Mini 1998: Super Smash Mafia for Nintendo Switch! [GAME OVER

[acryon]

@Joey not it.

not a fan of how easily swayed gamma seems this game

I agree with this.

Of course he agrees with them because I'm voting him, this feels completely unnecessary and as such for show.

I'm allowed to dislike the play of someone that's voting me, and I'm not going to avoid saying so just because it looks OMGUS-y.

I always hated mid-post unvote, it feels as if the person is basically unvoting in reaction to whatever he quoted mid-post, i hate that

I typically do a catch-up post each morning where I go through and add things to one post as I encounter them/think about them. I can understand your other point about how it looks like posturing though. Maybe I should've added a FoS? Just not something I typically do.

[InfernoBrafin]

Brafin

@Gamma

Cause he's waiting, but wants to revote him. He should have just kept his vote there in the first place.

[Gamma Emerald]

I always hated mid-post unvote, it feels as if the person is basically unvoting in reaction to whatever he quoted mid-post, i hate that

I don't see scum motivation for this, kinda seems like it would be playstyle

[Gamma Emerald]

@Joey not it.

not a fan of how easily swayed gamma seems this game

I agree with this.

Of course he agrees with them because I'm voting him, this feels completely unnecessary and as such for show.

I'm allowed to dislike the play of someone that's voting me, and I'm not going to avoid saying so just because it looks OMGUS-y.

I always hated mid-post unvote, it feels as if the person is basically unvoting in reaction to whatever he quoted mid-post, i hate that

I typically do a catch-up post each morning where I go through and add things to one post as I encounter them/think about them. I can understand your other point about how it looks like posturing though. Maybe I should've added a FoS? Just not something I typically do.

A FoS would have been better but an actual vote would have been the best choice, I don't think rask was close to lynch

[pinturicchio]

@brafin I didn't want being serious is LAMIST, I said that SAYING that he's being serious and the rest isn't Is LAMIST. In his post: "trolls = anti town; serious and solvy = town; I'm serious = I'm town".

I will not explain you this again, if you don't agree, that's ok, but stop the misrep of my posts.

[acryon]

Brafin

@Gamma

Cause he's waiting, but wants to revote him. He should have just kept his vote there in the first place.

I was voting Joey at that point, who I no longer felt was scum. I wanted to re-vote, but after realizing he was V/LA, I figured I would give Rask a chance to catch up. I think a vote is a lot more meaningful when a person is around to react to it.

[Gamma Emerald]

Brafin

@Gamma

Cause he's waiting, but wants to revote him. He should have just kept his vote there in the first place.

I was voting Joey at that point, who I no longer felt was scum. I wanted to re-vote, but after realizing he was V/LA, I figured I would give Rask a chance to catch up. I think a vote is a lot more meaningful when a person is around to react to it.

ok cool, this is a decent thought
VOTE: Beef
I'm not sure if I'm fully townreading you but I think this is enough for me to remove my vote for now

[Torque]

not a fan of how easily swayed gamma seems this game

Would you rather me be locked into my reads and have terrible ones like in Railgun?

Wow now i feel bad :<
Eh its like, it feels so out of character for you to go like "ok you're right on crayon" when I tried to get ya to vote MathBlade for 3 in game days and it didnt work

[Torque]

@crayon whys rask wolfier than beefy

[acryon]

@crayon whys rask wolfier than beefy

They're actually pretty close. They've both done similar bad things I think (i.e.72,130), but Rask just has a little more content for me to pick up tone from.

I do think Beef looks quite bad so far, but 1) it's hard for me to justify the vote on someone with 5 posts, and 2) I'm naturally more uncertain about pursuing wagons that seem to be picking up steam really quickly. I could definitely see Beef-scum, but it feels early.

[Torque]

#339 implies you don't think beef is wolfy tho

[acryon]

#339 implies you don't think beef is wolfy tho

Well I think he's close to on par with Rask, which is almost wolfy enough to receive a serious vote, but not wolfy enough to be a 4th vote. Hence me not adding onto the wagon, but also not taking too much of an issue with people on it.

[Torque]

you're prolly too cautious about a 4th vote on a wagon but fair

[Index Chan]

I am having a hard time getting into the game and I can't seem to find Kiana anywhere

[pisskop]

Ive been skimming all day, so Ima have to read.

[Gamma Emerald]

I am having a hard time getting into the game and I can't seem to find Kiana anywhere

Thoughts on beef/pin/crayon?

[Raskolnikov]

@Beef can you give more detail about your votes/reads please.

[Raskolnikov]

VOTE: maria
Not a fan of maria here tbh.

[Raskolnikov]

UNVOTE:
actually nvm

Pinterest why would you try to reaction test via softing vig?
What does that hope to accomplish? I think the only thing that even happens there is either nothing or you reveal vig.

[Raskolnikov]

PK what's your inferno scumread based on?

[pinturicchio]

UNVOTE:
actually nvm

Pinterest why would you try to reaction test via softing vig?
What does that hope to accomplish? I think the only thing that even happens there is either nothing or you reveal vig.

Look at the posts before and after my "soft claim" and you'll see much more content after it. But yeah, it was not that good, but I do think I helped in some reads (for example, crayon, who I'm scumreading)

[Raskolnikov]

What's your read on infernoduckface?

[pinturicchio]

What's your read on infernoduckface?

I don't see scum motivation in our 1v1, but it pings me that he is soft-defending crayon when he asked Joey why he was soft-defending Index. It feels... Inconsistent, at least. Why soft-defend someone who, without my case, would be a null read or maaaaaybe a town lean? I mean, I get he "attacks" me because he believes I'm scum, but "defend" crayon? At this moment, Duckface is a Null to me, leaning to scum, and absolutely scum if crayon flipped scum.

Here's the post where Brafin points out that Joey is soft-defending Index:

I doubt

Kokichi's post is AI at all and

I don't really think

Pint's 15 isn't really attempting to start a discussion really. Its nothing that really gets us out of RVS if anything it's just banter

imo

.

Brafin

Opinion tags. My mom was a English major, bud, don't try to slip that past me.
Why are you soft-defending him?

[Raskolnikov]

Unless your definition of soft defending is very open such that half the things in the game are soft defending, I think it's defending without giving much explanation. Duck actually explains his reasoning why he doesn't think it's lamist from acronym pretty thoroughly.

[Raskolnikov]

weeb chan
harumaki

assuming weeb chan is kokichi, why on both