Before any potential hammer happens; I wantIn post 278, Ausuka wrote:@Taly; I think that post is null.
Tell me whyIn post 279, texcat wrote:As far as I can tell the case is that Doom was associated (if only in the mind of A50) with Creature, and A50 was scumreading Creature at the time. I see no sign of an independent case on Doom. A50 even started to retract his read on Doom inIn post 276, Taly wrote:3)Your case onDoomfeathersis understated. I cannot "follow you" if I don't know why you're pushing someone.
I know, but I was emphasizing my case onIn post 282, doomfeathers wrote:Shadpearl actually voted Almost50 after Paradox did. Creature and I were the other votes on Almost50 at the time.
Mmmm.... Yes and no. I could have changed my tune, I wasn't upset, honestly.In post 282, doomfeathers wrote:It was a two-line FOS. While I agree that Paradox is scummy, aren't you overreacting a bit? It looked like an honest mistake to me.
But I took issue with multiple things in that FoS, that I've already stated. Which, on top of quite a few other things I haven't been fond of about
Good. That's the point.In post 285, doomfeathers wrote:Questions to Taly about drawing fire: Posting your thoughts makes you easier to read, and thus works toward the Town win condition.
I don't care if I'm NKed.In post 285, doomfeathers wrote:As for getting shot, it doesn't really help anything to survive by playing poorly; scum are going to shoot town anyway. If enough people wear targets, scum won't be able to shoot them all. That's how I see it. Getting shot doesn't mean you lose; your victory is dependent on that of your team, so you can win while dead. If you get killed in the process of winning, that means you're playing well.
As long as my thoughts and voice are known until the point I can't let them be known anymore, then I played to my win condition.