[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 9247877 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 715: Friendly Neighbor 6 (Game Over) - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #31 (isolation #1) » Thu May 25, 2017 2:53 pm
Postby Flubbernugget »
There's a slight tinge in everyone's heart just to lynch Gamma for the fuck of it
But being serious, it was more of a gambit to end rvs ASAP.
I don't know what to make of the unprovoked claim right now. Knowing Gamma, I honestly doubt they would claim anything other than VT as scum, so my vote stays.
In post 31, Flubbernugget wrote:There's a slight tinge in everyone's heart just to lynch Gamma for the fuck of it
But being serious, it was more of a gambit to end rvs ASAP.
I don't know what to make of the unprovoked claim right now. Knowing Gamma, I honestly doubt they would claim anything other than VT as scum, so my vote stays.
Why not? I'd think it would make more sense to execute a frustrated PR claim as scum, since the tone of my previous posting would justify it.
In post 31, Flubbernugget wrote:There's a slight tinge in everyone's heart just to lynch Gamma for the fuck of it
But being serious, it was more of a gambit to end rvs ASAP.
I don't know what to make of the unprovoked claim right now. Knowing Gamma, I honestly doubt they would claim anything other than VT as scum, so my vote stays.
Do you think scum Gamma claims prior to intent though? The actual claim isn't relevant as much as the timing of it.
Never got an answer to this btw.
I don't. But I also don't like the idea that he really thinks a wagon raced to L1 and there's no scum on it
In post 31, Flubbernugget wrote:There's a slight tinge in everyone's heart just to lynch Gamma for the fuck of it
But being serious, it was more of a gambit to end rvs ASAP.
I don't know what to make of the unprovoked claim right now. Knowing Gamma, I honestly doubt they would claim anything other than VT as scum, so my vote stays.
Do you think scum Gamma claims prior to intent though? The actual claim isn't relevant as much as the timing of it.
Never got an answer to this btw.
I don't. But I also don't like the idea that he really thinks a wagon raced to L1 and there's no scum on it
So are you still voting him because you think he's scum or because you think he's wrong?
In post 31, Flubbernugget wrote:There's a slight tinge in everyone's heart just to lynch Gamma for the fuck of it
But being serious, it was more of a gambit to end rvs ASAP.
I don't know what to make of the unprovoked claim right now. Knowing Gamma, I honestly doubt they would claim anything other than VT as scum, so my vote stays.
Another question for you, @Flubbernugget. You said you don't think scumgamma would claim anything other than VT but wouldn't towngamma also claim VT in the same situation? They wouldn't want to make themselves a scum target by claiming a PR, right? I don't really see how claiming specifically VT is AI.
Gamma is the kind of person to have issues thinking all the kinks out of a big play, so I wouldn't expect him to lock into a Pr claim and try to wiggle through why he survived the night.
In post 31, Flubbernugget wrote:There's a slight tinge in everyone's heart just to lynch Gamma for the fuck of it
But being serious, it was more of a gambit to end rvs ASAP.
I don't know what to make of the unprovoked claim right now. Knowing Gamma, I honestly doubt they would claim anything other than VT as scum, so my vote stays.
Do you think scum Gamma claims prior to intent though? The actual claim isn't relevant as much as the timing of it.
Never got an answer to this btw.
I don't. But I also don't like the idea that he really thinks a wagon raced to L1 and there's no scum on it
So are you still voting him because you think he's scum or because you think he's wrong?
I think he is wrong and scum read him as a result
wrong =/= scum
Why do you think scumGamma makes that argument and not TownGamma? It feels like you're trying to justify keeping your vote on him instead of tying to critically analyze him.
VOTE: Flubbernugger
I don't have a smoking gun on Gamma but it's pg 4 and everyone else looks town so being wrong about how wagons work is good enough atm
I don't think Gamma would have claimed as town. It was a defensive play.
Do you have any scum reads?
Maybe, but why wouldn't Gamma have claimed as town as well? Whether he is scum or town he was at a risk of being lynched. Both allignments could react defensively to that.
I don't have any scum reads yet. I'm squinting at you and Mariomaker the most at the moment but I don't necessarily read either of you as scum.
Post
Post #118 (isolation #14) » Sun May 28, 2017 2:53 am
Postby Flubbernugget »
In post 115, Raya36 wrote:@Flubbernugget I'm honestly not following your reasoning for keeping your vote on Gamma. At the moment I see you as the scummiest so I'm putting my vote on you for now.
VOTE: Flubbernugget
You're not following my reasoning to vote Gamma but still using similar reasoning to vote me?
