Not Quite Normal Multiball II (Game Over)
-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
In post 268, catboi wrote:
hot take: commenting about the page count is >rand scumIn post 265, MalcolmTucker wrote:How is this game at 11 pages already.
Sussed me out already, well done.In post 269, Tracer Bullet wrote:
is this a scumclaimIn post 265, MalcolmTucker wrote:How is this game at 11 pages already.
discuss-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
Ya but I need to read through the thread and I am just home and going to bed. Hence why I shall do it in the morning.In post 274, Tracer Bullet wrote:you can have actual thoughts now-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
VOTE: MonkeyMan576
Not to keen on their posts so far. Their early posts read like they felt a bit desperate to find good reads and appear townie.
By contrast I think Butter is looking really townie so far. Solid posts but nice and concise in a way that's helpful. Same with STD, who I'd agree looks relaxed here while still doing necessary legwork to find mafia.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
I don't really see why such a post is particularly scummy really. I've since caught up and reflected on where I feel the game is at - I just was quite surprised coming in and seeing so much content on the go already.In post 457, Menalque wrote:thanks!
I voted CSF for 3 reasons:
(1) I think malc's "oh god 11 pages already" thing is very slightly +scum, but CSF's "he seems like he wouldn't mind the legwork of reading 10 pages" reads as overjustification to me
(2) she didn't say hello to me
(3) *reserved for now*
I think CSF's point was fair enough that I'll generally read back and make sure I know where I am with the game, but it was night for me anyway hence I knew I'd be delayed on a full catch-up until morning.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
That's not the issue here - if you're not aware how active a player is when making your list then your list clearly isn't as detailed or as coherent as you want it to appear to the rest of us.In post 487, MonkeyMan576 wrote:ok so you're less active than I thought. Are you wanting me to scumread you?-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
This post very much feels like a deflection. Convenient way to ignore the point being made.In post 539, Menalque wrote:dunn, you continue to astonish me with the amount of effort you put in, time and time again, to not understanding my play-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
Because it's surely a better look than deflecting onto the argument being made being entirely around playstyle. Players can adapt how they approach the game, saying "this is how I play" doesn't stop someone from potentially reading you as mafia.In post 555, Menalque wrote:
why... would I address the point that's being made?In post 553, MalcolmTucker wrote:
This post very much feels like a deflection. Convenient way to ignore the point being made.In post 539, Menalque wrote:dunn, you continue to astonish me with the amount of effort you put in, time and time again, to not understanding my play-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
I don't think anyone is expecting a lengthy rebuttal, but the snarky "you should know my playstyle by now" is pretty clear deflection from the point being made.In post 560, Menalque wrote:Man, it’s not even sunny yet I’m getting all this shade
And I mean, you’re still not really answering the question — it’s one read, that as of this time I haven’t decided if it’s made up or not, and there is no meaningful pressure behind it
Why would I waste my time doing something dreary like rebutting it instead of continuing to trip the light fantastic with my buds-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
Yes. I've said quite openly Klick/Monkey my main suspects so far based on their play.In post 565, Save The Dragons wrote:
do you have like other thoughtsIn post 563, MalcolmTucker wrote:
I don't think anyone is expecting a lengthy rebuttal, but the snarky "you should know my playstyle by now" is pretty clear deflection from the point being made.In post 560, Menalque wrote:Man, it’s not even sunny yet I’m getting all this shade
And I mean, you’re still not really answering the question — it’s one read, that as of this time I haven’t decided if it’s made up or not, and there is no meaningful pressure behind it
Why would I waste my time doing something dreary like rebutting it instead of continuing to trip the light fantastic with my buds-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
This is making me rethink a bit. Feel like Monkey has some suspect posts and a lot of stuff I don't really agree with, but not sure their approach so far is particularly conductive to someone who's mafia.In post 645, butterchurn wrote:
I can't speak for everyone who is voting him, but I don't think that's an accurate assessment of my scumread on him, at least. It's certainly not about his opinions. I think the way he responds to questioning is slimy. He has consistently made statements that appear confident, but when asked about where the basis of each statement is coming from, he has at times weakly defended it, or clearly made up a reason to justify it, or dodged the question, until finally usually coming back to say that the original statement was a joke or that it shouldn't be taken seriously. Saying that about an RVS vote is fine. But about reads made on page 20 of a game? And even if that is the case, why take the extra step of trying to justify it initially? The approach just feels scummy to me, like he cares more about his own appearances than about whatever it is he's saying.In post 623, catboi wrote:- I'm not really vibing with the wagon on monkeyman - to me it feels like he's getting voted for having weird or irrational opinions, not necessarily scum-motivated ones. The stuff he says might seem bizarre but I feel like he actually believes what he's saying. The pressure on him feels opportunistic in nature.
