The game we played together where you thought I was scummy and basically wouldn’t vote elsewhere or even unvote when asked.In post 73, EzekelRAGE wrote:Provide proof, otherwise this reads to me like you were trying to add fire to a wagon.In post 72, Doughboy wrote:No I made a statement based off my experience of you. 1 game is still better than no games.In post 69, EzekelRAGE wrote:You make this statement like we have played in a number of games.
That’s on you. If you interpreted one way I can’t control that.In post 74, EzekelRAGE wrote:My problem is your wording. It’s very misleading. If you said I played 1 game with rage and he seemed to vote scummy. I would’ve corrected you on the seem part.
Using typically to me implies you have a good range of data to go on,certainly more than one game.
If I go to the casino once and win 2k, I can’t go typically I win 2k at the casino, because I haven’t been enuff times to say that.
All I did was ask you to provide proof of the statement that you made. You just said I thought you were scum that game, why would I do anything you ask me to?In post 75, Doughboy wrote:The game we played together where you thought I was scummy and basically wouldn’t vote elsewhere or even unvote when asked.In post 73, EzekelRAGE wrote:Provide proof, otherwise this reads to me like you were trying to add fire to a wagon.In post 72, Doughboy wrote:No I made a statement based off my experience of you. 1 game is still better than no games.In post 69, EzekelRAGE wrote:You make this statement like we have played in a number of games.
Do I need to link it?
His interpretation is reasonable imoIn post 76, Doughboy wrote:That’s on you. If you interpreted one way I can’t control that.In post 74, EzekelRAGE wrote:My problem is your wording. It’s very misleading. If you said I played 1 game with rage and he seemed to vote scummy. I would’ve corrected you on the seem part.
Using typically to me implies you have a good range of data to go on,certainly more than one game.
If I go to the casino once and win 2k, I can’t go typically I win 2k at the casino, because I haven’t been enuff times to say that.
My issue isn't that you didn't read that he was serious, it's that you asked. My issue isn't the statement "I read him as scummy" in a vacuum, it's a pretty innocuous statement, it's the context you presented it in where it wasn't a read on a player, and it clearly wasn't one you reached on your own.In post 70, EzekelRAGE wrote:Well, can’t do anything about that, but it won’t be the last time you see that phrase or something similar to it from me.In post 59, GuerillaWoo wrote:I'm not a fan of how he said "I read it as scummy". Like, clearly the origin of his 'suspicion' isn't a read, it's Alchemist's meta guess.
Feels like a good place to nest my vote rn VOTE: Ezekiel but I still wanna hear something serious from Saudade.
Seriousness of the guess - my bad on missing/forgetting that part. Was reading thread earlier, was about to make post, got busy but tha part about lynching based on such a weak angle stuck out to me. When I got a little bit of free time again I made that post instead of going back and rereading that part. Only thing that changes is I view them as scummy for attempting it.
Are you serious? Where did I defend scum in that game, back up the bs you are spewing please. You were scummy that game. I wasnt the only player who thought so since you were -1 from being lynched, 1 other town and 1 scum on your vote. Other town players brought up how you played a bigger role in distracting town from hunting scum with you arguing with another player. If asuska nvm cc’d you as scum in that game you were gonna try to lynch me or ff who were both vt.In post 81, Doughboy wrote:He was partly responsible for town losing cause he couldn’t get past somebody he found scummy to the point he defended scum which I pointed out already ye I can barely provide an example?
I’ll ignore him for now but if a wagon forms I’ll be happy to hammer
Confidence in voting- this is why I am on db. Him doing that is partially playing a role in you going after me, I read that as misleading and scummy. He brought up my voting confidence, i told him to back it up. How are you reading that and still believe db’s word on my confidence?In post 82, GuerillaWoo wrote:I don't think prior grudges are very conducive to scumhunting tbh, although I think meta can be a partial reason to vote for someone I don't like thinking of it as the main course? But it's good that you brought up his voting confidence, it is definitely of interest here.My issue isn't that you didn't read that he was serious, it's that you asked. My issue isn't the statement "I read him as scummy" in a vacuum, it's a pretty innocuous statement, it's the context you presented it in where it wasn't a read on a player, and it clearly wasn't one you reached on your own.In post 70, EzekelRAGE wrote:Well, can’t do anything about that, but it won’t be the last time you see that phrase or something similar to it from me.In post 59, GuerillaWoo wrote:I'm not a fan of how he said "I read it as scummy". Like, clearly the origin of his 'suspicion' isn't a read, it's Alchemist's meta guess.
Feels like a good place to nest my vote rn VOTE: Ezekiel but I still wanna hear something serious from Saudade.
Seriousness of the guess - my bad on missing/forgetting that part. Was reading thread earlier, was about to make post, got busy but tha part about lynching based on such a weak angle stuck out to me. When I got a little bit of free time again I made that post instead of going back and rereading that part. Only thing that changes is I view them as scummy for attempting it.
The first is an attempt to get permission from town to vote for someone. The second is a misrepresentation. Together, they read like you're trying to buddy up to the thread, both by piggybacking off someone else's early wagons and then by presenting yourself as scumhunting.
So, one last time, what areyourreads? Why is Doughboy your vote and not Scioness/Dva? Why did you immediately trust that Alchemist is town and not possibly scum gambiting for an early lynch?Why is it feeling more and more like you're not going through a townie process?
Those are reasonable asks at this point
It's ambiguous. You could read it to mean that EzekelRAGE thinks DVa is scummy; but in fact I'm pretty sure he meant the DVaIn post 51, EzekelRAGE wrote:Are you guys serious about the Dva thing in regards to the replacement? Is so that is scummy to me.
Lol
Yeah, again, zero issues with lynching someone that's contributing nothing and refuses to help outta spite.In post 90, Gamma Emerald wrote:Lol
You don’t get a guy like Saudade to do what you want by brute forcing him
You appease him
Came in and voted Saudade then left. Think that was his only game related post. There's another user who hasn't come in at all afaik but I'm guessing the kick will catch him instead. I'd rather get people contributing rn tbhIn post 95, Tommy wrote:GuerillaWoo, why LTVNGambit?
Gamma Emerald, do you think Saudade's posts are coming from town?
Yeah, again, not a single issue if y'all wanna lynch this guy. Don't care if he's scum or not. If he's scum he's just gonna linger in the background doing this shit, and if he's town he's just gonna linger in the background doing this shit. LameSaudade wrote:Good vote though, you win games on this website often?