with 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
day one will end in (expired on 2018-08-05 09:00:00)
- skitter30 v/la Fridays & Saturdays
- quack
This sounds like something someone who snuck onto the wagon would sayIn post 848, OkaPoka wrote:the wagon blew up and it was basically a meme
chance that scum didn't even have time to sneak on
This sounds like something someone who failed to sneak onto the wagon would sayIn post 853, Skygazer wrote:This sounds like something someone who snuck onto the wagon would sayIn post 848, OkaPoka wrote:the wagon blew up and it was basically a meme
chance that scum didn't even have time to sneak on
I think this is possibly a reasonable suggestion but I'm worried we'll end up doing too much set-up spec work for the scumIn post 856, Enigma wrote:If a town vig shot ruru, this might be useful information to share? No judging
Could help understanding reactions to the PGO claim, and also make a bit of sense of the night actions.
I disagree with this. If a town vig did shoot ruru, they're effectively a VT now and this would narrow the pool of possible TPRs for scum.In post 856, Enigma wrote:If a town vig shot ruru, this might be useful information to share? No judging
Could help understanding reactions to the PGO claim, and also make a bit of sense of the night actions.
On the other hand, potential TPRs could get caught out by a scum PGO activation - so this might also balance the risks involved. And I feel claiming would add some more certainty for everyone in interpreting D1 and N1 activities, rather than second guessing what ifs.In post 860, ofrhz wrote:I disagree with this. If a town vig did shoot ruru, they're effectively a VT now and this would narrow the pool of possible TPRs for scum.In post 856, Enigma wrote:If a town vig shot ruru, this might be useful information to share? No judging
Could help understanding reactions to the PGO claim, and also make a bit of sense of the night actions.
I am still suspicious of AP following Invs flip.In post 801, AP wrote:I concur. I never trusted that AP guys. He's so cheeky and smug too. I'd much rather Jackie Chan in The Tuxedo, tbh. (Well, the bonus is JLH is still in The Tuxedo)In post 774, Enigma wrote:PS: if he flips red, me feels SvS with AP.
I bet there is at least one scum in the bolded (hint, it's not me).In post 459, Invisibility wrote:Sando - leantown
skitter30 - town
AP - null
brassherald - slight townlean
BuJaber - townlean
Ausuka - town
Skygazer - null
vulcan logician - siteflaked?
ceejayvinoya - null
ruru - townlean actually
ofrhz - town
OkaPoka - townlean
Enigma - null
{AP, Skygazer, Ceejay, Enigma, vulcan}
VOTE: vulcan logician
I imagine there is at least one scum on that wagon, just too easy of a reason not to.In post 332, the worst wrote:VOTE COUNT 1.9
Enigma (6)~ Ausuka, Skygazer,ruru, ofrhz, skitter30, ceejayvinoya,
I also suspect there is at least one scum who jumped onto the Invs wagon, probably late when they realised my wagon was a no go for D1.In post 833, the worst wrote:VOTE COUNT 1.22
Invisibility (8)~ruru, skitter30, Enigma, OkaPoka, Cardi B, ofrhz, ceejayvinoya, AP,
If Vig shot Ruru N1 they're not the greatest, so I'm gonna assume they didn't.In post 839, Skygazer wrote:If a vig shot the number one draft pick for fake claiming PGO then that'd be really stupid. Honestly pretty likely that scum had gotten that pick if they felt safe enough to make that kill.
No they didn't actually say it.In post 868, OkaPoka wrote:where did skygazer say this ?
On the other hand, if scum have the PGO/vig pair and if a townie somewhere mid/top of the draft went for the same pair and rolled VT - then it is possible from PoE to also get an idea of possible scum near the top of the draft.In post 867, Sando wrote:So yes, I'd say if mafia end up not having the pgo slot then we can probably start looking pretty hard at Skygazer.