Micro 803: The Coalition

Micro Games (9 players or fewer). Archived during the 2023 queue overhaul.
User avatar
Wisdom
Wisdom
Of the One
User avatar
User avatar
Wisdom
Of the One
Of the One
Posts: 51319
Joined: September 20, 2012

Post Post #125 (ISO) » Sun May 20, 2018 3:16 am

Post by Wisdom »

mylo, invsibility and neenie; talk to us about the rest of your reads
User avatar
Hiraki
Hiraki
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Hiraki
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 12372
Joined: September 16, 2010

Post Post #126 (ISO) » Sun May 20, 2018 3:34 am

Post by Hiraki »

In post 124, Wisdom wrote:
In post 122, Hiraki wrote:Then why hasn't she asked me why I'm scumreading her?
You're both put off by the other not doing what you expect them to
It doesn't work like that
I'm pretty sure not having the right mindset is how it works.
User avatar
Ausuka
Ausuka
she/her
Team Mafia Winner

User avatar
User avatar
Ausuka
she/her
Team Mafia Winner

Team Mafia Winner

Posts: 11318
Joined: July 21, 2017
Pronoun: she/her
Location: Coventry, UK

Post Post #127 (ISO) » Sun May 20, 2018 3:52 am

Post by Ausuka »

In post 120, Hiraki wrote:
In post 106, Ausuka wrote:Hiraki's read on me is hilariously fake and he should never be allowed into any townbloc. Consider the fact that
Correct, within the span of 3 posts on 2 pages, you had 2 people healed and 1 person hurt. You have 3 solid reads by page 2? Really? And you're calling me fake?
No, I don't exactly have "solid reads" but I also don't need "solid reads" to state what my reads are, and that's basically what I was doing. Why can't I heal townleans and hurt scumleans? It's not like there was no content at that point for me to get reads from.
In post 120, Hiraki wrote: Then to justify it your response is:
In post 47, Ausuka wrote:gut
If it's gut, and it's page 2, why did you feel the need to vote?
... what? I voted because it's a way to indicate reads. There is no purpose whatsoever to not voting. It's a good practice in general.
In post 120, Hiraki wrote:You never asked any questions and you just went right for it. That doesn't seem town motivated to me.
What am I supposed to ask? "Hey Invisibility, why do you ping me? I expect an 100 word essay and I want it by Thursday." or something?
In post 120, Hiraki wrote:
In post 84, Ausuka wrote:Considering the content I've given so far scumreading me feels flat-out disingenuous.
Which again reiterates that you have no intention of figuring out the game but you're just going to let it slide super hard.
I have no intention of figuring out the game because I don't think someone scumreading me just because I had 3 reads on page 2 is realistic??? I obviously do have intentions of figuring out the game. I have reads, I've shared them, and I've got a 5-player bloc that I think solves the game. In comparison, you've only healed the popular townreads and tunneled on me.
In post 120, Hiraki wrote:
In post 106, Ausuka wrote:Hiraki had no reaction.
I don't really react to things like a Youtuber.
That's not the point I was making and you know it. :]
And this becomes super ironic REALLY quickly, because then you post this;
In post 120, Hiraki wrote: I think the best point to look at how much snipping Ausuka is doing here to look for specific key text and phrases rather than actively questioning is here:
after you literally just snipped my post to respond to something completely out of context.
Also snipping quotes to respond to the bits you want to respond to is absolutely not a scumtell and I don't think town!hikari thinks it is? Like, I can give links if you want but I don't know why I need to.
In post 120, Hiraki wrote:
In post 112, Ausuka wrote:
In post 109, Wisdom wrote:I dont agree with ausuka
Who's scum then?
Note that the original quote was -
In post 109, Wisdom wrote:I dont agree with ausuka but shes probably town

