In post 1454, RCEnigma wrote:
Do you have anything for a case against maxous in particular? Or did you just want to have two wagons?
Idk his case on AP was weird and not good. If I thought two of my three scumreads from d1 were likely wrong, the first thing I’d do coming out of the game in d2 isn’t to case my third remaining scumread from d1. Like maybe that’s just me.
Dva was also scumreading him yesterday though I don’t think she ever said why (
![Evil or Very Mad :evil:](./images/smilies/icon_evil.gif)
), and I’m kind of sheeping this right now since her reads are >rand
I should probably do a metadive on max at some point but I’m kind of lazy rn
It’s not that I want two wagons running against each other necessarily. I don’t really like either the AP or the profii wagon
AP:
- Based on a skim of flubber’s last two scumgames, he doesn’t seem inclined to throw his partners into the spotlight like he sort of did with AP yesterday.
- AP’s reasoning behind his flubb vote was that he had no strong scumreads. I think that’s an okay reason to jump on a wagon, so idk why max said AP voted without explanation there. And maybe it’s just me, but it wasn’t obvious that the Flubbernugget wagon was going to take off when AP jumped on.
- Also this is kind of a stretch but AP knows I’m an easy mislynch, especially when I’m under pressure, so I guess him not jumping on my counterwagon earns him another townpoint.
Profii:
- Flubber’s interactions with profii didn’t seem partner-y. Idk how to explain that further lol
- If you go into profii’s post history, he consistently uses the word “informed” in lieu of “tmi” throughout all of his games. So I don’t think him throwing out the word is a good reason to scumread him
I’m basically looking for a better wagon than these two rn