A Story Revisited (Anything uPick): Day 6

[Nero Cain]

Why are you scum reading me?

[Vecna]

Anyways, im gonna refrain from getting it on with you again. Theres way better targets to lynch for the forseeable future, and your chances of lynching me are also exactly zero, so yeah.....figure out a scumteam that doesnt involve me.

[Nero Cain]

ok, I'm just going to assume this is scum Vecna backing down.

[Vecna]

Why are you scum reading me?

Probably mainly suspicion. You constantly kept at a rather safe distance from the whole Mastina thing. You wanted her lynched, without -really- sticking your neck out for it, and the follow-up lines up quite nicely with how id imagine a scumteam to formulate a plan here.

Ofcourse, it might just be that youre partially correct and NR + one of jingle/jjh will flip scum here.......but it just feels wrong.

Im not gonna be pushing that gut feeling here though, as im not even certain how certain I am of it myself.

[Nero Cain]

@meme

-do NOT target Wheme tonight.

[Vecna]

ok, I'm just going to assume this is scum Vecna backing down.

Its a wrong assumption. Its a town Vecna learning from the past, and deciding not to get into this right now. Theres no point to it regardless. The way you constantly keep insisting im scum here though, feels wrong as well, but maybe its just because you dont have all the information.

[Nero Cain]

What information is that?

[Jingle]

IDK, I keep looking at this playerlist and it always comes down to the same ppl.

Okay.

Why are Gamma, Wheme, Porkens, Ari, and LA all town?

@Nero

[Nero Cain]

and I'm avoiding your question for the time being. Deal with it.

[Nero Cain]

or I guess I will give you an answer. These are gut town reads and im POE scum reading not them-Meme

[jjh927]

Can we just recap NR's use of her role?

N1: Porkens - who refused to give over whatever the hell it is she actually checks
N2: mastina - who agreed, but NR got no result
N3: Supposedly attempted to target me but instead targeted Jingle
N4: Targeted nobody


And the evolution of her claim?
What we know it does:

I was told, "Nico is demanding your role; you have 48 hours to comply, or she becomes a triple voter for you."

I am Nico Robin, conditional triple voter conditional tracker/watcher.

Each night I target a player and they have 48 hours to give me who they visited. If they don't, I gain a triple vote against them. I targeted Porkens N1 and mastina N2. My action on Porkens failed and I got no result on mastina.

She then retracts the watcher aspect of her claim after people start talking about what would happen if Mastina got jailkept and Vecna inevitably votes her because from his perspective, her claiming watcher is a scumclaim.

@Vecna I looked at my role PM again, and it seems that I am not a Watcher after all, but a Role Cop.

Guess this is what happens when I don't read my own role PM thoroughly..... :O

At this point, I deserve to be lynched for sheer stupidity......

And then we have

Then she lied to me, because the way my role is written, I am rolecop in flavor only, while my actual role is tracker.

When RC calls that a flavourcop

[jjh927]

The mechanics make no fucking sense

She claims to have got a no result as opposed to a failure on Mastina but without having got anything other than a tracker result. She's jumped through claims it would make no sense to think without reading. Her actions do not make mechanical sense. She has lied. Multiple times.





Oh also I seem to have lost some bits of that recap lemme add em in

[jjh927]

Here's the ebwop

Can we just recap NR's use of her role?

N1: Porkens - who refused to give over whatever the hell it is she actually checks
N2: mastina - who agreed, but NR got no result
N3: Supposedly attempted to target me but instead targeted Jingle
N4: Targeted nobody


And the evolution of her claim?
What we know it does:

I was told, "Nico is demanding your role; you have 48 hours to comply, or she becomes a triple voter for you."

So she opened with this:

Well, I am not only a triple voter, I am also a rolecop. That's what Porkens wanted me to say, and now I have.

Which is fair enough I guess. It lined up with the demand we know of the role. But then she decides she misread it when trying to think of a way to not straight up guilty Mastina for some reason while still wanting to be able to bus her.

I am Nico Robin, conditional triple voter conditional tracker/watcher.

Each night I target a player and they have 48 hours to give me who they visited. If they don't, I gain a triple vote against them. I targeted Porkens N1 and mastina N2. My action on Porkens failed and I got no result on mastina.

She then retracts the watcher aspect of her claim after people start talking about what would happen if Mastina got jailkept and Vecna inevitably votes her because from his perspective, her claiming watcher is a scumclaim.

@Vecna I looked at my role PM again, and it seems that I am not a Watcher after all, but a Role Cop.

Guess this is what happens when I don't read my own role PM thoroughly..... :O

At this point, I deserve to be lynched for sheer stupidity......

And then we have

Then she lied to me, because the way my role is written, I am rolecop in flavor only, while my actual role is tracker.

When RC calls that a flavourcop

[NicoRobin]

You got parity copped and your response to that has been to post less and doing exactly the same things as you were doing that got you parity copped and then blame the people voting you for voting you because you've been scummy with a bad response to being copped.

I don't see how following a parity cop equates to "giving up on reason" when said cop gave a clear answer and your response to it hasn't been towny.

Furthermore, you refused to follow Creature when he claimed his guilty, and yet you are willing to follow the parity cop's results now. Why is that?

Oh, yeah, because they align with your pre-determined viewpoints.

[jjh927]

Creature's guilty wasn't a guilty for the reasons I pointed out

[Firebringer]

VOTE: Invisibility

Firebringer, Invisibility, NR, Porkens is my scumpool with a side chance of meme men in there.

this is a very scummy post by lady angel i want u all to remember.

[NicoRobin]

Creature's guilty wasn't a guilty for the reasons I pointed out

And MM's guilty isn't a guilty because redirector.

[jjh927]

Fire have you started using your ability yet

[jjh927]

Creature's guilty wasn't a guilty for the reasons I pointed out

And MM's guilty isn't a guilty because redirector.

Nah, extremely unlikely

[NicoRobin]

Of course, if you can prove me that the redirector either won't mess with MM's results or doesn't exist, then NSG would be scum cos I know I am town and we're not the same alignment, but you have to provide proof re: redirector.

[Firebringer]

i am neighboring jingle for the rest of the game.
i am confident he is town.

if he dies i will neighbor probably vecna

[NicoRobin]

Creature's guilty wasn't a guilty for the reasons I pointed out

And MM's guilty isn't a guilty because redirector.

Nah, extremely unlikely

So why is Creature's guilty fake because of redirector and MM's ability isn't, eh?

[Gamma Emerald]

Creature's guilty wasn't a guilty for the reasons I pointed out

And MM's guilty isn't a guilty because redirector.

Ew

[NicoRobin]

Creature's guilty wasn't a guilty for the reasons I pointed out

And MM's guilty isn't a guilty because redirector.

Nah, extremely unlikely

So why is Creature's guilty fake because of redirector and MM's ability isn't, eh?

[Shoshin]

Hey Fire, can you neighbor me?