Mini Normal 2033: Dolphins (Game Over)

[Creature]

I'm confirmed town just for replacing in

[GuerillaWoo]

Oooh it's a narrative now.

Shallow, superficial, not engaging content, skimming posts and forming confident reads off them while pretending you read them only to later backpedal when you're called out.

Saying shit like "town has a tendency to stick to reads even when being disproven" only to then literally say "ok, but I didn't realize that's what you meant".

When you read the above paragraph, btw, I'm pretty sure your playstyle here dictates that you use your "99% of the time" statement to disagree, using the fact that your vote's on me to defend backpedaling every time.

And at the endgame you're gonna look back at this and realize: this was your mistake. This is what shallowness looks like.

Good enuff a definition for ya bud?

[Creature]

But since I don't intend to lynch a claimed doctor today, I'm more interested at the moment in what your Flubber read tells me about you.

Who's the doc?

[Gamma Emerald]

@Doughboy what do you think of these recent posts by Saudade? he was re-evaluating reads and it kinda seemed a little townie but idk, then he went right back to fluffposting

This feels icky
Several times as town I’ve given the occasional silly post is a serious period
So it’s conceivable others play like this

[Creature]

Page 57

thinking we should do wilky if he's not the claimed doc

[Creature]

Dude I don't think you realize I don't give a shit whether you label your posts or not. I just wanted to see how you'd react when you're accused of making shallow reads. Your defensiveness speaks volumes here.

I'm not hiding behind anything. I literally brought it up. Projecting much

You didn't call my reads shallow FUCKING ONCE. Nice. Motherfucking. Try.
VOTE: GuerillaWoo
I'm not moving this 99% of the time

???

What's going on?

[Gamma Emerald]

Oooh it's a narrative now.

Shallow, superficial, not engaging content, skimming posts and forming confident reads off them while pretending you read them only to later backpedal when you're called out.

Saying shit like "town has a tendency to stick to reads even when being disproven" only to then literally say "ok, but I didn't realize that's what you meant".

When you read the above paragraph, btw, I'm pretty sure your playstyle here dictates that you use your "99% of the time" statement to disagree, using the fact that your vote's on me to defend backpedaling every time.

And at the endgame you're gonna look back at this and realize: this was your mistake. This is what shallowness looks like.

Good enuff a definition for ya bud?

It’s A definition. I’d call it wrong but honestly it’s more you’re calling my reads shallow when from this post it looks like you consider my PLAY shallow.

[Creature]

oh I gotta deal with a likely TvT

[Gamma Emerald]

Page 57

thinking we should do wilky if he's not the claimed doc

Flubber is the doc

Dude I don't think you realize I don't give a shit whether you label your posts or not. I just wanted to see how you'd react when you're accused of making shallow reads. Your defensiveness speaks volumes here.

I'm not hiding behind anything. I literally brought it up. Projecting much

You didn't call my reads shallow FUCKING ONCE. Nice. Motherfucking. Try.
VOTE: GuerillaWoo
I'm not moving this 99% of the time

???

What's going on?

GW keeps changing the reason he’s pushing me, which is scummy

[Creature]

Hehe

[Creature]

Good old times when you would find a bullshit reason to lynch scum

[Creature]

but in this case it's most likely a plain TvT

[Creature]

I'm so happy today

[Creature]

My election candidates are doing so well

[Gamma Emerald]

oh I gotta deal with a likely TvT

Why are you calling it a TvT when you’ve barely read it

[GuerillaWoo]

Oooh it's a narrative now.

Shallow, superficial, not engaging content, skimming posts and forming confident reads off them while pretending you read them only to later backpedal when you're called out.

Saying shit like "town has a tendency to stick to reads even when being disproven" only to then literally say "ok, but I didn't realize that's what you meant".

When you read the above paragraph, btw, I'm pretty sure your playstyle here dictates that you use your "99% of the time" statement to disagree, using the fact that your vote's on me to defend backpedaling every time.

And at the endgame you're gonna look back at this and realize: this was your mistake. This is what shallowness looks like.

Good enuff a definition for ya bud?

It’s A definition. I’d call it wrong but honestly it’s more you’re calling my reads shallow when from this post it looks like you consider my PLAY shallow.

Wtf does this even mean lol. You gotta find another excuse, honestly, Gamma a little self-respect bud

~~You didn't catch me as scum because it's all subjective, maaan~~

[Creature]

oh I gotta deal with a likely TvT

Why are you calling it a TvT when you’ve barely read it

That's my first glance.

[Creature]

If you want to convince me otherwise, down down there.

[Gamma Emerald]

Word definitions aren’t fucking subjective
You using the wrong term maybe...? Like, the next-to-last paragraph looks like you’re calling my play shallow. Maybe I’m looking at it a little sideways, I can see the reads thing if I factor that out.

[Gamma Emerald]

If you want to convince me otherwise, down down there.

?

[Creature]

won't wanna know what it means

[Gamma Emerald]

lol jfc it's vote count, literally the acronym the mod posts every time he tallies

Also I've literally posted more joke posts than Saudade. Like he even posted that pic in response to my joke. Why does he get "reconsidered" and not me? Why am I your town read? Ignore his Mila Kunis joke, what made you scum read him and then almost change your mind?

Meh this post could be Town
But GW has still been changing the goalposts which I will not ignore

[Gamma Emerald]

won't wanna know what it means

Tell. Me.

[GuerillaWoo]

GW keeps changing the reason he’s pushing me, which is scummy

So I take it this is your scum partner?


It's called having more than one reason, silly. Having a fingerprint and then DNA isn't "moving the goalposts", it's a rich read. You'd know about that if you were town and weren't trying to throw out every excuse. I didn't read it, that's not my definition, actually you never called my reads shallow, actually it's not my reads it's my PLAY, you're scum cuz you didn't include town reads and just shaded everyone, actually you did include town reads but you didn't label it a readlist so how was I supposed to know

How was i, a poor humble towny like the rest of you, supposed to know being called someone who hops on wagons without reading the posts or understanding the reads is akin to making shallow reads

Town never admits to being wrong. Actually what I meant was 99% of the time they don't, I used that number recently and it's definitely connected

Bruh

[Gamma Emerald]

I'm just mulling over this exchange rn. I honestly don't know if he's lying or not here. Like I think he genuinely doesn't understand that it wasn't directed at him, but I dunno, he could just be saving face. Like he knew he was lying earlier and now he's trying to play up the VI card? Does that make sense?

I dunno. UNVOTE: for now. Like if he were scum, what would the point be in in blatantly drawing attention to himself with these big VI gestures? If I were to assume he were scum this would be a very public and risky gambit play.

Although it's not like I haven't seen bigger gambits, I've used the VI routine myself, and AS TOWN.

Legit don't know what to think here. Is he really not seeing it? How? Is anyone else here reading that post up there the way he is?

Why not reconsider when someone else brought this up before? This feels a little posturey
And oh fucking man I’m already getting ready to tear into your most recent post