I agree with thatIn post 326, MariaR wrote:@mod request to make the voters or the person being voted for bolded or a dif color it's somewhat hard to read the VC
could just be me
This is my style (admittedly as either alignment). I play mafia for fun, but from the standpoint that it's fun to investigate. If I want to have silly fun, I can mess around with people I know IRL, so you won't see me do that much here. I don't want to create the impression that I hate fun or being silly, but I also will do my best to keep the game from goingIn post 297, pinturicchio wrote:I believe acryon has played consistenly as a "serious" guy in a game where almost everyone else is being troll af. That's a good alibi
My point was more-so to others than you, but your post was the most recent of a ton of "jokey" posts. So it was just me trying to preempt the aforementioned going off the rails.In post 318, Torque wrote:ya know crayon's "im playing with trolls" and whatever was a response to one of my posts. I mean I don't see any relationship between that comment and my post, I'm sure there was something, not just like "look at me being serious while everyone is trolling xdxd"
Want him to explain what the purpose of that comment was but I don't think scumreading him based on that is a thing really
I agree with this.In post 320, Torque wrote:not a fan of how easily swayed gamma seems this game
Haven't gathered much from your posts. Any reads thusfar?In post 328, Dunnstral wrote:me too
He's not saying "I'm not trolling, so I must be town," He's saying "We need to be serious and play the game guys and not just screw around." This can come from either town or scum. In addition, LAMIST posts tend to be more fabricated and forced, because scum does not actually believe what they are saying. That was not forced, yours was.
Would you rather me be locked into my reads and have terrible ones like in Railgun?In post 320, Torque wrote:not a fan of how easily swayed gamma seems this game
Cos I wanted to vote elsewhere, ok boyo?In post 323, Joey_ wrote:Why arent you voting the meat boi?In post 319, Gamma Emerald wrote:without mine I believe twoIn post 318, Torque wrote:ya know crayon's "im playing with trolls" and whatever was a response to one of my posts. I mean I don't see any relationship between that comment and my post, I'm sure there was something, not just like "look at me being serious while everyone is trolling xdxd"
Want him to explain what the purpose of that comment was but I don't think scumreading him based on that is a thing really
ye picturillo's dedication to push crayon is villagery
should i be worried that Joey's mindmelding with me this much
would vote beefy boi but how many votes is he at?
I don't particularly buy into it right now, but I also don't have enough of an issue with it to challenge people on it. His few posts alone aren't enough to sway me one way or the other.In post 334, Joey_ wrote:Why arent you voting the meat boi ? Why arent you even commenting on the wagon itself when you seems to react to the rest of the content
You should likely have some conviction behind your reads, yes.In post 336, Gamma Emerald wrote:Would you rather me be locked into my reads and have terrible ones like in Railgun?In post 320, Torque wrote:not a fan of how easily swayed gamma seems this game
If you're not fishing, then how about you just say? How are guessing games helpful for anyone?In post 338, Gamma Emerald wrote:I give everyone one post to tell me what's wrong with acryon's last post (and btw I already very much know what I'm saying so don't bother screaming anything about me fishing for reasoning)
Haven't had to use this one in a while.In post 341, Gamma Emerald wrote:Because I'm wanting to see if anyone else can see how obviously bad what I'm looking at is
Why say that first line
Because I want to make sure you know I'm not using it lightly.
@gamma this was a trash sentence and the unvote posturizing.In post 333, acryon wrote:I want to re-vote Raskolnikov, but I'll wait until they are back from V/LA and add more.
Of course he agrees with them because I'm voting him, this feels completely unnecessary and as such for show.In post 333, acryon wrote:I agree with this.In post 320, Torque wrote:not a fan of how easily swayed gamma seems this game
I think this might actually be a good point btw, was unsure of what it was exactly trying to say, but yeah I can see the posturing nowIn post 345, Joey_ wrote:@gamma this was a trash sentence and the unvote posturizing.In post 333, acryon wrote:I want to re-vote Raskolnikov, but I'll wait until they are back from V/LA and add more.
THAT being said, some ppl play like that as town too