I did feel a little hesitant, since he is the highest postcount player so far (mostly due to the pressure on him) and so maybe there's just more things to pick on, and maybe he would have been more likely to quiet down and let things blow over if he were scum.I could see some of the votes like tictac sticking around from RVS being opportunistic. But that could always come from the opposite scum faction. I still like the chances of it being scum.
VOTE: Klick
Happier with my vote here for now.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
This is true re Flavor but looking through your ISO I think you've had quite a lot of filler despite being one of the most active players so far. Lot of jokey stuff early on, few changed votes and lots of questions without substantive pushes as such.In post 651, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Flavour Leaf you have been very useless today, thank you.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
I'm not necessarily comparing your play to Flavor's, just noticed from an ISO scan you have a lot of posts that I'd argue can be classed as filler.In post 654, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
I never claimed i would be better.In post 653, MalcolmTucker wrote:
This is true re Flavor but looking through your ISO I think you've had quite a lot of filler despite being one of the most active players so far. Lot of jokey stuff early on, few changed votes and lots of questions without substantive pushes as such.In post 651, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Flavour Leaf you have been very useless today, thank you.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
Out of interest, was your initial STD vote just an early gut feeling vibe type vote? I think they've looked townie so far.In post 652, bnuuy wrote:
It looked like a slip but I wasn’t sure (the “this” felt out of place)In post 628, catboi wrote:
I have to ask, why the FoS on monkeyman? Did you not want to move your vote off Save The Dragons, and if so, why not?In post 402, bnuuy wrote:
What is “this”?In post 254, MonkeyMan576 wrote:This is probably an all scum hood. Sigh.
FoS: MonkeyMan
VOTE: monkeyman
Better place for my vote than StD currently-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
Going back - I've mostly found cassowary's play alright but this post feels oddly confrontational in an unnatural way. Cassowary, like me, said they were slightly aggrieved when they joined to see the high post count and the game has been moving quickly so far. Why the sudden snark when someone else casually asks for a catch-up?In post 583, cassowary wrote:
What if, instead of asking this, you read over what was posted since youIn post 580, Sword of Ducks wrote:Alright, school's over, what'd I miss?lastasked this, and then told us what you thought about it?-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
Out of interest, what changed your mind re voting for me? A while back you seemed pretty comfortable with how I was playing, even when I was voting for you. Strikes me as a bit of an opportunistic vote here.In post 790, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I don't like being on the same wagon as Tucker now that I think about it.
VOTE: MalcomTucker-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
This is fairly correct on my thinking so far - for what it's worth I've not been as proactive as I generally like to be in terms of making reads up until now but I sometimes struggle with forming particularly firm reads in D1, especially if the game is a bit patchy with no central or definitive conflicts that have emerged yet.In post 809, catboi wrote:
Don't like the initial vote on monkey but although underexplained 418 is a start, and 491 to 648 looks like he's trying to actually analyze and figure out monkeyman rather than blindly pushing him. That kind of progression can be faked but monkeyman is still a wagon, could easily keep pushing it, instead forcing himself to give other thoughts. The immediate evaluation of Norwee unprompted in 653 looked like he saw someone and decided to investigate, like he's pulling at threads to see what comes out. And again similar where he digs up a cassowary post in 658 when it's not being discussed by anyone, and it's interesting, thoughtful analysis picking at someone's post. Not necessarily on board with a hypocrisy case but the reasoning feels more detailed than you typically get from noob-scumIn post 747, Menalque wrote:
uhIn post 715, catboi wrote:Malcolm looks like he's genuinely solving
where?
