Micro 708: H4rdcore Mafia (Game Over)
-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
-
-
LaLight
-
-
LaLight Goon
-
-
LaLight
-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
-
-
LaLight Goon
-
-
LaLight Goon
-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
I have fairly townread him. But I am never going to 100% townread anyone who is not mod-confirmed.In post 108, Infinity 324 wrote:
Also, didn't you townread LQ? Why did you?In post 74, Infinity 324 wrote:
What was the point of this question?In post 23, LaLight wrote:I know you are quite a strong town player, but can you tell me any game you're scum in? Thanks!
The point of the question was that I have seen town!LQ once, here he looks quite similar, but I don't know if this behaviour is AI, so I asked him to point me to the game he was scum in. I always suspect everybody.-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
Not yet due to VLA i have stated earlier. I will be able to do it tomorrowIn post 110, Infinity 324 wrote:...did you read the game and have conclusions?-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
Caught up!
I don't like duppin's play: too much defence, lack of any scumhunting whatsoever, although casting many shades on players.
I don't like ZZZX' play: aggressive without any actual reasons, providing not much useful content. E.g. the thought about "dead tell no tales" and "I will deathtunnel everyone blahblah" is completely useless without reasons, but looks like "I am trying to play a pro-town game". It is not pro-town. VOTE: ZZZX with willingness to switch onto duppin.
I TR LQ and Moonbird as I have from the beginning, strongly enough to not try to get a wagon on them in the next 17 hours.
OMGUS in me cries aloud that the try of GL to lynch me based on my little content or whatever is the try to distract our attention.
Null on NM. I don't see antitown play.-
-
LaLight
-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
-
-
LaLight
-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
I am sorry, but 144 pages and 365 LQ's posts? From what I saw by skimming LQ's posts there were contentless and short, which is definitely not the case here.In post 156, Infinity 324 wrote:
There so little depth in your reads, you don't seem to be trying to scumhunt.In post 154, LaLight wrote:for?
You also never followed up on that LQ game you asked for, which makes me think you didn't really care about it.
Depth? I have no idea what depth do you want given 7 pages of the game in which nothing really happened. Sorry, I really don't have anything bright to put my claws in.-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
Well, I am mostly thinking that the guy who posted 4 times with little to no content can not be scum. Scum doesn't do things like this. Too antitown given that some of us agreed to provide reads when we vote. He just posted a picture, asked two meaningless questions and that's all. What scum will do that? I don't really believe.In post 157, duppin wrote:
What exactly are you getting at here? It sounds like you're trying to defend NM while acknowledging his play has been 'anti town'. Could you elaborate?In post 152, LaLight wrote:Well, I feel an idiot but I just looked at NM's ISO and yes, definitely anti-town. But scummy?
Policy lynch, yeah, i can agree to that.-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
Scum is trying to hide behind aggressive tone. The vivid example is that when i feel aggression towards me I try not to interact witht his player any more, or interact less, and I do miss that the player's point is bullshit. It's the tone that turns me away.In post 161, Infinity 324 wrote:
I feel like you could give a lot more than "these people aren't scumhunting". Like I think duppin has given a lot that could be intepreted as scumhunting, same with ZZZX. I was expecting an analysis of that rather than just dismissal. I also think that zzzx's aggressive tone and policy opinions are pretty NAI. Like why do you think scum would do that and not town?In post 158, LaLight wrote:
I am sorry, but 144 pages and 365 LQ's posts? From what I saw by skimming LQ's posts there were contentless and short, which is definitely not the case here.In post 156, Infinity 324 wrote:
There so little depth in your reads, you don't seem to be trying to scumhunt.In post 154, LaLight wrote:for?
You also never followed up on that LQ game you asked for, which makes me think you didn't really care about it.
Depth? I have no idea what depth do you want given 7 pages of the game in which nothing really happened. Sorry, I really don't have anything bright to put my claws in.
n_m plays the same as town and scum pretty much. Exactly like this.
Town though tries to inform people of their reads in a most understandable and cool way, so people wouldn't be looking at tone but reads themselves.