Post
Post #138 (isolation #20) » Mon May 29, 2017 2:29 am
Postby Flubbernugget »
In post 132, Raya36 wrote:He started by voting for Gamma and asking for someone to hammer. At first I didn't think that pointed towards him being scum but after looking back through the thread I feel differently. The part that made me rethink my read on him is that he stated the purpose of his vote was to end rvs asap, which is fine, but from my understanding bringing someone to L-1 during rvs is enough to end it. It was never really explained why he wanted someone to hammer. At that point in the game there was nothing posted that could have been AI so it seemed like they were okay with (or even pushing for) a random vote. I don't see the logic behind that from a town pov.
That's kind of the point. If you do what's expected, the reaction from it is less. Gamma never actually got hammered nor did I actually expect them to. Gamma's reasoning as to why they thought they were getting hammered is pretty bad too.
Post
Post #139 (isolation #21) » Mon May 29, 2017 2:34 am
Postby Flubbernugget »
In post 132, Raya36 wrote:I also don't feel that this was addressed well enough. My point was that both towngamma and scumgamma could have reacted defensively to the possibility of being hammered and reacting that way isn't necessarily AI. I don't see how his response addresses that, unless I'm missing something.
Being over defensive is a scum tell. There is not a doubt in my mind that nobody town would have hammered, and if scum hammered town would have been all over them D2.
Post
Post #140 (isolation #22) » Mon May 29, 2017 2:35 am
Postby Flubbernugget »
In post 132, Raya36 wrote:Of course I'm going to vote for who I see scummiest but past that similarity I don't really see how our reasoning is similar. Can you explain this more?
That's as far as the similarity goes.
You have yet to refute that everyone else looked town at the time so I'm not sure where else you expected my vote to go.
Post
Post #236 (isolation #31) » Wed May 31, 2017 4:02 pm
Postby Flubbernugget »
In post 191, Alchemist21 wrote:We should all cast just cast naked votes the rest of the game. Then we'll definitely catch the scum, especially if all the votes are just one continuous string of reaction tests. /s
Post
Post #237 (isolation #32) » Wed May 31, 2017 4:03 pm
Postby Flubbernugget »
In post 193, MarioManiac4 wrote:on a more serious note; i don't like how alchemist is trying to "campaign" against blank votes; it feels like he's trying to look pro-town but I don't see the actual scumhunting there. there isn't much followup on his questions and his push on flubber has been stale for a while
also gut is a perfectly viable method
In post 222, BTD6_maker wrote:What conclusions do you expect? At this point, anyone could be Town or scum. I have weak reads, but not much more. What I choose to analyse is arbitrary because I am rather busy and cannot analyse every post in depth.
Currently, you and Flubbernugget are weak scum reads while Gamma and Raya are weak Town. Most others are near nullish.
In post 223, MarioManiac4 wrote:like, most of your posts are long and analyzing, but even though I see analysis, I don't see how it affects your reads. If you could post something like "you and Flubbernugget are weak scum reads while Gamma and Raya are weak Town. Most others are near nullish.", I think that would help with trying to read you.
(Also, I'm pretty much confirmed town. )
Can you explain your Raya read? I have her as leaning Town, but one reason I had I realized was NAI and the other reason may be as well. I'd like to know if you're seeing something more substantial from her.
I did a double take, congrats, well played.
And mfw BTD6 has a weak scumread on the claimed FN
(inb4 it's JK setup and Mario is scum gambiting hard)
Why are you both shunning and entertaining BTD's scum read?
In post 283, Something_Smart wrote:and my vote is on one of the players I pointed out as being suspicious
I know that and mentioned as much. The fact that you come in and act like you have no clue where to start when you had several suspicions to work with is what pings me, and the suspicion is strengthened by you voting Gamma with your "no idea where to start" thing when you had established suspicions of them. If you already had those to work then it tells me you were lying about not knowing where to start to try to keep your hands clean.
Post
Post #294 (isolation #46) » Mon Jun 05, 2017 12:25 am
Postby Flubbernugget »
In post 288, Raya36 wrote:Don't have a lot of time but I'm popping in to say that I'm still happy with my Flubber vote.
Also I'd like to point out that Dany took a very long time to answer MM's question then when he finally did answer it he had the same read as Alchemist two posts above. I don't know about anyone else but it seems a little sheepy to me.
Post
Post #401 (isolation #50) » Wed Jun 07, 2017 1:52 pm
Postby Flubbernugget »
In post 349, Gamma Emerald wrote:Eh
Flubs doesn't seem like anything worth keeping but I want a report from the wagon
Can everyone voting him tell me why