For a newer player it's fairly decent, hasn't felt like he's making pushes in a dishonest way, and is looking for things to analyze. Don't get the hate? I get he annoyed you by pushing you but I don't think it looked ill intentioned.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
I tend to have hedgy posts early game because inevitably we're all working in the dark. I'll suggest ideas and possible theories but generally be pretty open on my uncertainties and possible contradictions to what I'm saying. Occasionally I'll identify a player who I really think is mafia and push strongly but I'm inevitably incorrect when I do so.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
In post 66, Sword of Ducks wrote:somehow I'm having flashbacks to my first mafia game, when I just walked into the thread and saw a bunch of things happening at once
that's this, againIn post 69, Sword of Ducks wrote:Anyway, how's everyone's day going? I don't have much to do today, so I can actually have free time.In post 107, Sword of Ducks wrote:VOTE: catboi
honestly I don't know what happening but am choosing to go with it for the momentIn post 278, Sword of Ducks wrote:arg how'd I miss this much with a simple shower god
can someone fill me in pleaseIn post 479, Sword of Ducks wrote:Can someone give me an update on what's happened while I was taking stupid mandatory testing?In post 580, Sword of Ducks wrote:Alright, school's over, what'd I miss?
Looking through Sword's ISO, getting a bit of a townie vibe...I'm not sure self-conscious mafia would ask so many catch-up questions, other ways to post filler I think that are less likely to attract attention. Interested to see how they play going forward though.In post 586, Sword of Ducks wrote:
The general consensus is to vote me because I'm inactive, which is okay. I have PSSAs and can't play the 'catch-up' game when I'm in a room for two hours with no access to my phone to keep track of you people.In post 585, Nashville Dreams wrote:
He's not going to.In post 583, cassowary wrote:
What if, instead of asking this, you read over what was posted since youIn post 580, Sword of Ducks wrote:Alright, school's over, what'd I miss?lastasked this, and then told us what you thought about it?-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
Just read back and your main contention with me seems to be that I didn't go anywhere after initially shading you but I don't think that's a big issue here - I was pointing out that despite making a lot of posts you had a lot of filler content all the same, not as if I voted for you. Although your sudden suspicion of me afterwards, as you admit a proper conviction read, feels a little bit weird to me, and a bit of a desperate reason to be going after someone.In post 822, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Yes, we have an idea right there. It's Malcolm.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
Generally I feel like Monkey is posting a lot in a way that's making themselves get noticed a lot more than would be ideal for mafia. Generally mafia want to blend in and avoid being noticed too much unless they're trying to sway town.In post 826, Menalque wrote:
hey malc, can you please explain a bit more what you meant by "not sure their approach so far is particularly conductive to someone who's mafia"?In post 648, MalcolmTucker wrote:
This is making me rethink a bit. Feel like Monkey has some suspect posts and a lot of stuff I don't really agree with, but not sure their approach so far is particularly conductive to someone who's mafia.In post 645, butterchurn wrote:
I can't speak for everyone who is voting him, but I don't think that's an accurate assessment of my scumread on him, at least. It's certainly not about his opinions. I think the way he responds to questioning is slimy. He has consistently made statements that appear confident, but when asked about where the basis of each statement is coming from, he has at times weakly defended it, or clearly made up a reason to justify it, or dodged the question, until finally usually coming back to say that the original statement was a joke or that it shouldn't be taken seriously. Saying that about an RVS vote is fine. But about reads made on page 20 of a game? And even if that is the case, why take the extra step of trying to justify it initially? The approach just feels scummy to me, like he cares more about his own appearances than about whatever it is he's saying.In post 623, catboi wrote:- I'm not really vibing with the wagon on monkeyman - to me it feels like he's getting voted for having weird or irrational opinions, not necessarily scum-motivated ones. The stuff he says might seem bizarre but I feel like he actually believes what he's saying. The pressure on him feels opportunistic in nature.
I did feel a little hesitant, since he is the highest postcount player so far (mostly due to the pressure on him) and so maybe there's just more things to pick on, and maybe he would have been more likely to quiet down and let things blow over if he were scum.I could see some of the votes like tictac sticking around from RVS being opportunistic. But that could always come from the opposite scum faction. I still like the chances of it being scum.
VOTE: Klick
Happier with my vote here for now.
also the reasons for the klick vote are those from 419 or was there anything else that made you decide to change your vote to there?
Reasoning for Klick was in 419 yes, although I'd mentioned suspecting them once or twice before that too.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
In post 693, NorwegianboyEE wrote:VOTE: MalcolmTucker
One of my first somewhat convinced votes as they shaded me but then it seemed like they didn't go anywhere with it.
