A warlock, a werewolf, and a vampire... [Game Over]

Lady 1 · Post Post #75 (isolation #0) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:24 am

I'm just so happy to be here right now.

Lady 1 · Post Post #81 (isolation #1) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:27 am

The part that makes Lady 7 townie to me isn't the fact that she faked a townslip it's that everyone was buying into it. Maybe a TMI that lady is town. The rest of the stuff is pretty basic that you could look up by seeing the other dance games.

I got left in pre dance last game so I'm sorry if I'm a little emotional today.

Lady 1 · Post Post #89 (isolation #2) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:32 am

When Lady 2 flips a dirty wolf I want my snapcredit bros

Lady 1 · Post Post #90 (isolation #3) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:33 am

In post 85, Lady 6 wrote:I'm scum reading G6 if that's more exciting for you

You can be wolfy too

Lady 1 · Post Post #96 (isolation #4) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:34 am

In post 93, Lady 3 wrote:
In post 89, Lady 1 wrote:When Lady 2 flips a dirty wolf I want my snapcredit bros
Is this a legitimate scumread?

Both of my scumreads are serious yes. Don't push me though I'll probably cry

Lady 1 · Post Post #100 (isolation #5) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:35 am

In post 95, Gentleman 4 wrote:why is Lady 1 just calling random people wolfs...

Why is Gentleman 4 commenting on something like this instead of finding the wolves! See what I did there?

Lady 1 · Post Post #102 (isolation #6) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:36 am

My page top game cannot be matched. I'm taking applications for dance partners

Lady 1 · Post Post #111 (isolation #7) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:38 am

Lady 6s explnation isn't that bad, but still don't know if I like it. Mech talk is >rand wolfy but considering that's all G6 did and then outted a townread....meh

Lady 1 · Post Post #112 (isolation #8) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:39 am

Lady 3 lock town not changing

Lady 1 · Post Post #115 (isolation #9) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:39 am

In post 104, Lady 2 wrote:
In post 89, Lady 1 wrote:When Lady 2 flips a dirty wolf I want my snapcredit bros
Nice to meet you too.

Hello, I'm very happy and scared to be here how are you?

Lady 1 · Post Post #118 (isolation #10) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:40 am

In post 113, Lady 6 wrote:
In post 111, Lady 1 wrote:then outted a townread....meh
check again.

I did they were townreading G8

Lady 1 · Post Post #121 (isolation #11) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:41 am

In post 116, Lady 6 wrote:
In post 112, Lady 1 wrote:Lady 3 lock town not changing
unfortunately paired with someone im not town reading

True but I'm not touching them in first dance for sure.

Lady 1 · Post Post #122 (isolation #12) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:41 am

In post 120, Lady 6 wrote:
In post 118, Lady 1 wrote:
In post 113, Lady 6 wrote:
In post 111, Lady 1 wrote:then outted a townread....meh
check again.
I did they were townreading G8
G8 is the IC

oh you right. Okay so he just did pure mech talk ehhhhh who cares just wait for it. I guess you can be less wolfy than Lady 2 for now

Lady 1 · Post Post #130 (isolation #13) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:44 am

In post 125, Lady 6 wrote:
In post 122, Lady 1 wrote:Lady 2
Where is your Lady Peach read coming from?

Posts feel like trying to blend in and 63 is TMI pair lady 2 with an ugly gentleman and send them out of here first dance and then praise me for my victory please because my fragile ego needs the validation

Lady 1 · Post Post #134 (isolation #14) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:45 am

In post 126, Gentleman 4 wrote:
In post 121, Lady 1 wrote:True but I'm not touching them in first dance for sure.
Why not?

I do think Gentleman 9 could be town, and I'm not really understanding why him saying WIFOM is scummy.

Lady 3 is obv town. That's more than I'll probably be able to say for the rest of the pairings that'll show up.

Lady 1 · Post Post #140 (isolation #15) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:47 am

In post 135, Gentleman 4 wrote:It seems like Lady 1 does not understand jokes. Post 63 was a meme.

Still doesn't take away from my scumread

Lady 1 · Post Post #142 (isolation #16) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:48 am

I personally want to pair with the ic so I can taste the sweet embrace of death

Lady 1 · Post Post #158 (isolation #17) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:52 am

In post 151, Lady 2 wrote:
In post 81, Lady 1 wrote:The part that makes Lady 7 townie to me isn't the fact that she faked a townslip it's that everyone was buying into it.
Explain this

Apparently it was a joke but if everyone sheeped and called 1 person town I figured wolves was either TMIing or they were really town since it's unlikely wolves to just be auto towncred

Lady 1 · Post Post #167 (isolation #18) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:54 am

I don't want G4/L6 together because they'll be my paranoia wolf pairing for the entire game.

Lady 1 · Post Post #172 (isolation #19) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:55 am

In post 165, Lady 2 wrote:
In post 158, Lady 1 wrote:Apparently it was a joke but if everyone sheeped and called 1 person town I figured wolves was either TMIing or they were really town since it's unlikely wolves to just be auto towncred
I still don't get it. You're saying that if someone is getting called town by a lot of people, they must be town, because it can't be the case that scum would get called by a lot of people?

That sounds circular.

This early? Probably. Let me stick to my townread you dirty wolf. Get out of my head

Lady 1 · Post Post #174 (isolation #20) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:56 am

In post 170, Gentleman 4 wrote:
In post 158, Lady 1 wrote:Apparently it was a joke but if everyone sheeped and called 1 person town I figured wolves was either TMIing or they were really town since it's unlikely wolves to just be auto towncred
I think if a wolf got townread early because of a strong entrance, the other wolves would also probably join in on the consensus of townreading their wolf buddy.

Disagree because all wolves are scared little cry babies who don't want to look bad on their partner flipping.

Come at me you wolves

Lady 1 · Post Post #186 (isolation #21) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 6:59 am

I would like all the Gentleman to say they want to dance with me even if it's a lie.
pedit: Both of you seem very competent and a lot more serious than the rest of the thread and that kind of style always makes me think deepwolf. More a me thing than either of you but I'd probably vote you guys at one point if I ran out of wolf reads. Assuming I am not left to die in the first dance

Lady 1 · Post Post #189 (isolation #22) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 7:00 am

In post 182, Lady 2 wrote:
In post 130, Lady 1 wrote:63 is TMI
Wait hold it, you got a scumread on me from 63 while not realizing that three other people had posted the same thing?

Were you looking at my ISO for this?

Yes

Lady 1 · Post Post #196 (isolation #23) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 7:02 am

In post 192, Lady 2 wrote:So did you have a read on me before ISOing me, or was the ISO done in an attempt to form the read?

the second option

Lady 1 · Post Post #199 (isolation #24) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 7:04 am

Be townie L6 or find wolves and I promise to not shimmy shuffle you for a bit

This offer goes to anyone who gets wolves

Lady 1 · Post Post #200 (isolation #25) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 7:04 am

In post 191, Gentleman 9 wrote:i would like to dance with you l1 but my heart is taken even though she oops'd me

<3 Thank you

Lady 1 · Post Post #206 (isolation #26) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 7:07 am

Oh no how can I pretend to have the best reads if everyone pushes back against me. This is horrible

Lady 1 · Post Post #208 (isolation #27) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 7:08 am

In post 205, Gentleman 4 wrote:
In post 196, Lady 1 wrote:
In post 192, Lady 2 wrote:So did you have a read on me before ISOing me, or was the ISO done in an attempt to form the read?
the second option
What about her prompted you to ISO her? Did 89 come before or after you decided to ISO her?

She is the lady directly below me. My biggest competition. It was after the iso

Lady 1 · Post Post #227 (isolation #28) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 7:16 am

My entire thread is going to me asking my Gentleman partner if they're trying to pocket me.

