So, as far as what rolf posted, like, I feel like I responded to him once, he completely ignored it and proceeded to say exactly the same things again. So that's annoying. I also get the sense he's the type who you can't exactly reason with, as he's going to just feel the way he feels. But I guess we shall see.
First time he says anything is #69, which is just a vote. Fine. I don't care that much he didn't say why.
Re-affirms the suspicion in #209, again without saying why.
Then there was #244 where he finally explained the vote - by citing something I did not do. :/
i particularly dislike where he implies that he'll just keep on tunneling on eddie and pine tomorrow pretty much regardless of what happens today
He does sort of correct himself in the next post, when he can't find my saying what he claims I had said, but then literally goes on to say "whatever" he's still scum anyway. Super.
He then asked me some questions directly for the first time, like he was trying to engage me. Which I responded to, in #273, to the sound of deafening silence.
Goes back to voting me in #573, and as far as I can tell, it's all about my "vote-parking." Like, is he seriously still voting for Pine, how scummy is that? but also accuses me of throwing "shade" on the side of select other wagons.
Then, his big "case." Which consists entirely of him pointing out where I expressed suspicions of Eddie early.
And, gee, yes, that happened. I had some early suspicion of Eddie, because of how he was posting. He glosses over my #125 where I explained more or less exactly what I was thinking at the time because it has too many words. He continues to characterize this as "shading" Eddie, as opposed to, what? Just expressing a suspicion?
And then he jumps to my #214 about KMD, and characterizes this as some kind of...flip? Because I'm now expressing suspicion of KMD for his Eddie vote. He has seemingly missed #202, where I started to come around on Eddie, and also seemingly missed the entire context of #214, where I had been specifically waiting to see how KMD responded to Eddie's accusation, and KMD's response was super lackluster.
He
really
doesn't like that I express suspicions of KMD and also Tywin while still voting for Pine. I've explained this too. I then gave more or less sequential reads on all of them (though, the Tywin one wasn't even a true read) just by way of explaining my current stances on people, but apparently this is more evidence to rolf, because...? Why am I explaining my suspicions of people I am not currently voting for?
Is that really it?
He asserts there has never been momentum against Pine, which I guess I would dispute. Plenty of people have expressed suspicion, though I certainly concede he's not been subject of a major wagon yet.
He then concludes by jumping through a somewhat twisted logical hoop to conclude that he people I have been "shading" (in this case KMD and Tywin, I have no idea what he thinks about Eddie) are Town, while the person I am
voting
(but not
pushing,
see) is my actual scumbuddy.
There is literally nothing to even respond to here, except to acknowledge that I have not been using my vote this game. I half wonder if I hadn't even voted at all if the entire case would evaporate in a puff of smoke, or if that would just then be it's own thing. Because it's scummy to express suspicion of people without voting for them (it's really not).
What about this are other people agreeing with?
I see where Magna has his own post. I'll try to respond to that tomorrow.