You described it as a "somewhat convinced" vote, and said that was one of your first. Where am I supposed to deduce that as being memey?In post 828, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I’m pushing you in an very memey manner.
For you to describe it as desperate feels very false and discredity.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
That isn't true at all.In post 832, MonkeyMan576 wrote:In post 811, MalcolmTucker wrote:
Out of interest, what changed your mind re voting for me? A while back you seemed pretty comfortable with how I was playing, even when I was voting for you. Strikes me as a bit of an opportunistic vote here.In post 790, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I don't like being on the same wagon as Tucker now that I think about it.
VOTE: MalcomTuckerYou seem to think anyone voting for you is opportunistic.I explained my reasoning and you can take me at my word, there is no hidden motive.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
Re 1 - It's obviously not universal and sometimes mafia just make mistakes and end up blundering, but it's a pretty common feature of the game for scum players to want to blend in simply because it can help them avoid suspicion. The goal of the game for everyone in the day phases as an individual is to avoid being voted out, blending in as town is what allows mafia to do that. When evaluating how a player approaches the game, if they've come under pressure, one thing I'll look at is whether their play from thereon in is how I'd expect mafia to play in similar circumstances. I don't think Monkey has particularly tried to do anything major to dissuade the heat on them.In post 831, Menalque wrote:
(1) why do you think this?In post 829, MalcolmTucker wrote:1 Generally mafia want to blend in and avoid being noticed too much unless they're trying to sway town.
Reasoning for Klick was in 419 yes, although 2 I'd mentioned suspecting them once or twice before that too.
(2) you hadn't, actually
Re 2 - apologies, I'm getting mixed up post numbers wise there and was confusing it with my vote. You're correct that 419 was first time I talked about suspecting Klick. Mentioned this once or twice after before eventually changing my vote.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
I personally didn't see anything within your posts to indicate that it was anything other than a standard post. The "meme" aspect here just seems to be a bit of a cover for what you admit is a genuine and sincere read. Or, to put it better, why should I be at all concerned or interested in the memeyness of the push when it's still a push from you all the same? Either you suspect a player as mafia or you don't. You clearly suspect you, on what I'd argue is a pretty flimsy basis.In post 834, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
I can both be convinced about my vote and push it as an memey manner.In post 830, MalcolmTucker wrote:In post 693, NorwegianboyEE wrote:VOTE: MalcolmTucker
One of my first somewhat convinced votes as they shaded me but then it seemed like they didn't go anywhere with it.
You described it as a "somewhat convinced" vote, and said that was one of your first. Where am I supposed to deduce that as being memey?In post 828, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I’m pushing you in an very memey manner.
For you to describe it as desperate feels very false and discredity.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
In what way? You say your push on me was memey. How was I particularly supposed to know that over text?In post 838, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You’re sorta misrepping here Malcolm.
I’m not covering anything. In fact i’m quite open about my motivations.
I think you could be scum so i’m encouraging votes on you both as the possibility to flip scum and to get information from the game, and also you.
Maybe you’d towntell? Maybe not.
Is the reasoning flimsy? I’d say it’s good enough for day 1.
Do you have an super strong scumread or do you think i should be reading you differently?-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
This was a really lazy vote from Menalque as well after I asked a pretty basic question.
-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
I asked why you'd deflect instead of replying to points against you. Then you replied with a vote on me.In post 844, Menalque wrote:
what makes it a lazy vote, amigo?In post 841, MalcolmTucker wrote:This was a really lazy vote from Menalque as well after I asked a pretty basic question.
-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
Re your 846 Butter - yeah I think Melanque's vote on me was a bit weird since it came out of nowhere but their general questioning has been perfectly reasonable.