HEAL: ausuka
Yet Ausuka went right onto the point that might have insinuated her a little as scum. She doesn't even bring up the point that Wisdom is TRing her.
HE LITERALLY SAID I WAS PROBABLY TOWN. And I'm worried about him insinuating me as scum? What? He literally just said he was disagreeing with my reads but I was town. If I'm scum that's just as good to me as agreeing with me and calling me town.
And why do I need to bring up the fact that Wisdom is TRing me? What do you want me to say? "Oh jolly gee Wisdom, thank you so much for townreading me! I really appreciate that a lot. Thank you!!!!" or something? If I have nothing to say, I'm not going to respond to it.
In post 122, Hiraki wrote:Then why hasn't she asked me why I'm scumreading her?
Why should I ask you for reasoning? If there's reasoning you want to give, just share it; otherwise I'll just assume there's nothing you want to say about it, otherwise you would've just, you know, given your reasoning?
No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.
User avatar
Mathdino
Mathdino
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Mathdino
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 14337
Joined: February 24, 2013
Location: Right Behind You

Post Post #128 (ISO) » Sun May 20, 2018 4:04 am

Post by Mathdino »

In post 123, Wisdom wrote:HEAL: hiraki
HURT: math
I assume this is because I'm not posting content
User avatar
Mathdino
Mathdino
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Mathdino
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 14337
Joined: February 24, 2013
Location: Right Behind You

Post Post #129 (ISO) » Sun May 20, 2018 4:05 am

Post by Mathdino »

Believe it or not, this is partially intentional

I think I have a model for how scum behaves in this setup but observer effect can ruin it on page 6
User avatar
Wisdom
Wisdom
Of the One
User avatar
User avatar
Wisdom
Of the One
Of the One
Posts: 51319
Joined: September 20, 2012

Post Post #130 (ISO) » Sun May 20, 2018 4:41 am

Post by Wisdom »

sure but that doesnt help me read you
I want to know your thoughts
User avatar
Mathdino
Mathdino
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Mathdino
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 14337
Joined: February 24, 2013
Location: Right Behind You

Post Post #131 (ISO) » Sun May 20, 2018 4:46 am

Post by Mathdino »

I'm concerned that since scums wincon requires at least one of them to temporarily hardcore town it up
It might be impossible to win d1
And an info coalition might be better than an attempt at winning
User avatar
Ausuka
Ausuka
she/her
Team Mafia Winner

User avatar
User avatar
Ausuka
she/her
Team Mafia Winner

Team Mafia Winner

Posts: 11318
Joined: July 21, 2017
Pronoun: she/her
Location: Coventry, UK

Post Post #132 (ISO) » Sun May 20, 2018 4:49 am

Post by Ausuka »

If scum could just hardtown themselves whenever they wanted, scum would win 100% of games. :P

I think something that's potentially more useful is to look at who isn't trying to lock themselves as town; for example I think a NM/Neenie team is pretty unviable atm.
No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.
User avatar
Mathdino
Mathdino
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Mathdino
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 14337
Joined: February 24, 2013
Location: Right Behind You

Post Post #133 (ISO) » Sun May 20, 2018 4:50 am

Post by Mathdino »

Like this is low stakes and low responsibility
It feels like it's easier to town it up here than any other type of setup, even kingmaker
That's part of why I'm not trying to powertown
Seems pointless, NAI, and would impact my actual reading ability
User avatar
Mathdino
Mathdino
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Mathdino
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 14337
Joined: February 24, 2013
Location: Right Behind You

Post Post #134 (ISO) » Sun May 20, 2018 4:50 am

Post by Mathdino »

You can blame a wagon for being wrong
Can't really blame the coalition
Everyone has so much less responsibility here
User avatar
Wisdom
Wisdom
Of the One
User avatar
User avatar
Wisdom
Of the One
Of the One
Posts: 51319
Joined: September 20, 2012

Post Post #135 (ISO) » Sun May 20, 2018 4:51 am

Post by Wisdom »

what do you mean by info coalition
if we fail to win we get info from it regardless
User avatar
Mathdino
Mathdino
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Mathdino
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 14337
Joined: February 24, 2013
Location: Right Behind You

Post Post #136 (ISO) » Sun May 20, 2018 4:53 am

Post by Mathdino »

As in we should agree on who's the most lynchable within the coalition if and when things go wrong
If we have 3 or 4 definite townreads, one should be difficult to read and likely to win as scum
User avatar
Wisdom
Wisdom
Of the One
User avatar
User avatar
Wisdom
Of the One
Of the One
Posts: 51319
Joined: September 20, 2012

Post Post #137 (ISO) » Sun May 20, 2018 4:56 am

Post by Wisdom »

i dont get it
if someone is hard to read and good as scum they should just stay outside the coalition
User avatar
Wisdom
Wisdom
Of the One
User avatar
User avatar
Wisdom
Of the One
Of the One
Posts: 51319
Joined: September 20, 2012