Point taken about nm. Then policy lynch I guess is the best outcome.-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
Interesting point of view, but no. I am actually thinking about that deadline is soon. Also no one commented the tought that we can nolynch to prolong the deadline.In post 165, momo wrote:VOTE: LaLight
Just read your iso and am sorry but the type of scum hunting you are doing reminds me of scum hunting for a mislynch.-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
I don't think soIn post 169, ZZZX wrote:Wait was NM's the hamma?-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
your own reasons? Iirc you said that he needs to go because of his antitown behaviour. Everyone here had the same reasonsIn post 295, ZZZX wrote:
for NM not only do I have more experiance with NM with most people on site but I have my own reasons for it. It had to be done.In post 293, moonbird wrote:If we assume NM and Lalight to be town. I'm tneding ZZX as scum due to their soft entry onto the NM wagon.
Apologies for the flake; it's test month.-
-
LaLight
-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
-
-
LaLight
-
-
LaLight
-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
I usually first try to recall what I remember about a person and only then check their ISO. That said, I trust my gutreads a little moreIn post 320, duppin wrote: So just to answer this, no a null read does not need to be based off anything, but once again, if he was interested in evaluating the wagon I do not get the logic behind not even checking NM's ISO first.-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
As far as I remember I confused him with someone else when making the first post. I don't clearly remember, but I thought he posted something of content.In post 324, duppin wrote:
I see, what did you remember about him then?In post 323, LaLight wrote:
I usually first try to recall what I remember about a person and only then check their ISO. That said, I trust my gutreads a little more
My D1 is always reading posts and looking at who has written them. Then, when I recall the name, I feel like "There was something interesting" or "There wasn't anything interesting". About NM I remembered something. Then I read an ISO.-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
In post 50, duppin wrote:
Uh, I clearly stated that there was no reason to talk about the WIFOM right now. I only asked initially because I got the impression this setup is very WIFOM heavy so wanted to was just curious if anyone had any experience with the setup, but sure we can pretend I'd rather talk about WIFOM than scumhunting. My vote is on lynch bait? I've never played with that guy before, in fact I haven't even played a game on mafiascum for quite a while so I have no idea who he is. The idea that a naked vote is scummy is simply absurd and given your first posts I couldn't resist.In post 38, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 26, duppin wrote:hai guys
I've never played this setup before but thought it looked interesting. I'm guessing its going to be a WIFOM fest?In post 32, duppin wrote:
I'd love to but given the flipless aspect I'd be surprised if there isn't going to be a lot of WIFOM later. But oh well, doesn't really matter at least not for now.In post 30, ZZZX wrote:
best way to deal with wifom in this kind of game:In post 26, duppin wrote:hai guys
I've never played this setup before but thought it looked interesting. I'm guessing its going to be a WIFOM fest?
Throw it out of the fuckign window
don't even try to..So you would rather talk about WIFOM than actually Scum hunt? Also your vote is on lynch bait. Also its a naked vote. Also you are not playing Pro-Town. Also, why shouldn't I vote you for all this?
VOTE: duppin
I mean we can talk about game mechanics all you want, but I'd rather get the game going and this early on in the game I think a naked vote is a fair place to start to get the game going. Can either help create pressure or reactions.
I am not playing pro town? Hm perhaps not, but I've managed to create discussion apparently so I'd say it's fine. I'm not really getting anything from your earlier rants so this works for me.
As for why you shouldn't vote on you, well I'm town, so if you are town I think that's a great reason for not voting on me.
This post is crearly overdefensive. No need to react so brightly on every word of LQ.
In post 57, duppin wrote:Also could you explain your read on momo? You seemed to imply momo was town, so I'd like to know why.In post 60, duppin wrote:
You called me out for voting on mislynch bait.In post 59, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Nowhere did I imply momo was Town. My read on momo is Null atm since he has a single fucking post.In post 57, duppin wrote:Also could you explain your read on momo? You seemed to imply momo was town, so I'd like to know why.In post 62, duppin wrote:Hm I agree to some extent but still think it's a weird thing to call me out for then. But well to be honest that probably has something to do with the fact that I have never played with him, so it just feels weird to be called out for voting on him.In post 63, duppin wrote:If you want to know why I voted for him, I just wanted to vote on the least active player (which means absolutely nothing at this point) because I do not believe town has any reason to not actively attempt to game solve in this setup, so I was actually going to vote for GL because he had no posts at the time, but someone had already voted on him so I decided to go for the next on the list and that was momo. It's possible someone else had 1 post as well, but he was just the first one I noticed.
