In post 2592, CheekyTeeky wrote:That's a good point. Hopefully people are onto it enough to unwagon mala and jump on someone more decent. *coughAricough*
Hello yes this is me!
So, we have a lyncher claimed I gather. Is that Mala or Elsa? What was the other one's claim? It seems we have both, yes?
Oh wait you want to jump ONTO me?
I'm flattered
But no, I am def not a better wagon hahaha
In post 2566, Malakittens wrote:My flavor is retracted also. I'm a 3rd party. In order for me to win I need a player to be lynched. if they are NK'd I lose the game. I'm also apparently full Bulletproof in order to help me survive to meet my win condition
So a Lyncher? Why would Lyncher have its flavor retracted?
Same reason I dont have a flavor. I guess as long as your card doesn't say "have all of Serenity die a horrible and painful death to win" I think you also dont get a flavor.
In post 2584, Malakittens wrote:So I’m glad we are going to let Elsa live who is claimed 3rd party who I’m sure hasn’t said everything in the role PM but planning on saying fuck it lets lynch you. Yeah please explain to me how that’s fair because it’s not
EJ claimed doc and she was very specific and adamant, about being on Cheeky.
In post 2597, BuJaber wrote:Ahh .. so I was right about Mala crumbing but not right about the exact role / alignment.
@Toog - yes I'm suggesting you vote Menno, or at least asking if you would consider lynching Menno.
I mean if NDS is scum it gives townpoints to chara but don't expect me to throw away my entire read on the slot just like that. I don't think NDS flips scum.
So that's 3 claimed 3p... we can't keep all of them alive forever unless we lynch scum like every day because scum have a better chance of shooting down all the town now.
Does this has anything to do with RC replacing out? I think Chara is probably town by play but moreso because of RC AtE on subbing out. I disagree that there’s anything AI based on his arguing with Tora.
In post 2584, Malakittens wrote:So I’m glad we are going to let Elsa live who is claimed 3rd party who I’m sure hasn’t said everything in the role PM but planning on saying fuck it lets lynch you. Yeah please explain to me how that’s fair because it’s not
good enough to make that claim as scum and pull it off. And as town. Cerb and I spent some time talking about it already and ultimately we feel like that slot is just going to resolve itself within a couple phases. If it doesn't, then it has to eat rope for all the reasons already stated.
~D
Even mentioning the word "Neutral" brings me up again in discussion. And this all happens when I gotta work an early shift at work now. Sigh.
To Mala: Well, you
did
admit to not trying as hard as a 3p with such an ability. Being jealous of a fellow "Neut" seems sad when I dont even screw with your wincon.
Plus it seems some of the town wants to lynch elsawhere so you're fine for now. Why thrower shade at me in particular if not only out of jealously though?
To Drixx: Thanks for the praise and semi-threat in the same paragraph. Always makes my heart tingle with joy. I'll be sure to "resolve" everything for everyone when the right time comes.
It's not a threat my friend. It's just the reality of the situation. We gotta play to our wincons. Help keep us so far ahead of scum that we need not worry about you taking a win with scum and there's no reason to worry too much about you.
But ... there comes a time where we are gonna have to rope you ... just the way it is. Didn't say I was happy about it. I'm a fan of new ideas with 3p/neutral characters and making them more deep and interesting. We'll see I guess.
If anyone else is 3p, claim now or eat rope when run up. I have proven my willingness to work with you. If you don’t prove your willingness to work with me, your claim will be ignored after today.
In post 2334, Jingle wrote:Oh, also, because this makes it super clear that I have power and I'm fairly certain my soft earlier outed what said power was, I'm a mason. My mason buddy OR I made a crumb at some point that should be fairly obvious only if pointed out. I'm not interested in outing them right now.
I don't see how getting 3p players to mass claim is beneficial at this stage. I think we just continue to assess claims based on previous actions and feasibility. I do think we just lynch the next player if they aren't town though.
In post 2500, Reasonably Rational wrote:You do not have a right ot lead any wagons until 1) your partner explicitly confirms the masonry, and 2) one of you flips as town mason.