Lady 1 · Post Post #230 (isolation #29) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 7:16 am

In post 224, Gentleman 4 wrote:
In post 206, Lady 1 wrote:Oh no how can I pretend to have the best reads if everyone pushes back against me. This is horrible
This could also mean your reads are right.

In post 208, Lady 1 wrote:She is the lady directly below me. My biggest competition. It was after the iso
Ok. There are eight ladies, so you will get a dance 99.99% of the time.

G1 feels fine to me so far on a quick iso skim.

My reads being right? Of course they're right as I would never doubt myself or go back on my reads ever.

Lady 1 · Post Post #236 (isolation #30) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 7:20 am

Paring 2 strong players is fine on paper but that leaves room for paranoia and that's the main point I was trying to get at.

Have I been wolfy enough yet that I can leave the thread?

Lady 1 · Post Post #245 (isolation #31) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 7:25 am

In post 243, Lady 5 wrote:Also someone gave me credit for the “letting the IC choose” thing and I feel I should point out that you’re mixing me up with L7

This feels really LAMIST

Lady 1 · Post Post #332 (isolation #32) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 11:00 am

In post 246, Lady 2 wrote:It is blatantly LAMIST. Doesn't make it scummy.

Who as town types out that post though. It feels like such a grab for cred. Well I see past it with my eyes of wonder. You can't fool me

Lady 1 · Post Post #333 (isolation #33) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 11:02 am

In post 259, Gentleman 2 wrote:Human, nymph, dryad, dwarf, elf, wizard, druid, priest, sorcerer, bard, white knight. Make your pick.

If I get with the IC can I be the princess

Lady 1 · Post Post #334 (isolation #34) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 11:03 am

In post 280, Gentleman 1 wrote:Why? I think scum are more likely to lolpropose and accept, given they just don't want to die.

Hard disagree bone man.

Lady 1 · Post Post #335 (isolation #35) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 11:04 am

I don't get the townreads on bone man or replaceout megee

Lady 1 · Post Post #423 (isolation #36) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 2:11 pm

Maybe I should take this a little bit more seriously. Also I don't think I've done anything that isn't hard to fake as a wolf so like, don't get the townreading on me either

Lady 1 · Post Post #425 (isolation #37) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 2:12 pm

Lady 4 and Gent 5 can be town though

Lady 1 · Post Post #431 (isolation #38) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 2:14 pm

In post 430, Lady 7 wrote:If it isn't obvious I intend to go very hard this game.

I plan to beat you on that when I get past this phase

Lady 1 · Post Post #433 (isolation #39) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 2:16 pm

I'd like if Bones or glasses paired with lady 2 so I could shimmy them out and then leave the other

Lady 1 · Post Post #440 (isolation #40) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 2:20 pm

The gentleman are a lot easier to sort than the ladies. Don't know if that means anything.

Lady 1 · Post Post #443 (isolation #41) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 2:22 pm

I already have my 3 pairings I want in end game can I get a gg

Lady 1 · Post Post #450 (isolation #42) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 2:24 pm

In post 447, Gentleman 4 wrote:
In post 443, Lady 1 wrote:I already have my 3 pairings I want in end game can I get a gg
I’m intrigued. Let’s discuss.

You/me
Lady 8/IC
Lady 4/Gent 5.

Thoughts?

Lady 1 · Post Post #455 (isolation #43) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 2:27 pm

In post 452, Lady 7 wrote:
In post 450, Lady 1 wrote:
In post 447, Gentleman 4 wrote:
In post 443, Lady 1 wrote:I already have my 3 pairings I want in end game can I get a gg
I’m intrigued. Let’s discuss.
You/me
Lady 8/IC
Lady 4/Gent 5.

Thoughts?
Build it again without yourself.
I'll be honest I am playing this game assuming I won't end game.

Replace me with the already made pair of Lady 3/Gent 9 probably then. Maybe Gent 4 and Lady 7 but that's only if Gent 1 is a dirty wolf

Lady 1 · Post Post #458 (isolation #44) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 2:28 pm

In post 453, Gentleman 1 wrote:You and Lady 4 are out of the others' leagues in that list

Quiet wolf the townie people are trying to play the game here.

Lady 1 · Post Post #462 (isolation #45) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 2:29 pm

In post 454, Gentleman 5 wrote:
In post 450, Lady 1 wrote:
In post 447, Gentleman 4 wrote:
In post 443, Lady 1 wrote:I already have my 3 pairings I want in end game can I get a gg
I’m intrigued. Let’s discuss.
You/me
Lady 8/IC
Lady 4/Gent 5.

Thoughts?
Explain Lady 4 townread

I like the tone/style of the posts they're making. Doesn't seem too big of an agenda. I'd explain in more detail but we're not dancing yet

Lady 1 · Post Post #465 (isolation #46) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 2:30 pm

In post 457, Gentleman 4 wrote:
In post 450, Lady 1 wrote:
In post 447, Gentleman 4 wrote:
In post 443, Lady 1 wrote:I already have my 3 pairings I want in end game can I get a gg
I’m intrigued. Let’s discuss.
You/me
Lady 8/IC
Lady 4/Gent 5.

Thoughts?
Well the IC doesn’t make it to end game. I still sorta want to be with L6, but that could change. I still have no read on L4, so what makes you think she’s town so far? I do think G5 has been townie since he started posting. Why did you leave out the L7/G1 pair?
Also, not sure if I townread you atm.

You'll townread me when you see me in the pt. Bones man has no reason to be townread at the moment. Just explained my L4 townread a little.

Lady 1 · Post Post #470 (isolation #47) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 2:32 pm

I probably shouldn't have made that list tbh

Lady 1 · Post Post #476 (isolation #48) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 2:34 pm

In post 472, Gentleman 4 wrote:
In post 465, Lady 1 wrote:You'll townread me when you see me in the pt.
Why the pt compared to the game thread?

Because I'm having fun in the thread right now and with no threat of me getting lynched I can just post a few thoughts and leave it at that. When the dance starts and we need to let more people go I'll be explaining in a lot more detail on why I suspect certain people. My posting style is probably gonna change too.

But for now, I'm just mad vibing

Lady 1 · Post Post #480 (isolation #49) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 2:36 pm

In post 478, Gentleman 1 wrote:
In post 458, Lady 1 wrote:
In post 453, Gentleman 1 wrote:You and Lady 4 are out of the others' leagues in that list
Quiet wolf the townie people are trying to play the game here.
Explain why I'm wolfy?

Not worth the effort unless I can get you not to have a dance partner.

Lady 1 · Post Post #481 (isolation #50) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 2:37 pm

In post 477, Lady 8 wrote:
In post 450, Lady 1 wrote:
In post 447, Gentleman 4 wrote:
In post 443, Lady 1 wrote:I already have my 3 pairings I want in end game can I get a gg
I’m intrigued. Let’s discuss.
You/me
Lady 8/IC
Lady 4/Gent 5.

Thoughts?
Wouldn't that just get me and him killed? Gent 8 and I wouldn't live to final six.

You/Gent 4 would take some convincing. Actually Lady 4 kind of too, I like Lady 4's posting recently but I wouldn't bet the game on her yet. Gent 5 I like, but why isn't he with me?

Pedit: @470 I like the attempt! Feels somewhat gut-based. I can relate with just getting a bunch of town together and trying to bet the game on them.

It would but if you're asking me who I tr more between you and lady 4 it's lady 4.

