I'm going to assume that "can" from Mulch in 80 is supposed to be "can't". No edited tag though.
Where did these numbers come from?Mulch wrote:Welp NotMafia already has a ... 4/13 chance of being scum. Uh...
30% chance
Oh hey! Was there a reason for this or is naked voting Nos just code for "hello"?
mastina you are...something amazing. Yume's explanation sounded fine to me. Not sure why you'd think it was otherwise. Why did you redirect from Yume to Radiant Moonlight here? Does this mean 102 wasn't actually a joke?MathBlade wrote:Interesting. I give you the entire floor to explain your emotions and you don't explain crap. Like and RadiantCowbells just takes it? This is not typical RC play at all. Generally He is all "Hey I did good shit" and "I am awesome" and "You should know better Math" and "Cmon that was amazing though right?" Why are you just taking what Yume is suggesting with a joke RC? Plus Titus hasn't said I am scum yet for a completely bullshit reason.
VOTE: RadiantMoonlight
I don't think this is true. She can't mess with valid votes, but I'm not sure if that means "any text in vote tags".
As of right now Creature's 159 was made on the hour, edited one minute later. I know this because it has an edited tag. Why are you taking Mulch's word as gospel?Not_Mafia wrote: Do u even read bro? A post doesn't show as edited if you edit it within the first 5 minutes
This is unnerving.In post 136, Stalfos wrote:mastina you are...something amazing.
I don't think that's how it works. Safe from deleting. Not safe from editing.hebichan wrote: speaking of the vote thing, that does remind me. We should probably vote or unvote in every post to avoid editing.
UNVOTE:
The issue is that Mulch is saying that his posts are being edited (155) when there's no tag saying they are, and we didn't know under what circumstances that happens. Creature's post is evidence that it's not five minutes because of the timestamps, not because of the content. Like it feels like you've missed the point of the conversation.In post 194, hebichan wrote:Why am I scum again? Because I don't see the point in over thinking about something that changed when we have no idea what the motive was and have no way of gleaming that?
It's entirely possible it was edited specifically to move the town dialogue to the fact it was edited.
Oh god you're still doing it. Why this one?MarioManiac4 wrote:VOTE: Mulch
made hebi prime lynch material?In post 180, hebichan wrote:Whooo 8 pages already.
I think this stuff over creature's post edit is a little overblown right now.
That's a pretty bloody excessive demand considering it was a reasonable request from Mulch.In post 346, Radiant Moonlight wrote:Will you never vote me again for the rest of the game?Can you link one time you’ve done it, humor me?
Yume, do you have an opinion on the game so far?Yume wrote:She is beauty and she's graceIn post 394, Radiant Moonlight wrote: Let's have a Gif party. I'll wait for RC to come around on hebi.
She is queen of the wide open space
She is Padparadscha, so hold your case
In my heart she has a place
What would that be? Seems pretty clear that she means she thinks there wasn't enough time between you posting it and her seeing it for mastina to have made any changes.In post 461, Mulch wrote:ur ignoring the fact lol that everyone has talked aboutIn post 460, hebichan wrote:I'm sheeping my smocaine townread mostly, but also I never saw that last post mulch said got edited by edited, even though I was in this thread almost right after mulch posted it.
Responding first historically-I honestly didn't (and still don't) see much tonewise that's good behind camn's early posting, especially before 184 when Aronis gave it. 106 I would lean slight negative on, 166 says basically nothing and I don't see any phenomenal tone there. It's important to note that some posts were edited but I doubt they were much better. This one might be entirely due to my own conception of her but I'm decently familiar with camn, she's been so null it hurts and is a silly read.In post 509, Mulch wrote:Huh, I dislike your thoughts on Aronis's "weak townread" on Camn. I could easily follow Aronist's thoughts there as Camn has phenomenal tone...
Not wanting to give the rule away with regards to the edits to mastina was incredibly forced.In post 521, Mulch wrote:I find that the reasoning regarding keeping information to yourself to be a bit forced. Thats something that is like such an obscure thing to expect her to sensor her thoughts and scumread her for not doing it accordingly... Unless you had a god-tier meta read on Camn I don't understand how you could expect this?
What's your read on me?In post 522, camn wrote:Ha ha...my post where I exposed the rule got deleted.
Stalfis you are out of your element.
Good question is definitely unnatural and a first for me, said because it made me think more on camn. In general I try to do too much by myself as town and not take a more cooperative approach. This is pretty directly influenced by Nacho and trying to incorporate elements of his towngame.In post 533, Mulch wrote:I would like to say, that besides the logic Stalfos is doing a few "things" I do when I am scum a lot...in terms of certain word choices... hard not to scumread this stuff
Spoiler: don't read if you will be frustrated with lack of explanation
And something maybe I can "explain":
Spoiler:
This is literally the worst and I sincerely hope it is a joke. Do you mind playing the game instead of doing things based on what makes you look good or what you can blame on others postgame?In post 600, Mulch wrote:Well, here's my thinking. I can just keep my vote on Prism. If I'm lynched, and Prism is scum and RC is town, I can be after the game that I played much better than RC. If Prism AND RC are scum, then I can brag after the game that I can read both of them and that if you had listened to me we would have won. If NEITHER are scum... I can still blame RC for having 2 bad reads.
