In post 734, Tommy Egan wrote:On mobile so will respond to Nos when I'm back on laptop.
@tchill if invis/Byron are mislynch bait then surely they are in criteria as your d1/2/3 lynches as they would be a liability to town?
*cough*Tchill*cough*
In post 734, Tommy Egan wrote:On mobile so will respond to Nos when I'm back on laptop.
@tchill if invis/Byron are mislynch bait then surely they are in criteria as your d1/2/3 lynches as they would be a liability to town?
I see no reason for town to make this post without any questions or outlining reasons other than the quote itself.In post 86, ByronVilla wrote:OK now my vote is serious.In post 84, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:There may be something that tells me you're town - but I want to ignore it for now.
Again gets a bit too edgy, I don't see town hitting out with the defence of leave me alone i'm learning, I mean the fact he's in the normal queue and not the newbie leaves him in a situation of sink or swim and he obviously believed in himself enough to sign up to games outwith the newbie queue.In post 124, ByronVilla wrote:Ok don't OMGUS. I am learning to play this game so let me, being an ass helps no-one. Just because you said 'oh guys I have info on how Lefty's town but I'm ignoring it', it doesn't excuse you from not giving us that information. You're still withholding information whether or not you tell us you have that information.In post 122, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:And again, you would not have known I was 'witholding' informationa had I not stated it openly in a post.
Stop surface level reading and learn to Mafia bro.
I mean being an ass is a scumtell for me. I'll admit it's more anti-town than scummy, but I don't see town motivation in being confrontational, avoiding questions and in general just not giving information away. Scum motivation is in this, as it throws off town and blocks the information that they can work with.Gustavo wrote:Why would scum do this? How do you differentiate scummy vs just being an assIn post 116, ByronVilla wrote:Scumread: BBT - Says stuff with no reason, and then when asked to elaborate he just ignores them or makes a snarky comment. It's probably me having a personal gripe, but withholding information from town is one of the scummiest things you can do imo, and this is a prime example.
This is either town that has taken advice of others and used it wisely or scum that has backed down from a losing battle and i'm not quite sure which.In post 250, ByronVilla wrote:My read on you has changed slightly, you're still an ass but scum wouldn't want to be an ass for the most part so you're like a slight scum lean now. (Ay you wanna answer that question still?)In post 249, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Byron, why the change?
Has your read on me changed or is the read on Invis stronger?
Invis I just feel off about. Feels like they've just bounced around wagons with no real solid reads. Invis, can you give us a readlist if possible (Ideally with reasonings)? You keep saying so-and-so are town/scum but with no real explanation behind each read. Feels like a weirdly safe way of playing that I'm not a fan of.
I was at college at this point. I elaborated in 107 when I got home, but it was that specific post that pinged me about BBT.In post 826, Tommy Egan wrote:I see no reason for town to make this post without any questions or outlining reasons other than the quote itself.In post 86, ByronVilla wrote:OK now my vote is serious.In post 84, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:There may be something that tells me you're town - but I want to ignore it for now.
I don't think I qualify for newbie queue, I've played two games as newbie and three games out of newbie so I don't think I can join another newbie gameIn post 826, Tommy Egan wrote:Again gets a bit too edgy, I don't see town hitting out with the defence of leave me alone i'm learning, I mean the fact he's in the normal queue and not the newbie leaves him in a situation of sink or swim and he obviously believed in himself enough to sign up to games outwith the newbie queue.In post 124, ByronVilla wrote:Ok don't OMGUS. I am learning to play this game so let me, being an ass helps no-one. Just because you said 'oh guys I have info on how Lefty's town but I'm ignoring it', it doesn't excuse you from not giving us that information. You're still withholding information whether or not you tell us you have that information.In post 122, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:And again, you would not have known I was 'witholding' informationa had I not stated it openly in a post.
Stop surface level reading and learn to Mafia bro.