Lady 1 · Post Post #487 (isolation #51) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 2:43 pm

In post 485, Lady 6 wrote:
In post 458, Lady 1 wrote:
In post 453, Gentleman 1 wrote:You and Lady 4 are out of the others' leagues in that list
Quiet wolf the townie people are trying to play the game here.
I thought you hadn't done anything worth town reading yet

oh *** I'm caught

Lady 1 · Post Post #490 (isolation #52) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 2:48 pm

You can take gent 4 if you want. But remember my warning

Lady 1 · Post Post #494 (isolation #53) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 2:53 pm

In post 492, Lady 6 wrote:what are your feelings on being the princess, lady 1?

Is it because I'm townread enough to be the princess or because people want to just get rid of me...don't answer that I already know the answer.

I don't mind

Lady 1 · Post Post #509 (isolation #54) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 3:04 pm

I have updated my avi and am ready to become princess

Lady 1 · Post Post #512 (isolation #55) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 3:06 pm

Don't make me take off my crown I've worked very hard on it.

Lady 1 · Post Post #516 (isolation #56) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 3:10 pm

I want someone to have paranoia about me

Lady 1 · Post Post #518 (isolation #57) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 3:12 pm

Thank you I am a god tier wolf and I can't wait to make end game and fool all of you

Lady 1 · Post Post #522 (isolation #58) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 3:13 pm

In post 519, Gentleman 4 wrote:
In post 516, Lady 1 wrote:I want someone to have paranoia about me
Bold to assume you're townread.

Oh no...

Lady 1 · Post Post #526 (isolation #59) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 3:16 pm

The fact I can't tell if Lady 7 is joking or now terrifies me

Lady 1 · Post Post #529 (isolation #60) » Fri Jul 31, 2020 3:17 pm

I don't really want to pair with the IC but I'd say yes if they asked and given people want me to go with it I'll do it.

Lady 1 · Post Post #688 (isolation #61) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 7:20 am

All the ladies are getting asked besides me. If I wasn't crying already I would be now.

Lady 1 · Post Post #690 (isolation #62) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 7:22 am

I have now clearly done things that I should be townread for so I will now accept all townreads on my slot

Lady 1 · Post Post #694 (isolation #63) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 7:26 am

I can make those giant smarty wall case posts too if I wanted like the others but who wants to read that am I right?
pedit: I'm not saying yes to Gent 2 and I'm already gonna be voting for pair Gent 1/Lady 7 when the game starts

Lady 1 · Post Post #697 (isolation #64) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 7:30 am

Lady 4/5/6 are mostly fine even if calling Lady 6 fine scares me. Would make 7/2 do the shimmy out of here. People townread 8 a lot so I guess they can be town! Uh, don't really know what to think about 3 for obv reason.
Gent 1/2 can do the skimmy out of here Gent 5/4/9 are fine no real read on the others

Lady 1 · Post Post #698 (isolation #65) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 7:31 am

Look at me making reads and all that wow I am really good at game

Lady 1 · Post Post #705 (isolation #66) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 8:03 am

Me vs the girl they tell you not to worry about his how I feel about Lady 8

Lady 1 · Post Post #731 (isolation #67) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 10:16 am

In post 728, Gentleman 6 wrote:Lady 1, serious question, what makes the game of mafia enjoyable the most to you?

Being able to have healthy conversation about reads and trying to figure things out together with other people. Why?

Lady 1 · Post Post #733 (isolation #68) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 10:22 am

G3 can stick around but that's a popular statement so I don't see any reason to keep talking about this. Lady 2 2s recent posting hasn't helped my scumread on them.

Lady 1 · Post Post #734 (isolation #69) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 10:23 am

I like L4s progression so far and would like to hear more about what people think about Lady 7 because I know I'm obviously wrong on one of her/G1 but they're who I want to vote pretty easily at the moment due to the fact I think they're both wolfy

Lady 1 · Post Post #744 (isolation #70) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 11:18 am

In post 742, Gentleman 6 wrote:
In post 731, Lady 1 wrote:
In post 728, Gentleman 6 wrote:Lady 1, serious question, what makes the game of mafia enjoyable the most to you?
Being able to have healthy conversation about reads and trying to figure things out together with other people. Why?
Your posting strikes me as something similar to how I play when I'm really happy about the role PM I drew, or the players in the game.

Given this is an anon alt game...

I am happy with the role pm I got true.

Lady 1 · Post Post #745 (isolation #71) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 11:19 am

In post 737, Lady 2 wrote:
In post 733, Lady 1 wrote:Lady 2 2s recent posting hasn't helped my scumread on them.
Can we have a healthy conversation about this read? I can't really find much explanation of it in your ISO.

I don't really see how much solving you've done in the game. Your tone doesn't help but that's more a personality thing than it is a reason to think you're a wolf. You just seem very defensive and only get fired up whenever it's about you in question.

Lady 1 · Post Post #747 (isolation #72) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 11:21 am

In post 739, Lady 6 wrote:
In post 734, Lady 1 wrote:I like L4s progression so far and would like to hear more about what people think about Lady 7 because I know I'm obviously wrong on one of her/G1 but they're who I want to vote pretty easily at the moment due to the fact I think they're both wolfy
A lot of people agree that at the very least G1 shouldn't be town read. Where does your Lady 7 scum read stem from? That's the more unpopular take at present

A lot of Lady 7s posting feels planned. At first she said she wasn't going to post in her PT and changed her mind and then made a big deal of 'oh I have paranoia on a lot of these players! Paranoia this and that!' It feels like a way to leave her options open. I also don't like her talking about how scum want to pair with Lady 8 as if to set up a mislynch down the line. There's more to the read but this is based off memory and not iso diving

Lady 1 · Post Post #754 (isolation #73) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 11:26 am

In post 749, Lady 2 wrote:
In post 745, Lady 1 wrote:I don't really see how much solving you've done in the game. Your tone doesn't help but that's more a personality thing than it is a reason to think you're a wolf. You just seem very defensive and only get fired up whenever it's about you in question.
What is your definition of solving? Forming reads?

I've shared every read I have, and I'm more than happy to explain any you want to hear about. I'm not going to make up reads out of thin air, though.

Do you not like it when people wolf read you?

Lady 1 · Post Post #757 (isolation #74) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 11:27 am

In post 750, Lady 2 wrote:
In post 747, Lady 1 wrote:A lot of Lady 7s posting feels planned. At first she said she wasn't going to post in her PT and changed her mind and then made a big deal of 'oh I have paranoia on a lot of these players! Paranoia this and that!' It feels like a way to leave her options open.
This sounds like the opposite of planned to me. Wouldn't the easiest way to keep your options open be to just not give a strong opinion on how you'll play the PT?

Not posting in the pt with your town partner is pretty stupid as wolf. You can still keep your options open and post in your pt. Along with the fact if you just never gave a strong opinion on anything you won't make end game.

Lady 1 · Post Post #759 (isolation #75) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 11:28 am

In post 751, Gentleman 6 wrote:
In post 744, Lady 1 wrote:
In post 742, Gentleman 6 wrote:
In post 731, Lady 1 wrote:
In post 728, Gentleman 6 wrote:Lady 1, serious question, what makes the game of mafia enjoyable the most to you?
Being able to have healthy conversation about reads and trying to figure things out together with other people. Why?
Your posting strikes me as something similar to how I play when I'm really happy about the role PM I drew, or the players in the game.

Given this is an anon alt game...
I am happy with the role pm I got true.
You are the exact kind of player I feel like I am able to sort best.

This bodes well, and I will use you as an anchor kthnx.

I don't know if I should be worried or if I should take this as a compliment

Lady 1 · Post Post #763 (isolation #76) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 11:30 am

In post 758, Lady 2 wrote:
In post 754, Lady 1 wrote:Do you not like it when people wolf read you?
I don't like it when people scumread me for my playstyle and then refuse to keep an open mind about me.

