Large Normal 211: Scientific Mafia

[Mulch]

stop

Voting

TIAM

Y;al dumb af

[Gamma Emerald]

I liked LUV and Quicks reason to replace out is maybe understandable
but 2iam opportunistically jumped to their wagon and said "its golden"

VOTE: twoinamillion

why are you making ti about LUV

[Gamma Emerald]

the whole policy thing sounds like something you say to scumbuddies, not neighbors.

talk with me about this, do you have an idea of what he said?

[TwoInAMillion]

Actually, I don't care if people vote me, it just makes them scummier.

[Egg]

the whole policy thing sounds like something you say to scumbuddies, not neighbors.

talk with me about this, do you have an idea of what he said?

Boon mentioned quick saying something along the lines of "hey guys I'm gonna vote boon on policy" and then making a case on boon being scum. It sounds like his motive was just to get boon lynched and continue with the game once he's gone. As scum, that's a way to get rid of a player you don't want to play with and further your win condition at the same time (unless boon is scum too but...). As town, it's just a pointlessly piss poor attitude. But the whole thing about mentioning it as policy in the neighborhood and then trying to make a real case just doesn't fit as being genuine in any way.

[Inferno390]

Actually, I don't care if people vote me, it just makes them scummier.

Well, this is fircking OMGUS.

ALso notie how every time I make a good point, TIAM never speaks of it again?

[Gamma Emerald]

VOTE: Mordin Solus
I don't see us not lynching this today

[Mulch]

JUST VOTE NOSFEARTU

[Firebringer]

Not interested in this game rn

UNVOTE:

[Firebringer]

VOTE: Northsidegal

[Beefster]

I'm honestly caught between TIAM and Quick. I would prefer TIAM for sure, but I do think that there is some legitimate sus on Quick as well.
I'll be on whichever wagon is more likely to go through from here on out, for extra pressure. Consider me Actor for the day.
UNVOTE:

I went back to highlight my lynch all liars policy on Quick and found this

Quick didn’t replace out because he’s scum, he replaced out because he’s scum on my blacklist, and I read him as scummy.

Quick said he wasn’t aware when he replaced in, yet in the neighborhood he brought up trying to policy before I even started posting. He then made a case on me.

He left after I started pushing back.

Replacement is NAI, but the stuff said around it is scummy to me

So Quick has asked to replace out because he didn’t know that FL was here when he came in. Now that I can believe - I’ve replaced in just because I was bored and wanted to play, rather than cherry picking a slot

So for FL to post the above means Quick might have just joined and _then_ realised he was in a game with FL

Now he isn’t posting so I’m assuming that is what was meant

So I don’t think I have enough for lynch all liars, it could just be that after realising who was in the game, he then had an issue.

UNVOTE:

Firebringer was on this wagon and just said policy, what policy please?

Also be interested to see how TIAM reads all that

Both of these look like backing off from pressure.

[Beefster]

Quantity does not equal quality. Nothing wrong with short posts.

Unless they're legitimately bad posts.

Not_Mafia would be a prime example of a player who gives short, reasoning-free posts that aren't scumtells.

[Beefster]

welcome replacements!

guys. TIAM wagon is bad. Please stop.

Arch, you keep saying this. Care to explain why the wagon is bad? It doesn't reflect well on you to defend a scummy player like this.

[Nosferatu]

UNVOTE:

[Beefster]

Scum:
2iam
Inferno
Arch
Nos
maybe Mulch
maybe Gamma

[Beefster]

There's probably a lurker or two somewhere in there.

[Mulch]

Scum:
2iam
Inferno
Arch
Nos
maybe Mulch
maybe Gamma

Vote nos then

[Gamma Emerald]

UNVOTE:

lol scumclaim
cbf to cfd now, lets just hammer quick

[Nosferatu]

UNVOTE:

lol scumclaim
cbf to cfd now, lets just hammer quick

what?

I hopped on this as a policy, the slot's been replaced.

90% of the other reasons were literally just fucking dumb which I said before.

[Gamma Emerald]

and your policy was...?
plus you can say whatever you want but my vote made quick the defacto leading wagon

[Nosferatu]

and your policy was...?
plus you can say whatever you want but my vote made quick the defacto leading wagon

quick replaced out?

the vote leading by one doesn't make the policy wagon not a policy wagon

After the replacement says something I'll either put my vote back or not, it's not that hard.

[Gamma Emerald]

how the fuck is replacing out policy worthy

[Nosferatu]

you're telling me you've never been in a game with a policy vote on a slot that replaced out

[texcat]

Hi all. I haven't read the latest 10 pages of so, but hope to finish them soon.

VOTE: Mordin Solus
I don't see us not lynching this today

This is the LUV slot, right? I can get behind this lynch.

VOTE: Mordin

Not interested in this game rn

UNVOTE:

UNVOTE:

Both of these unvotes look suspicious to me. Gamma, why did you call out Nos, but not Fire?

[Mulch]

I'm down to lynch the LUV slot