Post Post #138 (ISO) » Sun May 20, 2018 4:59 am

Post by Wisdom »

the way i see it;
town play like town
other town identify them
scum are forced to tryhard and will likely slip up if theyre not very good scum
we go for the win and if we miss we see who's most likely to be scum in the coalition
User avatar
Mathdino
Mathdino
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Mathdino
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 14337
Joined: February 24, 2013
Location: Right Behind You

Post Post #139 (ISO) » Sun May 20, 2018 4:59 am

Post by Mathdino »

I mean that's a decent reason to keep you outside the coalition :lol:

I guess I'm psyching myself out

The thing is, if and when this fails, we ALWAYS lynch inside the coalition directly after

And then we're on our own in 1:6 mountainous even if we succeed

So I'm trying to figure out what puts us in the best position

I. E. If someone is easy to read later on, they should stay out
User avatar
Wisdom
Wisdom
Of the One
User avatar
User avatar
Wisdom
Of the One
Of the One
Posts: 51319
Joined: September 20, 2012

Post Post #140 (ISO) » Sun May 20, 2018 5:03 am

Post by Wisdom »

alright
we have a margin of two townies being outside
along with two scumreads we could have those two be people who will be best at the game afterwards
User avatar
Wisdom
Wisdom
Of the One
User avatar
User avatar
Wisdom
Of the One
Of the One
Posts: 51319
Joined: September 20, 2012

Post Post #141 (ISO) » Sun May 20, 2018 5:08 am

Post by Wisdom »

though idk
i suppose whether youre town inside a failed coalition or town outside
you need to be someone who can be read
ie if we put the easily readable town outside and the harder inside we might have less of a chance succeeding at lynching the scum in a failed coalition
User avatar
Wisdom
Wisdom
Of the One
User avatar
User avatar
Wisdom
Of the One
Of the One
Posts: 51319
Joined: September 20, 2012

Post Post #142 (ISO) » Sun May 20, 2018 5:10 am

Post by Wisdom »

i think we should just go for 5 most town and work it from there if it fails
User avatar
Hiraki
Hiraki
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Hiraki
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 12372
Joined: September 16, 2010

Post Post #143 (ISO) » Sun May 20, 2018 5:59 am

Post by Hiraki »

Gonna try something new in a few games. Everytime I write long posts, I'm gonna bold what I think are the most important points for other people to read. Boldnotes, if you will.
In post 127, Ausuka wrote:... what? I voted because it's a way to indicate reads. There is no purpose whatsoever to not voting. It's a good practice in general.
Gut reads. On page 2. Mmmk.
In post 127, Ausuka wrote:What am I supposed to ask? "Hey Invisibility, why do you ping me? I expect an 100 word essay and I want it by Thursday." or something?
Pretty disingenuous and completely misses the point. I'd hope that maybe your town meta is better than this.

You should try and figure out why your reads are doing something abnormal from town behavior.
In post 127, Ausuka wrote:I have no intention of figuring out the game because I don't think someone scumreading me just because I had 3 reads on page 2 is realistic??? I obviously do have intentions of figuring out the game. I have reads, I've shared them, and I've got a 5-player bloc that I think solves the game. In comparison, you've only healed the popular townreads and tunneled on me.
This is a two parter:
In post 127, Ausuka wrote:I have no intention of figuring out the game because I don't think someone scumreading me just because I had 3 reads on page 2 is realistic??? I obviously do have intentions of figuring out the game. I have reads, I've shared them, and I've got a 5-player bloc that I think solves the game.
On page 6? That gut must be pretty strong.
In post 127, Ausuka wrote:In comparison, you've only healed the popular townreads and tunneled on me.
Should I not be healing townreads? What's the difference if they're popular? This is a paradox in itself. Ausuka is backhandedly saying that I'm just sheeping people and then also reminds everyone that I'm tunneling on someone who is a "popular townread". This is probably one of the worst backhands I've seen.
In post 127, Ausuka wrote:That's not the point I was making and you know it.
Actually, it quite clearly was. I don't react to things unless they require reaction your post:
In post 106, Ausuka wrote:Clearly, the fact that I scumread Invisibility didn't mean anything to him (even though that's pretty much the only thing in those posts that can be read into) considering that when Mathdino did this;

Hiraki had no reaction.
I didn't include the MathDino quote because I didn't really care to edit. Ausuka wanted me to talk about something that I didn't talk about. I don't even get what this means except that I didn't react to it.