Hm, this is good to know. What's your take on the following people. If you've answered already feel free to direct me to them:
G1
G9
G4

L6
L8

Lady 1 · Post Post #765 (isolation #77) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 11:31 am

In post 760, Lady 2 wrote:
In post 757, Lady 1 wrote:Along with the fact if you just never gave a strong opinion on anything you won't make end game.
There is a difference between not giving a strong opinion on one thing (which most players do not have a strong opinion on) and not giving a strong opinion on ANYTHING.

Also the wincon for scum is not to have all of their members reach endgame-- it's to have ONE of them reach endgame. Keep that in mind.

You're not wrong, but that doesn't take away from my reasoning that I dislike how L7 feels like she's acting with all this level of paranoia. If people townread her so much do they townread G1 as well?

Lady 1 · Post Post #773 (isolation #78) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 11:36 am

No you can't. You should fear me

Lady 1 · Post Post #779 (isolation #79) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 11:39 am

In post 775, Lady 5 wrote:
In post 694, Lady 1 wrote:I'm already gonna be voting for pair Gent 1/Lady 7 when the game starts
Why?

I scumread both of them independently

Lady 1 · Post Post #794 (isolation #80) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 11:51 am

Because I am clearly the townist lady around

Lady 1 · Post Post #796 (isolation #81) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 11:55 am

In post 784, Lady 7 wrote:@L1.Cry

In terms of leaving options open I think that if I opened the day phase pushing L8/G5 people should suspect me I have very much called both those slots town as far as the near future is concerned. And as scum I would be aware that I wouldn't need appropriate setup on a late game push if that is what I see L8/G5 as.

If you think that my statement regarding how scum would like to pair up with strong looking players is me giving myself an easier time trying to lynch them. Why do you think to some capacity I'd be throwing G1 under the bus given I self described myself as someone scum would want, not to mention I do need to defend G1 long term as scum to win who my paranoia is extending to.
Also why start trying to pressure them now when by the time I'd need to lynch them the landscape of the game is going to be completely different? I am literally just giving them a chance to say "you've been planning this all game" as a late game buzz argument.

Just because you talked about yourself as someone scum would want would not be throwing yourself under the bus unless that's a statement everyone would stick with and really I don't think that's the case. Like people wouldn't vote you guys because G1 paired with you and it's likely scum wanting to be with you. It would be for his own actions.

Calling 1 pair town is nice and all, but I don't expect you to be obvious about this because obviously leaving yourself open is bad play and you clearly seem somewhat decent. How this plays out depends on other factors that aren't in my control right now and if I talked more about them it'd just help you. So we'll see how it plays out.

Lady 1 · Post Post #797 (isolation #82) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 11:55 am

In post 795, Gentleman 4 wrote:
In post 792, Lady 5 wrote:Why Lady 1 and Gent 6?
G6 says L1 is a type of player that he can read well.

pedit: Not really.

Why must you hurt me so...

Lady 1 · Post Post #799 (isolation #83) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 11:56 am

In post 787, Lady 2 wrote:
In post 763, Lady 1 wrote:Hm, this is good to know. What's your take on the following people. If you've answered already feel free to direct me to them:
G1
G9
G4

L6
L8
G1 I thought his early game was somewhat towny i.e. saying scum are more likely to lolpropose followed by lolproposing and his posting felt pretty spontaneous which is usually towny.

G9 I originally had as pretty towny due to the impulsive request and then 123 which was brazen enough that I thought most scum wouldn't post it, however looking back I'm not really sure that's accurate. It is pretty ballsy though.

G4 I already talked about

L6 seems fine but I don't really have any strong leans. I'm pretty sure the avatar does interfere with my ability to read her as well, weirdly.

L8 I feel like there were some lines that I liked but I don't remember them off the top of my head. Meh can't really find anything after ISO'ing, so she's still null.

Hmmmm... you can stick around I guess.

Lady 1 · Post Post #800 (isolation #84) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 11:57 am

I don't really care much for the read part of L2s post but her response to how she acts with wolf reads is pretty consistent with what I would expect. So she can go back to bullish

Lady 1 · Post Post #801 (isolation #85) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 11:57 am

What a typo of a page top.

Lady 1 · Post Post #807 (isolation #86) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 12:03 pm

I have too many wolf reads and not enough townreads let's fix that

Lady 1 · Post Post #810 (isolation #87) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 12:04 pm

In post 809, Gentleman 6 wrote:
In post 806, Lady 6 wrote:They are also roughly at the same level of town read for me
Not sure if insult, compliment, or bof.

Yes

Lady 1 · Post Post #818 (isolation #88) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 12:08 pm

[G9, G5,]
[G3 G6]
[G4 G7]
[G1, G2]

[L4 L5]
[L6 L8 L3]
[L2, L7]

Lady 1 · Post Post #822 (isolation #89) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 12:09 pm

In post 819, Gentleman 7 wrote:
In post 709, Lady 6 wrote:Gentleman 7, you should ask someone else to dance, I don't plan on accepting your invitation
No thanks. I'd rather die than invite anyone else but you.

LOL

Lady 1 · Post Post #823 (isolation #90) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 12:09 pm

G7 lock town

Lady 1 · Post Post #833 (isolation #91) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 12:15 pm

In post 824, Gentleman 6 wrote:
In post 823, Lady 1 wrote:G7 lock town
Why am I so high on your list?

It's more the others are worse than you are better.

Lady 1 · Post Post #847 (isolation #92) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 12:18 pm

In post 837, Gentleman 4 wrote:
In post 833, Lady 1 wrote:It's more the others are worse than you are better.
I suspect your negative read on me may be because I am not willing to trust you. Is this right or is there more to it?

pedit:

I'm not egotistical enough to base a read because of how you view me. In fact, I can really care less how you or anyone else views me in the game. So there's more to it than that.

Lady 1 · Post Post #853 (isolation #93) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 12:21 pm

In post 852, Lady 4 wrote:Why are all the men so un-opinionated

Right!

Lady 1 · Post Post #857 (isolation #94) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 12:23 pm

In post 850, Gentleman 4 wrote:
In post 847, Lady 1 wrote:I'm not egotistical enough to base a read because of how you view me. In fact, I can really care less how you or anyone else views me in the game. So there's more to it than that.
Ok, so what have I been doing that you don't like?

If I take away the whole 'you're a serious' looking player part your iso feels pretty bland to me. I don't see anything that screams townie to me.

Lady 1 · Post Post #859 (isolation #95) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 12:24 pm

In post 857, Lady 1 wrote:
In post 850, Gentleman 4 wrote:
In post 847, Lady 1 wrote:I'm not egotistical enough to base a read because of how you view me. In fact, I can really care less how you or anyone else views me in the game. So there's more to it than that.
Ok, so what have I been doing that you don't like?
If I take away the whole 'you're a serious' looking player part your iso feels pretty bland to me. I don't see anything that screams townie to me.

Oh I also hate your reads

Lady 1 · Post Post #866 (isolation #96) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 12:27 pm

In post 861, Lady 2 wrote:Is hating someone's reads even correlated with them being scum? I feel like scum are more likely to tend toward consensus reads.

That's player based not fact based

Lady 1 · Post Post #868 (isolation #97) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 12:28 pm

In post 863, Gentleman 4 wrote:
In post 857, Lady 1 wrote:If I take away the whole 'you're a serious' looking player part your iso feels pretty bland to me. I don't see anything that screams townie to me.
Do you think being serious is townie then? As for the last sentence, I'm not sure if I will ever do something that "screams" townie.

You could, others have already. Also being serious isn't a town tell. Nor is being not serious don't get how you got that impression from my posting though.