So, there are 3 good outcomes, if I stick my vote on Prism
? Little early for the apologies, mate.In post 540, Mulch wrote: I'm truly sorry if your town, Prism. I really am
Give me time to make a cup of tea, jeez. And take unexpected phone calls. And have dinner. Did you want to talk or something?Radiant Moonlight wrote:Where'd you go @_@
Mulch wrote:Ugh the Key part of the hydra is so much townier than the Prism part
Not to mention this. You have said before that I'm obvious town and play terribly as scum, and I can even find you the very quote you said it in. That would make me a super easy read for you right? So I asked and you say you think I'm being towny.Mulch wrote:Ugh the Key part of the hydra is so much townier than the Prism part
You edited Regfan's post to be "Hard to watch Prism", the only compliment you gave you made it clear not to compliment my play but just my effort, and you literally watched me lead town headon into 3 mislynches singlehandedly. You literally spent the whole postgame crying about how bad my townplay is, and lording my scumplay that you've never seen. You accused me of wanting to "slay the beast" and now are basically doing the same thing to me/RC without having any fucking clue about how our scumgames work, and apparently no clue about how my towngame works either.Mulch in Dystopia wrote:Lol
Headline tmrw:
NOT ONLY DOES PRISM VOTE the wrong read because of emotions, they CONVINCE the other town that was just starting to warm up to vic scum to lose the game too.
CAN prism get to THREE hundred percent at fault on tmrw..
?Not_Mafia wrote:VOTE: mulch
This is a terrible deal, railway stations are far superior to utilities.In post 811, Not_Mafia wrote:I'll trade you the Electric Company for Liverpool Street Station
Priz is afk until Sunday as stated in 788. Want to talk to me instead?In post 793, Nosferatu wrote:ayy lets goIn post 791, Stalfos wrote:Actually I think I can get a better handle on Nos so I'll slot them as the first one.
An example of what you mean here would be good too. This is the closest thing to an explanation that you've got.In post 476, Nosferatu wrote: tonally you're like so town but you keep on just saying scummy shit
Me or Nos?In post 852, Radiant Moonlight wrote:I want to talk to you
watCreature wrote:N proper caps
N (a player that starts with N) prob caps (a role)
Don't do this. Don'tIn post 863, Radiant Moonlight wrote:If you're town here I'm policy lynching you any time you express a scumread on me ever again.
Yeah I'd agree with you here I think, but what was your reason for thinking N_M might be scum at all?Nosferatu wrote:I don't think scumN_M makes that push on also scum!hebi
In post 875, Nosferatu wrote: Aronis made some scumposts that I think I quoted in my vote.
Nope. If you did, they didn't last long. Can you quote them now?
Again, would you be able to quote them? Same as hebi, not sure what you mean.Nosferatu wrote: like based on tone I'd say mulch was town, but he's making a lot of scumposts.
I've been looking forward to playing with you too!Radiant Moonlight wrote: I've been looking forward to playing with you this game fwiw. Who do you think is scum and why? What are your reads on Mulch and Mathblade?
I can see townreading the recent Mulch AtE but it's more the fake indecision early on that bothers me. That and the "Does Mastina know the rule?" without actually trying to capitalize, which is something I really think camn does considering GG2.In post 934, Nosferatu wrote:camn's switcharoo on mulch is kinda ???
The posts themselves in my opinion weren't great. I don't see what deleted posts have to do with that, they aren't entirely out of context. If you've explained something else that I'm missing then explain it now. I also don't see why my opinion on these posts would change over time. Scumreading me for being inactive because my body is breaking down on me is not a good reason.In post 943, camn wrote:Like this-
You keep saying this.. and it is weaker and weaker every time.
Stalfos: this old post is funny.
camn: oh.. I see half of them are deleted, and so you probably shouldn't read much out of it.
Stalfos: this old post is funny.
..
days go by..
Stalfos: this old post is funny.
Right, publicly, not privately. I know, because you openly speculated about it.camn wrote:There is no 'capitializing' on the editing rule anyway.
Believe me, I tried to think of how to do it.
You're making a big claim here without actually having evidence that my intent is malice than a real read. You aren't exactly up for a lynch today either, despite the fact that I think you should.camn wrote:In the end, it was better to tell. Which, if you were looking at the situation in an honest way, and not just trying to pin 'scumpoints' on me, you would realize.
But you arent, cuz you are scum. And as scum, you don't need to actually figure out anything, just get mislynches. So shove it.
viewtopic.php?p=9410835#p9410835In post 951, camn wrote:Oh god the old "show me evidence' defense.
VOTE: Stalfos
(For Mathblade's computer-VC-monkey)