[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 13753255 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 1078: Datisi's micro normals are back [game over] - Mafiascum.net
In post 115, VP Baltar wrote:
I find the fire, skitter, ausuka, osuka group has something off and I can't quite put my finger on it. It's like a series of overreactions that contribute to the next. To be fair to ausuka, she's just kind of there, so would love her take on those other three specifically.
Hellbrooks is maybe millennial.
I'm kind of, uh, I don't know the word for it but this game is just like
"wow ausuka is SOOOO awkward lol she must be scum"
"lol that's just ausuka lmao"
like what do i do with that really
i dont like this ausuka post but i like my baltar vote as well
Post
Post #209 (isolation #10) » Wed Apr 26, 2023 7:03 am
Postby tris »
In post 144, skitter30 wrote:
Also no, i don't think she was *afraid* of the wagon at all, but this post had a lot of anxious vibes and that's ehat pinged - i don't think town would be anxious, and that was a strange clause at the end ...
what is the difference between being afraid of the wagon and being anxious?
In post 81, fireisredsir wrote:
id rather not elaborate yet bc it's sort of one of those things that is dependent on a pattern of behavior and it's a little early to call out exactly what ive seen so far and how it compares to my expectations bc it's a sort of small sample of posts and maybe im wrong and saying it allows him to adjust. ill tell u later tho shhh
what the fuck is this? either you have something or you don't. if you do, then you should just point it out and if you don't and it's "dependent on a pattern of behavior" then you shouldn't come off so strong because then you'd just make whoever it is you're talking about very acutely aware of the fact that you're watching them closely. this is either horseshit disguised as townposting or just kind of stupid, but i can't immediately tell which
Like, on the one hand, this is kind of a BS reason from fire...the reason it is BS being that fire has a mediocre track record of reading me correctly and I've kind of barely done anything this game yet.
Osuka jumps in and attacks its vagueryness...which is not only the wrong reason to dislike that fire post, it's worth about as much as the poop he wants to put in my pants (not much). Fire can be vague, but the "oh I have a VP read from nothing" is the actual sus part.
But if Fire knows they aren't particularly good at reading you, wouldn't it then make more sense for them to be reserved on their feeling on you? Isn't it natural for them to decide to wait for something more substantive before outing the read completely,
because
of this track record?
that wasn't the reason fire gave for holding it back.
In post 81, fireisredsir wrote:
id rather not elaborate yet bc it's sort of one of those things that is dependent on a pattern of behavior and it's a little early to call out exactly what ive seen so far and how it compares to my expectations bc it's a sort of small sample of posts and maybe im wrong and saying it allows him to adjust. ill tell u later tho shhh
what the fuck is this? either you have something or you don't. if you do, then you should just point it out and if you don't and it's "dependent on a pattern of behavior" then you shouldn't come off so strong because then you'd just make whoever it is you're talking about very acutely aware of the fact that you're watching them closely. this is either horseshit disguised as townposting or just kind of stupid, but i can't immediately tell which
Like, on the one hand, this is kind of a BS reason from fire...the reason it is BS being that fire has a mediocre track record of reading me correctly and I've kind of barely done anything this game yet.
Osuka jumps in and attacks its vagueryness...which is not only the wrong reason to dislike that fire post, it's worth about as much as the poop he wants to put in my pants (not much). Fire can be vague, but the "oh I have a VP read from nothing" is the actual sus part.
But if Fire knows they aren't particularly good at reading you, wouldn't it then make more sense for them to be reserved on their feeling on you? Isn't it natural for them to decide to wait for something more substantive before outing the read completely,
because
of this track record?
that wasn't the reason fire gave for holding it back.
Hmm?
I mean the justification Fire gave is wanting a larger sample size (I think interpreting this as wanting something more substantive is fair?) to see if a pattern held up. Or are you saying that Fire not wanting to out the read because of their track record was not reasoning given? Which like yeah it wasn't, but I don't have a hard time believing that it could still be a factor.
