In post 7789, stungun0404 wrote:back to reviewing the answers to my questions last day phase, which i admittedly got sidetracked from. i plan to be one of scum’s worst nightmares so long as i am alive, so i need to focus on this
gamma emerald is in my possibly scumpool: his answer yesterday on my question can be seen in 5084, wherein he states human sequencer (the predecessor of creature) was kinda scummy but not enough for him to scumread, and that gamma did not remember creature being in the game so that was instant scumpoints out of the gate, and asked me where i had previously asked this or if i had during d2 — but i was not in the game on d2, lol.
reads my long post on creature’s slot later and concludes human sequencer replace-out is nai as they are kinda flaky.
gamma emerald takes a stance thinking creature is scummy, even though he primarily focuses on the titus slot yesterday, who was scum - so that might be something to note as a plausible distancing attempt if anywhere there was one.
but overall, i like that he took a definite stance rather than beating around the bush with his answer here.
——————————-
apart from that, gamma emerald votes kokichi for leader d1 “to see what he would do with the power”, lol. idk if that is town or scum tbh, because there isn’t a protown reason and this could be genuine, but it sure is interesting.
296 from gamma emerald is super strange, given that numbers flipped scum.
309 is kinda awkward too in response to titus.
In post 310, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 271, Cerberus v666 wrote:
I'm pretty sure purely random out of 5/22 is almost guaranteed to wind up with a scum. Purely random with a smaller number of people selected *might* be optimal, but really, I think that's a silly line to take.
huh?
why is gamma questioning cerb here? seems to be going with titus’s suggestion of randomization of pr’s, which is slightly concerning.
hmm, i need to take a serious look at gamma here guys!