Lady 1 · Post Post #883 (isolation #98) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 12:37 pm

In post 875, Lady 7 wrote:
In post 796, Lady 1 wrote:Just because you talked about yourself as someone scum would want would not be throwing yourself under the bus unless that's a statement everyone would stick with and really I don't think that's the case. Like people wouldn't vote you guys because G1 paired with you and it's likely scum wanting to be with you. It would be for his own actions.
If my argument doesn't hold up then I am not setting anything up for the late game.
I either believe it will hold up and I am setting people up while shooting myself in the foot or it doesn't hold up and nothing really matters.

Either way your read doesn't make that much sense to me.

Even if you're not setting yourself up for late game as someone pointed out to me. That doesn't take away from the rest of the argument. Your second point is just...objectlely false.

But it doesn't need to make sense to a smelly wolf anyway

Lady 1 · Post Post #888 (isolation #99) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 12:41 pm

Gent 2 feels like he's either in anti spew or just too ballsy to be a wolf rn.

Lady 1 · Sat Aug 01, 2020 12:41 pm

In post 886, Lady 7 wrote:
In post 883, Lady 1 wrote:Even if you're not setting yourself up for late game as someone pointed out to me. That doesn't take away from the rest of the argument. Your second point is just...objectlely false.

But it doesn't need to make sense to a smelly wolf anyway
It really doesn't make sense but you do you I guess.

'I don't agree with you so it doesn't make sense'

lol alright.

Lady 1 · Sat Aug 01, 2020 12:48 pm

In post 892, Gentleman 2 wrote:Scum wants to pair up as soon as possible. Gent 5 or Gent 9 comes into mind.

This depends on how comfortable scum are and we don't really know the answer to that. If you're a confident scum player and think you can pair up by being townie you don't need to pair up asap considering it will bring eyes to you. And that's not even considering the ladies although I do think there's some merit in the ladies to try and wait out pairings, but since this hasn't happened I had nothing to trap people with. A shame

Lady 1 · Sat Aug 01, 2020 12:51 pm

In post 893, Lady 7 wrote:
In post 889, Lady 1 wrote:'I don't agree with you so it doesn't make sense'

lol alright.
I mean you didn't agree with my counter argument you didn't go against it.

Either I believe my argument holds up and am setting myself for the future but I am also saying G1 as scum would want to pair up with me.
Or I don't think my argument holds up in which case I am not setting up lynches either.

Unless you think I am pushing lynches without really caring if people like my reasoning or not? Which feels like a bad way to push something through even as scum.

It's you who didn't talk about my argument all you really did was say how you're not setting yourself up for lategame and at that point I can see/let go. But that wasn't the crux of my argument that you haven't proven false. I also openly said one of the main things I need to see depends on later in the game so you saying 'it doesn't make sense' isn't even close to the case.

Having options and setting up lynches is 2 entirely different things as well.

Lady 1 · Sat Aug 01, 2020 12:51 pm

In post 895, Gentleman 7 wrote:Lady 1. Strongly held opinions with flimsy reason to be convinced. Overcompensating for rolling scum or bad at mafia.

In post 526, Lady 1 wrote:The fact I can't tell if Lady 7 is joking or now terrifies me
This post pings me negatively.

Not going to be my dance partner!

A) Wasn't gonna dance with you anyway
B) Super ironic

Lady 1 · Sat Aug 01, 2020 12:53 pm

In post 896, Gentleman 2 wrote:
In post 894, Lady 1 wrote:
In post 892, Gentleman 2 wrote:Scum wants to pair up as soon as possible. Gent 5 or Gent 9 comes into mind.
This depends on how comfortable scum are and we don't really know the answer to that. If you're a confident scum player and think you can pair up by being townie you don't need to pair up asap considering it will bring eyes to you. And that's not even considering the ladies although I do think there's some merit in the ladies to try and wait out pairings, but since this hasn't happened I had nothing to trap people with. A shame
It's best to be quick to pair up because the longer you take, the higher the chance of being left out

Obviously, that goes without saying. But using that to argue that it makes the early gents more wolfy isn't a good idea imo. Because it depends on the player in question and since we have no idea who they are we can't really use that kind of statement.

Lady 1 · Sat Aug 01, 2020 12:56 pm

I will be very sad if you are a wolf Gent 7. You do not have my heart but you do have my support

Lady 1 · Post Post #909 (isolation #106) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 1:00 pm

I think I want Gent 2 to stay because he believes what he's saying even if I don't agree with it and that's the important part.

Lady 1 · Post Post #919 (isolation #107) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 1:04 pm

Lady 6 don't break my friend Gent 7s heart. You should dance with him

Lady 1 · Post Post #921 (isolation #108) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 1:06 pm

In post 919, Lady 1 wrote:Lady 6 don't break my friend Gent 7s heart. You should dance with him

I unironically support this btw

Lady 1 · Post Post #928 (isolation #109) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 1:19 pm

Gent 3 all I see is non townreads and scumreads from you the only person I remember you townreading is the person you want to partner with.

Got anything else to share?

Lady 1 · Post Post #929 (isolation #110) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 1:19 pm

In post 926, Gentleman 9 wrote:If you scum read both players in a pair then you should like the pairing

If that's the case then I love Gent 1 and Lady 7

Lady 1 · Post Post #990 (isolation #111) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 2:08 pm

Yes townread me more you fools. I cannot wait to win this game as a wolf.

Lady 1 · Post Post #994 (isolation #112) » Sat Aug 01, 2020 2:10 pm

In post 992, Lady 5 wrote:
In post 990, Lady 1 wrote:Yes townread me more you fools. I cannot wait to win this game as a wolf.
You’re not meant to claim your main

I'm positive no one in this game knows my main so I can post however I want.

Lady 1 · Sat Aug 01, 2020 2:34 pm

I'm lonely

Lady 1 · Sat Aug 01, 2020 2:40 pm

In post 1035, Lady 6 wrote:I pretty much agree with G3's reasoning on G6, in that my mild reasons for town reading G2 and G7 are stronger than my even milder reasons for seeing G6 as town.

I personally hope L2 doesn't say yes to G4 and we send him down the river

Lady 1 · Sat Aug 01, 2020 2:43 pm

In post 1037, Gentleman 6 wrote:
In post 1036, Lady 1 wrote:
In post 1035, Lady 6 wrote:I pretty much agree with G3's reasoning on G6, in that my mild reasons for town reading G2 and G7 are stronger than my even milder reasons for seeing G6 as town.
I personally hope L2 doesn't say yes to G4 and we send him down the river
Is this your incredibly obstinate way of proposing to me?

Is it working?

In post 1038, Lady 2 wrote:
In post 1036, Lady 1 wrote:I personally hope L2 doesn't say yes to G4 and we send him down the river
You want to send G4 down the river?

Kinda. Him or G7 given I doubt anyone will take G7 seriously ever

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 2:57 am

I can’t believe no one asked me to dance yet am I that ugly?

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 3:06 am

In post 1257, Gentleman 4 wrote:hypothetically, which gentleman would you like to dance with? Also, are you scumreading me because of the "null" post thing too?

I don’t really know where a lot of your reads come from and other guys seem less likely to be a wolf than you. I do think the vibe you give off is making people wolf read you harder than they should but it’s not like I don’t understand where they’re coming from.

If I had my choice of partner it’d be 6 or you but lady 2 wants you. If people are still unsure about me I can be a princess and die too.