Fire gets thoughts on Baltar -> Fire gets a bit of doubt about it because of past record (either consciously or more of a subtle doubt because of those past games) -> Fire decides to be careful with their reads and wants an extra set of posts to get a stronger feeling
Is not an unlikely chain of events to me and I don't think Fire having doubts on their ability to read Baltar will be inherently voiced.
In post 212, tris wrote:
why does everyone think that post is towny?
I don't think think a particular post from hellbrooks is towny per se (though I'm sure I could dig in and better understand my own feeling here.) I think what's townie from brooks is the free wheeling vibe. There is a transparency of to her posting that reads to me like clearly saying things off the top of your head, which is a quality I generally associate with being town because you aren't afraid to say the wrong thing. Admittedly, I think brooks is cool and I'm susceptible to being too easily charmed by friendlies.
ha! yeah. i do agree i think about the broader posting. and also about the possibility of being charmed.
i think it's meaningful because i think it's a stretch for you to believe this specifically:
In post 79, skitter30 wrote:
There's a little too much of a real 'don't wagon me!!!!' vibe to this post that i don't like
i think its v plausible that the post would ping you. i think that you'd recognize it as a potentially ping-y post as either alignment bc you're able to do that. but i think the way you talked about it feels like making it into a bigger deal than it is and overjustifying
if you had just said "this post pings me because it feels a little anxious", yeah sure i can agree. but adding on the bit about her being afraid of a real wagon is like... really? you think ausuka would really be that afraid of an rvs wagon in like post 6?
so my thought process on seeing it was thinking that a world where you knew the post was ping-y but maybe didn't quite know why and still decided to come up with something to connect point a and b felt more like something you'd do as scum than something you'd do as town
maybe this is dumb and just a case of you seeing something different in the post than i do and me arrogantly thinking my read on it is the more reasonable one and so therefore you're more likely to be scum
but also scum skitter misreads tone in jokey posts etc etc
idk its not that significant of a read but it was like the first real thing i noticed and i was feeling it in the moment
I was p clear that it was vibes, but i was asked for elaboration twice, so i attempted to articulate what was bothering me. I do think thay in the process of writing it out i figured out what was pinging me, and that may have been why it sounded overexplained. I'm trying to pay more attention to these things (it worked really well in the thing mafia ...m)
Also no, i don't think she was *afraid* of the wagon at all, but this post had a lot of anxious vibes and that's ehat pinged - i don't think town would be anxious, and that was a strange clause at the end ...
I don't really like your vote on me tbh, it feels like a stretch. I'm aware that you admitted it was a stretch
Also i think ausuka's reaction is kinda icky regardless
VOTE: Skitter
The culmination of all of these takes feels just very meh, I'm moreso getting "this is the logical assumptions to take from what's been posted" than real feelings on the game.
In post 191, Ausuka wrote:
I don't understand what you're talking about
You're saying there is a difference, and I asked to elaboratable that point because i dont understand how anyone could read the post i quoted differently ... and well here we are.
Who said anything about 'regardless of alignment'? If you roll scum, against a player you just played scum with, is it really so ridiculous to think maybe you would try and see if you could use that to your advantage at some point?
You said star was "planning" to use it against you. I guess it just feels a bit like circular logic to me. I asked regardless of alignment because the alignment is actually a really important thing to consider when weighing a person's criticisms against you, but you seem to be working from a start and end point of star!scum.
hypothetical scenario
~Micro 1078 Mafia Private Topic~
skygazer:
omg wow i'm scum i love being scum
meuh:
Hi I am Meuh
meuh:
this will be fun do you have any thoughts on the playerlist?
skygazer:
um sure! hellbooks is like my bestie. and uh i just finished a game with ausuka where we were scumbuddies
meuh:
uwu wow that's cool anything we can use?
skygazer:
well in the mafia pt ausuka seemed frustrated at getting scumread for bad reasons. so if she gets pushed i can use that maybe
meuh:
Wow skygazer ur so smart I wanna be like you when I grow up
(Also i'm pretty sure i already said that i thought the accusation by skygazer fit unnaturally which is why i didn't think it was town but okay)
but like, why wouldn't this be something she wouldn't have in her head if she were town as well?
