No lol XDIn post 3594, CheekyTeeky wrote:That means theres only one groupscum faction right? 2 max from the group scum, and 1 from the 3p.In post 3583, Jingle wrote:Nope. It's the number above the threshhold. If he'd said 4 it would have meant something.In post 3580, Reasonably Rational wrote:@A50: I...feel like that number of 3 should not have been given to us...
Yes, I get that. The clarification by the mod that they intended to say 3 or more is what was necessary. This isn't a parsing problem, it's a precision problem. 3 or more is not the same as 3.In post 3596, Jingle wrote:No, it means it's possible for 3 nontown players to die, assuming three nontown players exist.
This is a parsing problem.
3 can doesn't imply 4 can't.
Yep. I wouldn't assume that some scum can't win together.In post 3597, Flicker wrote:Actually, it's heavily implied/explicitly stated by the win condition that different scum factions can win together:In post 3589, Aristophanes wrote:Why not?
Not getting rid of the competition still goes against their eventual win!
Oooo interesting catch actually!In post 3597, Flicker wrote:Actually, it's heavily implied/explicitly stated by the win condition that different scum factions can win together:In post 3589, Aristophanes wrote:Why not?
Not getting rid of the competition still goes against their eventual win!
A50 said only 3 kills outside of town are possible IF theyre not the same alignment.In post 3600, Aristophanes wrote:No lol XDIn post 3594, CheekyTeeky wrote:That means theres only one groupscum faction right? 2 max from the group scum, and 1 from the 3p.In post 3583, Jingle wrote:Nope. It's the number above the threshhold. If he'd said 4 it would have meant something.In post 3580, Reasonably Rational wrote:@A50: I...feel like that number of 3 should not have been given to us...
Likely 9 town, 2 HoB + Traitor, 2 3P, and 3 left for the other scumteam.
Prolly Niska and his cronies for the other 3.
You know that TPFKAP's PM explicitly says HoB is a 2 man group with a traitor, right?In post 3599, CheekyTeeky wrote:So now I'm thinking 3scum+1traitor + 3p
FTFMIn post 3604, Jingle wrote:While that is true, Flicker, it doesn't mean they're not threats to each other.
Scum benefits from dropping the number of potential incoming shots drop just as much as town does. Unless they're literally the scummiest players in the thread, there's a chance they'll be shot. If they're the scummiest players in the thread, we're probably going to win anyway.
Cerbs is using the wrong logic from the prisoner's dilemma.
If both parties are trustworthy, both parties benefit. If either party isn't trustworthy, they benefit more. If both parties aren't trustworthy, both parties benefit.
You never benefit from being trustworthy. You benefit from convincing the other party you're going to be trustworthy.
If I was scum, I'd 100% be trying to convince the other team that holstering their shot is the optimal play. I'd also 100% not be holstering my shot.
In post 3591, Almost50 wrote:It's the least number above two.In post 3580, Reasonably Rational wrote:@A50: I...feel like that number of 3 should not have been given to us...
3or morenon-town players can die, provided that no more than 2 are of the same faction.
Prolly is gonna be one of the two.In post 3611, Jingle wrote:I'd rather you not shoot CT or RR, because both have softclaimed and thus are likely to be solved (or partially solved) in massclaim. Which I believe should happen tomorrow.
I'll let you know asap. Gonna do a quick read of you both first.In post 3609, CheekyTeeky wrote:Well Ari let me know if you're going to shoot me so I can claim.
