problem with is crimson butting in and asking for meta

yurkin · Post Post #261 (ISO) » Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:18 pm

In post 250, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 249, yurkin wrote:
In post 247, Alchemist21 wrote:What is that reason?
It doesn't concerns you
You’re just bullshitting at this point. You know that FOS is indefensible; that’s why when pressed on it you tried to shift focus away from it to your RVS actions and citing this unspecified reason when you couldn’t shift the focus.

Why the hell do I need to defend a FoS

Alchemist21 · Post Post #262 (ISO) » Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:20 pm

In post 259, yurkin wrote:I'd like some explanation why you were that stuck to why I have voted/unvoted, like no other players exist in this game

FoS exist to replace voting at some places, trying to excuse my FoS lmao

It showed that you were willing to place a vote and that your vote was not on anybody when you made the FOS.

This is not the first time I have said this.

If the next votecount shows that your claim is true then I will take my vote off of you.

Alchemist21 · Post Post #263 (ISO) » Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:23 pm

In post 261, yurkin wrote:
In post 250, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 249, yurkin wrote:
In post 247, Alchemist21 wrote:What is that reason?
It doesn't concerns you
You’re just bullshitting at this point. You know that FOS is indefensible; that’s why when pressed on it you tried to shift focus away from it to your RVS actions and citing this unspecified reason when you couldn’t shift the focus.
Why the hell do I need to defend a FoS

Because that’s what I was pushing you for.

yurkin · Post Post #264 (ISO) » Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:28 pm

In post 262, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 259, yurkin wrote:I'd like some explanation why you were that stuck to why I have voted/unvoted, like no other players exist in this game

FoS exist to replace voting at some places, trying to excuse my FoS lmao
It showed that you were willing to place a vote and that your vote was not on anybody when you made the FOS.

This is not the first time I have said this.

If the next votecount shows that your claim is true then I will take my vote off of you.

You cling to that FoS on mine, do you even have opinions outside of me.

yurkin · Post Post #265 (ISO) » Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:30 pm

In post 263, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 261, yurkin wrote:
In post 250, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 249, yurkin wrote:
In post 247, Alchemist21 wrote:What is that reason?
It doesn't concerns you
You’re just bullshitting at this point. You know that FOS is indefensible; that’s why when pressed on it you tried to shift focus away from it to your RVS actions and citing this unspecified reason when you couldn’t shift the focus.
Why the hell do I need to defend a FoS
Because that’s what I was pushing you for.

Ye and wonder why you were

Alchemist21 · Post Post #266 (ISO) » Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:37 pm

In post 264, yurkin wrote:
In post 262, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 259, yurkin wrote:I'd like some explanation why you were that stuck to why I have voted/unvoted, like no other players exist in this game

FoS exist to replace voting at some places, trying to excuse my FoS lmao
It showed that you were willing to place a vote and that your vote was not on anybody when you made the FOS.

This is not the first time I have said this.

If the next votecount shows that your claim is true then I will take my vote off of you.
You cling to that FoS on mine, do you even have opinions outside of me.

I do but they’re not what I’m focusing on right now.

yurkin · Post Post #267 (ISO) » Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:40 pm

Eyy that's all the post you talk to or about anyone else bedside me, so I'll conclude pushing or pursuing me can indeed me lazy scum.
But debil was sheeping you so shamelessly I doubt something w/w do

In post 56, Alchemist21 wrote:I'm noticing a lot of 2019 join dates. I'm hoping people don't get overwhelmed by the post volume and we don't end up in situation where half the game is getting replaced.

Ye games here are inactive

In post 88, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 77, pisskop wrote:
In post 76, Flubbernugget wrote:Anyway. I'm a miller that commutes on odd nights
But
I'm
an odd night miller compulsive commuter[/i]
Is this a reference to a past game?

Pretty standard question

In post 148, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 137, Flubbernugget wrote:
In post 135, Very cool and not mafia wrote:
In post 131, Flubbernugget wrote:Let's say I am trying to he left alone today. What good does that do me as either alignment?
leaves you alond, duh
Dumb post
It's not dumb. Being left alone and staying under the radar has obvious benefits if you have strong Night actions.

But it doesn't answer his question, neither does your comment

In post 119, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 111, yurkin wrote:Knowing Flubbernugget probably fps
Fps?

In post 111, yurkin wrote:Knowing Flubbernugget probably fps

In post 109, Egix96 wrote:
In post 95, pisskop wrote:Sorry.

Flubber claimed miller, a town who return as investigated mafia.
He then claimed to commute on odd nights.
So we send a happy and friendly vigilante bullet his way tonight. Its a start.
If the claim is true though, isn't it a waste of a vigshot?
Miller claims are the perfect candidate for a vig shot, and it’s because Miller claims are difficult to prove to be true.

Fancy play style

Overall you don't have any AI opinions outside me.

pisskop · Post Post #268 (ISO) » Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:41 pm

Alchemist has been present and forceful I feel

yurkin · Post Post #269 (ISO) » Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:41 pm

In post 266, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 264, yurkin wrote:
In post 262, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 259, yurkin wrote:I'd like some explanation why you were that stuck to why I have voted/unvoted, like no other players exist in this game

FoS exist to replace voting at some places, trying to excuse my FoS lmao
It showed that you were willing to place a vote and that your vote was not on anybody when you made the FOS.

This is not the first time I have said this.

If the next votecount shows that your claim is true then I will take my vote off of you.
You cling to that FoS on mine, do you even have opinions outside of me.
I do but they’re not what I’m focusing on right now.

Mhm did I missed something

pisskop · Post Post #270 (ISO) » Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:42 pm

And Im kind of curious why skeledoot cant just be some newb is learning or w.e.

As opposed to trying to do a lynch on you? Ignorance before malice?

yurkin · Post Post #271 (ISO) » Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:43 pm

In post 269, yurkin wrote:
In post 266, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 264, yurkin wrote:
In post 262, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 259, yurkin wrote:I'd like some explanation why you were that stuck to why I have voted/unvoted, like no other players exist in this game

FoS exist to replace voting at some places, trying to excuse my FoS lmao
It showed that you were willing to place a vote and that your vote was not on anybody when you made the FOS.

This is not the first time I have said this.

If the next votecount shows that your claim is true then I will take my vote off of you.
You cling to that FoS on mine, do you even have opinions outside of me.
I do but they’re not what I’m focusing on right now.
Mhm did I missed something

Nope I haven't. I've looked over your iso again

What are you focused on rn exactly @alchemist?

yurkin · Post Post #272 (ISO) » Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:44 pm

In post 270, pisskop wrote:And Im kind of curious why skeledoot cant just be some newb is learning or w.e.

As opposed to trying to do a lynch on you? Ignorance before malice?

He's not new, what makes you think so?

yurkin · Post Post #273 (ISO) » Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:46 pm

In post 268, pisskop wrote:Alchemist has been present and forceful I feel

Ayy but focuses solely on me with 2-3 mundane questions outside that

Big no no

pisskop · Post Post #274 (ISO) » Wed Oct 30, 2019 7:46 pm

I dont get why he is trying to get you, only you, and being so obvious about it.

sounds like youre feeling attacked by them, when any scum should been canvassing the field for easy votes/