In post 115, VP Baltar wrote:
I find the fire, skitter, ausuka, osuka group has something off and I can't quite put my finger on it. It's like a series of overreactions that contribute to the next. To be fair to ausuka, she's just kind of there, so would love her take on those other three specifically.
Hellbrooks is maybe millennial.
I'm kind of, uh, I don't know the word for it but this game is just like
"wow ausuka is SOOOO awkward lol she must be scum"
"lol that's just ausuka lmao"
like what do i do with that really
hold on, is this the post people are saying is ausuka being scummy for overreacting to being scumread? because here she was being prompted to characterize the discussion around her. and saying she doesn't know how to respond to it. doesn't feel like she's reacting strongly to it. its more passive.
In post 144, skitter30 wrote:
Also no, i don't think she was *afraid* of the wagon at all, but this post had a lot of anxious vibes and that's ehat pinged - i don't think town would be anxious, and that was a strange clause at the end ...
what is the difference between being afraid of the wagon and being anxious?
Afraid is a more extreme word. I think a person can be anxious (i.e. have some negative emotion abt it) withoht getting to the level of being afraid
In post 177, Ausuka wrote:
I think you were planning to use that at some point and jumped at the opportunity even when it didn't fit all that well
The post i made was like maybe somewhat defensive but the idea that I wouldn't say something like that as town is pretty ???
I also think when you said I was great at town, you didn't really believe that and were saying it because it was conducive to a d1 push on me, and that's backed up by you seeming to have like no idea about my town game and admitting as such.
So you think sky came into this game planning to push you? Not sure how else to understanf the first paragraph
In post 177, Ausuka wrote:
I think you were planning to use that at some point and jumped at the opportunity even when it didn't fit all that well
The post i made was like maybe somewhat defensive but the idea that I wouldn't say something like that as town is pretty ???
I also think when you said I was great at town, you didn't really believe that and were saying it because it was conducive to a d1 push on me, and that's backed up by you seeming to have like no idea about my town game and admitting as such.
So you think sky came into this game planning to push you? Not sure how else to understanf the first paragraph
thats how i took it ya which is weird to me bc i think the last thing i'd wanna do as scum is get into a 1v1 with town ausuka
In post 178, Skygazer wrote:
i think there's a p strong difference between me remembering you have a really strong town game and me not remembering what your town meta is like
I think after coming back and seeing that after three years of neither of us playing on this site, my scum game is incredibly different to how it used to be, town skygazer probably interacts with my meta very differently to what you have done
In post 177, Ausuka wrote:
I think you were planning to use that at some point and jumped at the opportunity even when it didn't fit all that well
The post i made was like maybe somewhat defensive but the idea that I wouldn't say something like that as town is pretty ???
I also think when you said I was great at town, you didn't really believe that and were saying it because it was conducive to a d1 push on me, and that's backed up by you seeming to have like no idea about my town game and admitting as such.
So you think sky came into this game planning to push you? Not sure how else to understanf the first paragraph
I think that if you come into a game having just been scum with someone, and then you roll scum against them, I think it's very plausible you have ideas of how to use that against them?
In post 182, VP Baltar wrote:
Ausuka, why do you think sky in particular would come after you?
I feel like words are being put in my mouth here? Is it really that unusual to have ideas of how you might push people you have some history with if you roll scum against them?
In post 182, VP Baltar wrote:
Ausuka, why do you think sky in particular would come after you?
I feel like words are being put in my mouth here? Is it really that unusual to have ideas of how you might push people you have some history with if you roll scum against them?
You're the one who essentially said "I think you came into this game with this attack planned." I'm putting zero words into your mouth.