Norwegian's approach definitely struck me as a bit more off - initially pulling back from the supposed seriousness of their push while then reversing on that again, because if they played it off as solely memey, they'd essentially be arguing that their most conviction-based push off the game so far wasn't actually a proper read, after I'd already called them out for posting a lot of filler.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
You hadn't particularly been reading me as scum before that though. The opportunism could be coming less from fear you'll be eliminated and more from opportunistic scum perhaps seeing an opportunity to eliminate someone they believe belongs to another faction.In post 851, MonkeyMan576 wrote:
That was the implication though. I'm not worried about how my vote looks, i'm worried about voting for scum.In post 849, Well Done wrote:You can vote opportunistically with zero people voting for you, so that seems kinda irrelevant
In fact that's probably an important detail to consider when we're pushing here - if you have multiple factions then it's perfectly possible for scum to mask themselves as town with genuine and believable pushes on other players they believe to be scum.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
This isn't an accurate representation of what I've thought of you at all. My general view is you've looked quite scummy so far but I'm not sure your play has been particularly conductive to someone who'd be scum, so it's making me wary of whether you might actually just be town. I feel like my progression on this has been pretty clear so far. I can't remember agreeing with you all that much previously but you can feel free to correct me. And if we did agree then it may have been on a single point...but that's different to agreeing with you 'in the blink of an eye' which implies I suddenly TR you and trust you on everything.In post 858, MonkeyMan576 wrote:
It's possible, but I don't think you can use the multiball setup to save yourself here. I trust Norway more than you at this point.In post 854, MalcolmTucker wrote:
You hadn't particularly been reading me as scum before that though. The opportunism could be coming less from fear you'll be eliminated and more from opportunistic scum perhaps seeing an opportunity to eliminate someone they believe belongs to another faction.In post 851, MonkeyMan576 wrote:
That was the implication though. I'm not worried about how my vote looks, i'm worried about voting for scum.In post 849, Well Done wrote:You can vote opportunistically with zero people voting for you, so that seems kinda irrelevant
In fact that's probably an important detail to consider when we're pushing here - if you have multiple factions then it's perfectly possible for scum to mask themselves as town with genuine and believable pushes on other players they believe to be scum.I was suspecting you anyways after you went from voting me to agreeing with me in a blink of an eye.So you can try to deflect the pressure against you by coming up with baseless arguments against me but I don't think it will work and you seem even scummier than before in my book.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
I said I felt your vote was a bit desperate and not based on anything strong. You said that didn't matter because it was memey. Then you said the read actually is quite a strong, conviction-based one anyway...which completely undermines the nature of a light-hearted push. A push fundamentally is just not that light-hearted if you think someone is mafia, you're clearly playing with some intent there but your approach has been contradictory at times.In post 859, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Lol what.In post 852, MalcolmTucker wrote:Re your 846 Butter - yeah I think Melanque's vote on me was a bit weird since it came out of nowhere but their general questioning has been perfectly reasonable.
Norwegian's approach definitely struck me as a bit more off - initially pulling back from the supposed seriousness of their push while then reversing on that again, because if they played it off as solely memey, they'd essentially be arguing that their most conviction-based push off the game so far wasn't actually a proper read, after I'd already called them out for posting a lot of filler.
I’ve never reversed on anything.
All along i’ve basically said the same thing. I’m suspecting you for an semi-serious reason, but used light-hearted lobbying to get votes on you so this game won’t stagnate and we get an proper alternative to Monkey wagon.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
That isn't how I've played though. STD has voted for me but I think they are town. Melanque voted for me but I've said openly I think their questioning of me was perfectly reasonable in how they went about it. Monkey has voted me but I've said I'm unsure on how I read them because while I think they're scummy to a degree I don't think they're playing in a way that isn't particularly mafia-like.In post 861, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I’ve been transparent the whole way but you’re still explaining away my play as "off" and such to shade me and it does not make me feel better about you when you constantly try to portray someone that votes you in as bad of an light as possible. That makes me think you don’t actually want to sort me but just try to accuse me and see what sticks.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
Why don't you actually respond to the points I've made in my post instead of deflecting? Your reason for trying to start a wagon on me was clearly contradictory and you expected me to pick up that you were "memeing" by starting a wagon on me even though you also suspect me anyway.In post 865, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
You’re completely making up an narrative and that’s making it hard for me to take your arguments seriously.In post 862, MalcolmTucker wrote:
I said I felt your vote was a bit desperate and not based on anything strong. You said that didn't matter because it was memey. Then you said the read actually is quite a strong, conviction-based one anyway...which completely undermines the nature of a light-hearted push. A push fundamentally is just not that light-hearted if you think someone is mafia, you're clearly playing with some intent there but your approach has been contradictory at times.In post 859, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Lol what.In post 852, MalcolmTucker wrote:Re your 846 Butter - yeah I think Melanque's vote on me was a bit weird since it came out of nowhere but their general questioning has been perfectly reasonable.
