In post 4731, Brian Skies wrote: In post 4726, Titus wrote:Why haven't you actually attempted to sort my soft? First you ignore it, but then you shade it as scum.
You once proclaimed Bell was scum, but you treat him here like town with zero transistion from your vote.
You don't care what my soft is. You haven't even acknowledged my Beam it over post because it doesn't fit your narrative.
Why should I give a shit about your 'soft' when you've only introduced it under pressure?
I only voted Bell because I thought he was crumbing his role and then changed it to an even night modifier. HP brought up the point that the post we all think he was crumbing Even Night could just as easily be interpreted as him claiming Not Even, and that it was a stupid argument anyway.
You also haven't acknowledged you could be wrong on your read on me despite being told all your reasons are wrong, so why should I care?
Wrong. A, I'm not under pressure.
B, I have hinted at my issue but not outright stated it most of the game.
You voted Bell to apply pressure to him to provide an out.
Again, do you even care about my perspective at all to sort me? No.
You're a better salesman than me, but your time is running out.
Pedit, Will respond to Spiffeh in a minute.