In post 188, Ausuka wrote:
No, there is a difference between coming onto the game with an intention to specifically target a player, and having ideas of things you might used against them based on your history together.
In post 188, Ausuka wrote:
No, there is a difference between coming onto the game with an intention to specifically target a player, and having ideas of things you might used against them based on your history together.
Why would you have a bag of tactics to use against a player if it wasn't pre-planned? Is that how you play as town, with strats to manage different players you have a history with, regardless of their alignment?
In post 177, Ausuka wrote:
I think you were planning to use that at some point and jumped at the opportunity even when it didn't fit all that well
The post i made was like maybe somewhat defensive but the idea that I wouldn't say something like that as town is pretty ???
I also think when you said I was great at town, you didn't really believe that and were saying it because it was conducive to a d1 push on me, and that's backed up by you seeming to have like no idea about my town game and admitting as such.
So you think sky came into this game planning to push you? Not sure how else to understanf the first paragraph
I think that if you come into a game having just been scum with someone, and then you roll scum against them, I think it's very plausible you have ideas of how to use that against them?
Well, how convinced are you that sky is scum here?
In post 191, Ausuka wrote:
I don't understand what you're talking about
>.>
OOOOOOOOOF this string of posts
Skitter sitting on the sidelines and just casting shade and nudging Ausuka towards the Sky scumread is definitely concerning to me (confirmation bias? who's that?). Asking Ausuka how convinced she is of Sky being scum both serves a purpose for scum and is a really odd question for town? I don't really see the thought process that leads you to believe that's a particularly relevant question.Also I just think Ausuka's town. The logic she's using here is slightly iffy but I can 100% see a townie and more specifically town!Ausuka make the conclusions being made here.
I dislike Baltar's towards Ausuka up to these posts in general. Stuff like 124 feels more like picking at things that are slightly illogical than genuine curiosity at Ausuka's alignment, but picking at those things, if I recall correctly, is what Baltar tends to do. However, I still feel like the dance game and Ausuka being town there would be seeping in the way he engages with her, which I know has been the case for myself and Fire has also mentioned it. Feeling kinda meh here
- How am i sittijg on the sidelines? I started the ausuka push?
- Where am i nudging ausuka towards townreading sky?
- i asked ausuka abt her sky read b/c her statement abt 'sky was planning to read me this way' only makes sense if she was accusing sky as being scum, and she didnt seem to convinced oc that read yet, so there was a disconnect there that i was trying to understakd. And even so that approach doesnt make sense ...
- town!ausuka is a *very* interestkng take and i'd loke to hear a lot more abt it, in particular in relation to how she's expecting sky to read her. Can yoy talk more abt this?
Tbh a lot of this is kinda ~words~ that doesnt align with the content of my push so uh i'd like you to elaborate more please
this meuh post did feel like more of a stretch to me than others
In post 115, VP Baltar wrote:
I find the fire, skitter, ausuka, osuka group has something off and I can't quite put my finger on it. It's like a series of overreactions that contribute to the next. To be fair to ausuka, she's just kind of there, so would love her take on those other three specifically.
Hellbrooks is maybe millennial.
I'm kind of, uh, I don't know the word for it but this game is just like
"wow ausuka is SOOOO awkward lol she must be scum"
"lol that's just ausuka lmao"
like what do i do with that really
hold on, is this the post people are saying is ausuka being scummy for overreacting to being scumread? because here she was being prompted to characterize the discussion around her. and saying she doesn't know how to respond to it. doesn't feel like she's reacting strongly to it. its more passive.
I mean it's reductive and doesnt describe what was actually happening
which part of it is like that? is it the word awkward instead of anxious? the second line is pretty much exactly what osuka said.
In post 144, skitter30 wrote:
Also no, i don't think she was *afraid* of the wagon at all, but this post had a lot of anxious vibes and that's ehat pinged - i don't think town would be anxious, and that was a strange clause at the end ...
what is the difference between being afraid of the wagon and being anxious?