Either you cast this vote REALLY seriously or you are speaking empty words. momo did have a single post. You did cast an empty vote. And looks like LQ voted you not only for voting the "mislynch bait". I mean, so much speaking about your momo vote is strange. Like you contribute, but not really.In post 64, duppin wrote:So all in all, I had no strong reasons at all for voting that early on so I might as well just post a naked vote.
Why tunnel momo? I don't see any reasons for doing thisIn post 178, duppin wrote:I agree with everything LQ said and I still get the impression that it applies to momo as well.
VOTE: Not_mafia(except they are scumbuddies)except duppin trying to seem like he has a strong read and grab towncred for it.
Then this.In post 254, duppin wrote:Hm well, I'm going to share my reads as well.
Moonbird is town. I trust my d1 read.
I think Momo seems very town after yesterday. Not because of one specific post but because of the way he interacted with NM. I thought that was really townie.
I feel better about LQ, but I do think he is capable of playing like that as scum as well. But still leaning town as I believe he is approaching the game the correct way.
GL I initially had as town, but his tunneling on me is starting to weird me out and I also disliked what he did near the end of the day, calling both of the wagons town (especially the NM read, I don't see how he could ever be anything but a null read to you at that point), while trying to setup lynches for d2. It seemed very sketchy. But I did feel like a lot of what he did on d1 came from a town perspective so meh. I'm finding it a bit difficult to get a proper read on him when he is tunneling me like that.
I liked Infinity d1, probably a bit biased though but I actually liked the way he pushed on LaLight for his read on me. Looking back at it it's probably a silly read but whatever. Not a fan of what he is doing today at all though, it seems very opportunistic.
I've already went over my thoughts on LaLight, I find him suspicious.
As for ZZZX, I don't really have a read on you at all.bussing stops.I know I have not very strong reads, but this seems weak even to me.
Yeah, I'm still very fine with duppin.-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
Ah, well.
Town!Person does a thing. He is called scummy for it immediately afterwards. He is like "what the bullshit" and either answers "you're wrong" or ignores it completely.
Scum!Person does a thing. He is called scummy for it immediately afterwards. And he is like "What the hell?! I can't be called scummy, thing i just did is townie because of this, this and this (and that!1!1). You're not only wrong, you're also scummy for calling my perfectly townie post scummy".
That's what i call overdefensiveness and that's what I sensed in you.-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
Before I reply to both, I came to realization that townreads in this game do not matter in no sense. THey don't matter because if you're townread and you're lynched, no one will give a tiniest crap about your reads after you die. Even in the metasense, no one will give a tiniest crap about your playstyle when the game will be over and your "told you so" won't matter at all. That's why I don't try to look townie, I try to catch scum, because that's the only thing that matters.
To the point.
In the life of every person there's the time when one looks thorugh his own ISO.
@duppin, that dialog when LQ didn't understand you was just really unbearable in terms of understanding between two people, you can't say from my post if I was or wasn't inclined to think you're scum, and I definitely did not side with you. It was just so strange LQ doesn't understand the simple request, that I thought that it might be on purpose (that could explain a lot) 70 and 71 (how can one do fancy linking here? ) were written by me before I even read the beginning of the game, whether you believe me or not. I still think that if one votes for lynchbait not knowing the person is one, it's not a good reason to vote for the one.
Actually, your responses are somewhat townie, but can be easily faked. But okay, UNVOTE: .
@Infinity, hey!
If there would be strong scummy aspects of someone's posting, we would all just vote for the guy and lynch him. And win. Looking at the smallest aspects is the thing I love this whole game for. I am sorry, but do you really always look for huge scummy narrative? Don't think so.
About 107-149, look above for clarification. i haven't read anyone back then and only then I reread the whole game.