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 3:07 am

In post 1255, Lady 3 wrote:
In post 1253, Lady 1 wrote:I can’t believe no one asked me to dance yet am I that ugly?
go and cry about it

The old you was less mean. Eat a snickers

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 3:15 am

In post 1267, Lady 3 wrote:I only bully you because I think you're town L1.cry <3

Ok this makes me feel better <3

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 3:16 am

In post 1268, Lady 5 wrote:I should probably mention that L6 and G3 are probably my two top townreads though, but we can have like adorable couple arguments like in a bad romcom before making up

If anyone else needed reason for L5 town look here

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 6:14 am

omg I'm getting a dance partner I need a new avi to fit my reaction to this amazing moment give me a second.

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 6:16 am

Okay I dressed up nicely for this moment do I look better?

Yes Gentleman 6 please teach me how to dance

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 6:24 am

You're right. It's between G2/G7

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 6:29 am

In post 1359, Lady 7 wrote:
In post 1356, Lady 1 wrote:You're right. It's between G2/G7
Oh god they both suck so much.

I would not be surprised if both were town tbh.

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 6:48 am

In post 1362, Lady 7 wrote:
In post 1360, Lady 1 wrote:
In post 1359, Lady 7 wrote:
In post 1356, Lady 1 wrote:You're right. It's between G2/G7
Oh god they both suck so much.
I would not be surprised if both were town tbh.
To some degree maybe?
Which one in particular do you think we should leave out. I'd have to analyze both to figure it out.

Depends on if Gent 7 is going to stick with his gimmick or not because on a town Gent 2 flip I would probably suspect Gent 4 a lot more. But if Gent 7 is gonna just do this all game we can leave him alone even though I'm pretty confident on him being town

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 9:07 am

I want you all to know I'm having a great time right now

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 12:29 pm

I believe I am the hardest slot to read due to my alluring posting and complex motives.

I think G2 and G7 should make 1 final post each or something along those lines and then we move on. This is dragging on in circles.

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 12:33 pm

Hot take: If you told me all the dirty wolves were in the guys I wouldn't call you crazy.

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 12:34 pm

In post 1494, Lady 1 wrote:Hot take: If you told me all the dirty wolves were in the guys I wouldn't call you crazy.

Still doesn't mean I won't stop from sending G1 and L7 down the river though

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 2:23 pm

We're laughing and grinning behind our masks
With reads so bad it makes me take out a flask
But thankfully with gentleman six
I'won't get fooled by wolfy tricks
Together we'll get through any task

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 2:38 pm

Killing number 7 is a huge mistake
doing so would make my heart ache
All you need to do is look at the signs
and you'll realize his posts are fine
In time you'll find the real fake

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 6:27 pm

Food for thought: How much are you willing to trust someone else's read on their own partner?

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 6:33 pm

I had a follow up question but the more I think about it I can really see the answer only helping wolves besides saying my own curiosity

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 6:34 pm

In post 1699, Gentleman 6 wrote:
In post 1697, Lady 7 wrote:To give you the answer you are looking for I think people are more likely to town read their partner due to the consequences associated with accidentally bombing a town partner.
And I feel like I myself feel the opposite!

I'll make you love me you'll see.

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 6:34 pm

In post 1701, Lady 3 wrote:1689 is true, town-indicative, and depressing and I would like to Disable it

Nothing in 1689 is town indicative and It makes me feel even more confident in the way people are reading gent 3. It's worrisome.

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 6:43 pm

In post 1707, Gentleman 3 wrote:I feel as though you've got something backwards here. You're not interested in my thoughts because if I'm scum they're prefabricated; very well, but if I'm scum then all of my thoughts are fabricated regardless. If I am town, they are quite real. So as I was trying to get at earlier, what is the specific reason to believe the scum case over the town case?

Moreover, I feel as though you ignored my second point there. Even if one granted I was scum and that my reads were set before I replaced in, the things that I wrote about them were not set before I replaced in, and it is the things written about reads that are relevant to one's alignment far more than the reads themselves. With that in mind, would you not agree that even if one granted that my reads were prefabricated, that the posts I made would still be just as alignment-indicative?

Hi, Lady 1 here what's up? You don't mind if I just step in for a second do ya? I think you're the one missing a key factor here, maybe both of you. Let's assume you had thoughts before replacing in. Now, I don't agree that this is a good line to go down but since we're going down it already let's entertain the thought. The key point is, if you had thoughts before replacing in regardless of what role pm you got they're going to come from a townie outlook because you don't make reads specing as scum you make them as town.

So in theory, no you couldn't really gather much off those posts. I think this is a really bad angle to go down, and I probably wouldn't have said anything if you weren't trying to put focus on the statement itself.

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 6:45 pm

In post 1708, Lady 3 wrote:
In post 1704, Lady 1 wrote:
In post 1701, Lady 3 wrote:1689 is true, town-indicative, and depressing and I would like to Disable it
Nothing in 1689 is town indicative and It makes me feel even more confident in the way people are reading gent 3. It's worrisome.
It's one of his least town-indicative posts, and the intent of my post was rather clearly not focused on the post's alignment spew.
This is kind of a chapter in my rising concern that the reason all your reads are anti consensus is because the consensus reads are just your loss condition based on the PT link you got

You wanna tell me what part of my reads are anti consensus cause this is the first time I'm hearing about it. I think the only read I have that you can call anti consensus at the moment is I think Lady 7 could be a wolf. If you wanna say I'm a wolf just making outlandish reads for the heck of it that seems kinda silly.

But then again I am amazing so I understand your worry

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 6:46 pm

In post 1713, Gentleman 6 wrote:Our marriage is going to be incredibly dysfunctional and kinky, Lady the 1st.

...Kinda hot.

If I was choosing a dance partner based on reads alone I'd probably have asked you stay out.

Good thing I would've hated partnering with someone who had the same reads with me.

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 6:48 pm

In post 1714, Lady 1 wrote:
In post 1708, Lady 3 wrote:
In post 1704, Lady 1 wrote:
In post 1701, Lady 3 wrote:1689 is true, town-indicative, and depressing and I would like to Disable it
Nothing in 1689 is town indicative and It makes me feel even more confident in the way people are reading gent 3. It's worrisome.
It's one of his least town-indicative posts, and the intent of my post was rather clearly not focused on the post's alignment spew.
This is kind of a chapter in my rising concern that the reason all your reads are anti consensus is because the consensus reads are just your loss condition based on the PT link you got
You wanna tell me what part of my reads are anti consensus cause this is the first time I'm hearing about it. I think the only read I have that you can call anti consensus at the moment is I think Lady 7 could be a wolf. If you wanna say I'm a wolf just making outlandish reads for the heck of it that seems kinda silly.

But then again I am amazing so I understand your worry

Oh also I'm not kidding where if you find anything in 1689 townie you're probably reading something in a wrong way because that is the most nullpost in a long while

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 6:54 pm

I've always outclassed you, I just haven't shown my full power yet. But I still think you're town. <3

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 6:56 pm

ngl when I started this I just wanted to goof off until I got a partner and then be really townie in my pt and watch as wolves try to ML my slot but then I got bored. Anyone else try that before?

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 6:59 pm

In post 1725, Gentleman 3 wrote:
In post 1712, Lady 1 wrote:
In post 1707, Gentleman 3 wrote:I feel as though you've got something backwards here. You're not interested in my thoughts because if I'm scum they're prefabricated; very well, but if I'm scum then all of my thoughts are fabricated regardless. If I am town, they are quite real. So as I was trying to get at earlier, what is the specific reason to believe the scum case over the town case?

Moreover, I feel as though you ignored my second point there. Even if one granted I was scum and that my reads were set before I replaced in, the things that I wrote about them were not set before I replaced in, and it is the things written about reads that are relevant to one's alignment far more than the reads themselves. With that in mind, would you not agree that even if one granted that my reads were prefabricated, that the posts I made would still be just as alignment-indicative?
Hi, Lady 1 here what's up? You don't mind if I just step in for a second do ya? I think you're the one missing a key factor here, maybe both of you. Let's assume you had thoughts before replacing in. Now, I don't agree that this is a good line to go down but since we're going down it already let's entertain the thought. The key point is, if you had thoughts before replacing in regardless of what role pm you got they're going to come from a townie outlook because you don't make reads specing as scum you make them as town.