Norwegian's approach definitely struck me as a bit more off - initially pulling back from the supposed seriousness of their push while then reversing on that again, because if they played it off as solely memey, they'd essentially be arguing that their most conviction-based push off the game so far wasn't actually a proper read, after I'd already called them out for posting a lot of filler.
I’ve never reversed on anything.
All along i’ve basically said the same thing. I’m suspecting you for an semi-serious reason, but used light-hearted lobbying to get votes on you so this game won’t stagnate and we get an proper alternative to Monkey wagon.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
I'm finding it a lot easier to TR players in this game than SR them despite the high scum count between different teams.
I'm liking Flavor's approach here and think they are town. I don't necessarily agree Catboi is mafia, and I thought Wallflower came out far worse in their exchange, but I do think there's a solid point made that Catboi may have seen it as easier to go after Wallflower than anyone else on their wagon.
CSF reads as town to me, and I'm generally agreeing with pretty much everything Butterchurn is posting.
I'm not hating the idea of Norwegian as possible mafia here, feel like there's been a mix of filler and no real major pushes despite their attempt to get a wagon going on me which then faded away.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
Reading through Wallflower's big post and to be honest none of it is really convincing me they are town. Ultimately despite their suspicions they are still very much hedging their bets on the slot, and some of their pros for Catboi being mafia are not particularly strong to me.
They criticise Catboi's 1184 for example by bringing up TB since they'd backed out - but from my POV I found that helpful because it very much clarified why TB had approached the game in the way they did, and will influence how I approach their slot going forward. It was a solid +1 town for me when I read it and strikes me as a complete reach to suspect someone as mafia.
Maybe I'm just too wary of getting sucked in by big posts that look like major townie effort but there's no reason it can't come from mafia. Especially when one of Catboi's main criticisms had been that Wallflower's suspicion of them was too vague.
I'll vote here for now.
VOTE: Wallflower-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
Much as I suspect Wallflower, I felt their point that Catboi could have been potentially trying to go after Wallflower because they viewed it as the easiest target on their bandwagon was insightful, as an example.In post 1308, Menalque wrote:
hmmIn post 1305, MalcolmTucker wrote:I'm liking Flavor's approach here
what do you like about FL's approach? be specific
Beyond that I think they're playing well and working to solve without being too tunnelled on any one player. Plenty of time for that to change since it's D1 but they're in my town pile for now.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
This is like my third game now with Flavor so I have a decent bit of experience playing with them. They miselimmed me once but I try to never take the game too personally.In post 1310, Menalque wrote:I'm surprised, because most newer players tend to hate the way FL plays and want to murderise him for it-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
I kinda agree with both STD and Butter here. I agree Monkey looks incredibly scummy and their voting pattern has been really poor - it feels a little bit too obvious to be scum at times though, if you've been accused of opportunistically joining bandwagons on D1 and that's getting you votes, I think you'd eventually stop doing so at some point. In a smaller game with one mafia team I'd be more confident of a TR, but the multi-team setup obviously does make me wonder a bit more if he's just playing the way he is because it's how he always plays and he doesn't want to switch it up.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
I think this misrepresents why people like Butter are frustrated by your approach and believe it to be indicative of mafia though. You continually join bandwagons but I don't think you consistently push any of them all that strongly. It's fine to move about on D1 but it looks weird when you aren't actually doing much with said movement.In post 1352, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Quite frankly, there are 9 scum in the game so jumping on a few wagons is pro town and not pro scum.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
To elaborate on the above, I also find it quite suspicious that Monkey is trying to use their wagon jumping as a pro-town point: if I'm writing them off as mafia a bit due to their playstyle, then it appears they're wanting to foster a view among the wider town that they are town even if their approach itself appears mafia indicative, if that makes sense.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
Caught up on the past day or so.
I've not read Bnuuy's ISO, and hadn't had too many thoughts on the slot so far, but I don't like how that wagon developed and then faded away again so quickly.
I don't think Menalque was particularly scummy for pushing it. Their belief in the slot being scum was genuine and consistent, as was their initial insistence afterwards.
Not keen on how eagerly Flavor went from viewing the vote as a compromise to being willing to join the wagon, to then backing off again pretty quickly. I think it's perfectly possible they did actually think Bnuuy's response was frustrated townie (I did too) and felt like a continued push there wouldn't be a good idea. But I find their joining the wagon interesting given they criticised Catboi pushing Wallflower on the basis it might be an "easy" elimination/push. Could Flavor's approach here not be seen as quite similar?