Vote me, but note, that this is a loss of time. We should be looking for scum (unless you're scum, then carry on).-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
-
-
LaLight
-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
thanks for trying to help me improve, I sincerely appreciate it.
I like your push, i don't think it's AI for anyone. You are not tunneling me, which may be AI for different reasons, mostly the reasons for tunneling. I mean if you tunnel me for shitreads and false contribution, it's somewhat townie, if you tunnel me for flailing or anything else general (like antitown behaviour whatever that means) that would be scummy. Now I don't feel any vibes from you.
D1 reads are mostly shit and I can see duppin really trying to prove he's town and succeed in it. Actually his 331 has a perfect point, I look at people from the PoV of my meta sometimes. Most of the time =D Some people are not overdefensive but overexplanative and it's NAI.-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
LQ have really made some good calls this game and for some time he was the one actually pushing the game and trying to cope with the mechanics in the way it is more profitable for town. No Naked Vote idea is just brilliant for one. Any scum would just sit back instead.
I haven't yet reread GL. Will do in evening, now I am going away from the computer. LQ is the strongest townread, duppin for now is slightly above null (closer to townie), moonbird who I remember to TR D1 disappeared and I need to look if they posted at all D2. For now ZZZX is my top lynch candidate. I am suspicious about you and momo. I am fully null on GL and moonbird. Who else is here?-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
then either I am 10% or you're scum.In post 343, ZZZX wrote:Also I dont mind you scum reading me, I welcome it
But can you at least put some effort into it? Its a statistic that people who scum read me without getting a good reason are 90% scum.-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
Apparently I started to put more suspicion in the game. momo plays townie - but is it a towntell for him? I hope you know what I mean. I don't like it when the person who always plays scummy suddenly starts playing very townie. Something's always wrong there: either they's a pr or scum. Former is not the case.In post 346, Infinity 324 wrote:That's everyone.
See I don't really understand how much changed between 300 and now. You explained duppin, but apparently you're suspicious of momo where you townread him before. You also are null on moon and guilty where you apparently townread them before. Can you explain why you townread those 3 people before and what changed?
Why are me and momo scummy for you.
PEdit: @lalight
Told already about moon: TRed by me D1, then disappeared, then I reread those posts and yeah, for the beginning of D1 they're pretty townie, but it's a Golden Age of townie posts. In the last game I've played, Normal 1903, I was scum and earned quite a lot of towncred solely based on D1. As it turned out, I won this game at 3-person LyLo.
I need to reread GL, that's what I am gonna do next.
Your playstyle is cautious and calculated. May be your meta, but your posts look like you reread them after writing to make them more neutral. scumtell imo.
Also, god it's freaking hard to play with 8 people knowing nothing about them (except that momo is usually mislynched )-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
there's 90% you're scum, you know that?In post 351, LicketyQuickety wrote:ZZZX's content has bee pretty bad. Like its just not Townie. I expect Town to have good points on this instead of talking about peripherals all game, which is what ZZZX is doing. I even told them they need to step up their game and I see no change, still talking about other things other than why people are Town or Scum.
VOTE: ZZZX-
-
LaLight
-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
-
-
LaLight
-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
Wagons
In post 225, GuyInFreezer wrote:Votecount! (1.5)
Not_Mafia (5) - ZZZX, LicketyQuickety, LaLight, duppin, momo
momo (1) - moonbird
LaLight (1) - Infinity 324
Infinity 324 (1) - Not_Mafia
Not Voting - GuiltyLion
With9votes,5to lynch
The deadline is in (expired on 2017-05-10 22:09:40).
ZZZX, LQ and momo were on both wagons. I am pretty sure we lynched 2 townies actually, so that tells us about something. I would say the scumteam is ZZZX/momoIn post 446, GuyInFreezer wrote:VC 2.2 revisited - Oh it's a lynch edition
duppin (2) - GuiltyLion, momo, LicketyQuickety, moonbird, ZZZX
LaLight (1) - Infinity 324
ZZZX (2) - LaLight
Not Voting: duppin
With8votes,5to lynch-
-
LaLight Goon
-
-
LaLight Goon
-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
This, this are scummy as I have told already. Mostly because you don't take into account that Infinity wanted not to blindly believe dead people, but to have their reads noted. You spent 5 posts to say we won't have anything from dead. It didnt look like scumhunting and it didn't looklike anything of any usefulness.
