In post 2750, Mathdino wrote:this is one of those weird situations where i feel like the game would've gone very differently if the role PMs were just typed out a bit more
Yeah I should have explained novice more, I guess it's not as well known a modifier as I thought, but I still think town would have won had UCV claimed
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
Wtf is reeeeee btw? I'm seeing it everywhere lately
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
In post 2750, Mathdino wrote:this is one of those weird situations where i feel like the game would've gone very differently if the role PMs were just typed out a bit more
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
In post 2753, Not_Mafia wrote:Yeah I should have explained novice more, I guess it's not as well known a modifier as I thought, but I still think town would have won had UCV claimed
Town would've won if everyone put their egos aside and worked together, they didn't even need PRs really. I managed a win because of dystopia, eddie having not gone through the whole game, had objective eyes which saw through the cloud of bs.
In post 2745, Not_Mafia wrote:RC abuses and harrases everyone, he's just immature and thinks the game revolves around him. he's not malicious
I agree with that
I agree with the both of you, although in my credit I didn't mention anything about RC being malicious, rather, I believe that all the statements I had made about his behavior was true. He is extremely un-fun to play with.
Everyone else in this game has been splendid, including Mathdino (despite being scuMVP #2 ), and I'd be happy to play with you all again.
In post 2743, Maki Harukawa wrote:Kiana don't worry about me it's sweet of you but I'll be fine with RC he's just wrong about his read on me in mafia I don't think he has ill intent.
<3
Oh Maki I'm sure you know very well why I had to replace out of all his games, I'm glad you're fine but I hope he doesn't bully me and you anymore.
like you're not wrong in that RC can be a toxic player but i've never felt the way he is is gendered but that just might be because he's not scared of me as a player as either alignment and i'm just trash at this game
"You are the Joker of mafia players" - Oversoul
"last time I was scum with Firebringer
his first post in the scum PT was "yes I rolled scum!"
I decided to post "haha just don't post that in the main thread", but to get up to date on the main thread first.
His first post in the main thread was "yes I rolled scum!" -popsofctown
This feels like character assassination via equivocation. The situation is described in terms that might be a stretch but aren't technically incorrect - using very loose/liberal definitions, doing something more than once could be characterised as "perpetual" and attacking someone very aggressively in a game could be characterised as "abuse"/"harassment". However, when grouped together the way they have been here, the words also have another meaning in typical usage; when we hear someone "perpetually abuses and harasses women" we would usually understand that to mean that the person in question routinely engages in behaviour towards women that's sexist, creepy, or even violent.
Kiana, it's okay to be upset with how someone behaved in a game or games, and I know that when you're frustrated it can be easy to say whatever you think will be most likely to get people to really hear your frustration. But you have to understand the way you phrased things here is potentially misleading in a way that isn't okay.