So in theory, no you couldn't really gather much off those posts. I think this is a really bad angle to go down, and I probably wouldn't have said anything if you weren't trying to put focus on the statement itself.
No, I understand this perfectly fine. I suppose I'll try to boil my main points down to two questions to keep it as focused as possible:

What is the specific reason to believe that I personally (as opposed to any other replacement) am scum who replaced in with prefabricated thoughts?

What is the extent to which one believes that these prefabrications go, and thus the extent to which my posts would thus be non-alignment-indicative?

If I had more energy right now I'd go into another long tangent about repackaging (one of the four main methods of resolving cognitive dissonance), but I don't, and besides my tangents are mostly self-indulgent anyways.

1) I don't believe I once stated you were scum, but I do think you are getting townread a lot harder than you have any right to be. I planned on just stating that in my pt and not the public thread because A) I wasn't going to push your pair for a bit B) I could be wrong C) But the main reason was I didn't want to deal with people questioning that read
2) Depends on the player I don't think there's a real point that you can just say 'yeah that's the point' but a good guess would be at the end of whatever catchup/page they replaced into because they would've got a role pm from that point onwards.

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 7:04 pm

In post 1738, Gentleman 5 wrote:
In post 1732, Lady 1 wrote:ngl when I started this I just wanted to goof off until I got a partner and then be really townie in my pt and watch as wolves try to ML my slot but then I got bored. Anyone else try that before?
More like watch as town try to miseliminate your slot, in that case

I could give you at least 8 examples of where scum try to go for the goofy lhf over town...if I was allowed to that is.

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 7:05 pm

In post 1737, Lady 3 wrote:Ok i will try

Everyone has values and strengths in certain aspects of mafia. It isn't just who can find town/scum. Nor is it who can post the most lines. Do what you think is comfortable and make sure you're having fun doing it alright? Try not to compare yourself.

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 7:10 pm

That feels like such a reach.

But a stupid reach to try and make an entire point/argument out of. Ugh...maybe I won't instantly vote Lady 7 and Gent 1.

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 7:15 pm

In post 1746, Gentleman 5 wrote:
In post 1744, Lady 1 wrote:That feels like such a reach.

But a stupid reach to try and make an entire point/argument out of. Ugh...maybe I won't instantly vote Lady 7 and Gent 1.
Who else are you considering voting?

G4/L2
G3/L6
G1/L7 is my order atm. If Lady 4 partners with G2 that probably changes.

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 7:20 pm

The only thing I fear is how good I am at this game and aliens.

Lady 1 · Sun Aug 02, 2020 7:30 pm

The person I want to read the most is Gent 9 because it's pretty obvious L3 is town but I don't want people to shade Gent 9 so we ML him so I will come to my own answer and let no one else change my mind or face my fury.

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 8:30 am

Wtf Gent 7 was a vampire who did that gimmic all game? I'm like, disappointed and surprised at the same time

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 8:33 am

I don't get G9.

I didn't mind pairing with the prince but I openly said I don't want to at the same time. If he was wolf reading me for that I'd understand, but he's wolf reading me for something that just...didn't happen.

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 8:34 am

VOTE: Gent 4/Lady 2

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 8:36 am

In post 1919, Lady 8 wrote:
In post 1902, Lady 7 wrote:I think it's actually relatively townie?
That is a good sequence for Lady 2, yeah

I'm starting to not get Gent 9's takes much.

Does Gent 9 go out of the gate swinging at me though as a wolf? A slot that seemed to be mostly townread

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 8:39 am

In post 1928, Gentleman 9 wrote:i reverse my read on shrlock g3 after realizing that a bunch of his stuff is wall fluff, and i talk about gorilla 7, in terms of I don't think he's town, but I think he's more town than 2.

Yeah this

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 8:40 am

Since my reads are apparently bad I'll let you guys handle everything while I take the free win? K? Okay.

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 8:42 am

I don't think we should put too much stock into reading G7 btw.

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 8:47 am

I get what L7 is saying but I rather vote the pair I wouldn't want in the end game/could be scum on either side

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 8:52 am

Gentleman 4 - Lady 2
Gentleman 2 - Lady 4
Gentleman 3 - Lady 6

are the only pairs I'll vote for at the moment.

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 8:58 am

In post 1959, Lady 5 wrote:
In post 1956, Lady 1 wrote:Gentleman 4 - Lady 2
Gentleman 2 - Lady 4
Gentleman 3 - Lady 6

are the only pairs I'll vote for at the moment.
Interesting, G3/L6, talk to me?

Every other pair you could make a case for end game to me and I might buy it. But I wouldn't be comfortable with any of these making end game.

G3 just makes a lot of posts that say a lot but mean very little. Stuff that is just very easy to type but doesn't really have a townie or scum thought process behind it.

L6 is just underwhelming to me.

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:04 am

In post 1963, Lady 5 wrote:
In post 1960, Lady 1 wrote:Every other pair you could make a case for end game to me and I might buy it. But I wouldn't be comfortable with any of these making end game.
Idk if I’d be comfortable with L3/G9 endgaming, but other than that I think I agree? Or like there’s a questionable person in each of the first two you lifted

I still think L6 is town. I think sorting G3 more thoroughly is a priority, I wouldn’t rule them out myself though

I understand G9/L3. I think L3 is very obvious town and Gent 9 to me isn't obvious scum that I'd want to get rid of him so soon.

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:05 am

I also don't expect my pair to make end game either but I refuse to go first dance because I'm having too much fun. Suckers

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:07 am

G7 wasn't a player the wolf team was ever going to expect to make end game. So obviously they were prepared for his death and probably tried to make themselves look regardless if he got a partner or not. If it was a highly contested slot that might be another story but I think we can all agree about G7.

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:30 am

Don't worry everyone I know if you could just let me be in end game by myself you would. Sadly I must read my partner.

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:34 am

In post 1984, Lady 7 wrote:A storm is brewing, not the game literally just real life.
If I lose power and can't post for 10 minutes, remember I love all of you.

I love me to

Stay safe <3

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:02 am

Hey guy with the ugly long hair you wanna talk more about why I the most towny lady here am a wolf? If you would like to apologize I will show mercy before I judo flip you

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:06 am

In post 2007, Gentleman 9 wrote:
In post 2006, Lady 1 wrote:Hey guy with the ugly long hair you wanna talk more about why I the most towny lady here am a wolf? If you would like to apologize I will show mercy before I judo flip you
i apologise you townie town lady

Carry on.

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:07 am

I want to know why people are townreading or scumreading my partner. I got him at a hard null myself right now.

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:10 am

In post 2008, Gentleman 3 wrote:Gentleman 5's claim that he believes he can sort Lady 8 has no bearing on me. Even knowing people's identities, I have no reason to trust his read over mine or to trust that he will eventually come to agree with me.

It seems quite reasonable to me to say that just in general someone you consider being town paired with someone you consider to be scum would be a reason to dislike a pairing, no? Regardless of their read on each other, it is an unfortunate situation where their death would result in the loss of one of your townreads.

Stuff like this is why I have a problem with Gent 3 because it's skipping/leaving out basic mafia theory/talk to make an excuse on your own reasoning and Gent 3 is obviously smart enough to not be this narrow minded

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:17 am

In post 2014, Gentleman 3 wrote:Sorry, could you elaborate? I'm not sure I understand what you mean by the bolded.