I mean being an ass is a scumtell for me. I'll admit it's more anti-town than scummy, but I don't see town motivation in being confrontational, avoiding questions and in general just not giving information away. Scum motivation is in this, as it throws off town and blocks the information that they can work with.Gustavo wrote:Why would scum do this? How do you differentiate scummy vs just being an assIn post 116, ByronVilla wrote:Scumread: BBT - Says stuff with no reason, and then when asked to elaborate he just ignores them or makes a snarky comment. It's probably me having a personal gripe, but withholding information from town is one of the scummiest things you can do imo, and this is a prime example.
I mean of course I'm gonna say the former but yeah I'm trying to play at least a bit more measured after my pretty ridiculous play in the me vs BBT squabble.In post 826, Tommy Egan wrote:This is either town that has taken advice of others and used it wisely or scum that has backed down from a losing battle and i'm not quite sure which.In post 250, ByronVilla wrote:My read on you has changed slightly, you're still an ass but scum wouldn't want to be an ass for the most part so you're like a slight scum lean now. (Ay you wanna answer that question still?)In post 249, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Byron, why the change?
Has your read on me changed or is the read on Invis stronger?
Invis I just feel off about. Feels like they've just bounced around wagons with no real solid reads. Invis, can you give us a readlist if possible (Ideally with reasonings)? You keep saying so-and-so are town/scum but with no real explanation behind each read. Feels like a weirdly safe way of playing that I'm not a fan of.
Please do. Because nobody wants to lynch my scum reads and if invisibility gets lynched and flips town I’m done with this game.In post 814, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Something real fishy is going on and if anybody wants to flash wagon Byron or Gus I'm absolutely 100% interested in doing that.
Are you outside of the US? I assumed that we were the same age.In post 827, ByronVilla wrote:I was at college at this point.
how did i accidentally type assumedIn post 829, Nosferatu wrote:I was under the impression that
invis and byron will never be NK'd so yes you are correct.In post 825, Tommy Egan wrote:In post 734, Tommy Egan wrote:On mobile so will respond to Nos when I'm back on laptop.
@tchill if invis/Byron are mislynch bait then surely they are in criteria as your d1/2/3 lynches as they would be a liability to town?
*cough*Tchill*cough*
oh please. Quite the melodramatic outlook.In post 828, Gustavo wrote:Please do. Because nobody wants to lynch my scum reads and if invisibility gets lynched and flips town I’m done with this game.In post 814, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Something real fishy is going on and if anybody wants to flash wagon Byron or Gus I'm absolutely 100% interested in doing that.
I mean your d1 play is a joke so I guess you can.In post 838, Invisibility wrote:hey dude can i make a joke thanks
In post 833, Garmr wrote:I think invisibility should be lynched. Ascetic should claim at start as to not waste towns power roles. It makes me think it's a fake claim.
His early game was incredibly scummy; His votes were jumpy and he picked every big wagon. He jumped on byronvilla because of he misunderstood the reaction from the masses and thought he could push that lynch.
He then votes geo when asked by BBT what his thoughts are. I would think he would of gone back to voting him earlier as town since he was a earlier scum read.
His latter plays seem null but they don't really match a natural progression of scum hunting. They seem to be adapting to what he think towns wants.
Also just throwing this out I think Tommy Egan is town
nothing in garmr's post is wrong which is why im TRing him.In post 841, Invisibility wrote:tchill, are you townreading garmr because he's scumreading me?
College in the UK is 16-18 y/oIn post 829, Nosferatu wrote:Are you outside of the US? I assumed that we were the same age.In post 827, ByronVilla wrote:I was at college at this point.
Are you scumreading Garmr? He's been the tiniest player all game.In post 841, Invisibility wrote:tchill, are you townreading garmr because he's scumreading me?
Tiniest player??? What do you mean by that?In post 847, wilky wrote:Are you scumreading Garmr? He's been the tiniest player all game.In post 841, Invisibility wrote:tchill, are you townreading garmr because he's scumreading me?
In post 847, wilky wrote:Are you scumreading Garmr? He's been the tiniest player all game.In post 841, Invisibility wrote:tchill, are you townreading garmr because he's scumreading me?