In post 353, Lefty wrote: In post 346, Gustavo wrote: In post 343, Lefty wrote: In post 326, Gustavo wrote:Lefty “looking” for people taking the easy shots meanwhile that’s exactly what he’s guilty of
Playing the victim now?
How is pushing completely against the grain taking an easy shot?
I’m not playing the victim. I’m calling it as I see it. You aren’t pushing against the grain. Others have indicated they scum read me or don’t town read me. That’s going with the grain sir.
You implied I called somebody scum when I didn’t and you said you scum read me for something town could do.
That’s taking easy shots.
I was the first to engage you about anything.
I called you a gut scum read yesterday and said exactly why. The way you’ve been arguing with my today doesn’t really change my original perception. You never voted Invis but you did attack in that instance and ended with a nice shade on their slot.
Invis was guilty of the very thing he was accusing somebody else for. Much like you are guilty of what you are accusing me of.
If calling that out is scummy, I’m fine with that but people should be holding players to a higher standard.
If I view invis for his push on Byron. Then your scum read on me is justified
If I tell invis he’s guilty of the things he’s scum reading Byron for (which is the truth) then you as town absolutely have I reason to scum read me. You as town should be agreeing with me.
“Ooh you make good sense, you must be scum” is fucking absurd.