I'm claiming pretty much the opposite. I'm allowed to be useless-ish because my role will sort itself when my partner decides to out themselves. I'm a lower priority sorting target than anyone but Chickadee at this point, because given my claim I'm gonna get shot sooner rather than later.
Not saying I'm gonna be full on useless, but that I'm more interested in what people come up with than whether they'll sheep me atm.
My scumreads are currently Porkens and redacted.
I can explain why getting 3p claims is useful, but I really don’t see a need, at the moment. If anyone claims 3p after this day phase, they are scum and they will be lynched.
You guys realize that Malakitty will never be night killed unless we have a town vigilante do it, right? She's scum who works better with Mafia than he does with Town. She also directly opposes our town wincon, so she needs to be lynched at some point for us to even win the game, nothing like Elsa's wincon. She has no positive town utility, like Doctor. She's been extremely weak on activity, and has made no promise to pick it up. Why even entertain keeping her alive?
Should we just mass claim at this point and pick the worst power among us to lynch? We've had 2 ridiculous claims so far, what are we even waiting for at this stage?
(And no, Jaber, I am not interested in voting Menno).
Way to put words in my mouth. You’re believing elsa’s Claim at face value. We don’t even know what his win coniditon says.
Tbh I was actually extremely busy during D1 which is zero but it happened
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
we'll also have to keep all claims to L-2 instead of L-1, in case Mala has actually done her research and would recognize the captain and hammer.
i don't think the arguments for keeping Mala alive are good. she isn't town, she can't stop town deaths, and scum aren't going to care if they kill a townie that would also kill Mala or not.
she also has BP so we can't vig her.
pedit: don't care about Elsa, there's a chance he has a wincon that isn't anti-town, but you've already claimed yours.
"Sibling," Farkran asked, starting slowly.
"The CORE is full of lasers, and Chemist1422's entire existence depends on her eye. If she looks into a laser, she will almost certainly die. Did you think about that?"
"Oh yes, my brother. I love thinking about that."
In post 2619, Malakittens wrote:Way to put words in my mouth. You’re believing elsa’s Claim at face value. We don’t even know what his win coniditon says.
Tbh I was actually extremely busy during D1 which is zero but it happened
I never said I've believed Elsa's claim. In fact quite the opposite. Mob mentality was to keep him alive for the positive utility and activity, and the fact that they can at least win with us. Your claim offers absolutely none of that, and your wincon directly counters ours. RR's solution is that scum shoots Mal at night and eliminates you as a problem all together, but Mal could be (and likely is) Bulletproof or may never get shot.
You also expect US to take your claim at face value as well, and you could just simply be mafia or worse 3p scum than lyncher.
In post 2591, Jingle wrote:Mala living encourages scum to shoot in the PoE pool because none of our claims make sense as mal and killing two people not of their faction is better than one. Also, if we get super ahead we can just lynch mal to give her the mutual win towards the endgame.
Also lyncher for mal is totally scarlet, not the operative.
why would we ever lynch Mal on purpose just to give Mala her win?
like i'm all for fun and fair play but playing to one's wincon is a thing. there is never a time i'm wasting a mislynch to get a 3p their win, unless we have mod-confirmed scum numbers and a guilty on the last scum.
and thinking that scum would purposely shoot in our PoE instead of in players they can't mislynch just for a bonus kill on a 3p that isn't a threat to them is just a really weird way to think abouy the nightkill.
"Sibling," Farkran asked, starting slowly.
"The CORE is full of lasers, and Chemist1422's entire existence depends on her eye. If she looks into a laser, she will almost certainly die. Did you think about that?"
"Oh yes, my brother. I love thinking about that."
In post 2622, Toogeloo wrote:We have the opportunity here to take out two anti-town players before a real night happens. Why are we wasting that?
i'm confused as to where you get the second anti-town from here.
"Sibling," Farkran asked, starting slowly.
"The CORE is full of lasers, and Chemist1422's entire existence depends on her eye. If she looks into a laser, she will almost certainly die. Did you think about that?"
"Oh yes, my brother. I love thinking about that."