Afraid is a more extreme word. I think a person can be anxious (i.e. have some negative emotion abt it) withoht getting to the level of being afraid
ok well then why would she be anxious about it?
Well scum don't like being wagoned, i don't think town care as mich
but like, an early rvs wagon with no actual justification doesn't mean much. when im scum, i actually kind of like having an rvs wagon on me. its fun. i dont know if ausuka feels like that, but i don't think she would be very bothered by it.
i don't like the reads you've been making. they dont follow natural for me.
i'll try to provide an overall summary later.
ok, so:
i think skitter is scummy because while her reads are reasonablish, they lack a little something more that i think is supposed to be there for town skitter (i think? its been a long time since i played).
the read on ausuka starts as a stretch, which ok fine its early game just coming out of rvs, but while she does add some more to the read about her responses to pressure. it feels rather static somehow. most importantly, her posts dont really show a towny mind at work behind them. i don't see evidence that she's really evaluating things. more that she's just decided 'i will make this read now'.
the read on fire just feels so empty and lifeless to me. like in this post:
Post
Post #348 (isolation #29) » Thu Apr 27, 2023 5:46 pm
Postby tris »
In post 319, hellbooks wrote:
sorry sorry. i just got embarrassed. like i know skitter is one of those Great Players and maybe shes like reading that and being like wtf are you saying lol do you even play this game more than once a year
In post 215, Meuh wrote:
osuka's take on Fire's posts around the time he made them line up a lot with my feelings which is nice
Leaning town there
to
In post 278, Meuh wrote:
Current feeling: VPB/Osuka team, if town in there then scum in Skitter/Hellbooks
Rest can be town
without me posting like zero content during that time?
Honestly forgot about what you said there
Regardless, when I took at look at the collective ISO of you/Skitter/VPB/Hellbooks, you fit within the group quite nicely and I found that to be pretty meaningful
Post
Post #397 (isolation #41) » Thu Apr 27, 2023 7:29 pm
Postby tris »
In post 393, fireisredsir wrote:
he finds a perverse enjoyment in saying just blatantly completely wrong things when he's scum and then laughing as people trip over themselves thinking that scum would never
where does it look like he's doing that in this game?
Post
Post #402 (isolation #42) » Thu Apr 27, 2023 7:33 pm
Postby tris »
i've found baltar's posting to be a little town. he looks like he's trying to pick apart the puzzle of the game. now, he might just be trying to project that image, but so far its all felt natural enough
In post 393, fireisredsir wrote:
he finds a perverse enjoyment in saying just blatantly completely wrong things when he's scum and then laughing as people trip over themselves thinking that scum would never
where does it look like he's doing that in this game?
that was a follow up point to the thing about him saying he was townie this game
In post 503, fireisredsir wrote:
some of the early posting i think also felt plausibly like coming from a scum angle as a (whats that word ffery likes. gestalt? idr. maybe thats right) i think but i don't remember why exactly but that kind of put you in my mental bucket of "be careful here" to start off
i had similar thought! my vote on her was actually secretly a tiny bit serious, but then i changed my mind.
Post
Post #667 (isolation #54) » Mon May 01, 2023 7:11 am
Postby tris »
people who im probably not voting today: vp baltar, fire, sky.
now, what do i think of: skitter, meuh, ausuka, osuka, hellbooks? is the question
i have no idea if i still scumread skitter. :/
ausuka is super null for me
my lazy brain wants me to sheep fire onto osuka, but i feel i shouldnt do that without actually taking another look at osuka, but then i get anxiety about the reading process, but i should just do it, ok i will. :)
In post 636, skitter30 wrote:
@meuh in 634 you kinda sound like your justifying an osuka vote to urself
Probably since a good chunk of that post are things I noticed when writing it and not beliefs I held coming into it, so it was more just writing down my thought process there than anything else