Here I saw your reasons, they are u s e l e s s. Of course no one will vote because the dead said so, but nio one would ignore them completely. I just don't see anything useful in those dead men posts, I still don't.
Here you ignored me. So don't tell only I don't want to participate in this dance
I highlighted the fact. I am not saying we should or we must, I am saying We Have 4 Mislynches. I am not dumb newbie, I understand it's better to win without mislynches or such, why have you sterted hating this phrase? Was a simple fucking fact.
Sure. you think you're unlynchable and you want others to believe in it. You're not tho. And also you're trying to throw shade on me for scumreading you even given that this is a flipless game. You won't flip town, and you can't convince others to lynch me because I scumread you, because we won't see whether you're town.
Are you trying to catch scum or just lynch as many people as you can?
Meta means nothing. If you are aware of your meta you an as well imitate it. I don't buy meta stuff.
Why is this post even here? Why have you remembered it? You haven't scumread me before, why now?
Out of the nowhere. This is your way to play game you mentioned? Look at those reads, have you put a single slice of effort there? Feeling so empty.
What the fuck is wrong with wagon analysis? Or are you 100% sure NM or duppin is scum? How can you be sure? Why don't we look into how votes go? I admit I might be wrong about the usefulness of the process, but come on! I wanted to try!-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
where?In post 493, ZZZX wrote:Also you are contradicting yourself.-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
That's.. dumbIn post 492, ZZZX wrote:
If I get you 5+ games where it happened would you easy my job by self voting since you are lying?In post 489, LaLight wrote:Here I saw your reasons, they are u s e l e s s. Of course no one will vote because the dead said so, but nio one would ignore them completely. I just don't see anything useful in those dead men posts, I still don't.-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
But I didn't mean it that way. In fact, 4 mislynches is not so many.In post 495, ZZZX wrote:
Because it came out in a way of "okey we can waste a lynch or two now on policy and whats so not. Lets not feel bad about it" from how it lead up to itIn post 489, LaLight wrote:I highlighted the fact. I am not saying we should or we must, I am saying We Have 4 Mislynches. I am not dumb newbie, I understand it's better to win without mislynches or such, why have you sterted hating this phrase? Was a simple fucking fact.
When I lynched NM i never gave an excuse and how we shouldn't feel bad. It was a NECESSITY for a game like this without any flips or PRs. I had seen no way to get anything out of NM so him dying was the only way. For you it felt more like "whatever lynch anyone" kind of post-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
it might appear so, but I did not.In post 502, ZZZX wrote:
Well many people sure will confirm that it appeared you did. It ain't only meIn post 498, LaLight wrote:
But I didn't mean it that way. In fact, 4 mislynches is not so many.In post 495, ZZZX wrote:
Because it came out in a way of "okey we can waste a lynch or two now on policy and whats so not. Lets not feel bad about it" from how it lead up to itIn post 489, LaLight wrote:I highlighted the fact. I am not saying we should or we must, I am saying We Have 4 Mislynches. I am not dumb newbie, I understand it's better to win without mislynches or such, why have you sterted hating this phrase? Was a simple fucking fact.
When I lynched NM i never gave an excuse and how we shouldn't feel bad. It was a NECESSITY for a game like this without any flips or PRs. I had seen no way to get anything out of NM so him dying was the only way. For you it felt more like "whatever lynch anyone" kind of post-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
i guess I need to get used to it. Now I think it's a scummy way to play. Antitown one.In post 504, ZZZX wrote:I've always been anti-norm. Been known for it. And its how I roll. Quite a few hate me for it, Others love me for it. As for me? I just like to judge how I wana play by myself.-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
That post I referred to says different things.In post 507, ZZZX wrote:
NM lynch was necessary.In post 489, LaLight wrote:Are you trying to catch scum or just lynch as many people as you can?
And you are trying to pass it off as me trying to lynch as many people as needed?
Are you fucking serious?-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
-
-
LaLight Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 673
- Joined: October 31, 2016
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-