By the same token though, I wasn't too keen on Catboi's equal willingness to join the wagon before then backing off again. Felt quite opportunistic and was a useful way to get the heat on them to die down a bit, while perhaps agreeing a bit more with players they'd clashed with a bit.
Mastina's suggestion that Butterchurn is mafia masking as town well was interesting and as someone who's TR'd Butterchurn, I'm aware I can easily be drawn in by level-headed players with a very clean and analytical style because that's generally how I like to approach the game (albeit I don't tend to do it all that well). But until Mastina posts any evidence of this I feel like their accusations are quite vague and not fully-formed enough. I've certainly not seen it so far. I also think Mastina's push could potentially be a clever scum tactic insofar as Butter doesn't necessarily look like the sort of push mafia would make given they won't get eliminated this turn...but there's also inherently nothing wrong with going there either because Butter's not been cleared and if Mastina is scum, it allows them to appear as if they're coming up with independent and original thoughts.
I also think Monkey is very townie at this point. I disagree with plenty they say but I feel like they don't give a shit about how their reads/progressions look in a way that's much more likely to come from town than scum, especially in a larger game where it's technically easier for scum to appear townie by genuinely suspecting other mafia.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
This was a weird post from tictac. Voting for a player who's no longer in the game, and asserting the argument between Flavor/TB was staged (surely was not the case). But it feels like a very weak argument to be coming from scum to me.In post 1794, tictac wrote:
more specifically, i felt TB vs leaf was an overdramatic and artificial argument about stuff that wasn't at all related to this game and not at all aimed at yeeting either of them.In post 1776, tictac wrote:
yeaIn post 1227, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:whoa TB was pooky? I guess that doesn't surprise me given the typing style, but pooky felt mean this game Contrary to what other people have said, that actually feels a bit out of character given my experience with him
in other words, it looked like svs to me, tho more strongly so from TB side of things.
VOTE: TB-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
Cheers for context. I dunno, I found the progression odd and it's not as if Bnuuy was exactly on the verge of going out given the size of the game. But I'm also unsure where you'd have particularly benefited from jumping onto the wagon and then jumping off it quickly if you were scum too.In post 1839, Flavor Leaf wrote:In post 1531, Flavor Leaf wrote:Honestly, if we vote Bnuuy, Norwegian, then the Bnuuy wagon is gonna be seen as being built up super fast.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
You have a way with words my friend. Your style is kinda growing on me.In post 1858, MonkeyMan576 wrote:It looks like you are switzerland in World War II, which isn't the morally correct position.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
Yeah this does not read like something posted for here unless I'm missing something? Why would say in advance you "might" try and claim something?In post 1868, Flavor Leaf wrote:Part of me wants to try to go for the Beloved Princess, and then just have a double night before scum get any info, and then just have a double night.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
Could be a style thing I guess, just feels odd to announce your intention openly that you might claim.In post 1885, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
It reads to me like something FL would post here.In post 1884, MalcolmTucker wrote:
Yeah this does not read like something posted for here unless I'm missing something? Why would say in advance you "might" try and claim something?In post 1868, Flavor Leaf wrote:Part of me wants to try to go for the Beloved Princess, and then just have a double night before scum get any info, and then just have a double night.-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
-
-
MalcolmTucker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: January 9, 2022
On this, do we reckon all scum teams kill tonight? I'd initially expect so since it's D1 and the game is still big enough that you can probably eliminate someone as scum and get away with it without people making obvious associatives. But then it obviously gets trickier further down the line once role player are perhaps revealed - if you don't have a kill, you risk them being able to live another day.In post 1893, Flavor Leaf wrote:In post 1889, butterchurn wrote:Yeah, I read that as him saying that Day 1 could actually be the most beneficial time to eliminate a Beloved Princess, because there are the maximum amount of town role actions available. So, I guess the risk is mitigated if she is a town Beloved Princess, and there's also a good chance of her just being scum. I'm not really sure how accurate that is, but I did have a thought along those lines as well.
there's also little to no other claims out there, so scum can't PR snipe well, so it's just mowing down people.
Scum can also choose not to kill because they only to kill 2 times in each 3 phases.