Why should I have commented on MathDino's SR? It's pretty clear he's not in the game right now.
In post 127, Ausuka wrote:after you literally just snipped my post to respond to something completely out of context.
Yeah, for the same reason, because I didn't want to deal with the quotes. The same intention is still there and the fact that you are actually calling me out on misrepping a post when I clearly addressed the point is super scummy.

In post 127, Ausuka wrote:Also snipping quotes to respond to the bits you want to respond to is absolutely not a scumtell and I don't think town!hikari thinks it is? Like, I can give links if you want but I don't know why I need to.
Never said this. Here's what I said - which you quoted but either didn't read or are just trying to misrep:
In post 120, Hiraki wrote:I think the best point to look at how much snipping Ausuka is doing here to look for specific key text and phrases rather than actively questioning is here:
Which refers to something you just brought up next in the post where you're going for zingers rather than comprehensive reads.
In post 127, Ausuka wrote:HE LITERALLY SAID I WAS PROBABLY TOWN. And I'm worried about him insinuating me as scum? What? He literally just said he was disagreeing with my reads but I was town. If I'm scum that's just as good to me as agreeing with me and calling me town.
Yeah, but I don't think you read that far. The above kind of proves that.
In post 127, Ausuka wrote:Why should I ask you for reasoning? If there's reasoning you want to give, just share it; otherwise I'll just assume there's nothing you want to say about it, otherwise you would've just, you know, given your reasoning?
Right - we're still on 4 people townbloc all on gut.

In post 134, Mathdino wrote:Can't really blame the coalition
Except if it's not yours. Won't fail if you just follow me.
User avatar
Invisibility
Invisibility
he or she
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Invisibility
he or she
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5911
Joined: April 17, 2018
Pronoun: he or she

Post Post #144 (ISO) » Sun May 20, 2018 6:00 am

Post by Invisibility »

feel good about wisdom HEAL: Wisdom
Invisibility is actually AWESOME!
User avatar
Hiraki
Hiraki
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Hiraki
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 12372
Joined: September 16, 2010

Post Post #145 (ISO) » Sun May 20, 2018 6:02 am

Post by Hiraki »

In post 136, Mathdino wrote:As in we should agree on who's the most lynchable within the coalition if and when things go wrong
If we have 3 or 4 definite townreads, one should be difficult to read and likely to win as scum
I thought about this a little more. I'm not a fan. Too much risk.
User avatar
Mathdino
Mathdino
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Mathdino
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 14337
Joined: February 24, 2013
Location: Right Behind You

Post Post #146 (ISO) » Sun May 20, 2018 6:04 am

Post by Mathdino »

Okay so I'd actually like to fuck the scum over and put them both in the coalition

My proposal:
1. An obvtownie that everyone agrees to neverlynch
2. Mathdino, because otherwise there's gonna be shittons of paranoia about me
3/4. Both scum
5. The 3rd pick for scum

Lynch everyone except the obvtownie and win
User avatar
Wisdom
Wisdom
Of the One
User avatar
User avatar
Wisdom
Of the One
Of the One
Posts: 51319
Joined: September 20, 2012

Post Post #147 (ISO) » Sun May 20, 2018 6:08 am

Post by Wisdom »

if we only put one scum in the coalition and we lynch them last we're in 5:1 with people we townread

how is that any better

not to mention that deletes any possibility of winning d1
User avatar
Wisdom
Wisdom
Of the One
User avatar
User avatar
Wisdom
Of the One
Of the One
Posts: 51319
Joined: September 20, 2012

Post Post #148 (ISO) » Sun May 20, 2018 6:08 am

Post by Wisdom »

4:1*
User avatar
Mathdino
Mathdino
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Mathdino
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 14337
Joined: February 24, 2013
Location: Right Behind You

Post Post #149 (ISO) » Sun May 20, 2018 6:19 am

Post by Mathdino »

Then we'd better put both scum in amirite

Return to “Mayfair Club [Micro Games]”