It's okay not many can understand my genius allow me to enlighten you.

The way you're talking is in an extremely selfish and coincided viewpoint and I don't think given what you've shown that's how you really think or act. Saying things like 'I have no reason to trust his read over mine' when this entire format of a game is figuring out partners and working together in a basic game of mafia is...just odd. Are you telling me you've never been convinced on a read before? No, because that's silly. So you trying to come in here and say that's why you're gonna vote a pair is...bad

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 10:18 am

Unrelated: I think I should look better for G7s flip not worse but now that I said that it doesn't matter.

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 11:45 am

In post 2029, Gentleman 1 wrote:
In post 1907, Lady 1 wrote:Wtf Gent 7 was a vampire who did that gimmic all game? I'm like, disappointed and surprised at the same time
This refers to the insistence on pairing with L6 right

How is that a not-scum gimmick? Like, wut *visible confusion*

I apologize for thinking G7 would put in effort into the game and not be useless as scum.

Clearly I should be executed for such assumptions

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 12:10 pm

In post 2043, Gentleman 1 wrote:
In post 2038, Lady 1 wrote:
In post 2029, Gentleman 1 wrote:
In post 1907, Lady 1 wrote:Wtf Gent 7 was a vampire who did that gimmic all game? I'm like, disappointed and surprised at the same time
This refers to the insistence on pairing with L6 right

How is that a not-scum gimmick? Like, wut *visible confusion*
I apologize for thinking G7 would put in effort into the game and not be useless as scum.

Clearly I should be executed for such assumptions
That’s probably a smaller portion of the “damage control” portion of your ISO

Also can someone answer my question about whether callbacks to the last anonymous dance are common?

I have nothing to damage control. Did I think Gent 7 was town? Yeah and I knew when I saw the flip I was gonna get pushed but that doesn't mean my points are false.

No one was gonna go to end game with Gent 7 he wasn't trying. So in my mind scum are more likely going to bus him then defend him. If you think that's false than prove me wrong. But you just saying I look bad because I defended the not trying scum isn't really a point.

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 12:13 pm

I'd pull up quotes if I townread my partner but this is a bit silly to me so I'll go back to calling the others wolfy and making open wolf posts because that makes people mad for some reason

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 12:21 pm

In post 2047, Gentleman 1 wrote:For have them on your second-from-the-bottom read tier you seemed a little too unwilling to let him go. I don’t think it’s the unwillingness itself that’s bad, but that combined with his placement.

Who do you think I'm gonna vouch for to stay? The guy at the bottom of my list or the one above it who I thought was getting townier? And if you read the rest of my iso you'll see I was pushing for G4 to leave cause I found both G2/G7 townie

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 5:11 pm

Hey Lady 7 your partner is town don't mess this up got it?

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 5:13 pm

In post 2110, Gentleman 5 wrote:
In post 818, Lady 1 wrote:[G9, G5,]
[G3 G6]
[G4 G7]
[G1, G2]

[L4 L5]
[L6 L8 L3]
[L2, L7]
Do you still feel this way about Gent 9?

No.
Pedit: VOTE: Lady 7/Gent 1 You have 5 minutes to apologize

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 5:16 pm

In post 2153, Lady 7 wrote:I mean I don't intend on leaving the dance.
So you don't have to worry about that.

Why do you town read the tunnel on you?

Out of everyone who's come at me this phase like fools I think G1 is the most likely to be the royal jester compared to a dirty wolf

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 5:17 pm

Oh that doesn't really explain the why part does it.

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 5:17 pm

Uhhhhhh do you want fake reasons that sound more convincing or my honest ones. I suggest the former

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 5:23 pm

I think G1 has had some super obviously towine posts on his replace in that isn't likely to come from a wolf. He'd be really stupid to do something like that and I just scumread other people more than him. Combine that with the fact if we take the townslips from before I'm pretty sure my read was wrong and he's just villa and I can admit when I'm wrong on such a thing.

Spoiler: only for Lady 7 eyes

Side note execute one should be a null/null pair and execute two can be a spicy scum/town pair

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 5:23 pm

I think G1 has had some super obviously towine posts on his replace in that isn't likely to come from a wolf. He'd be really stupid to do something like that and I just scumread other people more than him. Combine that with the fact if we take the townslips from before I'm pretty sure my read was wrong and he's just villa and I can admit when I'm wrong on such a thing.

Spoiler: only for Lady 7 eyes

Side note execute one should be a null/null pair and execute two can be a spicy scum/town pair

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 5:28 pm

I can't wait to vote for Gent 3 and Lady 6 after whatever the first lynch is and get totally ignored
pedit:
VOTE: Lady 4

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 5:29 pm

What if G2 and G7 were BOTH mafia so G7 didn't defend himself that hard for his wolf partner. God I am so smart I even impress myself sometimes

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 5:32 pm

Update: G6 has gotton a bit townier but not towny enough for me to care enough about being in end game even though I never see my pairing making it with my posting style.

Still feel like we never let the 2-4 pairs make end game either so we should just send them down the river

thanks for coming to my ted talk

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 5:33 pm

In post 2170, Lady 7 wrote:If the question is, does Lady 7 ever let a scum buddy die, I am not sure, it's all wifom because G7.vampire could have gone for a "big AtE" play and tell L4.Salad to bus him anyway in hopes of being an end game pair.
I am leaning town and I am not voting them as a result, but honestly I wouldn't be that suprised if Salad ended up being a werewolf or warlock.

SLIPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

VOTE: Lady 4

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 5:39 pm

In post 2175, Gentleman 2 wrote:It's possible Lady 4 is scum and I don't mind getting to leave this game so I can return to my original account. I just kind of feel bad because she said she didn't want to leave so soon when she noted she would have to pair with G7 or me.

This is probably the best post you've made all game tbh
pedit: Only if you want it to be

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 5:40 pm

Hey L3 you townreading G9?

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 5:42 pm

Can I vote you guys or do you want me to wait 1 more vote?

Lady 1 · Mon Aug 03, 2020 5:44 pm

I'm just gonna sit on the only pair I feel some amount of confidence in even if no one will join me
VOTE: Gent 3/Lady 6
pedit: Okay

Lady 1 · Tue Aug 04, 2020 11:47 am

I'm just waiting for my partner to do anything before I move forward

Lady 1 · Tue Aug 04, 2020 1:09 pm

Oh no I townread my partner that means I need to start caring if people start to vote our pair.

Nooooooooooooo

Lady 1 · Tue Aug 04, 2020 1:19 pm

Still feel fine about Lady 4 on a re read.

Lady 1 · Wed Aug 05, 2020 3:30 am

Now that my partner is town I kinda date this game but oh well.

Lady 1 · Wed Aug 05, 2020 3:31 am

In post 2532, Lady 1 wrote:Now that my partner is town I kinda hate this game but oh well.

Auto correct

Lady 1 · Wed Aug 05, 2020 3:36 am

VOTE: Gent 2

Lady 1 · Wed Aug 05, 2020 3:37 am

My energy bar is at 100 right now so if you reads now is probably the time to ask.

Lady 1 · Wed Aug 05, 2020 3:48 am

G5 what reads do you feel like talking about or are you just in meme post mode? Do carry on regardless

Lady 1 · Wed Aug 05, 2020 3:51 am

Are you asking me how I feel about that final 4? I'm fine with it I don't scumread any of those 4 pairings.

Lady 1 · Wed Aug 05, 2020 3:53 am

Have you or can you go into your L8/L7 townreads for me a little?

Lady 1 · Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:08 am

No, those are the only 2 people in that final 4 that I have as townlean compared to town that's all. Well, I don't really townread Lady 7 but everyone else does so I've given up on trying that